Xiaomi Pad 8 Pro vs Galaxy Tab S10 FE
85
out of 100
VS
65
out of 100
Here we compared two mid-range tablets: the 11.2-inch Xiaomi Pad 8 Pro (with Qualcomm Snapdragon Elite) that was released on September 25, 2025, against the Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 FE, which is powered by Exynos 1580 and came out 6 months before. On this page, you will find tests, full specs, strengths, and weaknesses of each of the devices.
Select the amount of RAM to evaluate performance and value for money more precisely
Key differences
Reasons to consider the Xiaomi Pad 8 Pro
- 2.5x better performance in AnTuTu Benchmark (3153K versus 1240K)
- Higher display refresh rate β 144 Hz
- Comes with 1200 mAh larger battery capacity: 9200 vs 8000 mAh
- Shows 12% longer battery life (27:53 vs 24:49 hours)
- Delivers 31% higher peak brightness (806 against 617 nits)
- Newer Bluetooth version (v5.4)
- Supports higher wattage charging (67W versus 45W)
- Compatible with the latest Wi-Fi 7 wireless networks
- 38% higher pixel density (344 vs 249 PPI)
- Has a built-in infrared port
Reasons to consider the Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 FE
- Waterproof body (IP68 classification)
- Expandable storage via MicroSD card
- Ready for eSIM technology
Review
Display
Screen quality, color accuracy, brightness
Camera
Photo and video recording quality
Performance
CPU and memory performance (apps, system)
Gaming
Capabilities for playing modern games
Battery
Battery life, charging type and speed
Connectivity
Networks, ports, data transmission
Select your primary usage scenario to get a more accurate NanoReview Score
Value for money (Beta)
Tests and specifications
Comparison table of technical specifications and testsDisplay
| Type | IPS LCD | TFT LCD |
| Size | 11.2 inches | 10.9 inches |
| Resolution | 2136 x 3200 pixels | 1440 x 2304 pixels |
| Aspect ratio | 3:2 | 16:10 |
| PPI | 344 ppi | 249 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 144 Hz | 90 Hz |
| Adaptive refresh rate | Yes | No |
| Max rated brightness | 800 nits | 750 nits |
| HDR support | Yes, Dolby Vision | No |
| Touch sampling rate | 360 Hz | - |
| Screen protection | Tempered glass | Tempered glass |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 85.7% | 81.7% |
| Display features | - DCI-P3 | - DCI-P3 |
| RGB color space | 99.8% | 97.3% |
| PWM | Not detected | Not detected |
| Response time | 28 ms | 32 ms |
| Contrast | 2087:1 | 1700:1 |
Screen space comparison
Pad 8 Pro
11.2β³ (3:2 ratio) = 57.9 in2
Galaxy Tab S10 FE
10.9β³ (16:10 ratio) = 53.4 in2
~8% more screen space
Peak brightness test (auto)
Design and build
| Height | 251.22 mm (9.89 inches) | 254.3 mm (10.01 inches) |
| Width | 173.42 mm (6.83 inches) | 165.8 mm (6.53 inches) |
| Thickness | 5.75 mm (0.23 inches) | 6 mm (0.24 inches) |
| Weight | 485 g (17.11 oz) | 497 g (17.53 oz) |
| Waterproof | No | IP68 |
| Rear material | Metal | Metal |
| Frame material | Metal | Metal |
| Colors | Gray, Blue, Green | Silver, Gray, Blue, Purple |
| Fingerprint scanner | Yes, in-button | Yes, in-button |
| Area | 436 cm2 (67.5 inches2) | 422 cm2 (65.4 inches2) |
| Repairability | Average (2.74/5) | Average (2.82/5) |
| Drop resistance | Very good (B) Β· 208 drops | - |
Screen-to-body ratio
Tablet Ranking (21st and 83rd place)
Android Tablet Ranking (16th and 62nd place)
Performance
| Chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon Elite | Samsung Exynos 1580 |
| Max clock | 4320 MHz | 2900 MHz |
| CPU cores | 8 (2 + 6) | 8 (1 + 3 + 4) |
| Architecture | - 6 cores at 3.53 GHz: Oryon (Phoenix M) - 2 cores at 4.32 GHz: Oryon (Phoenix L) |
- 4 cores at 1.95 GHz: Cortex-A520 - 3 cores at 2.6 GHz: Cortex-A720 - 1 core at 2.9 GHz: Cortex-A720 |
| L3 cache | 8 MB | 4 MB |
| Manufacturing | TSMC | Samsung |
| Lithography process | 3 nanometers | 4 nanometers |
| Neural processor (NPU) | Hexagon | Yes |
| Graphics | Adreno 830 | Xclipse 540 |
| GPU shading units | 1536 | 256 |
| GPU clock | 1100 MHz | 1300 MHz |
| FLOPS | ~3379.2 GFLOPS | ~1331.2 GFLOPS |
Benchmarks
Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)
Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)
Compute Score (GPU)
| Compute Score (GPU) | 24482 | 7019 |
| Single-core score | 3028 | 1360 |
| Multi-core score | 9557 | 3877 |
AnTuTu Benchmark 11
| CPU | 950473 | 491848 |
| GPU | 1169909 | 298745 |
| Memory | 360775 | 187448 |
| UX | 671896 | 262140 |
| Total score | 3153053 | 1240181 |
| Samples | [7 tests] | [4 tests] |
3DMark Steel Nomad Light
| Stability | - | 94% |
| Graphics test | 18 FPS | 5 FPS |
| Graphics score | 2476 | 657 |
3DMark Solar Bay
| Graphics test | 44 FPS | - |
| Section 1 | 49 FPS | - |
| Section 2 | 44 FPS | - |
| Section 3 | 37 FPS | - |
| Graphics score | 11483 | - |
PCMark 3.0
| Web score | 20463 | 12301 |
| Video editing | 8142 | 7055 |
