AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS vs Ryzen 7 260

61 out of 100
AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS
VS
61 out of 100
AMD Ryzen 7 260

We compared two 8-core laptop CPUs: the 3.8 GHz AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS against the 3.8 GHz Ryzen 7 260. On this page, you'll find out which processor has better performance in benchmarks, games and other useful information.

Review

General overview and comparison of the processors
Single-Core Performance
Performance in single-threaded apps and benchmarks
Multi-Core Performance
Measure performance when all cores are involved
Power Efficiency
The efficiency score of power consumption
Integrated Graphics
iGPU capabilities for gaming and 3D-intensive tasks
NanoReview Final Score
Choose your main usage scenario to recalculate the Final Score and see which CPU suits your needs.
πŸ”Œ Usage Scenario:

Key Differences

What are the key differences between 260 and 8845HS
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 7 260
  • Newer - released 1 year and 1 month later

Test in Benchmarks

Comparing the performance of CPUs across various tasks

Cinebench

Reputable cross-platform benchmark for high-performance processors
Cinebench 2024 (Single)
Cinebench 2024 (Multi)
Cinebench 2026 (Single) 570 -
Cinebench 2026 (Multi) 4125 -
Cinebench Scores (175th and 184th place)

GeekBench v6

The new version of this benchmark emulates common operations often used in real-world apps
Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)
2580
Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)
13018
12763
File compression 1120 MB/sec 1040 MB/sec
Clang compilation 96.4 Klines/sec 104 Klines/sec
HTML 5 Browser 278.2 pages/sec 248.3 pages/sec
PDF Renderer 374.3 Mpixels/sec 368.5 Mpixels/sec
Text processing 261.9 pages/sec 263.9 pages/sec
Background blur 59.9 images/sec 61.8 images/sec
Photo processing 110.7 images/sec 105.2 images/sec
Ray tracing 22.3 Mpixels/sec 23.2 Mpixels/sec
Sources: GeekBench [1], [2] – 158 samples

PassMark

Synthetic test that focuses on raw computational performance for low-level functions
Passmark CPU (Single-Core)
Passmark CPU (Multi-Core)
28291
28032
Integer math 97 GOps/sec 96.7 GOps/sec
Floating point math 58.8 GOps/sec 59.4 GOps/sec
Find prime numbers 86M Primes/sec 76M Primes/sec
Random string sorting 41.4M Strings/sec 42.3M Strings/sec
Data encryption 20.3 GBytes/sec 20.2 GBytes/sec
Data compression 341.6 MBytes/sec 351 MBytes/sec
Physics 1339 Frames/sec 1213 Frames/sec
Extended instructions 25.4B Matrices/sec 26.5B Matrices/sec
Sources: PassMark [3], [4] – 3870 & 1034 samples

Blender

3D rendering test that measures CPU performance in 3D modeling tasks (uses all cores)
Blender CPU
206.52

Performance Per Watt

Shows the score you get per each watt of PL1 TDP
Cinebench 2024 / Watt 17.3 PPW 16.5 PPW
Geekbench 6 Multi / Watt 241.1 PPW 236.4 PPW
Passmark CPU Mark / Watt 523.9 PPW 519.1 PPW
Blender / Watt 3.8 PPW 3.82 PPW
These are rough calculations, as most CPUs surpass PL1 TDP wattage even in multicore workloads.

Recent User Tests

The latest benchmark tests that have been submitted by users
AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS
DateBenchmarkResult
πŸ“˜ 2026-05-15 (korn87)Cinebench 2026570 / 4125
πŸ“˜ 2026-05-07 (korn87)Geekbench 6 CPU2718 / 13855
πŸ“˜ 2026-05-07 (korn87)Cinebench 2026570 / 4125
πŸ“˜ 2026-03-09 (MaidElle)Geekbench 6 CPU2514 / 12971
πŸ“˜ 2026-02-26 (iFraan)Geekbench 6 CPU2331 / 10135
AMD Ryzen 7 260
DateBenchmarkResult
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-06 -> Ard57Cinebench 2026510 / 3450
πŸ“˜ 2026-06-08 (johndoe)Geekbench 6 CPU2649 / 12830

