Xiaomi Pad 8 Pro vs Huawei MatePad 11.5 S (2025)
85
out of 100
VS
65
out of 100
Here we compared two mid-range tablets: the 11.2-inch Xiaomi Pad 8 Pro (with Qualcomm Snapdragon Elite) that was released on September 25, 2025, against the Huawei MatePad 11.5 S (2025), which is powered by HiSilicon Kirin 9020 and came out 1 month before. On this page, you will find tests, full specs, strengths, and weaknesses of each of the devices.
Select the amount of RAM to evaluate performance and value for money more precisely
Key differences
Reasons to consider the Xiaomi Pad 8 Pro
- 2.9x better performance in AnTuTu Benchmark (3153K versus 1092K)
- Newer Bluetooth version (v5.4)
- Supports higher wattage charging (67W versus 40W)
- Ability to record video in 4K resolution
- Fingerprint scanner
- More energy-efficient CPU β Snapdragon Elite
- Compatible with the latest Wi-Fi 7 wireless networks
- 18% higher pixel density (344 vs 291 PPI)
- Has a built-in infrared port
Review
Display
Screen quality, color accuracy, brightness
Camera
Photo and video recording quality
Performance
CPU and memory performance (apps, system)
Gaming
Capabilities for playing modern games
Battery
Battery life, charging type and speed
Connectivity
Networks, ports, data transmission
Scores with a red asterisk (*) are approximate and may change in the future as we gather more data.
Select your primary usage scenario to get a more accurate NanoReview Score
Value for money (Beta)
Tests and specifications
Comparison table of technical specifications and testsDisplay
| Type | IPS LCD | TFT LCD |
| Size | 11.2 inches | 11.5 inches |
| Resolution | 2136 x 3200 pixels | 1840 x 2800 pixels |
| Aspect ratio | 3:2 | 3:2 |
| PPI | 344 ppi | 291 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 144 Hz | 144 Hz |
| Adaptive refresh rate | Yes | Yes |
| Max rated brightness | 800 nits | 500 nits |
| HDR support | Yes, Dolby Vision | No |
| Touch sampling rate | 360 Hz | - |
| Screen protection | Tempered glass | - |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 85.7% | 85.1% |
| Display features | - DCI-P3 | - |
| RGB color space | 99.8% | - |
| PWM | Not detected | - |
| Response time | 28 ms | - |
| Contrast | 2087:1 | - |
Screen space comparison
MatePad 11.5 S (2025)
11.5β³ (3:2 ratio) = 61 in2
Pad 8 Pro
11.2β³ (3:2 ratio) = 57.9 in2
~5% more screen space
Peak brightness test (auto)
Design and build
| Height | 251.22 mm (9.89 inches) | 261 mm (10.28 inches) |
| Width | 173.42 mm (6.83 inches) | 177.3 mm (6.98 inches) |
| Thickness | 5.75 mm (0.23 inches) | 6.1 mm (0.24 inches) |
| Weight | 485 g (17.11 oz) | 515 g (18.17 oz) |
| Waterproof | No | No |
| Rear material | Metal | Metal |
| Frame material | Metal | Metal |
| Colors | Gray, Blue, Green | Silver, Gray, Green, Purple |
| Fingerprint scanner | Yes, in-button | No |
| Area | 436 cm2 (67.5 inches2) | 463 cm2 (71.8 inches2) |
| Repairability | Average (2.74/5) | - |
| Drop resistance | Very good (B) Β· 208 drops | - |
Screen-to-body ratio
Tablet Ranking (21st and 80th place)
Android Tablet Ranking (16th and 60th place)
Performance
| Chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon Elite | HiSilicon Kirin 9020 |
| Max clock | 4320 MHz | 2285 MHz |
| CPU cores | 8 (2 + 6) | 8 (1 + 3 + 4) |
| Architecture | - 6 cores at 3.53 GHz: Oryon (Phoenix M) - 2 cores at 4.32 GHz: Oryon (Phoenix L) |
- 4 cores at 1.6 GHz: Taishan-Little - 3 cores at 2.15 GHz: TaiShan V120 - 1 core at 2.5 GHz: TaiShan V121 |
| L3 cache | 8 MB | 10 MB |
| Manufacturing | TSMC | SMIC |
| Lithography process | 3 nanometers | 7 nanometers |
| Neural processor (NPU) | Hexagon | Da Vinci |
| Graphics | Adreno 830 | Maleoon 920 |
| GPU shading units | 1536 | 1024 |
| GPU clock | 1100 MHz | 840 MHz |
| FLOPS | ~3379.2 GFLOPS | ~1720.3 GFLOPS |
Benchmarks
Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)
Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)
Compute Score (GPU)
| Compute Score (GPU) | 24482 | 3027 |
| Single-core score | 3028 | 1360 |
| Multi-core score | 9557 | 3866 |
AnTuTu Benchmark 11
| CPU | 950473 | 434379 |
| GPU | 1169909 | 145725 |
| Memory | 360775 | 245545 |
| UX | 671896 | 266923 |
| Total score | 3153053 | 1092572 |
| Samples | [7 tests] | Less than 3 |
3DMark Steel Nomad Light
| Graphics test | 18 FPS | - |
| Graphics score | 2476 | - |
3DMark Solar Bay
| Graphics test | 44 FPS | - |
