Xiaomi Redmi Pad 2 9.7 vs Honor Pad X9a
Here we compared two budget tablets: the 9.7-inch Xiaomi Redmi Pad 2 9.7 (with Qualcomm Snapdragon 6s 4G Gen 2) that was released on April 28, 2026, against the Honor Pad X9a, which is powered by Qualcomm Snapdragon 685 and came out 1 year and 2 months before. On this page, you will find tests, full specs, strengths, and weaknesses of each of the devices.
Select the amount of RAM to evaluate performance and value for money more precisely
Key differences
Reasons to consider the Xiaomi Redmi Pad 2 9.7
- Expandable storage via MicroSD card up to 2048GB
- More recent OS version: Android 16 versus 15
- Much smaller footprint: 25% more compact case (51.9 vs 69.3 square inches)
- Weighs 69 grams less
- Includes a 3.5 mm headphone audio jack port
Reasons to consider the Honor Pad X9a
- Has a 1.8 inches larger screen size
- Newer Bluetooth version (v5.1)
- Comes with 700 mAh larger battery capacity: 8300 vs 7600 mAh
- Has 50% more RAM: 6GB versus 4GB
- Supports higher wattage charging (35W versus 18W)
Review
Display
Screen quality, color accuracy, brightness
Camera
Photo and video recording quality
Performance
CPU and memory performance (apps, system)
Gaming
Capabilities for playing modern games
Battery
Battery life, charging type and speed
Connectivity
Networks, ports, data transmission
Scores with a red asterisk (*) are approximate and may change in the future as we gather more data.
Select your primary usage scenario to get a more accurate NanoReview Score
Value for money (Beta)
Tests and specifications
Comparison table of technical specifications and testsDisplay
| Type | IPS LCD | TFT LCD |
| Size | 9.7 inches | 11.5 inches |
| Resolution | 1280 x 2048 pixels | 1504 x 2508 pixels |
| Aspect ratio | 8:5 | 5:3 |
| PPI | 268 ppi | 254 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Adaptive refresh rate | Yes | Yes (60-120 Hz) |
| Max rated brightness | 600 nits | 450 nits |
| HDR support | No | No |
| Screen protection | Tempered glass | Tempered glass |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 81.4% | 84.1% |
| RGB color space | 96.9% | - |
| PWM | Not detected | - |
| Response time | 30 ms | - |
| Contrast | 1045:1 | - |
Screen space comparison
Pad X9a
11.5″ (5:3 ratio) = 58.3 in2
Redmi Pad 2 9.7
9.7″ (8:5 ratio) = 42.3 in2
~37% more screen space
Peak brightness test (auto)
Design and build
| Height | 226.51 mm (8.92 inches) | 267.3 mm (10.52 inches) |
| Width | 147.97 mm (5.83 inches) | 167.4 mm (6.59 inches) |
| Thickness | 7.4 mm (0.29 inches) | 6.77 mm (0.27 inches) |
| Weight | 406 g (14.32 oz) | 475 g (16.75 oz) |
| Waterproof | No | No |
| Rear material | Metal | Metal |
| Frame material | Metal | Metal |
| Colors | Silver, Gray | Gray |
| Fingerprint scanner | No | No |
| Area | 335 cm2 (52 inches2) | 447 cm2 (69.3 inches2) |
| Repairability | - | Good (3.05/5) |
| Drop resistance | - | Bad (E) · 10 drops |
Visual size comparison
Screen-to-body ratio
Tablet Ranking (105th and 117th place)
Android Tablet Ranking (80th and 90th place)
Performance
| Chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 6s 4G Gen 2 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 685 |
| Max clock | 2900 MHz | 2800 MHz |
| CPU cores | 8 (4 + 4) | 8 (4 + 4) |
| Architecture | - 4 cores at 1.9 GHz: Cortex-A53 - 4 cores at 2.9 GHz: Cortex-A73 |
- 4 cores at 1.9 GHz: Cortex-A53 - 4 cores at 2.8 GHz: Cortex-A73 |
| Manufacturing | TSMC | TSMC |
| Lithography process | 6 nanometers | 6 nanometers |
| Neural processor (NPU) | Hexagon | Hexagon 686 |
| Graphics | Adreno 610 | Adreno 610 |
| GPU shading units | 128 | 128 |
| GPU clock | 950 MHz | 1260 MHz |
| FLOPS | ~243.2 GFLOPS | ~322.6 GFLOPS |
Benchmarks
Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)
Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)
Compute Score (GPU)
| Compute Score (GPU) | 382 | 387 |
| Single-core score | 480 | 470 |
| Multi-core score | 1549 | 1463 |
AnTuTu Benchmark 11
| CPU | 205210 | 185758 |
| GPU | 30511 | 30082 |
