Xiaomi Redmi Pad 2 Pro vs Xiaomi Poco Pad M1

66 out of 100
Xiaomi Redmi Pad 2 Pro
VS
68 out of 100
Xiaomi Poco Pad M1

Here we compared two mid-range tablets: the 12.1-inch Xiaomi Redmi Pad 2 Pro (with Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 4) that was released on September 24, 2025, against the Xiaomi Poco Pad M1, which is powered by the same chip and came out 2 months after. On this page, you will find tests, full specs, strengths, and weaknesses of each of the devices.

Select the amount of RAM to evaluate performance and value for money more precisely
Memory
8 / 256 GB

Key differences

An overview of the main advantages of each tablet
Reasons to consider the Xiaomi Poco Pad M1
  • Has 33% more RAM: 8GB versus 6GB

Review

Evaluation of Xiaomi Redmi Pad 2 Pro and Poco Pad M1 crucial features
Display
Screen quality, color accuracy, brightness
Camera
Photo and video recording quality
Performance
CPU and memory performance (apps, system)
Gaming
Capabilities for playing modern games
Battery
Battery life, charging type and speed
Connectivity
Networks, ports, data transmission
Scores with a red asterisk (*) are approximate and may change in the future as we gather more data.
NanoReview Score
Final comparison evaluation
Select your primary usage scenario to get a more accurate NanoReview Score
πŸ“± Primary usage:

Value for money (Beta)

To get an accurate value-for-money index, update the default prices with actual prices from your country’s retailers (for the selected memory configs) and press the "Calculate" button.
Currency
6 / 128 GB
VS
8 / 256 GB
73.4
(Good)
Value Index
85.0
(Very good)

Tests and specifications

Comparison table of technical specifications and tests

Display

Type IPS LCD IPS LCD
Size 12.1 inches 12.1 inches
Resolution 1600 x 2560 pixels 1600 x 2560 pixels
Aspect ratio 16:10 16:10
PPI 249 ppi 249 ppi
Refresh rate 120 Hz 120 Hz
Adaptive refresh rate Yes (60-120 Hz) Yes (30-120 Hz)
Max rated brightness in HDR 650 nits 650 nits
HDR support Yes, Dolby Vision Yes, Dolby Vision
Touch sampling rate 360 Hz 360 Hz
Screen protection Tempered glass Tempered glass
Screen-to-body ratio 83.5% 83.5%
Display tests
RGB color space 96.6% 97%
PWM Not detected Not detected
Response time 28 ms 30 ms
Contrast 1764:1 1676:1
Peak brightness test (auto)
542 nits
572 nits
Sources: NotebookCheck [3], [4]

Design and build

Height 279.8 mm (11.02 inches) 279.8 mm (11.02 inches)
Width 181.7 mm (7.15 inches) 181.65 mm (7.15 inches)
Thickness 7.5 mm (0.3 inches) 7.5 mm (0.3 inches)
Weight 610 g (21.52 oz) 610 g (21.52 oz)
Waterproof No No
Rear material Metal Metal
Frame material Metal Metal
Colors Silver, Gray, Purple Gray, Blue
Fingerprint scanner No No
Area 508 cm2 (78.8 inches2) 508 cm2 (78.8 inches2)
Repairability Average (2.74/5) Average (2.74/5)
Drop resistance Very good (B) Β· 208 drops Very good (B) Β· 208 drops
Screen-to-body ratio
Tablet Ranking (78th and 70th place)
Android Tablet Ranking (59th and 52nd place)

Performance

Chipset specifications of Xiaomi Redmi Pad 2 Pro and Xiaomi Poco Pad M1
SoC
Chipset Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 4 Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 4
Max clock 2700 MHz 2700 MHz
CPU cores 8 (1 + 3 + 4) 8 (1 + 3 + 4)
Architecture - 4 cores at 1.8 GHz: Kryo Silver (Cortex-A520)
- 3 cores at 2.4 GHz: Kryo Gold (Cortex-A720)
- 1 core at 2.7 GHz: Kryo Prime (Cortex-A720)
- 4 cores at 1.8 GHz: Kryo Silver (Cortex-A520)
- 3 cores at 2.4 GHz: Kryo Gold (Cortex-A720)
- 1 core at 2.7 GHz: Kryo Prime (Cortex-A720)
Manufacturing TSMC TSMC
Lithography process 4 nanometers 4 nanometers
Neural processor (NPU) Yes Yes
GPU
Graphics Adreno 810 Adreno 810
GPU shading units 256 256
GPU clock 895 MHz 895 MHz
FLOPS ~458.2 GFLOPS ~458.2 GFLOPS

Benchmarks

Benchmark comparison of Xiaomi Redmi Pad 2 Pro and Xiaomi Poco Pad M1
Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)
Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)
Compute Score (GPU)
Compute Score (GPU) 4784 4785
Single-core score 1239 1237
Multi-core score 3286 3281
Sources: Geekbench [3], [4]
AnTuTu Benchmark 11
1054201
CPU 380886 415572
GPU 190421 192123
Memory 139368 160447
UX 276207 286059
Total score 986882 1054201
Samples Less than 3 [2 tests]

