Xiaomi Pad 7 Ultra vs Asus Pad (T3201)
86
out of 100
VS
74
out of 100
Here we compared two tablets: the 14-inch Xiaomi Pad 7 Ultra (with Xiaomi Xring O1) that was released on May 22, 2025, against the Asus Pad (T3201), which is powered by MediaTek Dimensity 8300 and came out 1 year and 2 months after. On this page, you will find tests, full specs, strengths, and weaknesses of each of the devices.
Select the amount of RAM to evaluate performance and value for money more precisely
Key differences
Reasons to consider the Xiaomi Pad 7 Ultra
- 2.2x better performance in AnTuTu Benchmark (2963K versus 1331K)
- Has a 1.8 inches larger screen size
- Comes with 3000 mAh larger battery capacity: 12000 vs 9000 mAh
- Has 50% more RAM: 12GB versus 8GB
- Newer Bluetooth version (v5.4)
- Supports higher wattage charging (120W versus 45W)
- Ability to record video in 4K resolution
- Fingerprint scanner
- Compatible with Wi-Fi 7 wireless networks
Reasons to consider the Asus Pad (T3201)
- Higher display refresh rate – 144 Hz
- Expandable storage via MicroSD card up to 1024GB
- More recent OS version: Android 16 versus 15
- Much smaller footprint: 22% more compact case (76.4 vs 98.3 square inches)
- Weighs 89 grams less
Review
Display
Screen quality, color accuracy, brightness
Camera
Photo and video recording quality
Performance
CPU and memory performance (apps, system)
Gaming
Capabilities for playing modern games
Battery
Battery life, charging type and speed
Connectivity
Networks, ports, data transmission
Scores with a red asterisk (*) are approximate and may change in the future as we gather more data.
Select your primary usage scenario to get a more accurate NanoReview Score
Value for money (Beta)
Tests and specifications
Comparison table of technical specifications and testsDisplay
| Type | OLED | OLED |
| Size | 14 inches | 12.2 inches |
| Resolution | 2136 x 3200 pixels | 2800 x 1840 pixels |
| Aspect ratio | 3:2 | 3:2 |
| PPI | 275 ppi | 275 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 144 Hz |
| Adaptive refresh rate | Yes | Yes |
| Max rated brightness in HDR | 1600 nits | 2000 nits |
| HDR support | Yes, Dolby Vision | Yes, Dolby Vision |
| Touch sampling rate | 360 Hz | - |
| Screen protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 | Tempered glass |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 92% | 89.8% |
| Display features | - DCI-P3 | - DCI-P3 - DC Dimming |
Screen space comparison
Pad 7 Ultra
14″ (3:2 ratio) = 90.5 in2
Pad (T3201)
12.2″ (3:2 ratio) = 68.7 in2
~31% more screen space
Design and build
| Height | 305.82 mm (12.04 inches) | 271.1 mm (10.67 inches) |
| Width | 207.47 mm (8.17 inches) | 182 mm (7.17 inches) |
| Thickness | 5.1 mm (0.2 inches) | 6.5 mm (0.26 inches) |
| Weight | 609 g (21.48 oz) | 520 g (18.34 oz) |
| Waterproof | No | No |
| Rear material | Metal | Metal |
| Frame material | Metal | Metal |
| Colors | Gray, Blue | White |
| Fingerprint scanner | Yes, in-button | No |
| Area | 634 cm2 (98.4 inches2) | 493 cm2 (76.5 inches2) |
Visual size comparison
Screen-to-body ratio
Tablet Ranking (19th and 57th place)
Android Tablet Ranking (15th and 42nd place)
Performance
| Chipset | Xiaomi Xring O1 | MediaTek Dimensity 8300 |
| Max clock | 3700 MHz | 3350 MHz |
| CPU cores | 10 (2 + 4 + 2 + 2) | 8 (1 + 3 + 4) |
| Architecture | - 2 cores at 1.8 GHz: Cortex-A520 - 2 cores at 1.9 GHz: Cortex-A725 - 4 cores at 3.4 GHz: Cortex-A725 - 2 cores at 3.9 GHz: Cortex-X925 |
- 4 cores at 2.2 GHz: Cortex-A510 - 3 cores at 3.2 GHz: Cortex-A715 - 1 core at 3.35 GHz: Cortex-A715 |
| L3 cache | - | 4 MB |
| Manufacturing | TSMC | TSMC |
| Lithography process | 3 nanometers | 4 nanometers |
| Neural processor (NPU) | Yes | MediaTek APU 780 |
| Graphics | Immortalis-G925 MP16 | Mali G615 MP6 |
| GPU shading units | 2048 | 768 |
| GPU clock | 1392 MHz | 1400 MHz |
| FLOPS | ~5701.6 GFLOPS | ~2150.4 GFLOPS |
Benchmarks
Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)
Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)
Compute Score (GPU)
| Compute Score (GPU) | 20977 | 9511 |
| Single-core score | 2737 | 1396 |
