Xiaomi Pad 9 Pro Max vs Xiaomi Pad 8 Pro
Here we compared two tablets: the 13.3-inch Xiaomi Pad 9 Pro Max (with Xiaomi Xring O3) that was released on September 7, 2026, against the Xiaomi Pad 8 Pro, which is powered by Qualcomm Snapdragon Elite and came out 11 months before. On this page, you will find tests, full specs, strengths, and weaknesses of each of the devices.
Select the amount of RAM to evaluate performance and value for money more precisely
Key differences
Reasons to consider the Xiaomi Pad 9 Pro Max
- Has a 2.1 inches larger screen size
- Comes with 2800 mAh larger battery capacity: 12000 vs 9200 mAh
- 63% better performance in AnTuTu Benchmark (5137K versus 3153K)
- Newer Bluetooth version (v6.0)
- Supports higher wattage charging (120W versus 67W)
- More recent OS version: Android 17 versus 16
- CPU with a higher amount of cores (+2)
- 17% faster in single-core GeekBench 6 test: 3539 and 3028 points
Reasons to consider the Xiaomi Pad 8 Pro
- Much smaller footprint: 28% more compact case (67.6 vs 93.3 square inches)
- 12% higher pixel density (344 vs 308 PPI)
- Weighs 160 grams less
Review
Display
Screen quality, color accuracy, brightness
Camera
Photo and video recording quality
Performance
CPU and memory performance (apps, system)
Gaming
Capabilities for playing modern games
Battery
Battery life, charging type and speed
Connectivity
Networks, ports, data transmission
Scores with a red asterisk (*) are approximate and may change in the future as we gather more data.
Select your primary usage scenario to get a more accurate NanoReview Score
Value for money (Beta)
Tests and specifications
Comparison table of technical specifications and testsDisplay
| Type | IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| Size | 13.3 inches | 11.2 inches |
| Resolution | 3408 x 2272 pixels | 2136 x 3200 pixels |
| Aspect ratio | 3:2 | 3:2 |
| PPI | 308 ppi | 344 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 144 Hz | 144 Hz |
| Adaptive refresh rate | Yes | Yes |
| Max rated brightness | 1000 nits | 800 nits |
| HDR support | Yes, HDR10 | Yes, Dolby Vision |
| Touch sampling rate | - | 360 Hz |
| Screen protection | Tempered glass | Tempered glass |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 87.6% | 85.7% |
| Display features | - DCI-P3 | - DCI-P3 |
| RGB color space | - | 99.8% |
| PWM | - | Not detected |
| Response time | - | 28 ms |
| Contrast | - | 2087:1 |
Screen space comparison
Pad 9 Pro Max
13.3″ (3:2 ratio) = 81.6 in2
Pad 8 Pro
11.2″ (3:2 ratio) = 57.9 in2
~41% more screen space
Peak brightness test (auto)
Design and build
| Height | 296.2 mm (11.66 inches) | 251.22 mm (9.89 inches) |
| Width | 203.08 mm (8 inches) | 173.42 mm (6.83 inches) |
| Thickness | 5.67 mm (0.22 inches) | 5.75 mm (0.23 inches) |
| Weight | 645 g (22.75 oz) | 485 g (17.11 oz) |
| Waterproof | No | No |
| Advanced cooling | Vapor chamber | - |
| Rear material | Metal | Metal |
| Frame material | Metal | Metal |
| Colors | Silver, Gray, Burgundy | Gray, Blue, Green |
| Fingerprint scanner | Yes, in-button | Yes, in-button |
| Area | 602 cm2 (93.3 inches2) | 436 cm2 (67.5 inches2) |
| Repairability | - | Average (2.74/5) |
| Drop resistance | - | Very good (B) · 208 drops |
Visual size comparison
Screen-to-body ratio
Tablet Ranking (2nd and 22nd place)
Android Tablet Ranking (1st and 16th place)
Performance
| Chipset | Xiaomi Xring O3 | Qualcomm Snapdragon Elite |
| Max clock | 4350 MHz | 4320 MHz |
| CPU cores | 10 (2 + 4 + 4) | 8 (2 + 6) |
| Architecture | - 4 cores at 3.15 GHz: C1-Pro - 4 cores at 3.68 GHz: C1-Premium - 2 cores at 4.35 GHz: C1-Ultra |
- 6 cores at 3.53 GHz: Oryon (Phoenix M) - 2 cores at 4.32 GHz: Oryon (Phoenix L) |
| L3 cache | 16 MB | 8 MB |
| Manufacturing | TSMC | TSMC |
| Lithography process | 3 nanometers | 3 nanometers |
| Neural processor (NPU) | Yes | Hexagon |
| Graphics | Mali-G2 Ultra NX MP16 | Adreno 830 |
| GPU shading units | 2048 | 1536 |
| GPU clock | 1600 MHz | 1100 MHz |
| FLOPS | ~6554 GFLOPS | ~3379.2 GFLOPS |
Benchmarks
Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)
Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)
Compute Score (GPU)
| Compute Score (GPU) | 33102 | 24482 |
| Single-core score | 3539 | 3028 |
| Multi-core score | 13220 | 9557 |
AnTuTu Benchmark 11
| CPU | 1312458 | 950473 |
| GPU | 2089734 | 1169909 |
| Memory | 978562 | 360775 |
| UX | 756891 | 671896 |
| Total score | 5137645 | 3153053 |
| Samples | Less than 3 | [7 tests] |
3DMark Steel Nomad Light
| Graphics test | - | 18 FPS |
| Graphics score | - | 2476 |
3DMark Solar Bay
| Graphics test | - | 44 FPS |
| Section 1 | - | 49 FPS |