Specifications

Full technical specification of AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS and Ryzen 7 260

General

Vendor Amd Amd
Released December 6, 2023 January 7, 2025
Type Laptop Laptop
Instruction Set x86-64 x86-64
Codename Zen 4 (Hawk Point) Zen 4 (Hawk Point)
Integrated GPU Radeon 780M Radeon 780M
Rival Equivalent - Intel Core Ultra 7 165H -
Successor - AMD Ryzen 7 260 -
AMD Ryzen CPU ranking (60th and 58th place)

CPU

Performance Cores
P-Cores 8 8
P-Threads 16 16
Base Frequency (P) 3.8 GHz 3.8 GHz
Turbo Boost Frequency (P) 5.1 GHz 5.1 GHz
Total
Total Cores 8 8
Total Threads 16 16
Bus Frequency 100 MHz 100 MHz
Multiplier 38x 38x
L1 Cache 64K (per core) 64K (per core)
L2 Cache 1MB (per core) 1MB (per core)
L3 Cache 16MB (shared) 16MB (shared)
Unlocked Multiplier No No

Package

Transistors 25 billions -
Fabrication Process 4 nm 4 nm
TDP (PL1) 35-54 W (configurable) 35-54 W (configurable)
Socket FP8 FP8
Peak Temperature 100Β°C 100Β°C
Laptop processors ranking (92nd and 90th place)

iGPU

Integrated Graphics Radeon 780M Radeon 780M
GPU Base Clock 800 MHz 800 MHz
GPU Boost Clock 2700 MHz 2700 MHz
Shading Units 768 768
TMUs 48 48
ROPs 32 32
Execution Units 12 12
TGP 15 W 15 W
iGPU FLOPS
4.1 TFLOPS
4.1 TFLOPS

Memory Support

Memory Types - DDR5-5600
- LPDDR5x-7500
- LPDDR5X-7500
- DDR5-5600
Max. Memory Size 256 GB 256 GB
Memory Channels 2 2
ECC Support No No

Misc

Official Site AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS official page AMD Ryzen 7 260 official page
PCI Express Version 4.0 4.0
PCI Express Lanes 20 20

Cast your vote

Choose between two processors
76 (34.4%)
145 (65.6%)
Total votes: 221

Comments

So which CPU will you choose: AMD Ryzen 7 260 or Ryzen 7 8845HS?
🌐 Register your profile and become part of NanoReview community!
Avatar
him January 30, 2026 at 02:49 PM
260's really good for AI stuff and also despite these numbers the benchmarks are quite different.
+2 Reply
Avatar
asdf February 22, 2026 at 08:50 PM
the npu is irrelevant as the 260 is basically always paired with a dgpu. even the lowest end rtx 5050 puts out about 420 ai tops compared to the 16 ai tops of the 260's npu
+2 Reply
Avatar
Ignacio_TW November 21, 2025 at 08:09 PM
These CPUs are identical according to the specs here. Where is the bonus performance coming from in some benchmarks?
+18 Reply
Avatar
asdf February 22, 2026 at 08:51 PM
margin of error or maybe better cooling in newer laptops
+3 Reply
Avatar
Matti November 11, 2025 at 07:07 PM
Ryzen 260= Ryzen 7 8845hs
+23 Reply
Avatar
Joestar July 1, 2025 at 03:04 AM
AMD is intelling for real
+3 Reply
Avatar
Cpu_cuk March 14, 2025 at 08:22 AM
Basically another rebrand
+12 Reply
Avatar
akp831 March 14, 2025 at 11:29 AM
It's not as bad as mediatek's strategy of rebranding Processors like the Dimensity 6400 (Launched earlier this year) Are rebrands of the dimensity 700 (Launched Late 2020) So basically: They're making manufactures use rebranded 5 year-old processors
+11 Reply
Avatar
i_cant_quitefigureitout December 25, 2025 at 02:42 AM
akp831, and spectrum too LOL☠️. they still have a 26nm processor "refresh" for one of there lower ended processors. specifically i mentioning SC9863 to SC9863A rebrand.
0 Reply