Xiaomi Redmi Pad 2 9.7 vs Honor Pad X9a

57 out of 100
Xiaomi Redmi Pad 2 9.7
VS
52 out of 100
Honor Pad X9a

Here we compared two budget tablets: the 9.7-inch Xiaomi Redmi Pad 2 9.7 (with Qualcomm Snapdragon 6s 4G Gen 2) that was released on April 28, 2026, against the Honor Pad X9a, which is powered by Qualcomm Snapdragon 685 and came out 1 year and 2 months before. On this page, you will find tests, full specs, strengths, and weaknesses of each of the devices.

Select the amount of RAM to evaluate performance and value for money more precisely
Memory

Key differences

An overview of the main advantages of each tablet
Reasons to consider the Xiaomi Redmi Pad 2 9.7
  • Expandable storage via MicroSD card up to 2048GB
  • More recent OS version: Android 16 versus 15
  • Much smaller footprint: 25% more compact case (51.9 vs 69.3 square inches)
  • Weighs 69 grams less
  • Includes a 3.5 mm headphone audio jack port
Reasons to consider the Honor Pad X9a
  • Has a 1.8 inches larger screen size
  • Newer Bluetooth version (v5.1)
  • Comes with 700 mAh larger battery capacity: 8300 vs 7600 mAh
  • Has 50% more RAM: 6GB versus 4GB
  • Supports higher wattage charging (35W versus 18W)

Review

Evaluation of Xiaomi Redmi Pad 2 9.7 and Honor Pad X9a crucial features
Display
Screen quality, color accuracy, brightness
Camera
Photo and video recording quality
Performance
CPU and memory performance (apps, system)
Gaming
Capabilities for playing modern games
Battery
Battery life, charging type and speed
Connectivity
Networks, ports, data transmission
Scores with a red asterisk (*) are approximate and may change in the future as we gather more data.
NanoReview Score
Final comparison evaluation
Select your primary usage scenario to get a more accurate NanoReview Score
📱 Primary usage:

Value for money (Beta)

To get an accurate value-for-money index, update the default prices with actual prices from your country’s retailers (for the selected memory configs) and press the "Calculate" button.
Currency
4 / 64 GB
VS
6 / 128 GB
114.4
(Excellent)
Value Index
87.7
(Very good)

Tests and specifications

Comparison table of technical specifications and tests

Display

Type IPS LCD TFT LCD
Size 9.7 inches 11.5 inches
Resolution 1280 x 2048 pixels 1504 x 2508 pixels
Aspect ratio 8:5 5:3
PPI 268 ppi 254 ppi
Refresh rate 120 Hz 120 Hz
Adaptive refresh rate Yes Yes (60-120 Hz)
Max rated brightness 600 nits 450 nits
HDR support No No
Screen protection Tempered glass Tempered glass
Screen-to-body ratio 81.4% 84.1%
Display tests
RGB color space 96.9% -
PWM Not detected -
Response time 30 ms -
Contrast 1045:1 -
Screen space comparison
Pad X9a
11.5″ (5:3 ratio) = 58.3 in2
Redmi Pad 2 9.7
9.7″ (8:5 ratio) = 42.3 in2
~37% more screen space
Peak brightness test (auto)
416 nits
n/a
Sources: NotebookCheck [3]

Design and build

Height 226.51 mm (8.92 inches) 267.3 mm (10.52 inches)
Width 147.97 mm (5.83 inches) 167.4 mm (6.59 inches)
Thickness 7.4 mm (0.29 inches) 6.77 mm (0.27 inches)
Weight 406 g (14.32 oz) 475 g (16.75 oz)
Waterproof No No
Rear material Metal Metal
Frame material Metal Metal
Colors Silver, Gray Gray
Fingerprint scanner No No
Area 335 cm2 (52 inches2) 447 cm2 (69.3 inches2)
Repairability - Good (3.05/5)
Drop resistance - Bad (E) · 10 drops
Visual size comparison
Screen-to-body ratio
Pad X9a +3%
84.1%
Tablet Ranking (105th and 117th place)
Android Tablet Ranking (80th and 90th place)

Performance

Chipset specifications of Xiaomi Redmi Pad 2 9.7 and Honor Pad X9a
SoC
Chipset Qualcomm Snapdragon 6s 4G Gen 2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 685
Max clock 2900 MHz 2800 MHz
CPU cores 8 (4 + 4) 8 (4 + 4)
Architecture - 4 cores at 1.9 GHz: Cortex-A53
- 4 cores at 2.9 GHz: Cortex-A73
- 4 cores at 1.9 GHz: Cortex-A53
- 4 cores at 2.8 GHz: Cortex-A73
Manufacturing TSMC TSMC
Lithography process 6 nanometers 6 nanometers
Neural processor (NPU) Hexagon Hexagon 686
GPU
Graphics Adreno 610 Adreno 610
GPU shading units 128 128
GPU clock 950 MHz 1260 MHz
FLOPS ~243.2 GFLOPS ~322.6 GFLOPS

