Xiaomi Pad 7 Pro vs Vivo Pad 5 Pro
Here we compared two flagship tablets: the 11.2-inch Xiaomi Pad 7 Pro (with Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3) that was released on October 29, 2024, against the Vivo Pad 5 Pro, which is powered by MediaTek Dimensity 9400 and came out 6 months after. On this page, you will find tests, full specs, strengths, and weaknesses of each of the devices.
Select the amount of RAM to evaluate performance and value for money more precisely
Key differences
Reasons to consider the Xiaomi Pad 7 Pro
- Fingerprint scanner
- Delivers 15% higher peak brightness (769 against 669 nits)
- 20% higher pixel density (344 vs 286 PPI)
- Much smaller footprint: 24% more compact case (67.6 vs 89 square inches)
- Supports Dolby Atmos sound technology
- Weighs 135 grams less
- Has a built-in infrared port
Reasons to consider the Vivo Pad 5 Pro
- Has a 1.8 inches larger screen size
- Comes with 3200 mAh larger battery capacity: 12050 vs 8850 mAh
- 50% better performance in AnTuTu Benchmark (2825K versus 1880K)
- Faster storage type - UFS 4.1 versus UFS 4.0
- 46% faster in single-core GeekBench 6 test: 2738 and 1873 points
Review
Display
Screen quality, color accuracy, brightness
Camera
Photo and video recording quality
Performance
CPU and memory performance (apps, system)
Gaming
Capabilities for playing modern games
Battery
Battery life, charging type and speed
Connectivity
Networks, ports, data transmission
Scores with a red asterisk (*) are approximate and may change in the future as we gather more data.
Select your primary usage scenario to get a more accurate NanoReview Score
Value for money (Beta)
Tests and specifications
Comparison table of technical specifications and testsDisplay
| Type | IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| Size | 11.2 inches | 13 inches |
| Resolution | 2136 x 3200 pixels | 2064 x 3096 pixels |
| Aspect ratio | 3:2 | 3:2 |
| PPI | 344 ppi | 286 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 144 Hz | 144 Hz |
| Adaptive refresh rate | Yes | Yes |
| Max rated brightness | 800 nits | 1200 nits |
| HDR support | Yes, Dolby Vision | Yes, HDR10 |
| Touch sampling rate | 360 Hz | - |
| Screen protection | Tempered glass | Tempered glass |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 85.7% | 87.6% |
| Display features | - DCI-P3 | - DCI-P3 |
| RGB color space | 99.3% | 99.5% |
| PWM | Not detected | Not detected |
| Response time | 27 ms | 48 ms |
| Contrast | 1338:1 | 1366:1 |
Screen space comparison
Pad 5 Pro
13β³ (3:2 ratio) = 78 in2
Pad 7 Pro
11.2β³ (3:2 ratio) = 57.9 in2
~34% more screen space
Peak brightness test (auto)
Design and build
| Height | 251.22 mm (9.89 inches) | 289.56 mm (11.4 inches) |
| Width | 173.42 mm (6.83 inches) | 198.32 mm (7.81 inches) |
| Thickness | 6.18 mm (0.24 inches) | 6.64 mm (0.26 inches) |
| Weight | 500 g (17.64 oz) | 635 g (22.4 oz) |
| Waterproof | No | No |
| Rear material | Metal | Metal |
| Frame material | Metal | Metal |
| Colors | Black, Blue, Green | White, Gray, Blue, Pink |
| Fingerprint scanner | Yes, in-button | No |
| Area | 436 cm2 (67.5 inches2) | 574 cm2 (89 inches2) |
Visual size comparison
Screen-to-body ratio
Tablet Ranking (51st and 31st place)
Android Tablet Ranking (37th and 23rd place)
Performance
| Chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 | MediaTek Dimensity 9400 |
| Max clock | 3000 MHz | 3630 MHz |
| CPU cores | 8 (1 + 4 + 3) | 8 (1 + 3 + 4) |
| Architecture | - 3 cores at 2 GHz: Cortex-A520 - 4 cores at 2.8 GHz: Cortex-A720 - 1 core at 3 GHz: Cortex-X4 |
- 4 cores at 2.4 GHz: Cortex-A720 - 3 cores at 3.3 GHz: Cortex-X4 - 1 core at 3.62 GHz: Cortex-X925 |
| L3 cache | 8 MB | 12 MB |
| Manufacturing | TSMC | TSMC |
| Lithography process | 4 nanometers | 3 nanometers |
| Neural processor (NPU) | Hexagon | MediaTek NPU 890 |
| Graphics | Adreno 735 | Mali-G925 Immortalis MP12 |
| GPU shading units | 768 | 1536 |
| GPU clock | 1100 MHz | 1612 MHz |
| FLOPS | ~1689.6 GFLOPS | ~4952.1 GFLOPS |
Benchmarks
Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)
Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)
Compute Score (GPU)
| Compute Score (GPU) | 10004 | 24474 |
| Single-core score | 1873 | 2738 |
| Multi-core score | 4947 | 8542 |
AnTuTu Benchmark 11
| CPU | 588596 | 889187 |
| GPU | 516242 | 966129 |
| Memory | 308105 | 370036 |
| UX | 468006 | 600124 |
| Total score | 1880949 | 2825476 |
| Samples | [7 tests] | [51 tests] |
3DMark Steel Nomad Light
| Stability | 95% | - |
| Graphics test | 8 FPS | - |
