Xiaomi Poco Pad M1 vs Honor Pad X10 Pro Max
68
out of 100
VS
60
out of 100
Here we compared two mid-range tablets: the 12.1-inch Xiaomi Poco Pad M1 (with Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 4) that was released on November 26, 2025, against the Honor Pad X10 Pro Max, which is powered by Qualcomm Snapdragon 6s 4G Gen 2 and came out 10 months after. On this page, you will find tests, full specs, strengths, and weaknesses of each of the devices.
Select the amount of RAM to evaluate performance and value for money more precisely
Key differences
Reasons to consider the Xiaomi Poco Pad M1
- Thinner bezels – 78.9% more screen real estate
- Has a 9.1 inches larger screen size
- 2.1x better performance in AnTuTu Benchmark (1054K versus 512K)
- Comes with 1900 mAh larger battery capacity: 12000 vs 10100 mAh
- Newer Bluetooth version (v5.4)
- Compatible with Wi-Fi 6 wireless networks
- Has 33% more RAM: 8GB versus 6GB
- Smaller footprint: 11% more compact case (78.7 vs 88.8 square inches)
Reasons to consider the Honor Pad X10 Pro Max
- 294% higher pixel density (982 vs 249 PPI)
- More recent OS version: Android 16 versus 15
- Supports higher wattage charging (45W versus 33W)
Review
Display
Screen quality, color accuracy, brightness
Camera
Photo and video recording quality
Performance
CPU and memory performance (apps, system)
Gaming
Capabilities for playing modern games
Battery
Battery life, charging type and speed
Connectivity
Networks, ports, data transmission
Scores with a red asterisk (*) are approximate and may change in the future as we gather more data.
Select your primary usage scenario to get a more accurate NanoReview Score
Value for money (Beta)
Tests and specifications
Comparison table of technical specifications and testsDisplay
| Type | IPS LCD | TFT LCD |
| Size | 12.1 inches | 3 inches |
| Resolution | 1600 x 2560 pixels | 1560 x 2500 pixels |
| Aspect ratio | 16:10 | 16:10 |
| PPI | 249 ppi | 982 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Adaptive refresh rate | Yes (30-120 Hz) | Yes (60-120 Hz) |
| Max rated brightness | - | 700 nits |
| Max rated brightness in HDR | 650 nits | - |
| HDR support | Yes, Dolby Vision | No |
| Touch sampling rate | 360 Hz | - |
| Screen protection | Tempered glass | Tempered glass |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 83.5% | 4.6% |
| RGB color space | 97% | - |
| PWM | Not detected | - |
| Response time | 30 ms | - |
| Contrast | 1676:1 | - |
Screen space comparison
Poco Pad M1
12.1″ (16:10 ratio) = 65.8 in2
Pad X10 Pro Max
3″ (16:10 ratio) = 4 in2
~1526% more screen space
Peak brightness test (auto)
Design and build
| Height | 279.8 mm (11.02 inches) | 297.6 mm (11.72 inches) |
| Width | 181.65 mm (7.15 inches) | 192.7 mm (7.59 inches) |
| Thickness | 7.5 mm (0.3 inches) | 6.7 mm (0.26 inches) |
| Weight | 610 g (21.52 oz) | 618 g (21.8 oz) |
| Waterproof | No | No |
| Rear material | Metal | Metal |
| Frame material | Metal | Metal |
| Colors | Gray, Blue | Gray, Green |
| Fingerprint scanner | No | No |
| Area | 508 cm2 (78.8 inches2) | 573 cm2 (89 inches2) |
| Repairability | Average (2.74/5) | - |
| Drop resistance | Very good (B) · 208 drops | - |
Visual size comparison
Screen-to-body ratio
Tablet Ranking (83rd and 108th place)
Android Tablet Ranking (64th and 83rd place)
Performance
| Chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 4 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 6s 4G Gen 2 |
| Max clock | 2700 MHz | 2800 MHz |
| CPU cores | 8 (1 + 3 + 4) | 8 (4 + 4) |
| Architecture | - 4 cores at 1.8 GHz: Kryo Silver (Cortex-A520) - 3 cores at 2.4 GHz: Kryo Gold (Cortex-A720) - 1 core at 2.7 GHz: Kryo Prime (Cortex-A720) |
- 4 cores at 1.9 GHz: Cortex-A53 - 4 cores at 2.9 GHz: Cortex-A73 |
| Manufacturing | TSMC | TSMC |
| Lithography process | 4 nanometers | 6 nanometers |
| Neural processor (NPU) | Yes | Hexagon |
| Graphics | Adreno 810 | Adreno 610 |
| GPU shading units | 256 | 128 |
| GPU clock | 895 MHz | 950 MHz |
| FLOPS | ~458.2 GFLOPS | ~243.2 GFLOPS |
Benchmarks
Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)
Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)
