AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395 vs Ryzen 9 9900X

We compared two CPUs: the 3.0 GHz AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395 (laptop) with 16-cores against the 4.4 GHz Ryzen 9 9900X (desktop) with 12-cores. On this page, you'll find out which processor has better performance in benchmarks, games and other useful information.

Review

General overview and comparison of the processors
Single-Core Performance
Performance in single-threaded apps and benchmarks
Multi-Core Performance
Measure performance when all cores are involved
Power Efficiency
The efficiency score of power consumption
Integrated Graphics
iGPU capabilities for gaming and 3D-intensive tasks
The "iGPU" and "Power Efficiency" have a minor impact on the NanoReview Score for desktop CPU.
NanoReview Final Score
Choose your main usage scenario to recalculate the Final Score and see which CPU suits your needs.
πŸ”Œ Usage Scenario:

Value for money (Beta)

Global average CPU prices are used by default! For better accuracy, enter your current prices and click β€œCalculate".
Currency
VS

Key Differences

What are the key differences between 9900X and 395
Advantages of AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395
  • More powerful Radeon 8060S integrated graphics: 14.8 vs 0.6 TFLOPS
  • Around 166.4 GB/s (186%) higher theoretical memory bandwidth
  • Supports quad-channel memory
  • Newer - released 7 months later
  • Has 4 more physical cores
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 9 9900X
  • Unlocked multiplier
  • Supports up to 192 GB DDR5-5600 RAM
  • Newer PCI Express version – 5.0
  • 10% higher Turbo Boost frequency (5.6 GHz vs 5.1 GHz)
  • 11% faster in a single-core Geekbench v6 test - 3340 vs 3017 points

Test in Benchmarks

Comparing the performance of CPUs across various tasks

Cinebench

Reputable cross-platform benchmark for high-performance processors
Cinebench 2024 (Single)
Cinebench 2024 (Multi)
Cinebench 2026 (Single) 619 763
Cinebench 2026 (Multi) 7559 7580
Cinebench Scores (37th and 41st place)

GeekBench v6

The new version of this benchmark emulates common operations often used in real-world apps
Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)
Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)
22363
File compression 2050 MB/sec 1510 MB/sec
Clang compilation 202 Klines/sec 191.4 Klines/sec
HTML 5 Browser 527.3 pages/sec 361.8 pages/sec
PDF Renderer 586.3 Mpixels/sec 534 Mpixels/sec
Text processing 339.2 pages/sec 350.5 pages/sec
Background blur 72.8 images/sec 82.7 images/sec
Photo processing 200 images/sec 118.4 images/sec
Ray tracing 45.8 Mpixels/sec 45.5 Mpixels/sec
Sources: GeekBench [1], [2]

PassMark

Synthetic test that focuses on raw computational performance for low-level functions
Passmark CPU (Single-Core)
Passmark CPU (Multi-Core)
Integer math 200.8 GOps/sec 180.5 GOps/sec
Floating point math 128.8 GOps/sec 119.7 GOps/sec
Find prime numbers 303M Primes/sec 432M Primes/sec
Random string sorting 76.2M Strings/sec 71.4M Strings/sec
Data encryption 35.5 GBytes/sec 33.3 GBytes/sec
Data compression 691 MBytes/sec 678.8 MBytes/sec
Physics 3481 Frames/sec 3330 Frames/sec
Extended instructions 56.4B Matrices/sec 54.8B Matrices/sec
Sources: PassMark [3], [4] – 1115 & 6489 samples

Blender

3D rendering test that measures CPU performance in 3D modeling tasks (uses all cores)
Blender CPU
454.53

Performance Per Watt

Shows the score you get per each watt of PL1 TDP
Cinebench 2024 / Watt 15.5 PPW 15.1 PPW
Geekbench 6 Multi / Watt 186.4 PPW 162.9 PPW
Passmark CPU Mark / Watt 458 PPW 452.7 PPW
Blender / Watt 3.51 PPW 3.79 PPW
These are rough calculations, as most CPUs surpass PL1 TDP wattage even in multicore workloads.

Recent User Tests

The latest benchmark tests that have been submitted by users
AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395
DateBenchmarkResult
πŸ“˜ 2026-06-20 -> RhyndGeekBench2885 / 20105
πŸ“˜ 2026-04-23 -> RhyndCinebench 2026619 / 7559
πŸ“˜ 2026-04-20 (Rhynd)Cinebench 2026608 / 7101
πŸ“˜ 2025-09-11 (dsc)Cinebench 2024115 / 1855
πŸ“˜ 2025-06-30 (Declan)GeekBench2744 / 17850
AMD Ryzen 9 9900X
DateBenchmarkResult
πŸ“˜ 2026-06-20 (Alenaes)Cinebench 2026773 / 7971
πŸ“˜ 2026-06-04 (Alenaes)Cinebench 2024139 / 1841
πŸ“˜ 2026-06-04 (Alenaes)Cinebench 2026763 / 7580
πŸ“˜ 2026-05-01 (PLL)Cinebench 2024137 / 1853
πŸ“˜ 2026-04-03 (freziontechno)Cinebench 2026759 / 7584

Specifications

Full technical specification of AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395 and Ryzen 9 9900X

General

Vendor Amd Amd
Released January 7, 2025 June 3, 2024
Type Laptop Desktop
Instruction Set x86-64 x86-64
Codename Zen 5 (Strix Halo) Zen 5 (Granite Ridge)
Integrated GPU Radeon 8060S Radeon Graphics
Rival Equivalent - Apple M4 Pro (14-Core) - Intel Core i9 14900K
AMD Ryzen CPU ranking (8th and 6th place)

CPU

Performance Cores
P-Cores 16 12
P-Threads 32 24
Base Frequency (P) 3.0 GHz 4.4 GHz
Turbo Boost Frequency (P) 5.1 GHz 5.6 GHz
Total
Total Cores 16 12
Total Threads 32 24
Bus Frequency 100 MHz 100 MHz
Multiplier 30x 44x
L1 Cache 80K (per core) 80K (per core)
L2 Cache 1MB (per core) 1MB (per core)
L3 Cache 64MB (shared) 64MB (shared)
Unlocked Multiplier No Yes

Package

Fabrication Process 4 nm 4 nm
TDP (PL1) 45-120 W (configurable) 120 W
Max. Boost TDP (PL2) - 162 W
Socket FP11 AM5
Peak Temperature 100Β°C 95Β°C
Desktop CPU ranking (#14th place)

iGPU

Integrated Graphics Radeon 8060S Radeon Graphics
GPU Base Clock 1295 MHz 400 MHz
GPU Boost Clock 2900 MHz 2200 MHz
Shading Units 2560 128
TMUs 160 8
ROPs 64 4
Execution Units 40 2
TGP 55 W 15 W
iGPU FLOPS
14.8 TFLOPS
0.6 TFLOPS

Memory Support

Memory Types - LPDDR5X-8000 - DDR5-5600
Max. Memory Size 128 GB 192 GB
Memory Channels 4 2
Max. Memory Bandwidth 256 GB/s 89.6 GB/s
ECC Support Yes Yes

Misc

Official Site AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395 official page AMD Ryzen 9 9900X official page
PCI Express Version 4.0 5.0
PCI Express Lanes 16 28

Cast your vote

Choose between two processors
6 (66.7%)
3 (33.3%)
Total votes: 9

Comments

So which CPU will you choose: AMD Ryzen 9 9900X or AI Max+ 395?
🌐 Register your profile and become part of NanoReview community!