Xiaomi Redmi Pad Pro vs Xiaomi Redmi Pad 2 Pro
Here we compared two mid-range tablets: the 12.1-inch Xiaomi Redmi Pad Pro (with Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 2) that was released on April 10, 2024, against the Xiaomi Redmi Pad 2 Pro, which is powered by Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 4 and came out 1 year and 6 months after. On this page, you will find tests, full specs, strengths, and weaknesses of each of the devices.
Select the amount of RAM to evaluate performance and value for money more precisely
Key differences
Reasons to consider the Xiaomi Redmi Pad Pro
- Water-resistant body (IP52 classification)
- Delivers 19% higher peak brightness (655 against 551 nits)
- More recent OS version: Android 16 versus 15
Reasons to consider the Xiaomi Redmi Pad 2 Pro
- Shows 35% longer battery life (32:02 vs 23:43 hours)
- Comes with 2000 mAh larger battery capacity: 12000 vs 10000 mAh
- 47% better performance in AnTuTu Benchmark (986K versus 671K)
- Newer Bluetooth version (v5.4)
- Reverse charging feature
- 21% faster in single-core GeekBench 6 test: 1239 and 1020 points
Review
Display
Screen quality, color accuracy, brightness
Camera
Photo and video recording quality
Performance
CPU and memory performance (apps, system)
Gaming
Capabilities for playing modern games
Battery
Battery life, charging type and speed
Connectivity
Networks, ports, data transmission
Select your primary usage scenario to get a more accurate NanoReview Score
Value for money (Beta)
Tests and specifications
Comparison table of technical specifications and testsDisplay
| Type | IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| Size | 12.1 inches | 12.1 inches |
| Resolution | 1600 x 2560 pixels | 1600 x 2560 pixels |
| Aspect ratio | 16:10 | 16:10 |
| PPI | 249 ppi | 249 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Adaptive refresh rate | Yes (30-120 Hz) | Yes (60-120 Hz) |
| Max rated brightness | 600 nits | - |
| Max rated brightness in HDR | - | 650 nits |
| HDR support | Yes, Dolby Vision | Yes, Dolby Vision |
| Touch sampling rate | 240 Hz | 360 Hz |
| Screen protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 3 | Tempered glass |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 83.4% | 83.5% |
| Display features | - DCI-P3 | - |
| RGB color space | 94% | 96.6% |
| PWM | Not detected | Not detected |
| Response time | 20 ms | 28 ms |
| Contrast | 1283:1 | 1764:1 |
Peak brightness test (auto)
Design and build
| Height | 280 mm (11.02 inches) | 279.8 mm (11.02 inches) |
| Width | 181.85 mm (7.16 inches) | 181.7 mm (7.15 inches) |
| Thickness | 7.52 mm (0.3 inches) | 7.5 mm (0.3 inches) |
| Weight | 571 g (20.14 oz) | 610 g (21.52 oz) |
| Waterproof | IP52 | No |
| Rear material | Metal | Metal |
| Frame material | Metal | Metal |
| Colors | Gray, Blue, Green | Silver, Gray, Purple |
| Fingerprint scanner | No | No |
| Area | 509 cm2 (78.9 inches2) | 508 cm2 (78.8 inches2) |
| Repairability | - | Average (2.74/5) |
| Drop resistance | - | Very good (B) Β· 208 drops |
Screen-to-body ratio
Tablet Ranking (99th and 78th place)
Android Tablet Ranking (74th and 59th place)
Performance
| Chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 2 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 4 |
| Max clock | 2400 MHz | 2700 MHz |
| CPU cores | 8 (4 + 4) | 8 (1 + 3 + 4) |
| Architecture | - 4 cores at 1.95 GHz: Cortex-A55 - 4 cores at 2.4 GHz: Cortex-A78 |
- 4 cores at 1.8 GHz: Kryo Silver (Cortex-A520) - 3 cores at 2.4 GHz: Kryo Gold (Cortex-A720) - 1 core at 2.7 GHz: Kryo Prime (Cortex-A720) |
| Manufacturing | Samsung | TSMC |
| Lithography process | 4 nanometers | 4 nanometers |
| Neural processor (NPU) | Yes | Yes |
| Graphics | Adreno 710 | Adreno 810 |
| GPU shading units | 256 | 256 |
| GPU clock | 940 MHz | 895 MHz |
| FLOPS | ~481.3 GFLOPS | ~458.2 GFLOPS |
Benchmarks
Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)
Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)
Compute Score (GPU)
| Compute Score (GPU) | 2299 | 4784 |
| Single-core score | 1020 | 1239 |
| Multi-core score | 2975 | 3286 |
AnTuTu Benchmark 11
| CPU | 284982 | 380886 |
| GPU | - | 190421 |
| Memory | 136497 | 139368 |
| UX | 249543 | 276207 |
| Total score | 671022 | 986882 |
| Samples | Less than 3 | Less than 3 |
3DMark Steel Nomad Light
| Stability | 98% | - |
| Graphics test | 2 FPS | - |
| Graphics score | 252 | - |
PCMark 3.0
| Web score | 13114 | - |
