Xiaomi Poco Pad M1 vs Xiaomi Poco Pad

68 out of 100
Xiaomi Poco Pad M1
VS
64 out of 100
Xiaomi Poco Pad

Here we compared two mid-range tablets: the 12.1-inch Xiaomi Poco Pad M1 (with Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 4) that was released on November 26, 2025, against the Xiaomi Poco Pad, which is powered by Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 2 and came out 1 year and 6 months before. On this page, you will find tests, full specs, strengths, and weaknesses of each of the devices.

Key differences

An overview of the main advantages of each tablet
Reasons to consider the Xiaomi Poco Pad M1
  • Comes with 2000 mAh larger battery capacity: 12000 vs 10000 mAh
  • 35% better performance in AnTuTu Benchmark (1054K versus 778K)
  • Newer Bluetooth version (v5.4)
  • More recent OS version: Android 15 versus 14
  • 20% faster in single-core GeekBench 6 test: 1237 and 1032 points

Review

Evaluation of Xiaomi Poco Pad M1 and Poco Pad crucial features
Display
Screen quality, color accuracy, brightness
Camera
Photo and video recording quality
Performance
CPU and memory performance (apps, system)
Gaming
Capabilities for playing modern games
Battery
Battery life, charging type and speed
Connectivity
Networks, ports, data transmission
Scores with a red asterisk (*) are approximate and may change in the future as we gather more data.
NanoReview Score
Final comparison evaluation
Select your primary usage scenario to get a more accurate NanoReview Score
πŸ“± Primary usage:

Value for money (Beta)

To get an accurate value-for-money index, update the default prices with actual prices from your country’s retailers (for the selected memory configs) and press the "Calculate" button.
Currency
8 / 256 GB
VS
8 / 256 GB
85.0
(Very good)
Value Index
73.8
(Good)

Tests and specifications

Comparison table of technical specifications and tests
Tablet:
vs

Display

Type IPS LCD IPS LCD
Size 12.1 inches 12.1 inches
Resolution 1600 x 2560 pixels 1600 x 2560 pixels
Aspect ratio 16:10 16:10
PPI 249 ppi 249 ppi
Refresh rate 120 Hz 120 Hz
Adaptive refresh rate Yes (30-120 Hz) No
Max rated brightness - 600 nits
Max rated brightness in HDR 650 nits -
HDR support Yes, Dolby Vision Yes, Dolby Vision
Touch sampling rate 360 Hz -
Screen protection Tempered glass Corning Gorilla Glass 3
Screen-to-body ratio 83.5% 83.4%
Display features - - DCI-P3
Display tests
RGB color space 97% -
PWM Not detected -
Response time 30 ms -
Contrast 1676:1 -
Peak brightness test (auto)
572 nits
n/a
Sources: NotebookCheck [3]

Design and build

Height 279.8 mm (11.02 inches) 280 mm (11.02 inches)
Width 181.65 mm (7.15 inches) 181.85 mm (7.16 inches)
Thickness 7.5 mm (0.3 inches) 7.52 mm (0.3 inches)
Weight 610 g (21.52 oz) 571 g (20.14 oz)
Waterproof No -
Rear material Metal Metal
Frame material Metal Metal
Colors Gray, Blue Gray, Blue
Fingerprint scanner No No
Area 508 cm2 (78.8 inches2) 509 cm2 (78.9 inches2)
Repairability Average (2.74/5) -
Drop resistance Very good (B) Β· 208 drops -
Screen-to-body ratio
83.5%
83.4%
Tablet Ranking (70th and 85th place)
Android Tablet Ranking (52nd and 64th place)

Performance

Chipset specifications of Xiaomi Poco Pad M1 and Xiaomi Poco Pad
SoC
Chipset Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 4 Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 2
Max clock 2700 MHz 2400 MHz
CPU cores 8 (1 + 3 + 4) 8 (4 + 4)
Architecture - 4 cores at 1.8 GHz: Kryo Silver (Cortex-A520)
- 3 cores at 2.4 GHz: Kryo Gold (Cortex-A720)
- 1 core at 2.7 GHz: Kryo Prime (Cortex-A720)
- 4 cores at 1.95 GHz: Cortex-A55
- 4 cores at 2.4 GHz: Cortex-A78
Manufacturing TSMC Samsung
Lithography process 4 nanometers 4 nanometers
Neural processor (NPU) Yes Yes
GPU
Graphics Adreno 810 Adreno 710
GPU shading units 256 256
GPU clock 895 MHz 940 MHz
FLOPS ~458.2 GFLOPS ~481.3 GFLOPS

Benchmarks

Benchmark comparison of Xiaomi Poco Pad M1 and Xiaomi Poco Pad
Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)
1237
1032
Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)
3281
2976
Compute Score (GPU)
Poco Pad M1 +107%
4785
2314
Compute Score (GPU) 4785 2314
Single-core score 1237 1032
Multi-core score 3281 2976
Sources: Geekbench [3], [4]
AnTuTu Benchmark 11
1054201
778166
CPU 415572 297225
GPU 192123 73188
Memory 160447 152467
UX 286059 255286
Total score 1054201 778166
Samples [2 tests] [2 tests]
PCMark 3.0
12964
Web score - 13631
Video editing - 6946
Photo editing - 24734
Data manipulation - 11507
Writing score - 13590