| Memory | 155427 | 162956 |
| UX | 169563 | 137172 |
| Total score | 560711 | 515968 |
| Samples | Less than 3 | Less than 3 |
PCMark 3.0
| Web score | - | 11364 |
| Video editing | - | 4584 |
| Photo editing | - | 16321 |
| Data manipulation | - | 7431 |
| Writing score | - | 10637 |
Recent User Tests
Xiaomi Redmi Pad 2 9.7
No benchmark results yet
Honor Pad X9a
| Date | Benchmark | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 📘 2026-08-11 (SkyBlack) | CPU Throttle | 94% |
| 📘 2026-08-11 (SkyBlack) | Geekbench 6 GPU | 385 |
| 📘 2026-08-11 (SkyBlack) | Geekbench 6 CPU | 470 / 1463 |
| 📘 2026-08-11 (SkyBlack) | AnTuTu 11 | 515968 |
Memory
Configuration
| RAM size | 4 GB | 6 GB |
| Memory type | LPDDR4X | LPDDR4X |
| Memory clock | 2133 MHz | 2133 MHz |
| Channels | 2 | 2 |
| Storage size | 64 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 2.2 | UFS 2.2 |
| Memory card | MicroSD | No |
| Memory card max size | Up to 2048 GB | - |
Software
| Operating system | Android 16 | Android 15 |
| ROM | - | MagicOS 9 |
| OS updates | 4 years | 5 years |
| Security updates | 7 years | - |
Battery
| Capacity | 7600 mAh | 8300 mAh |
| Max charge power | 18 W | 35 W |
| Battery type | Li-Po | Li-Po |
| Replaceable | No | No |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Reverse charging | No | No |
| Bypass charging | No | No |
| Fast charging | Yes | Yes |
| Full charging time | 1:35 hr | - |
| Battery cycles | - | 1200 cycles |
Main camera
| Matrix | 8 megapixels | 8 megapixels |
| Image resolution | 3264 x 2448 | - |
| Zoom | Digital | Digital |
| Flash | No | No |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
| 8K video recording | No | No |
| 4K video recording | No | No |
| 1080p video recording | Up to 30FPS | Up to 30FPS |
| Slow motion | No | No |
| Lenses | 1) Standard: 8 MP |
1) Standard: 8 MP |
| Camera features | - Bokeh mode | - |
| Image resolution | 8 MP | 8 MP |
| Aperture | f/2.0 | f/2.0 |
| Sensor size | 1/4.0" (≈ 0.25 inch) | 1/5.0" (≈ 0.2 inch) |
| Pixel size | 1.12 micron | - |
| Autofocus | Phase autofocus | Phase autofocus |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
Selfie camera
| Megapixels | 5 megapixels | 5 megapixels |
| Image resolution | - | 2592 x 1944 |
| Aperture | f/2.2 | f/2.2 |
| Sensor | CMOS | - |
| Sensor size | 1/5.0" (≈ 0.2 inch) | - |
| Pixel size | 1.12 micron | - |
| Autofocus | No | No |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
| Video resolution | 1080p (Full HD) at 30 FPS | 1080p (Full HD) at 30 FPS |
| Depth sensor (TOF 3D) | No | No |
Connectivity
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 5 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac) | Wi-Fi 5 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac) |
| Wi-Fi features | - Dual Band - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
- Dual Band - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
| Bluetooth version | 5 | 5.1 |
| Bluetooth features | LE | LE |
| USB type | USB Type-C | USB Type-C |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| USB features | - Charging - USB-Storage mode - OTG |
- Charging - USB-Storage mode - OTG |
| DisplayPort | No | No |
| NFC* | No | No |
| Infrared port | No | No |
| Type of SIM card | No | No |
| eSIM support* | No | No |
| Hybrid slot | No | No |
| 5G support | No | No |
Sound
| Speakers | Stereo | 4.0 |
| Headphone audio jack | Yes | No |
| FM radio | No | No |
| Dolby Atmos | - | No |
Speakers test
Max loudness
Other
| Category | Budget | Budget |
| Announced | April 2026 | March 2025 |
| Release date | April 2026 | March 2025 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $180 | $185 |
| Sensors | - Proximity sensor - Accelerometer |
- Accelerometer |
| Bundled charger | Yes, 18 W | Not included |
*Disclaimer! NFC, GSM network support, and some other specs can be different depending on the country.
Conclusion
After analyzing all the data, we think that the Xiaomi Redmi Pad 2 9.7 is definitely a better buy.
Cast your vote
Total votes: 2