Xiaomi Redmi Pad Pro vs Galaxy Tab A9+ (Plus)

59 out of 100
Xiaomi Redmi Pad Pro
VS
50 out of 100
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+ (Plus)

Here we compared two mid-range tablets: the 12.1-inch Xiaomi Redmi Pad Pro (with Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 2) that was released on April 10, 2024, against the Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+ (Plus), which is powered by Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 and came out 6 months before. On this page, you will find tests, full specs, strengths, and weaknesses of each of the devices.

Select the amount of RAM to evaluate performance and value for money more precisely
Memory

Key differences

An overview of the main advantages of each tablet
Reasons to consider the Xiaomi Redmi Pad Pro
  • Water-resistant body (IP52 classification)
  • Has a 1.1 inches larger screen size
  • Comes with 2960 mAh larger battery capacity: 10000 vs 7040 mAh
  • Higher display refresh rate – 120 Hz
  • Delivers 41% higher peak brightness (655 against 463 nits)
  • Newer Bluetooth version (v5.2)
  • More recent OS version: Android 16 versus 13
  • 15% better performance in AnTuTu Benchmark (671K versus 582K)
  • Compatible with Wi-Fi 6 wireless networks
  • Has 50% more RAM: 6GB versus 4GB
  • Has 2 SIM card slots
  • 21% higher pixel density (249 vs 206 PPI)
  • Supports higher wattage charging (33W versus 15W)
Reasons to consider the Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+ (Plus)
  • Shows 7% longer battery life (25:25 vs 23:43 hours)
  • Much smaller footprint: 15% more compact case (67.3 vs 78.9 square inches)
  • Weighs 91 grams less
  • Ready for eSIM technology

Review

Evaluation of Xiaomi Redmi Pad Pro and Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+ (Plus) crucial features
Display
Screen quality, color accuracy, brightness
Camera
Photo and video recording quality
Performance
CPU and memory performance (apps, system)
Gaming
Capabilities for playing modern games
Battery
Battery life, charging type and speed
Connectivity
Networks, ports, data transmission
NanoReview Score
Final comparison evaluation
Select your primary usage scenario to get a more accurate NanoReview Score
πŸ“± Primary usage:

Value for money (Beta)

To get an accurate value-for-money index, update the default prices with actual prices from your country’s retailers (for the selected memory configs) and press the "Calculate" button.
Currency
6 / 128 GB
VS
4 / 64 GB
74.5
(Good)
Value Index
108.5
(Excellent)

Tests and specifications

Comparison table of technical specifications and tests

Display

Type IPS LCD TFT LCD
Size 12.1 inches 11 inches
Resolution 1600 x 2560 pixels 1200 x 1920 pixels
Aspect ratio 16:10 8:5
PPI 249 ppi 206 ppi
Refresh rate 120 Hz 90 Hz
Adaptive refresh rate Yes (30-120 Hz) No
Max rated brightness 600 nits 500 nits
HDR support Yes, Dolby Vision No
Touch sampling rate 240 Hz -
Screen protection Corning Gorilla Glass 3 Tempered glass
Screen-to-body ratio 83.4% 80.9%
Display features - DCI-P3 -
Display tests
RGB color space 94% 94.2%
PWM Not detected Not detected
Response time 20 ms 42 ms
Contrast 1283:1 1409:1
Screen space comparison
Redmi Pad Pro
12.1β€³ (16:10 ratio) = 65.8 in2
Galaxy Tab A9+ (Plus)
11β€³ (8:5 ratio) = 54.4 in2
~20% more screen space
Peak brightness test (auto)
655 nits
Sources: NotebookCheck [3], [4]

Design and build

Height 280 mm (11.02 inches) 257.1 mm (10.12 inches)
Width 181.85 mm (7.16 inches) 168.7 mm (6.64 inches)
Thickness 7.52 mm (0.3 inches) 6.9 mm (0.27 inches)
Weight 571 g (20.14 oz) 480 g (16.93 oz)
Waterproof IP52 No
Rear material Metal Metal
Frame material Metal Metal
Colors Gray, Blue, Green Silver, Gray, Blue
Fingerprint scanner No No
Area 509 cm2 (78.9 inches2) 434 cm2 (67.2 inches2)
Repairability - Average (2.81/5)
Visual size comparison
Screen-to-body ratio
Tablet Ranking (99th and 125th place)
Android Tablet Ranking (74th and 97th place)

Performance

Chipset specifications of Xiaomi Redmi Pad Pro and Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+ (Plus)
SoC
Chipset Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 695
Max clock 2400 MHz 2200 MHz
CPU cores 8 (4 + 4) 8 (2 + 6)
Architecture - 4 cores at 1.95 GHz: Cortex-A55
- 4 cores at 2.4 GHz: Cortex-A78
- 6 cores at 1.8 GHz: Kryo 660 Silver (Cortex-A55)
- 2 cores at 2.2 GHz: Kryo 660 Gold (Cortex-A78)
Manufacturing Samsung TSMC
Lithography process 4 nanometers 6 nanometers
Neural processor (NPU) Yes Hexagon 686
GPU
Graphics Adreno 710 Adreno 619
GPU shading units 256 256
GPU clock 940 MHz 840 MHz
FLOPS ~481.3 GFLOPS ~430.1 GFLOPS

Benchmarks

Benchmark comparison of Xiaomi Redmi Pad Pro and Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+ (Plus)
Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)
Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)
Compute Score (GPU)
Compute Score (GPU) 2299 1405
Single-core score 1020 908
Multi-core score 2975 2072
Sources: Geekbench [3], [4]
AnTuTu Benchmark 11
CPU 284982 245267
GPU - 57538
Memory 136497 108723
UX 249543 170923
Total score 671022 582451
Samples Less than 3 [14 tests]
3DMark Steel Nomad Light
Stability 98% -
Graphics test 2 FPS -
Graphics score 252 -
Sources: 3DMark [5], [6]
PCMark 3.0
Web score 13114 10572
Video editing 7079 4298
Photo editing 22606 22564
Data manipulation 10865 8881
Writing score 13799 13360

