Xiaomi Black Shark Pad 7 vs Galaxy Tab A11

50 out of 100
Xiaomi Black Shark Pad 7
VS
53 out of 100
Samsung Galaxy Tab A11

Here we compared two budget tablets: the 11-inch Xiaomi Black Shark Pad 7 (with MediaTek Helio G88) that was released on October 30, 2025, against the Samsung Galaxy Tab A11, which is powered by MediaTek Helio G99 and came out 1 month before. On this page, you will find tests, full specs, strengths, and weaknesses of each of the devices.

Select the amount of RAM to evaluate performance and value for money more precisely
Memory

Key differences

An overview of the main advantages of each tablet
Reasons to consider the Xiaomi Black Shark Pad 7
  • Has a 2.3 inches larger screen size
  • Comes with 2600 mAh larger battery capacity: 7700 vs 5100 mAh
  • Has 50% more RAM: 6GB versus 4GB
  • 12% higher pixel density (201 vs 179 PPI)
Reasons to consider the Samsung Galaxy Tab A11
  • 61% better performance in AnTuTu Benchmark (545K versus 339K)
  • Newer Bluetooth version (v5.3)
  • More energy-efficient CPU – Helio G99
  • More recent OS version: Android 16 versus 15
  • Much smaller footprint: 38% more compact case (40.8 vs 65.6 square inches)
  • 74% faster in single-core GeekBench 6 test: 732 and 421 points
  • Weighs 170 grams less
  • Ready for eSIM technology

Review

Evaluation of Xiaomi Black Shark Pad 7 and Samsung Galaxy Tab A11 crucial features
Display
Screen quality, color accuracy, brightness
Camera
Photo and video recording quality
Performance
CPU and memory performance (apps, system)
Gaming
Capabilities for playing modern games
Battery
Battery life, charging type and speed
Connectivity
Networks, ports, data transmission
Scores with a red asterisk (*) are approximate and may change in the future as we gather more data.
NanoReview Score
Final comparison evaluation
Select your primary usage scenario to get a more accurate NanoReview Score
📱 Primary usage:

Value for money (Beta)

To get an accurate value-for-money index, update the default prices with actual prices from your country’s retailers (for the selected memory configs) and press the "Calculate" button.
Currency
6 / 128 GB
VS
4 / 64 GB
97.0
(Very good)
Value Index
101.5
(Excellent)

Tests and specifications

Comparison table of technical specifications and tests

Display

Type IPS LCD TFT LCD
Size 11 inches 8.7 inches
Resolution 1200 x 1900 pixels 800 x 1340 pixels
Aspect ratio 16:10 5:3
PPI 201 ppi 179 ppi
Refresh rate 90 Hz 90 Hz
Adaptive refresh rate - No
Max rated brightness 420 nits 500 nits
HDR support No No
Screen protection Tempered glass Tempered glass
Screen-to-body ratio 83% 81.9%
Display tests
RGB color space - 78.6%
PWM - Not detected
Response time - 29 ms
Contrast - 1461:1
Screen space comparison
Black Shark Pad 7
11″ (16:10 ratio) = 54.4 in2
Galaxy Tab A11
8.7″ (5:3 ratio) = 33.4 in2
~62% more screen space
Peak brightness test (auto)
Sources: NotebookCheck [3]

Design and build

Height 254.6 mm (10.02 inches) 211 mm (8.31 inches)
Width 166.1 mm (6.54 inches) 124.7 mm (4.91 inches)
Thickness 7.3 mm (0.29 inches) 8 mm (0.31 inches)
Weight 505 g (17.81 oz) 335 g (11.82 oz)
Waterproof No No
Rear material Metal Metal
Frame material Metal Metal
Colors Gray, Blue Silver, Gray
Fingerprint scanner No No
Area 423 cm2 (65.5 inches2) 263 cm2 (40.8 inches2)
Repairability - Average (2.72/5)
Drop resistance - Good (C) · 104 drops
Visual size comparison
Screen-to-body ratio
Tablet Ranking (121st and 110th place)
Android Tablet Ranking (94th and 85th place)

Performance

Chipset specifications of Xiaomi Black Shark Pad 7 and Samsung Galaxy Tab A11
SoC
Chipset MediaTek Helio G88 MediaTek Helio G99
Max clock 2000 MHz 2200 MHz
CPU cores 8 (2 + 6) 8 (2 + 6)
Architecture - 6 cores at 1.8 GHz: Cortex-A55
- 2 cores at 2 GHz: Cortex-A75
- 6 cores at 2 GHz: Cortex-A55
- 2 cores at 2.2 GHz: Cortex-A76
Manufacturing TSMC TSMC
Lithography process 12 nanometers 6 nanometers
Neural processor (NPU) MediaTek APU Yes
GPU
Graphics Mali-G52 MP2 Mali-G57 MP2
GPU shading units 48 64
GPU clock 1000 MHz 1000 MHz
FLOPS ~96 GFLOPS ~128 GFLOPS