| Section 1 | 49 FPS | - |
| Section 2 | 44 FPS | - |
| Section 3 | 37 FPS | - |
| Graphics score | 11483 | - |
PCMark 3.0
| Web score | 20463 | - |
| Video editing | 8142 | - |
| Photo editing | 35214 | - |
| Data manipulation | 16669 | - |
| Writing score | 20187 | - |
Recent User Tests
Xiaomi Pad 8 Pro
| Date | Benchmark | Result |
|---|---|---|
| π 2026-08-13 (Zei) | GeekBench CPU | 3028 / 9557 |
| π 2026-08-13 (Zei) | AnTuTu | 3206291 |
| π 2026-08-08 (Fadhilah sinaga) | AnTuTu | 3095623 |
| π 2026-07-19 -> B1Zet | AnTuTu | 3172442 |
| π 2026-05-21 (DimaSN16) | AnTuTu | 3048170 |
Huawei MatePad 11.5 S (2025)
| Date | Benchmark | Result |
|---|---|---|
| π 2026-09-09 -> LeofMate | AnTuTu | 1291607 |
| π 2025-09-13 (Efe TuΔra) | AnTuTu | 1092572 |
Memory
Configuration
| RAM size | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Memory type | LPDDR5X | - |
| Memory clock | 5300 MHz | - |
| Channels | 4 | - |
| Storage size | 128 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 4.1 | - |
| Memory card | No | No |
Software
| Operating system | Android 16 | HarmonyOS 5.0 |
| ROM | HyperOS 3 | - |
| OS size | 50 GB | - |
| OS updates | 5 years | - |
Battery
| Capacity | 9200 mAh | 8800 mAh |
| Max charge power | 67 W | 40 W |
| Battery type | Li-Po | Li-Po |
| Replaceable | No | No |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Reverse charging | Yes | Yes |
| Fast charging | Yes (52% in 30 min) | Yes |
| Full charging time | 1:17 hr | - |
| Battery cycles | 1000 cycles | - |
| Web browsing | 08:46 hr | - |
| Watching video | 12:31 hr | - |
| Gaming | 07:23 hr | - |
| Standby | 175 hr | - |
General battery life
Main camera
| Matrix | 50 megapixels | 13 megapixels |
| Image resolution | 8160 x 6144 | 4160 x 3120 |
| Zoom | Digital | Digital |
| Flash | LED | LED |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
| 8K video recording | No | No |
| 4K video recording | Up to 60FPS | No |
| 1080p video recording | Up to 60FPS | Up to 30FPS |
| Lenses | 1) Standard: 50 MP |
1) Standard: 13 MP |
| Camera features | - Bokeh mode | - |
| Image resolution | 50 MP | 13 MP |
| Aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.8 |
| Sensor | Samsung S5KJN1 | - |
| Sensor size | 1/2.76" (β 0.36 inch) | - |
| Pixel size | 0.64 micron | - |
| Autofocus | Phase autofocus | No |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
Selfie camera
| Megapixels | 32 megapixels | 8 megapixels |
| Image resolution | 6528 x 4896 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Aperture | f/2.2 | f/2.0 |
| Sensor | Omnivision OV32D | - |
| Sensor size | 1/3.6" (β 0.28 inch) | - |
| Pixel size | 0.61 micron | - |
| Autofocus | No | No |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
| Video resolution | 1080p (Full HD) at 30 FPS | 1080p (Full HD) at 30 FPS |
| Depth sensor (TOF 3D) | No | No |
Connectivity
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 7 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be) | Wi-Fi 6 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax) |
| Wi-Fi features | - Dual Band - Wi-Fi MiMO - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
- Dual Band - Wi-Fi MiMO - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
| Bluetooth version | 5.4 | 5.2 |
| Bluetooth features | LE | LE |
| USB type | USB Type-C | USB Type-C |
| USB version | 3.2 | 3.1 |
| USB features | - Charging - USB-Storage mode - OTG |
- Charging - USB-Storage mode - OTG |
| DisplayPort | Yes | Yes |
| NFC* | No | No |
| Infrared port | Yes | No |
| Type of SIM card | No | No |
| eSIM support* | No | - |
| 5G support | No | No |
Sound
| Speakers | 4.0 | 4.0 |
| Headphone audio jack | No | No |
| FM radio | No | No |
| Dolby Atmos | Yes | No |
Speakers test
Max loudness
Other
| Category | Mid-range | Mid-range |
| Announced | September 2025 | August 2025 |
| Release date | September 2025 | August 2025 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $499 | $350 |
| Sensors | - Proximity sensor - Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Ambient light sensor - Compass - Fingerprint |
- Accelerometer - Ambient light sensor |
| Bundled charger | Yes, 67 W | Yes, 0 W |
*Disclaimer! NFC, GSM network support, and some other specs can be different depending on the country.
Conclusion
After analyzing all the data, we think that the Xiaomi Pad 8 Pro is definitely a better buy.
Cast your vote
Total votes: 3