Xiaomi Redmi Pad 2 9.7 vs Xiaomi Redmi Pad 2

57 out of 100
Xiaomi Redmi Pad 2 9.7
VS
56 out of 100
Xiaomi Redmi Pad 2

Here we compared two tablets: the 9.7-inch Xiaomi Redmi Pad 2 9.7 (with Qualcomm Snapdragon 6s 4G Gen 2) that was released on April 28, 2026, against the Xiaomi Redmi Pad 2, which is powered by MediaTek Helio G100 Ultra and came out 11 months before. On this page, you will find tests, full specs, strengths, and weaknesses of each of the devices.

Select the amount of RAM to evaluate performance and value for money more precisely
Memory

Key differences

An overview of the main advantages of each tablet
Reasons to consider the Xiaomi Redmi Pad 2 9.7
  • Higher display refresh rate – 120 Hz
  • More recent OS version: Android 16 versus 15
  • Much smaller footprint: 21% more compact case (51.9 vs 65.6 square inches)
  • Weighs 104 grams less
Reasons to consider the Xiaomi Redmi Pad 2
  • Has a 1.3 inches larger screen size
  • Comes with 1400 mAh larger battery capacity: 9000 vs 7600 mAh
  • Delivers 26% higher peak brightness (526 against 416 nits)
  • Newer Bluetooth version (v5.3)
  • 51% faster in single-core GeekBench 6 test: 725 and 480 points

Review

Evaluation of Xiaomi Redmi Pad 2 9.7 and Pad 2 crucial features
Display
Screen quality, color accuracy, brightness
Camera
Photo and video recording quality
Performance
CPU and memory performance (apps, system)
Gaming
Capabilities for playing modern games
Battery
Battery life, charging type and speed
Connectivity
Networks, ports, data transmission
Scores with a red asterisk (*) are approximate and may change in the future as we gather more data.
NanoReview Score
Final comparison evaluation
Select your primary usage scenario to get a more accurate NanoReview Score
πŸ“± Primary usage:

Value for money (Beta)

To get an accurate value-for-money index, update the default prices with actual prices from your country’s retailers (for the selected memory configs) and press the "Calculate" button.
Currency
4 / 64 GB
VS
4 / 128 GB
114.4
(Excellent)
Value Index
113.0
(Excellent)

Tests and specifications

Comparison table of technical specifications and tests

Display

Type IPS LCD IPS LCD
Size 9.7 inches 11 inches
Resolution 1280 x 2048 pixels 1600 x 2560 pixels
Aspect ratio 8:5 16:10
PPI 268 ppi 274 ppi
Refresh rate 120 Hz 90 Hz
Adaptive refresh rate Yes No
Max rated brightness 600 nits 600 nits
HDR support No No
Touch sampling rate - 360 Hz
Screen protection Tempered glass Tempered glass
Screen-to-body ratio 81.4% 83%
Display tests
RGB color space 96.9% 92.5%
PWM Not detected 14999 Hz
Response time 30 ms 29 ms
Contrast 1045:1 1421:1
Screen space comparison
Redmi Pad 2
11β€³ (16:10 ratio) = 54.4 in2
Redmi Pad 2 9.7
9.7β€³ (8:5 ratio) = 42.3 in2
~28% more screen space
Peak brightness test (auto)
416 nits
526 nits
Sources: NotebookCheck [3], [4]

Design and build

Height 226.51 mm (8.92 inches) 254.58 mm (10.02 inches)
Width 147.97 mm (5.83 inches) 166.04 mm (6.54 inches)
Thickness 7.4 mm (0.29 inches) 7.36 mm (0.29 inches)
Weight 406 g (14.32 oz) 510 g (17.99 oz)
Waterproof No No
Rear material Metal Metal
Frame material Metal Metal
Colors Silver, Gray Gray, Green, Purple
Fingerprint scanner No No
Area 335 cm2 (52 inches2) 423 cm2 (65.5 inches2)
Repairability - Average (2.74/5)
Drop resistance - Good (C) Β· 156 drops
Visual size comparison
Screen-to-body ratio
Tablet Ranking (105th and 106th place)
Android Tablet Ranking (80th and 81st place)

Performance

Chipset specifications of Xiaomi Redmi Pad 2 9.7 and Xiaomi Redmi Pad 2
SoC
Chipset Qualcomm Snapdragon 6s 4G Gen 2 MediaTek Helio G100 Ultra
Max clock 2900 MHz 2200 MHz
CPU cores 8 (4 + 4) 8 (2 + 6)
Architecture - 4 cores at 1.9 GHz: Cortex-A53
- 4 cores at 2.9 GHz: Cortex-A73
- 6 cores at 2 GHz: Cortex-A55
- 2 cores at 2.2 GHz: Cortex-A76
Manufacturing TSMC TSMC
Lithography process 6 nanometers 6 nanometers
Neural processor (NPU) Hexagon Yes
GPU
Graphics Adreno 610 Mali-G57 MP2
GPU shading units 128 64
GPU clock 950 MHz 1000 MHz
FLOPS ~243.2 GFLOPS ~128 GFLOPS