Benchmarks

Benchmark comparison of Xiaomi Black Shark Pad 7 and Samsung Galaxy Tab A11
Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)
Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)
Compute Score (GPU)
Compute Score (GPU) - 1314
Single-core score 421 732
Multi-core score 1360 2049
Sources: Geekbench [3]
AnTuTu Benchmark 11
545546
CPU 140153 250145
GPU 26892 43322
Memory 68773 116331
UX 103186 135748
Total score 339004 545546
Samples [14 tests] [178 tests]
PCMark 3.0
Web score 9166 10433
Video editing 5214 4521
Photo editing 13495 14671
Data manipulation 5942 7520
Writing score 8196 11923

Recent User Tests

The latest benchmark tests that have been submitted by users
Xiaomi Black Shark Pad 7
No benchmark results yet
Samsung Galaxy Tab A11
DateBenchmarkResult
📘 2026-09-09 (ctoyu7665)AnTuTu521495

Memory

Configuration
RAM
RAM size 6 GB 4 GB
Memory type LPDDR4X LPDDR4X
Memory clock 1800 MHz 2133 MHz
Channels 2 2
Storage
Storage size 128 GB 64 GB
Storage type - UFS 2.2
Memory card MicroSD MicroSD
Memory card max size Up to 1024 GB Up to 1024 GB

Software

Operating system Android 15 Android 15 (Can be upgraded to Android 16)
ROM HyperOS 2.0 One UI 8.0
OS size - 14 GB
OS updates - 5 years

Battery

Capacity 7700 mAh 5100 mAh
Max charge power - 15 W
Battery type Li-Po Li-Ion
Replaceable No No
Wireless charging No No
Reverse charging - No
Fast charging Yes Yes (51% in 60 min)
Full charging time - 2:28 hr
Battery cycles - 1200 cycles

Main camera

Matrix 13 megapixels 8 megapixels
Image resolution - 3264 x 2448
Zoom Digital Digital
Flash No No
Stabilization Digital Digital
8K video recording No No
4K video recording No No
1080p video recording Up to 30FPS Up to 30FPS
Slow motion No No
Lenses 1) Standard: 13 MP
1) Standard: 8 MP
Camera features - -
Standard lens
Image resolution 13 MP 8 MP
Aperture f/2.0 -
Autofocus Phase autofocus Phase autofocus
Stabilization Digital Digital

Selfie camera

Megapixels 5 megapixels 5 megapixels
Aperture f/2.2 f/2.0
Sensor - CMOS
Autofocus No No
Stabilization No No
Video resolution 1080p (Full HD) at 30 FPS 1080p (Full HD) at 30 FPS
Depth sensor (TOF 3D) No No

Connectivity

Wi-Fi standard Wi-Fi 5 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac) Wi-Fi 5 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac)
Wi-Fi features - Dual Band
- Wi-Fi Direct
- Wi-Fi Hotspot
- Wi-Fi Display
- Dual Band
- Wi-Fi Direct
- Wi-Fi Hotspot
- Wi-Fi Display
Bluetooth version 5 5.3
Bluetooth features LE LE
USB type USB Type-C USB Type-C
USB version 2 2
USB features - Charging
- USB-Storage mode
- OTG
- Charging
- USB-Storage mode
DisplayPort No No
GPS GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS
NFC* No No
Infrared port No No
Network
Number of SIM* 1 1
Type of SIM card Nano Nano
eSIM support* No Yes
Hybrid slot No No
LTE Cat* - 13
5G support No No

Sound

Speakers Stereo Stereo
Headphone audio jack Yes Yes
FM radio No No
Dolby Atmos Yes Yes
Speakers test
Max loudness

Other

Category Budget Budget
Announced October 2025 September 2025
Release date November 2025 October 2025
Launch price (MSRP) $155 $180
SAR (body) - 0.29 W/kg
Sensors - Accelerometer
- Ambient light sensor
- Accelerometer
- Ambient light sensor
- Compass
Bundled charger Yes, 0 W Not included
*Disclaimer! NFC, GSM network support, and some other specs can be different depending on the country.

Conclusion

If the performance, gaming, battery life, connectivity, and software are more important to you, then choose the Samsung Galaxy Tab A11. But if the display is more of a priority – go for the Xiaomi Black Shark Pad 7.

Cast your vote

So, which tablet would you choose?
1 (100%)
0 (0%)
Total votes: 1

User opinions

You can share your opinion or ask a question in the comments below
🌐 Register your profile and become part of NanoReview community!