| Section 2 | - | 44 FPS |
| Section 3 | - | 37 FPS |
| Graphics score | - | 11483 |
PCMark 3.0
| Web score | - | 20463 |
| Video editing | - | 8142 |
| Photo editing | - | 35214 |
| Data manipulation | - | 16669 |
| Writing score | - | 20187 |
Recent User Tests
Xiaomi Pad 9 Pro Max
| Date | Benchmark | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 📘 2026-09-08 (KarlderaL) | AnTuTu 12 | 5558210 |
Xiaomi Pad 8 Pro
| Date | Benchmark | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 📘 2026-09-18 (Ровный Вась на районе) | AnTuTu 12 | 3372673 |
| 📘 2026-09-14 (Jopher Gayeta) | AnTuTu 12 | 3170305 |
| 📘 2026-08-13 (Zei) | Geekbench 6 CPU | 3028 / 9557 |
| 📘 2026-08-13 (Zei) | AnTuTu 11 | 3206291 |
| 📘 2026-08-08 (Fadhilah sinaga) | AnTuTu 11 | 3095623 |
Memory
Configuration
| RAM size | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Memory type | LPDDR5X | LPDDR5X |
| Memory clock | - | 5300 MHz |
| Channels | 4 | 4 |
| Storage size | 256 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 4.1 | UFS 4.1 |
| Memory card | No | No |
Software
| Operating system | Android 17 | Android 16 |
| ROM | HyperOS 4 | HyperOS 3 |
| OS size | - | 50 GB |
| OS updates | 4 years | 5 years |
| Security updates | 6 years | - |
Battery
| Capacity | 12000 mAh | 9200 mAh |
| Max charge power | 120 W | 67 W |
| Battery type | Li-Po | Li-Po |
| Replaceable | No | No |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Reverse charging | Yes | Yes |
| Bypass charging | No | - |
| Fast charging | Yes | Yes (52% in 30 min) |
| Full charging time | - | 1:17 hr |
| Battery cycles | - | 1000 cycles |
| Web browsing | - | 08:46 hr |
| Watching video | - | 12:31 hr |
| Gaming | - | 07:23 hr |
| Standby | - | 175 hr |
General battery life
Main camera
| Matrix | 50 megapixels | 50 megapixels |
| Image resolution | - | 8160 x 6144 |
| Zoom | Digital | Digital |
| Flash | LED | LED |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
| 8K video recording | No | No |
| 4K video recording | Up to 60FPS | Up to 60FPS |
| 1080p video recording | Up to 60FPS | Up to 60FPS |
| Lenses | 1) Standard: 50 MP |
1) Standard: 50 MP |
| Camera features | - Bokeh mode | - Bokeh mode |
| Image resolution | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.8 |
| Sensor | - | Samsung S5KJN1 |
| Sensor size | 1/2.76" (≈ 0.36 inch) | 1/2.76" (≈ 0.36 inch) |
| Pixel size | 0.64 micron | 0.64 micron |
| Autofocus | Phase autofocus | Phase autofocus |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
Selfie camera
| Megapixels | 32 megapixels | 32 megapixels |
| Image resolution | - | 6528 x 4896 |
| Aperture | f/2.2 | f/2.2 |
| Sensor | CMOS | Omnivision OV32D |
| Sensor size | 1/3.6" (≈ 0.28 inch) | 1/3.6" (≈ 0.28 inch) |
| Pixel size | 0.61 micron | 0.61 micron |
| Autofocus | No | No |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
| Video resolution | 1080p (Full HD) at 30 FPS | 1080p (Full HD) at 30 FPS |
| Depth sensor (TOF 3D) | No | No |
Connectivity
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 7 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be) | Wi-Fi 7 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be) |
| Wi-Fi features | - Dual Band - Wi-Fi MiMO - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
- Dual Band - Wi-Fi MiMO - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
| Bluetooth version | 6.0 | 5.4 |
| Bluetooth features | LE | LE |
| USB type | USB Type-C | USB Type-C |
| USB version | 3.2 | 3.2 |
| USB features | - Charging - USB-Storage mode - OTG |
- Charging - USB-Storage mode - OTG |
| DisplayPort | Yes | Yes |
| NFC* | No | No |
| Infrared port | Yes | Yes |
| Type of SIM card | No | No |
| eSIM support* | No | No |
| 5G support | No | No |
Sound
| Speakers | 8.0 | 4.0 |
| Headphone audio jack | No | No |
| FM radio | No | No |
| Dolby Atmos | - | Yes |
Speakers test
Max loudness
Other
| Category | Flagship | Mid-range |
| Announced | September 2026 | September 2025 |
| Release date | September 2026 | September 2025 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $715 | $499 |
| Sensors | - Proximity sensor - Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Ambient light sensor - Compass - Fingerprint |
- Proximity sensor - Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Ambient light sensor - Compass - Fingerprint |
| Bundled charger | Yes, 120 W | Yes, 67 W |
*Disclaimer! NFC, GSM network support, and some other specs can be different depending on the country.
Conclusion
After analyzing all the data, we think that the Xiaomi Pad 9 Pro Max is definitely a better buy.
Cast your vote
Total votes: 9