| Video editing | 7079 | - |
| Photo editing | 22606 | - |
| Data manipulation | 10865 | - |
| Writing score | 13799 | - |
Recent User Tests
Xiaomi Redmi Pad Pro
| Date | Benchmark | Result |
|---|---|---|
| π 2026-06-11 (Minh Kha) | AnTuTu | 671022 |
| π 2025-02-11 (OwO) | GeekBench GPU | 2299 |
| π 2025-02-11 (OwO) | GeekBench CPU | 1020 / 2975 |
Xiaomi Redmi Pad 2 Pro
| Date | Benchmark | Result |
|---|---|---|
| π 2026-04-03 (Deepa) | GeekBench GPU | 4784 |
| π 2026-04-03 (Deepa) | GeekBench CPU | 1239 / 3286 |
| π 2026-04-03 (Deepa) | AnTuTu | 986882 |
Memory
Configuration
| RAM size | 6 GB | 6 GB |
| Memory type | LPDDR4X | LPDDR4X |
| Memory clock | 2133 MHz | 2133 MHz |
| Channels | 2 | 2 |
| Storage size | 128 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 2.2 | UFS 2.2 |
| Memory card | MicroSD | MicroSD |
| Memory card max size | Up to 1536 GB | Up to 2048 GB |
Software
| Operating system | Android 14 (Can be upgraded to Android 16) | Android 15 |
| ROM | HyperOS 3 | HyperOS 2.0 |
| OS size | 28 GB | 34 GB |
| OS updates | - | 0 years |
Battery
| Capacity | 10000 mAh | 12000 mAh |
| Max charge power | 33 W | 33 W |
| Battery type | Li-Po | Li-Po |
| Replaceable | No | No |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Reverse charging | No | Yes |
| Fast charging | Yes (28% in 30 min) | Yes (30% in 30 min) |
| Full charging time | 2:00 hr | 2:20 hr |
| Battery cycles | - | 1000 cycles |
| Web browsing | 07:10 hr | 08:13 hr |
| Watching video | 11:19 hr | 11:17 hr |
| Gaming | 05:30 hr | 07:52 hr |
| Standby | 149 hr | 233 hr |
General battery life
Main camera
| Matrix | 8 megapixels | 8 megapixels |
| Image resolution | 3264 x 2448 | 3264 x 2448 |
| Zoom | Digital | Digital |
| Flash | LED | No |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
| 8K video recording | No | No |
| 4K video recording | No | No |
| 1080p video recording | Up to 30FPS | Up to 30FPS |
| Slow motion | No | No |
| Lenses | 1) Standard: 8 MP |
1) Standard: 8 MP |
| Camera features | - Bokeh mode | - |
| Image resolution | 8 MP | 8 MP |
| Aperture | f/1.8 | f/2.0 |
| Sensor size | 1/4.0" (β 0.25 inch) | 1/4" (β 0.25 inch) |
| Pixel size | 1.12 micron | 1.12 micron |
| Autofocus | Phase autofocus | Phase autofocus |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
Selfie camera
| Megapixels | 8 megapixels | 8 megapixels |
| Image resolution | 3264 x 2448 | 3264 x 2448 |
| Aperture | - | f/2.2 |
| Focal length | - | 17 mm |
| Sensor | CMOS | CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/4.0" (β 0.25 inch) | 1/5.0" (β 0.2 inch) |
| Pixel size | 1.12 micron | 1.12 micron |
| Autofocus | No | No |
| Stabilization | Digital | No |
| Video resolution | 1080p (Full HD) at 30 FPS | 1080p (Full HD) at 30 FPS |
| Depth sensor (TOF 3D) | No | No |
Connectivity
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 6E (802.11 a/b/g/n/a/ac) | Wi-Fi 6 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax) |
| Wi-Fi features | - Dual Band - Wi-Fi MiMO - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
- Dual Band - Wi-Fi MiMO - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
| Bluetooth version | 5.2 | 5.4 |
| Bluetooth features | LE | LE |
| USB type | USB Type-C | USB Type-C |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| USB features | - Charging - USB-Storage mode - OTG |
- Charging - USB-Storage mode - OTG |
| DisplayPort | No | No |
| NFC* | No | No |
| Infrared port | No | No |
| Number of SIM* | 2 | - |
| Type of SIM card | No | No |
| eSIM support* | No | No |
| Hybrid slot | Yes | No |
| 5G support | Yes | No |
Sound
| Speakers | 4.0 | 4.0 |
| Headphone audio jack | Yes | Yes |
| FM radio | No | No |
| Dolby Atmos | Yes | Yes |
Speakers test
Max loudness
Other
| Category | Mid-range | Mid-range |
| Announced | April 2024 | September 2025 |
| Release date | April 2024 | September 2025 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $259 | $299 |
| Sensors | - Hall-effect sensor - Proximity sensor - Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Ambient light sensor |
- Proximity sensor - Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Ambient light sensor - Compass |
| Bundled charger | Not included | Yes, 33 W |
*Disclaimer! NFC, GSM network support, and some other specs can be different depending on the country.
Conclusion
After analyzing all the data, we think that the Xiaomi Redmi Pad 2 Pro is definitely a better buy.
Cast your vote
Total votes: 114