Recent User Tests

The latest benchmark tests that have been submitted by users
Xiaomi Redmi Pad 2 Pro
DateBenchmarkResult
πŸ“˜ 2026-04-03 (Deepa)GeekBench GPU4784
πŸ“˜ 2026-04-03 (Deepa)GeekBench CPU1239 / 3286
πŸ“˜ 2026-04-03 (Deepa)AnTuTu986882
Xiaomi Poco Pad M1
DateBenchmarkResult
πŸ“˜ 2026-05-05 (Joanderson)AnTuTu1035342
πŸ“˜ 2026-04-09 (Clyjow)AnTuTu1054201

Memory

Configuration
RAM
RAM size 6 GB 8 GB
Memory type LPDDR4X LPDDR4X
Memory clock 2133 MHz 2133 MHz
Channels 2 2
Storage
Storage size 128 GB 256 GB
Storage type UFS 2.2 UFS 2.2
Memory card MicroSD MicroSD
Memory card max size Up to 2048 GB Up to 2048 GB

Software

Operating system Android 15 Android 15
ROM HyperOS 2.0 HyperOS 2.0
OS size 34 GB -
OS updates 0 years 5 years

Battery

Capacity 12000 mAh 12000 mAh
Max charge power 33 W 33 W
Battery type Li-Po Li-Po
Replaceable No No
Wireless charging No No
Reverse charging Yes Yes
Bypass charging - No
Fast charging Yes (30% in 30 min) Yes (50% in 77 min)
Full charging time 2:20 hr 2:45 hr
Battery cycles 1000 cycles 1000 cycles
Battery life tests
Web browsing 08:13 hr -
Watching video 11:17 hr -
Gaming 07:52 hr -
Standby 233 hr -
General battery life

Main camera

Matrix 8 megapixels 8 megapixels
Image resolution 3264 x 2448 3264 x 2448
Zoom Digital Digital
Flash No No
Stabilization Digital Digital
8K video recording No No
4K video recording No No
1080p video recording Up to 30FPS Up to 30FPS
Slow motion No No
Lenses 1) Standard: 8 MP
1) Standard: 8 MP
Camera features - -
Standard lens
Image resolution 8 MP 8 MP
Aperture f/2.0 f/2.0
Sensor size 1/4" (β‰ˆ 0.25 inch) 1/4" (β‰ˆ 0.25 inch)
Pixel size 1.12 micron 1.12 micron
Autofocus Phase autofocus Phase autofocus
Stabilization Digital Digital

Selfie camera

Megapixels 8 megapixels 8 megapixels
Image resolution 3264 x 2448 3264 x 2448
Aperture f/2.2 f/2.2
Focal length 17 mm 17 mm
Sensor CMOS CMOS
Sensor size 1/5.0" (β‰ˆ 0.2 inch) 1/5.0" (β‰ˆ 0.2 inch)
Pixel size 1.12 micron 1.12 micron
Autofocus No No
Stabilization No No
Video resolution 1080p (Full HD) at 30 FPS 1080p (Full HD) at 30 FPS
Depth sensor (TOF 3D) No No

Connectivity

Wi-Fi standard Wi-Fi 6 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax) Wi-Fi 6 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax)
Wi-Fi features - Dual Band
- Wi-Fi MiMO
- Wi-Fi Direct
- Wi-Fi Hotspot
- Wi-Fi Display
- Dual Band
- Wi-Fi MiMO
- Wi-Fi Direct
- Wi-Fi Hotspot
- Wi-Fi Display
Bluetooth version 5.4 5.4
Bluetooth features LE LE
USB type USB Type-C USB Type-C
USB version 2 2
USB features - Charging
- USB-Storage mode
- OTG
- Charging
- USB-Storage mode
- OTG
DisplayPort No No
NFC* No No
Infrared port No No
Network
Type of SIM card No No
eSIM support* No No
Hybrid slot No No
5G support No No

Sound

Speakers 4.0 4.0
Headphone audio jack Yes Yes
FM radio No No
Dolby Atmos Yes Yes
Speakers test
Max loudness
92.3 dB
91.9 dB

Other

Category Mid-range Mid-range
Announced September 2025 November 2025
Release date September 2025 November 2025
Launch price (MSRP) $299 $329
Sensors - Proximity sensor
- Gyroscope
- Accelerometer
- Ambient light sensor
- Compass
- Proximity sensor
- Gyroscope
- Accelerometer
- Ambient light sensor
- Compass
Bundled charger Yes, 33 W Yes, 33 W
*Disclaimer! NFC, GSM network support, and some other specs can be different depending on the country.

Conclusion

These tablets have a lot in common, but we would recommend the Xiaomi Poco Pad M1.

Cast your vote

So, which tablet would you choose?
30 (18.5%)
132 (81.5%)
Total votes: 162

User opinions

You can share your opinion or ask a question in the comments below
🌐 Register your profile and become part of NanoReview community!
Avatar
Omar December 23, 2025 at 12:30 PM
Why is there difference between performance in antutu test? There are bif difference (200k)
+39 Reply