Xiaomi Poco Pad C1 vs Galaxy Tab A11+ (Plus)
Here we compared two tablets: the 9.7-inch Xiaomi Poco Pad C1 (with Qualcomm Snapdragon 6s 4G Gen 2) that was released on May 21, 2026, against the Samsung Galaxy Tab A11+ (Plus), which is powered by MediaTek Dimensity 7300 and came out 8 months before. On this page, you will find tests, full specs, strengths, and weaknesses of each of the devices.
Select the amount of RAM to evaluate performance and value for money more precisely
Key differences
Reasons to consider the Xiaomi Poco Pad C1
- Higher display refresh rate – 120 Hz
- Thinner bezels – 8.5% more screen real estate
- 30% higher pixel density (268 vs 206 PPI)
- Much smaller footprint: 23% more compact case (51.9 vs 67.3 square inches)
- Weighs 71 grams less
Reasons to consider the Samsung Galaxy Tab A11+ (Plus)
- Has a 1.3 inches larger screen size
- 62% better performance in AnTuTu Benchmark (828K versus 511K)
- Newer Bluetooth version (v5.1)
- Has 50% more RAM: 6GB versus 4GB
- More energy-efficient CPU – Dimensity 7300
- 2.2x faster in single-core GeekBench 6 test: 1050 and 484 points
- Ready for eSIM technology
Review
Display
Screen quality, color accuracy, brightness
Camera
Photo and video recording quality
Performance
CPU and memory performance (apps, system)
Gaming
Capabilities for playing modern games
Battery
Battery life, charging type and speed
Connectivity
Networks, ports, data transmission
Scores with a red asterisk (*) are approximate and may change in the future as we gather more data.
Select your primary usage scenario to get a more accurate NanoReview Score
Value for money (Beta)
Tests and specifications
Comparison table of technical specifications and testsDisplay
| Type | IPS LCD | TFT LCD |
| Size | 9.7 inches | 11 inches |
| Resolution | 1280 x 2048 pixels | 1200 x 1920 pixels |
| Aspect ratio | - | 5:3 |
| PPI | 268 ppi | 206 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 90 Hz |
| Adaptive refresh rate | Yes | - |
| Max rated brightness | 600 nits | - |
| HDR support | No | No |
| Screen protection | Tempered glass | Tempered glass |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 87.9% | 79.4% |
| RGB color space | - | 97.2% |
| PWM | - | Not detected |
| Response time | - | 25 ms |
| Contrast | - | 1534:1 |
Peak brightness test (auto)
Design and build
| Height | 226.51 mm (8.92 inches) | 257.1 mm (10.12 inches) |
| Width | 147.97 mm (5.83 inches) | 168.7 mm (6.64 inches) |
| Thickness | 7.4 mm (0.29 inches) | 6.9 mm (0.27 inches) |
| Weight | 406 g (14.32 oz) | 477 g (16.83 oz) |
| Waterproof | No | No |
| Rear material | Metal | Metal |
| Frame material | Metal | Metal |
| Colors | Gray, Blue | Silver, Gray |
| Fingerprint scanner | No | No |
| Area | 335 cm2 (52 inches2) | 434 cm2 (67.2 inches2) |
| Repairability | - | Average (2.8/5) |
Visual size comparison
Screen-to-body ratio
Tablet Ranking (98th and 102nd place)
Android Tablet Ranking (73rd and 77th place)
Performance
| Chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 6s 4G Gen 2 | MediaTek Dimensity 7300 |
| Max clock | 2900 MHz | 2500 MHz |
| CPU cores | 8 (4 + 4) | 8 (4 + 4) |
| Architecture | - 4 cores at 1.9 GHz: Cortex-A53 - 4 cores at 2.9 GHz: Cortex-A73 |
- 4 cores at 2 GHz: Cortex-A55 - 4 cores at 2.5 GHz: Cortex-A78 |
| L3 cache | - | 4 MB |
| Manufacturing | TSMC | TSMC |
| Lithography process | 6 nanometers | 4 nanometers |
| Neural processor (NPU) | Hexagon | MediaTek APU 655 |
| Graphics | Adreno 610 | Mali-G615 MP2 |
| GPU shading units | 128 | 256 |
| GPU clock | 950 MHz | 1047 MHz |
| FLOPS | ~243.2 GFLOPS | ~536.1 GFLOPS |
Benchmarks
Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)
Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)
Compute Score (GPU)
| Compute Score (GPU) | 387 | - |
| Single-core score | 484 | 1050 |
| Multi-core score | 1558 | 3102 |
AnTuTu Benchmark 11
| CPU | 200538 | 321298 |
| GPU | 29602 | 104848 |
| Memory | 114287 | 178637 |
| UX | 138620 | 223268 |
| Total score | 511632 | 828051 |
| Samples | Less than 3 | [5 tests] |
Recent User Tests
Xiaomi Poco Pad C1