Benchmarks

Benchmark comparison of Xiaomi Redmi Pad 2 9.7 and Xiaomi Redmi Pad 2
Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)
Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)
1980
Compute Score (GPU)
Redmi Pad 2 +230%
1260
Compute Score (GPU) 382 1260
Single-core score 480 725
Multi-core score 1549 1980
Sources: Geekbench [3]
AnTuTu Benchmark 11
570469
CPU 205210 219481
GPU 30511 48406
Memory 155427 146071
UX 169563 156511
Total score 560711 570469
Samples Less than 3 [74 tests]
PCMark 3.0
Web score - 10522
Video editing - 5262
Photo editing - 17642
Data manipulation - 7941
Writing score - 11407

Recent User Tests

The latest benchmark tests that have been submitted by users
Xiaomi Redmi Pad 2 9.7
No benchmark results yet
Xiaomi Redmi Pad 2
DateBenchmarkResult
πŸ“˜ 2026-10-03 (Zyraku)AnTuTu 12649124
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-24 (Max)AnTuTu 12645861
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-12 (Maksik)AnTuTu 12634343
πŸ“˜ 2026-04-24 (Mentos_uzbek)Battery lifeSOT 11:48 / 41:40

Memory

Configuration
RAM
RAM size 4 GB 4 GB
Memory type LPDDR4X LPDDR4X
Memory clock 2133 MHz 2133 MHz
Channels 2 2
Storage
Storage size 64 GB 128 GB
Storage type UFS 2.2 UFS 2.2
Memory card MicroSD MicroSD
Memory card max size Up to 2048 GB Up to 2048 GB

Software

Operating system Android 16 Android 15
ROM - HyperOS 2.0
OS size - 24 GB
OS updates 4 years 0 years
Security updates 7 years -

Battery

Capacity 7600 mAh 9000 mAh
Max charge power 18 W 18 W
Battery type Li-Po Li-Po
Replaceable No No
Wireless charging No No
Reverse charging No -
Bypass charging No -
Fast charging Yes Yes (17% in 30 min)
Full charging time 1:35 hr 2:59 hr
Battery cycles - 1000 cycles
Battery life tests
Web browsing - 08:38 hr
Watching video - 09:17 hr
Gaming - 06:30 hr
Standby - 233 hr
General battery life

Main camera

Matrix 8 megapixels 8 megapixels
Image resolution 3264 x 2448 3264 x 2448
Zoom Digital Digital
Flash No No
Stabilization Digital Digital
8K video recording No No
4K video recording No No
1080p video recording Up to 30FPS Up to 30FPS
Slow motion No No
Lenses 1) Standard: 8 MP
1) Standard: 8 MP
Camera features - Bokeh mode -
Standard lens
Image resolution 8 MP 8 MP
Aperture f/2.0 f/2.0
Sensor - GalaxyCore GC08A3
Sensor size 1/4.0" (β‰ˆ 0.25 inch) 1/4" (β‰ˆ 0.25 inch)
Pixel size 1.12 micron 1.12 micron
Autofocus Phase autofocus Phase autofocus
Stabilization Digital Digital

Selfie camera

Megapixels 5 megapixels 5 megapixels
Aperture f/2.2 f/2.2
Focal length - 17 mm
Sensor CMOS CMOS
Sensor size 1/5.0" (β‰ˆ 0.2 inch) 1/5.0" (β‰ˆ 0.2 inch)
Pixel size 1.12 micron 1.12 micron
Autofocus No No
Stabilization Digital No
Video resolution 1080p (Full HD) at 30 FPS 1080p (Full HD) at 30 FPS
Depth sensor (TOF 3D) No No

Connectivity

Wi-Fi standard Wi-Fi 5 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac) Wi-Fi 5 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac)
Wi-Fi features - Dual Band
- Wi-Fi Direct
- Wi-Fi Hotspot
- Wi-Fi Display
- Dual Band
- Wi-Fi Direct
- Wi-Fi Hotspot
- Wi-Fi Display
Bluetooth version 5 5.3
Bluetooth features LE LE
USB type USB Type-C USB Type-C
USB version 2 2
USB features - Charging
- USB-Storage mode
- OTG
- Charging
- USB-Storage mode
- OTG
DisplayPort No No
GPS - GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo
NFC* No No
Infrared port No No
Network
Number of SIM* - 2
Type of SIM card No Nano
Multi SIM mode - Standby
eSIM support* No No
Hybrid slot No No
5G support No No

Sound

Speakers Stereo 4.0
Headphone audio jack Yes Yes
FM radio No Yes
Dolby Atmos - Yes
Speakers test
Max loudness
84.3 dB
86.3 dB

Other

Category Budget Mid-range
Announced April 2026 June 2025
Release date April 2026 June 2025
Launch price (MSRP) $180 $229
Sensors - Proximity sensor
- Accelerometer
- Gyroscope
- Accelerometer
- Ambient light sensor
- Compass
Bundled charger Yes, 18 W Yes, 15 W
Further details
Notes on Redmi Pad 2:
    - Gyroscope, GPS and compass are only available on the 4G model.
*Disclaimer! NFC, GSM network support, and some other specs can be different depending on the country.

Conclusion

If the display and software are more important to you, then choose the Xiaomi Redmi Pad 2 9.7. But if the performance, gaming, and battery life are more of a priority – go for the Xiaomi Redmi Pad 2.

Cast your vote

So, which tablet would you choose?
5 (38.5%)
8 (61.5%)
Total votes: 13

User opinions

You can share your opinion or ask a question in the comments below
🌐 Register your profile and become part of NanoReview community!