Recent User Tests

The latest benchmark tests that have been submitted by users
Xiaomi Redmi Pad Pro
DateBenchmarkResult
πŸ“˜ 2026-06-11 (Minh Kha)AnTuTu671022
πŸ“˜ 2025-02-11 (OwO)GeekBench GPU2299
πŸ“˜ 2025-02-11 (OwO)GeekBench CPU1020 / 2975
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+ (Plus)
DateBenchmarkResult
πŸ“˜ 2026-08-15 (Julian Ludwig)GeekBench GPU1246
πŸ“˜ 2026-08-15 (Julian Ludwig)GeekBench CPU917 / 1939
πŸ“˜ 2026-07-31 (Samsung galaxy tab A9+)GeekBench CPU907 / 2014
πŸ“˜ 2026-07-31 (Samsung galaxy tab A9+)AnTuTu582451
πŸ“˜ 2026-07-26 (Abolfazl)AnTuTu601154

Memory

Configuration
RAM
RAM size 6 GB 4 GB
Memory type LPDDR4X LPDDR4X
Memory clock 2133 MHz 2133 MHz
Channels 2 2
Storage
Storage size 128 GB 64 GB
Storage type UFS 2.2 UFS 2.2
Memory card MicroSD MicroSD
Memory card max size Up to 1536 GB Up to 1024 GB

Software

Operating system Android 14 (Can be upgraded to Android 16) Android 13
ROM HyperOS 3 One UI 5.1
OS size 28 GB 22.9 GB
OS updates - 5 years

Battery

Capacity 10000 mAh 7040 mAh
Max charge power 33 W 15 W
Battery type Li-Po Li-Ion
Replaceable No No
Wireless charging No No
Reverse charging No No
Fast charging Yes (28% in 30 min) Yes (50% in 60 min)
Full charging time 2:00 hr 2:58 hr
Battery cycles - 1200 cycles
Battery life tests
Web browsing 07:10 hr 08:57 hr
Watching video 11:19 hr 11:07 hr
Gaming 05:30 hr 05:44 hr
Standby 149 hr 155 hr
General battery life
23:43 hr
25:25 hr

Main camera

Matrix 8 megapixels 8 megapixels
Image resolution 3264 x 2448 -
Zoom Digital Digital
Flash LED No
Stabilization Digital Digital
8K video recording No No
4K video recording No No
1080p video recording Up to 30FPS Up to 30FPS
Slow motion No No
Lenses 1) Standard: 8 MP
1) Standard: 8 MP
Camera features - Bokeh mode -
Standard lens
Image resolution 8 MP 8 MP
Aperture f/1.8 -
Sensor size 1/4.0" (β‰ˆ 0.25 inch) -
Pixel size 1.12 micron -
Autofocus Phase autofocus Phase autofocus
Stabilization Digital Digital

Selfie camera

Megapixels 8 megapixels 5 megapixels
Image resolution 3264 x 2448 -
Sensor CMOS CMOS
Sensor size 1/4.0" (β‰ˆ 0.25 inch) -
Pixel size 1.12 micron -
Autofocus No No
Stabilization Digital No
Video resolution 1080p (Full HD) at 30 FPS 1080p (Full HD) at 30 FPS
Depth sensor (TOF 3D) No No

Connectivity

Wi-Fi standard Wi-Fi 6E (802.11 a/b/g/n/a/ac) Wi-Fi 5 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac)
Wi-Fi features - Dual Band
- Wi-Fi MiMO
- Wi-Fi Direct
- Wi-Fi Hotspot
- Wi-Fi Display
- Dual Band
- Wi-Fi Direct
- Wi-Fi Hotspot
- Wi-Fi Display
Bluetooth version 5.2 5.1
Bluetooth features LE LE
USB type USB Type-C USB Type-C
USB version 2 2
USB features - Charging
- USB-Storage mode
- OTG
- Charging
- USB-Storage mode
DisplayPort No No
GPS - GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS
NFC* No No
Infrared port No No
Network
Number of SIM* 2 1
Type of SIM card No Nano
eSIM support* No Yes
Hybrid slot Yes No
LTE Cat* - 18
5G support Yes Yes

Sound

Speakers 4.0 4.0
Headphone audio jack Yes Yes
FM radio No No
Dolby Atmos Yes Yes
Speakers test
Max loudness

Other

Category Mid-range Mid-range
Announced April 2024 October 2023
Release date April 2024 October 2023
Launch price (MSRP) $259 $219
Successor - - Samsung Galaxy Tab A11+ (Plus)
Sensors - Hall-effect sensor
- Proximity sensor
- Gyroscope
- Accelerometer
- Ambient light sensor
- Gyroscope
- Accelerometer
- Ambient light sensor
- Compass
Bundled charger Not included Not included
Further details
Notes on Galaxy Tab A9+ (Plus):
    - Doesn't have S Pen support.
*Disclaimer! NFC, GSM network support, and some other specs can be different depending on the country.

Conclusion

After analyzing all the data, we think that the Xiaomi Redmi Pad Pro is definitely a better buy.

Cast your vote

So, which tablet would you choose?
46 (69.7%)
20 (30.3%)
Total votes: 66

User opinions

You can share your opinion or ask a question in the comments below
🌐 Register your profile and become part of NanoReview community!