| Photo editing | 35214 | 22426 |
| Data manipulation | 16669 | 10830 |
| Writing score | 20187 | 15855 |
Recent User Tests
Xiaomi Pad 8 Pro
| Date | Benchmark | Result |
|---|---|---|
| π 2026-08-13 (Zei) | GeekBench CPU | 3028 / 9557 |
| π 2026-08-13 (Zei) | AnTuTu | 3206291 |
| π 2026-08-08 (Fadhilah sinaga) | AnTuTu | 3095623 |
| π 2026-07-19 -> B1Zet | AnTuTu | 3172442 |
| π 2026-05-21 (DimaSN16) | AnTuTu | 3048170 |
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 FE
| Date | Benchmark | Result |
|---|---|---|
| π 2026-05-31 (Avacada) | GeekBench CPU | 1356 / 3888 |
| π 2026-02-09 (Mike) | CPU Throttle | 87% |
| π 2026-02-07 (Mike) | GeekBench CPU | 1360 / 3877 |
| π 2026-02-07 (Mike) | AnTuTu | 1260942 |
| π 2026-02-07 (Musicevolver) | GeekBench GPU | 7019 |
Memory
Configuration
| RAM size | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Memory type | LPDDR5X | LPDDR5 |
| Memory clock | 5300 MHz | 3200 MHz |
| Channels | 4 | 4 |
| Storage size | 128 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 4.1 | UFS 3.1 |
| Memory card | No | MicroSD |
Software
| Operating system | Android 16 | Android 15 (Can be upgraded to Android 16) |
| ROM | HyperOS 3 | One UI 8.5 |
| OS size | 50 GB | 29.5 GB |
| OS updates | 5 years | 0 years |
Battery
| Capacity | 9200 mAh | 8000 mAh |
| Max charge power | 67 W | 45 W |
| Battery type | Li-Po | Li-Ion |
| Replaceable | No | No |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Reverse charging | Yes | No |
| Fast charging | Yes (52% in 30 min) | Yes (50% in 30 min) |
| Full charging time | 1:17 hr | 2:50 hr |
| Battery cycles | 1000 cycles | 2000 cycles |
| Web browsing | 08:46 hr | 09:55 hr |
| Watching video | 12:31 hr | 14:58 hr |
| Gaming | 07:23 hr | 06:44 hr |
| Standby | 175 hr | 118 hr |
General battery life
Main camera
| Matrix | 50 megapixels | 13 megapixels |
| Image resolution | 8160 x 6144 | 4128 x 3096 |
| Zoom | Digital | Digital |
| Flash | LED | No |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
| 8K video recording | No | No |
| 4K video recording | Up to 60FPS | Up to 30FPS |
| 1080p video recording | Up to 60FPS | Up to 30FPS |
| Lenses | 1) Standard: 50 MP |
1) Standard: 13 MP |
| Camera features | - Bokeh mode | - |
| Image resolution | 50 MP | 13 MP |
| Aperture | f/1.8 | f/2.0 |
| Sensor | Samsung S5KJN1 | - |
| Sensor size | 1/2.76" (β 0.36 inch) | - |
| Pixel size | 0.64 micron | 1 micron |
| Autofocus | Phase autofocus | Phase autofocus |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
Selfie camera
| Megapixels | 32 megapixels | 12 megapixels |
| Image resolution | 6528 x 4896 | 4000 x 3000 |
| Aperture | f/2.2 | f/2.4 |
| Sensor | Omnivision OV32D | CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/3.6" (β 0.28 inch) | - |
| Pixel size | 0.61 micron | - |
| Autofocus | No | No |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
| Video resolution | 1080p (Full HD) at 30 FPS | 1080p (Full HD) at 30 FPS |
| Depth sensor (TOF 3D) | No | No |
Connectivity
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 7 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be) | Wi-Fi 6E (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax) |
| Wi-Fi features | - Dual Band - Wi-Fi MiMO - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
- Dual Band - Wi-Fi MiMO - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
| Bluetooth version | 5.4 | 5.3 |
| Bluetooth features | LE | LE |
| USB type | USB Type-C | USB Type-C |
| USB version | 3.2 | 2 |
| USB features | - Charging - USB-Storage mode - OTG |
- Charging - USB-Storage mode - OTG |
| DisplayPort | Yes | No |
| GPS | - | GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS |
| NFC* | No | Yes |
| Infrared port | Yes | No |
| Number of SIM* | - | 1 |
| Type of SIM card | No | Nano |
| Multi SIM mode | - | Standby |
| eSIM support* | No | Yes |
| Hybrid slot | - | No |
| 5G support | No | Yes |
Sound
| Speakers | 4.0 | Stereo |
| Headphone audio jack | No | No |
| FM radio | No | No |
| Dolby Atmos | Yes | Yes |
Speakers test
Max loudness
Other
| Category | Mid-range | Mid-range |
| Announced | September 2025 | April 2025 |
| Release date | September 2025 | April 2025 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $499 | $499 |
| SAR (body) | - | 0.92 W/kg |
| Sensors | - Proximity sensor - Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Ambient light sensor - Compass - Fingerprint |
- Proximity sensor - Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Ambient light sensor - Compass - Fingerprint |
| Bundled charger | Yes, 67 W | Not included |
*Disclaimer! NFC, GSM network support, and some other specs can be different depending on the country.
Conclusion
After analyzing all the data, we think that the Xiaomi Pad 8 Pro is definitely a better buy.
Cast your vote
Total votes: 13