| Date | Benchmark | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 📘 2026-07-04 (NiK0nvs) | Geekbench 6 CPU | 484 / 1558 |
Samsung Galaxy Tab A11+ (Plus)
| Date | Benchmark | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 📘 2026-06-08 (nghia) | AnTuTu 11 | 821867 |
| 📘 2026-06-08 (nghia) | AnTuTu 11 | 807986 |
| 📘 2026-04-23 (SAGM) | AnTuTu 11 | 881208 |
| 📘 2026-03-21 -> nazarkasiian | AnTuTu 11 | 828051 |
| 📘 2026-02-14 (May) | AnTuTu 11 | 838918 |
Memory
Configuration
| RAM size | 4 GB | 6 GB |
| Memory type | LPDDR4X | LPDDR4X |
| Memory clock | 2133 MHz | 2133 MHz |
| Channels | 2 | 2 |
| Storage size | 64 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 2.2 | UFS 2.2 |
| Memory card | MicroSD | MicroSD |
| Memory card max size | Up to 2048 GB | Up to 2048 GB |
Software
| Operating system | Android 16 | Android 16 |
| ROM | - | One UI 8.0 |
| OS size | - | 28.03 GB |
| OS updates | - | 5 years |
Battery
| Capacity | 7600 mAh | 7040 mAh |
| Max charge power | 18 W | 25 W |
| Battery type | Li-Po | Li-Ion |
| Replaceable | No | No |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Reverse charging | No | No |
| Bypass charging | No | - |
| Fast charging | Yes | Yes (50% in 60 min) |
| Full charging time | - | 2:05 hr |
| Battery cycles | - | 1200 cycles |
Main camera
| Matrix | 8 megapixels | 8 megapixels |
| Image resolution | 3264 x 2448 | - |
| Zoom | Digital | Digital |
| Flash | No | No |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
| 8K video recording | No | No |
| 4K video recording | No | No |
| 1080p video recording | Up to 30FPS | Up to 30FPS |
| Slow motion | No | No |
| Lenses | 1) Standard: 8 MP |
1) Standard: 8 MP |
| Camera features | - Bokeh mode | - |
| Image resolution | 8 MP | 8 MP |
| Aperture | f/2.0 | - |
| Sensor size | 1/4.0" (≈ 0.25 inch) | - |
| Pixel size | 1.12 micron | - |
| Autofocus | Phase autofocus | Phase autofocus |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
Selfie camera
| Megapixels | 5 megapixels | 5 megapixels |
| Aperture | f/2.2 | - |
| Sensor | CMOS | CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/5.0" (≈ 0.2 inch) | - |
| Pixel size | 1.12 micron | - |
| Autofocus | No | No |
| Stabilization | Digital | No |
| Video resolution | 1080p (Full HD) at 30 FPS | 1080p (Full HD) at 30 FPS |
| Depth sensor (TOF 3D) | No | No |
Connectivity
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 5 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac) | Wi-Fi 5 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac) |
| Wi-Fi features | - Dual Band - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
- Dual Band - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
| Bluetooth version | 5 | 5.1 |
| Bluetooth features | LE | LE |
| USB type | USB Type-C | USB Type-C |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| USB features | - Charging - USB-Storage mode - OTG |
- Charging - USB-Storage mode |
| DisplayPort | No | Yes |
| GPS | - | GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS |
| NFC* | No | No |
| Infrared port | No | No |
| Number of SIM* | - | 1 |
| Type of SIM card | No | Nano |
| eSIM support* | No | Yes |
| Hybrid slot | No | No |
| 5G support | No | Yes |
Sound
| Speakers | Stereo | 4.0 |
| Headphone audio jack | Yes | Yes |
| FM radio | No | No |
| Dolby Atmos | - | Yes |
Speakers test
Max loudness
Other
| Category | Budget | Mid-range |
| Announced | May 2026 | September 2025 |
| Release date | May 2026 | December 2025 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | - | $249 |
| Sensors | - Proximity sensor - Accelerometer |
- Proximity sensor - Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Ambient light sensor - Compass |
| Bundled charger | Yes, 18 W | Not included |
*Disclaimer! NFC, GSM network support, and some other specs can be different depending on the country.
Conclusion
If the display, camera, and design are more important to you, then choose the Xiaomi Poco Pad C1. But if the performance, gaming, battery life, and connectivity are more of a priority – go for the Samsung Galaxy Tab A11+ (Plus).
Cast your vote
Total votes: 2