Recent User Tests

The latest benchmark tests that have been submitted by users
Xiaomi Poco Pad M1
DateBenchmarkResult
πŸ“˜ 2026-05-05 (Joanderson)AnTuTu1035342
πŸ“˜ 2026-04-09 (Clyjow)AnTuTu1054201
Xiaomi Poco Pad
DateBenchmarkResult
πŸ“˜ 2026-03-29 (SRG)GeekBench CPU1025 / 2768
πŸ“˜ 2026-03-28 (SRG)AnTuTu770063
πŸ“˜ 2026-01-15 (Jeff)AnTuTu778166
πŸ“˜ 2025-04-20 (Vxmpiri)GeekBench GPU2314
πŸ“˜ 2025-04-20 (Vxmpiri)GeekBench CPU1032 / 2976

Memory

Configuration
RAM
RAM size 8 GB 8 GB
Memory type LPDDR4X LPDDR4X
Memory clock 2133 MHz 2133 MHz
Channels 2 2
Storage
Storage size 256 GB 256 GB
Storage type UFS 2.2 UFS 2.2
Memory card MicroSD MicroSD
Memory card max size Up to 2048 GB Up to 1024 GB

Software

Operating system Android 15 Android 14
ROM HyperOS 2.0 HyperOS 1.0
OS updates 5 years -

Battery

Capacity 12000 mAh 10000 mAh
Max charge power 33 W 33 W
Battery type Li-Po Li-Po
Replaceable No No
Wireless charging No No
Reverse charging Yes Yes
Bypass charging No -
Fast charging Yes (50% in 77 min) Yes (29% in 30 min)
Full charging time 2:45 hr 2:00 hr
Battery cycles 1000 cycles -

Main camera

Matrix 8 megapixels 8 megapixels
Image resolution 3264 x 2448 -
Zoom Digital Digital
Flash No LED
Stabilization Digital Digital
8K video recording No No
4K video recording No No
1080p video recording Up to 30FPS Up to 30FPS
Slow motion No No
Lenses 1) Standard: 8 MP
1) Standard: 8 MP
Camera features - - Bokeh mode
Standard lens
Image resolution 8 MP 8 MP
Aperture f/2.0 f/1.8
Sensor size 1/4" (β‰ˆ 0.25 inch) 1/4.0" (β‰ˆ 0.25 inch)
Pixel size 1.12 micron 1.12 micron
Autofocus Phase autofocus Phase autofocus
Stabilization Digital Digital

Selfie camera

Megapixels 8 megapixels 8 megapixels
Image resolution 3264 x 2448 -
Aperture f/2.2 -
Focal length 17 mm -
Sensor CMOS CMOS
Sensor size 1/5.0" (β‰ˆ 0.2 inch) 1/4.0" (β‰ˆ 0.25 inch)
Pixel size 1.12 micron 1.12 micron
Autofocus No No
Stabilization No Digital
Video resolution 1080p (Full HD) at 30 FPS 1080p (Full HD) at 30 FPS
Depth sensor (TOF 3D) No No

Connectivity

Wi-Fi standard Wi-Fi 6 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax) Wi-Fi 6 (802.11 a/b/g/n/a/ac)
Wi-Fi features - Dual Band
- Wi-Fi MiMO
- Wi-Fi Direct
- Wi-Fi Hotspot
- Wi-Fi Display
- Dual Band
- Wi-Fi MiMO
- Wi-Fi Direct
- Wi-Fi Hotspot
- Wi-Fi Display
Bluetooth version 5.4 5.2
Bluetooth features LE LE
USB type USB Type-C USB Type-C
USB version 2 2
USB features - Charging
- USB-Storage mode
- OTG
- Charging
- USB-Storage mode
- OTG
DisplayPort No No
NFC* No No
Infrared port No No
Network
Number of SIM* - 1
Type of SIM card No Nano
eSIM support* No No
Hybrid slot No No
5G support No Yes

Sound

Speakers 4.0 4.0
Headphone audio jack Yes Yes
FM radio No No
Dolby Atmos Yes Yes
Speakers test
Max loudness
91.9 dB
n/a

Other

Category Mid-range Mid-range
Announced November 2025 May 2024
Release date November 2025 May 2024
Launch price (MSRP) $329 $329
Sensors - Proximity sensor
- Gyroscope
- Accelerometer
- Ambient light sensor
- Compass
- Hall-effect sensor
- Gyroscope
- Accelerometer
- Ambient light sensor
- Compass
Bundled charger Yes, 33 W Yes, 33 W
Further details
Notes on Poco Pad:
    - The 5G model has water resistance, a 128 GB memory option, and GPS. The Wi-Fi model has none of these features.
*Disclaimer! NFC, GSM network support, and some other specs can be different depending on the country.

Conclusion

These tablets have a lot in common, but we would recommend the Xiaomi Poco Pad M1. It has a better camera, performance, gaming, software, and design.

Cast your vote

So, which tablet would you choose?
45 (75%)
15 (25%)
Total votes: 60

User opinions

You can share your opinion or ask a question in the comments below
🌐 Register your profile and become part of NanoReview community!