Benchmarks

Benchmark comparison of Xiaomi Redmi Pad 2 9.7 and Honor Pad X9a
Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)
480
470
Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)
1549
1463
Compute Score (GPU)
Pad X9a +1%
387
Compute Score (GPU) 382 387
Single-core score 480 470
Multi-core score 1549 1463
Sources: Geekbench [3]
AnTuTu Benchmark 11
560711
515968
CPU 205210 185758
GPU 30511 30082
Memory 155427 162956
UX 169563 137172
Total score 560711 515968
Samples Less than 3 Less than 3
PCMark 3.0
Web score - 11364
Video editing - 4584
Photo editing - 16321
Data manipulation - 7431
Writing score - 10637

Recent User Tests

The latest benchmark tests that have been submitted by users
Xiaomi Redmi Pad 2 9.7
No benchmark results yet
Honor Pad X9a
DateBenchmarkResult
📘 2026-08-11 (SkyBlack)CPU Throttle94%
📘 2026-08-11 (SkyBlack)Geekbench 6 GPU385
📘 2026-08-11 (SkyBlack)Geekbench 6 CPU470 / 1463
📘 2026-08-11 (SkyBlack)AnTuTu 11515968

Memory

Configuration
RAM
RAM size 4 GB 6 GB
Memory type LPDDR4X LPDDR4X
Memory clock 2133 MHz 2133 MHz
Channels 2 2
Storage
Storage size 64 GB 128 GB
Storage type UFS 2.2 UFS 2.2
Memory card MicroSD No
Memory card max size Up to 2048 GB -

Software

Operating system Android 16 Android 15
ROM - MagicOS 9
OS updates 4 years 5 years
Security updates 7 years -

Battery

Capacity 7600 mAh 8300 mAh
Max charge power 18 W 35 W
Battery type Li-Po Li-Po
Replaceable No No
Wireless charging No No
Reverse charging No No
Bypass charging No No
Fast charging Yes Yes
Full charging time 1:35 hr -
Battery cycles - 1200 cycles

Main camera

Matrix 8 megapixels 8 megapixels
Image resolution 3264 x 2448 -
Zoom Digital Digital
Flash No No
Stabilization Digital Digital
8K video recording No No
4K video recording No No
1080p video recording Up to 30FPS Up to 30FPS
Slow motion No No
Lenses 1) Standard: 8 MP
1) Standard: 8 MP
Camera features - Bokeh mode -
Standard lens
Image resolution 8 MP 8 MP
Aperture f/2.0 f/2.0
Sensor size 1/4.0" (≈ 0.25 inch) 1/5.0" (≈ 0.2 inch)
Pixel size 1.12 micron -
Autofocus Phase autofocus Phase autofocus
Stabilization Digital Digital

Selfie camera

Megapixels 5 megapixels 5 megapixels
Image resolution - 2592 x 1944
Aperture f/2.2 f/2.2
Sensor CMOS -
Sensor size 1/5.0" (≈ 0.2 inch) -
Pixel size 1.12 micron -
Autofocus No No
Stabilization Digital Digital
Video resolution 1080p (Full HD) at 30 FPS 1080p (Full HD) at 30 FPS
Depth sensor (TOF 3D) No No

Connectivity

Wi-Fi standard Wi-Fi 5 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac) Wi-Fi 5 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac)
Wi-Fi features - Dual Band
- Wi-Fi Direct
- Wi-Fi Hotspot
- Wi-Fi Display
- Dual Band
- Wi-Fi Direct
- Wi-Fi Hotspot
- Wi-Fi Display
Bluetooth version 5 5.1
Bluetooth features LE LE
USB type USB Type-C USB Type-C
USB version 2 2
USB features - Charging
- USB-Storage mode
- OTG
- Charging
- USB-Storage mode
- OTG
DisplayPort No No
NFC* No No
Infrared port No No
Network
Type of SIM card No No
eSIM support* No No
Hybrid slot No No
5G support No No

Sound

Speakers Stereo 4.0
Headphone audio jack Yes No
FM radio No No
Dolby Atmos - No
Speakers test
Max loudness
84.3 dB
n/a

Other

Category Budget Budget
Announced April 2026 March 2025
Release date April 2026 March 2025
Launch price (MSRP) $180 $185
Sensors - Proximity sensor
- Accelerometer
- Accelerometer
Bundled charger Yes, 18 W Not included
*Disclaimer! NFC, GSM network support, and some other specs can be different depending on the country.

Conclusion

After analyzing all the data, we think that the Xiaomi Redmi Pad 2 9.7 is definitely a better buy.

Cast your vote

So, which tablet would you choose?
0 (0%)
2 (100%)
Total votes: 2

User opinions

You can share your opinion or ask a question in the comments below
🌐 Register your profile and become part of NanoReview community!