| Multi-core score | 9191 | 4296 |
AnTuTu Benchmark 11
| CPU | 937172 | 367218 |
| GPU | 996086 | 492839 |
| Memory | 409648 | 234854 |
| UX | 620146 | 236756 |
| Total score | 2963052 | 1331667 |
| Samples | [2 tests] | Less than 3 |
3DMark Steel Nomad Light
| Stability | 93% | - |
| Graphics test | 19 FPS | - |
| Graphics score | 2510 | - |
3DMark Solar Bay
| Graphics test | 37 FPS | - |
| Section 1 | 39 FPS | - |
| Section 2 | 38 FPS | - |
| Section 3 | 34 FPS | - |
| Graphics score | 9767 | - |
PCMark 3.0
| Web score | 19150 | - |
| Video editing | 7129 | - |
| Photo editing | 29727 | - |
| Data manipulation | 18881 | - |
| Writing score | 21285 | - |
Memory
Configuration
| RAM size | 12 GB | 8 GB |
| Memory type | LPDDR5X | LPDDR5X |
| Memory clock | 4800 MHz | - |
| Channels | 4 | 4 |
| Storage size | 256 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 4.1 | UFS 3.1 |
| Memory card | No | MicroSD |
| Memory card max size | - | Up to 1024 GB |
Software
| Operating system | Android 15 | Android 16 |
| ROM | HyperOS 2.0 | - |
| Security updates | - | 3 years |
Battery
| Capacity | 12000 mAh | 9000 mAh |
| Max charge power | 120 W | 45 W |
| Battery type | Li-Po | Li-Po |
| Replaceable | No | No |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Reverse charging | Yes | Yes |
| Bypass charging | - | No |
| Fast charging | Yes | Yes (50% in 30 min) |
Main camera
| Matrix | 50 megapixels | 13 megapixels |
| Zoom | Digital | Digital |
| Flash | LED | LED |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
| 8K video recording | No | No |
| 4K video recording | Up to 60FPS | No |
| 1080p video recording | Up to 60FPS | Up to 30FPS |
| Slow motion | - | No |
| Lenses | 1) Standard: 50 MP |
1) Standard: 13 MP |
| Camera features | - Bokeh mode | - |
| Image resolution | 50 MP | 13 MP |
| Aperture | f/1.8 | - |
| Sensor | Samsung S5KJN1 | - |
| Sensor size | 1/2.76" (≈ 0.36 inch) | - |
| Pixel size | 0.64 micron | - |
| Autofocus | Phase autofocus | Phase autofocus |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
Selfie camera
| Megapixels | 32 megapixels | 5 megapixels |
| Aperture | f/2.2 | - |
| Sensor | Omnivision OV32D | - |
| Sensor size | 1/3.6" (≈ 0.28 inch) | - |
| Pixel size | 0.61 micron | - |
| Autofocus | No | No |
| Stabilization | Digital | No |
| Video resolution | 1080p (Full HD) at 30 FPS | 1080p (Full HD) at 30 FPS |
| Depth sensor (TOF 3D) | No | No |
Connectivity
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 7 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be) | Wi-Fi 6E (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax) |
| Wi-Fi features | - Dual Band - Wi-Fi MiMO - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
- Dual Band - Wi-Fi MiMO - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
| Bluetooth version | 5.4 | 5.3 |
| Bluetooth features | LE | LE |
| USB type | USB Type-C | USB Type-C |
| USB version | 3.2 | 3.0 |
| USB features | - Charging - USB-Storage mode - OTG |
- Charging - USB-Storage mode - OTG |
| DisplayPort | Yes | Yes, DP 1.4 |
| NFC* | No | No |
| Infrared port | Yes | No |
| Type of SIM card | No | No |
| eSIM support* | No | No |
| Hybrid slot | - | No |
| 5G support | No | No |
Sound
| Speakers | 8.0 | 4.0 |
| Headphone audio jack | No | No |
| FM radio | No | No |
| Dolby Atmos | - | Yes |
Other
| Category | Flagship | Mid-range |
| Announced | May 2025 | July 2026 |
| Release date | May 2025 | August 2026 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | - | $480 |
| Sensors | - Proximity sensor - Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Ambient light sensor - Compass - Fingerprint |
- Proximity sensor - Gyroscope - Accelerometer |
| Bundled charger | Yes, 120 W | Yes, 45 W |
Further details
Notes on Pad 7 Ultra:
- The Nano Soft screen model is 10g heavier.
- NFC is supported for data transfer only.
*Disclaimer! NFC, GSM network support, and some other specs can be different depending on the country.
Conclusion
After analyzing all the data, we think that the Xiaomi Pad 7 Ultra is definitely a better buy.
Cast your vote
Total votes: < 1