| Graphics score | 1053 | - |
3DMark Solar Bay
| Graphics test | 19 FPS | - |
| Section 1 | 22 FPS | - |
| Section 2 | 19 FPS | - |
| Section 3 | 16 FPS | - |
| Graphics score | 5082 | - |
PCMark 3.0
| Web score | 15027 | - |
| Video editing | 7550 | - |
| Photo editing | 27701 | - |
| Data manipulation | 14274 | - |
| Writing score | 18652 | - |
Recent User Tests
Xiaomi Pad 7 Pro
| Date | Benchmark | Result |
|---|---|---|
| π 2026-04-28 (Sigmos12345) | AnTuTu | 1798346 |
| π 2026-04-23 (Noli) | AnTuTu | 1797350 |
| π 2026-01-09 (Eytuzi) | AnTuTu | 1792363 |
| π 2025-11-30 (BeddXII) | AnTuTu | 1928866 |
| π 2025-11-28 (Niko) | AnTuTu | 1903303 |
Vivo Pad 5 Pro
No benchmark results yet
Memory
Configuration
| RAM size | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Memory type | LPDDR5X | LPDDR5X |
| Memory clock | 4200 MHz | 5333 MHz |
| Channels | 4 | 4 |
| Storage size | 128 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 4.0 | UFS 4.1 |
| Memory card | No | No |
Software
| Operating system | Android 15 | Android 15 |
| ROM | HyperOS 2.0 | OriginOS 5 |
| OS size | 32 GB | 17 GB |
Battery
| Capacity | 8850 mAh | 12050 mAh |
| Max charge power | 67 W | 66 W |
| Battery type | Li-Po | Li-Po |
| Replaceable | No | No |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Reverse charging | No | No |
| Fast charging | Yes (53% in 30 min) | Yes |
| Full charging time | 1:13 hr | - |
| Web browsing | 08:06 hr | - |
| Watching video | 09:41 hr | - |
| Gaming | 06:01 hr | - |
| Standby | 176 hr | - |
General battery life
Main camera
| Matrix | 50 megapixels | 13 megapixels |
| Image resolution | 8160 x 6144 | 4160 x 3120 |
| Zoom | Digital | Digital |
| Flash | LED | LED |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
| 8K video recording | No | No |
| 4K video recording | Up to 60FPS | Up to 30FPS |
| 1080p video recording | Up to 60FPS | Up to 30FPS |
| Lenses | 1) Standard: 50 MP 2) Depth: 2 MP |
1) Standard: 13 MP |
| Camera features | - Bokeh mode | - Bokeh mode |
| Image resolution | 50 MP | 13 MP |
| Aperture | f/1.8 | f/2.2 |
| Sensor size | 1/2.76" (β 0.36 inch) | - |
| Pixel size | 0.64 micron | - |
| Autofocus | Phase autofocus | Phase autofocus |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
Selfie camera
| Megapixels | 32 megapixels | 8 megapixels |
| Image resolution | 6528 x 4896 | 3264 x 2448 |
| Aperture | f/2.2 | - |
| Sensor | Omnivision OV32D | CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/3.6" (β 0.28 inch) | - |
| Pixel size | 0.61 micron | - |
| Autofocus | No | No |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
| Video resolution | 1080p (Full HD) at 30 FPS | 1080p (Full HD) at 30 FPS |
| Depth sensor (TOF 3D) | No | No |
Connectivity
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 7 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be) | Wi-Fi 7 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be) |
| Wi-Fi features | - Dual Band - Wi-Fi MiMO - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
- Dual Band - Wi-Fi MiMO - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
| Bluetooth version | 5.4 | 5.4 |
| Bluetooth features | LE | LE |
| USB type | USB Type-C | USB Type-C |
| USB version | 3.2 | 3.2 |
| USB features | - Charging - USB-Storage mode - OTG |
- Charging - USB-Storage mode - OTG |
| DisplayPort | Yes | Yes |
| NFC* | No | No |
| Infrared port | Yes | No |
| Type of SIM card | No | No |
| eSIM support* | No | No |
| 5G support | No | No |
Sound
| Speakers | 4.0 | 8.0 |
| Headphone audio jack | No | No |
| FM radio | No | No |
| Dolby Atmos | Yes | No |
Speakers test
Max loudness
Other
| Category | Flagship | Flagship |
| Announced | October 2024 | April 2025 |
| Release date | October 2024 | April 2025 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $459 | $539 |
| Successor | - Xiaomi Pad 8 Pro | - |
| Sensors | - Proximity sensor - Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Ambient light sensor - Compass - Fingerprint |
- Proximity sensor - Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Ambient light sensor |
| Bundled charger | Yes, 67 W | Yes, 66 W |
Further details
Notes on Pad 7 Pro:
- The 128 GB variant features UFS 3.1 memory, other models have UFS 4.0.
Notes on Pad 5 Pro:
- The 128GB model has UFS 3.1, while 256GB and 512GB use UFS 4.1.
*Disclaimer! NFC, GSM network support, and some other specs can be different depending on the country.
Conclusion
After analyzing all the data, we think that the Vivo Pad 5 Pro is definitely a better buy.
Cast your vote
Total votes: 27