Compute Score (GPU)
| Compute Score (GPU) | 4785 | 384 |
| Single-core score | 1237 | 489 |
| Multi-core score | 3281 | 1495 |
AnTuTu Benchmark 11
| CPU | 415572 | 194043 |
| GPU | 192123 | 29794 |
| Memory | 160447 | 149877 |
| UX | 286059 | 138777 |
| Total score | 1054201 | 512491 |
| Samples | [2 tests] | Less than 3 |
Recent User Tests
Xiaomi Poco Pad M1
| Date | Benchmark | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 📘 2026-05-05 (Joanderson) | AnTuTu 11 | 1035342 |
| 📘 2026-04-09 (Clyjow) | AnTuTu 11 | 1054201 |
Honor Pad X10 Pro Max
No benchmark results yet
Memory
Configuration
| RAM size | 8 GB | 6 GB |
| Memory type | LPDDR4X | LPDDR4X |
| Memory clock | 2133 MHz | 2133 MHz |
| Channels | 2 | 2 |
| Storage size | 256 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 2.2 | UFS 2.2 |
| Memory card | MicroSD | MicroSD |
| Memory card max size | Up to 2048 GB | Up to 1024 GB |
Software
| Operating system | Android 15 | Android 16 |
| ROM | HyperOS 2.0 | MagicOS 10 |
| OS updates | 5 years | - |
Battery
| Capacity | 12000 mAh | 10100 mAh |
| Max charge power | 33 W | 45 W |
| Battery type | Li-Po | Li-Po |
| Replaceable | No | No |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Reverse charging | Yes | No |
| Bypass charging | No | No |
| Fast charging | Yes (50% in 77 min) | Yes |
| Full charging time | 2:45 hr | - |
| Battery cycles | 1000 cycles | - |
Main camera
| Matrix | 8 megapixels | 5 megapixels |
| Image resolution | 3264 x 2448 | 2592 x 1944 |
| Zoom | Digital | Digital |
| Flash | No | No |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
| 8K video recording | No | No |
| 4K video recording | No | No |
| 1080p video recording | Up to 30FPS | Up to 30FPS |
| Slow motion | No | No |
| Lenses | 1) Standard: 8 MP |
1) Standard: 5 MP |
| Camera features | - | - |
| Image resolution | 8 MP | 5 MP |
| Aperture | f/2.0 | f/2.2 |
| Sensor size | 1/4" (≈ 0.25 inch) | - |
| Pixel size | 1.12 micron | - |
| Autofocus | Phase autofocus | Phase autofocus |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
Selfie camera
| Megapixels | 8 megapixels | 5 megapixels |
| Image resolution | 3264 x 2448 | 2592 x 1944 |
| Aperture | f/2.2 | f/2.2 |
| Focal length | 17 mm | - |
| Sensor | CMOS | - |
| Sensor size | 1/5.0" (≈ 0.2 inch) | - |
| Pixel size | 1.12 micron | - |
| Autofocus | No | No |
| Stabilization | No | Digital |
| Video resolution | 1080p (Full HD) at 30 FPS | 1080p (Full HD) at 30 FPS |
| Depth sensor (TOF 3D) | No | No |
Connectivity
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 6 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax) | Wi-Fi 5 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac) |
| Wi-Fi features | - Dual Band - Wi-Fi MiMO - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
- Dual Band - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
| Bluetooth version | 5.4 | 5.1 |
| Bluetooth features | LE | LE |
| USB type | USB Type-C | USB Type-C |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| USB features | - Charging - USB-Storage mode - OTG |
- Charging - USB-Storage mode - OTG |
| DisplayPort | No | No |
| GPS | - | GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo |
| NFC* | No | No |
| Infrared port | No | No |
| Type of SIM card | No | No |
| eSIM support* | No | No |
| Hybrid slot | No | No |
| 5G support | No | No |
Sound
| Speakers | 4.0 | 4.0 |
| Headphone audio jack | Yes | No |
| FM radio | No | No |
| Dolby Atmos | Yes | No |
Speakers test
Max loudness
Other
| Category | Mid-range | Mid-range |
| Announced | November 2025 | September 2026 |
| Release date | November 2025 | September 2026 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $329 | $280 |
| Sensors | - Proximity sensor - Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Ambient light sensor - Compass |
- Accelerometer |
| Bundled charger | Yes, 33 W | Not included |
*Disclaimer! NFC, GSM network support, and some other specs can be different depending on the country.
Conclusion
After analyzing all the data, we think that the Xiaomi Poco Pad M1 is definitely a better buy.
Cast your vote
Total votes: < 1