Home > CPU Comparison > Core Ultra 9 275HX or Ryzen AI Max+ 395: what's better?

Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX vs AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395

78 out of 100
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX
VS
82 out of 100
AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX
AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395

We compared two laptop CPUs: the 2.7 GHz Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX with 24-cores against the 3.0 GHz AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395 with 16-cores. On this page, you'll find out which processor has better performance in benchmarks, games and other useful information.

  1. Review
  2. Differences
  3. Performance
  4. Specs
  5. Comments (1)

Review

General overview and comparison of the processors
Single-Core Performance
Performance in single-threaded apps and benchmarks
Multi-Core Performance
Measure performance when all cores are involved
Power Efficiency
The efficiency score of power consumption
Integrated Graphics
iGPU capabilities for gaming and 3D-intensive tasks
NanoReview Final Score
Choose your main usage scenario to recalculate the Final Score and see which CPU suits your needs.
πŸ”Œ Usage Scenario:

Key Differences

What are the key differences between 395 and 275HX
Advantages of Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX
  • Unlocked multiplier
  • Supports up to 256 GB DDR5-6400 RAM
  • Has 8 more physical cores
  • More modern manufacturing process – 3 versus 4 nanometers
  • Newer PCI Express version – 5.0
  • 6% higher Turbo Boost frequency (5.4 GHz vs 5.1 GHz)
Advantages of AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395
  • More powerful Radeon 8060S integrated graphics: 14.8 vs 1.9 TFLOPS
  • Around 153.6 GB/s (150%) higher theoretical memory bandwidth
  • Supports quad-channel memory
  • Has 28 MB larger L3 cache size, helping fully utilize a high-end GPU in gaming

Test in Benchmarks

Comparing the performance of CPUs across various tasks
CPU:
Core Ultra 9 275HX
vs
Ryzen AI Max+ 395

Cinebench

Reputable cross-platform benchmark for high-performance processors
Cinebench 2024 (Single)
Cinebench 2024 (Multi)
Cinebench 2026 (Single) 500 619
Cinebench 2026 (Multi) 7832 7559
Cinebench Scores (30th and 38th place)
Submit your benchmark results

GeekBench v6

The new version of this benchmark emulates common operations often used in real-world apps
Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)
Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)
File compression 1480 MB/sec 2050 MB/sec
Clang compilation 216.2 Klines/sec 202 Klines/sec
HTML 5 Browser 435.5 pages/sec 527.3 pages/sec
PDF Renderer 545.5 Mpixels/sec 586.3 Mpixels/sec
Text processing 344.8 pages/sec 339.2 pages/sec
Background blur 78.6 images/sec 72.8 images/sec
Photo processing 156.4 images/sec 200 images/sec
Ray tracing 46.2 Mpixels/sec 45.8 Mpixels/sec
Sources: GeekBench [1], [2]

PassMark

Synthetic test that focuses on raw computational performance for low-level functions
Passmark CPU (Single-Core)
Passmark CPU (Multi-Core)
Integer math 155.2 GOps/sec 200.8 GOps/sec
Floating point math 191.1 GOps/sec 128.8 GOps/sec
Find prime numbers 448M Primes/sec 303M Primes/sec
Random string sorting 74.3M Strings/sec 76.2M Strings/sec
Data encryption 47.1 GBytes/sec 35.5 GBytes/sec
Data compression 608.4 MBytes/sec 691 MBytes/sec
Physics 3335 Frames/sec 3481 Frames/sec
Extended instructions 47B Matrices/sec 56.4B Matrices/sec
Sources: PassMark [3], [4] – 5997 & 1115 samples

Blender

3D rendering test that measures CPU performance in 3D modeling tasks (uses all cores)
Blender CPU

Performance Per Watt

Shows the score you get per each watt of PL1 TDP
Cinebench 2024 / Watt 35.3 PPW 15.5 PPW
Geekbench 6 Multi / Watt 371.8 PPW 186.4 PPW
Passmark CPU Mark / Watt 1013.7 PPW 458 PPW
Blender / Watt 6.54 PPW 3.51 PPW
These are rough calculations, as most CPUs surpass PL1 TDP wattage even in multicore workloads.

Recent User Tests

The latest benchmark tests that have been submitted by users
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX
DateBenchmarkResult
πŸ“˜ 2026-07-04 (dante)Cinebench 2024133 / 2062
πŸ“˜ 2026-07-04 (dante)Cinebench 20260 / 0
πŸ“˜ 2026-05-04 (Sujan)Cinebench 2024139 / 2318
πŸ“˜ 2026-05-03 (ToadyBoi)Cinebench 2024139 / 2290
πŸ“˜ 2026-04-10 (itsved4nt)Cinebench 2026500 / 7832
Add View all (23)
AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395
DateBenchmarkResult
πŸ“˜ 2026-06-20 -> RhyndGeekbench 6 CPU2885 / 20105
πŸ“˜ 2026-04-23 -> RhyndCinebench 2026619 / 7559
πŸ“˜ 2026-04-20 (Rhynd)Cinebench 2026608 / 7101
πŸ“˜ 2025-09-11 (dsc)Cinebench 2024115 / 1855
πŸ“˜ 2025-06-30 (Declan)Geekbench 6 CPU2744 / 17850
Add View all (9)

Specifications

Full technical specification of Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX and AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395

General

Vendor Intel Amd
Released January 6, 2025 January 7, 2025
Type Laptop Laptop
Instruction Set x86-64 x86-64
Codename Arrow Lake Zen 5 (Strix Halo)
Model number 275HX -
Integrated GPU Arc Graphics (4-Cores) Radeon 8060S
Rival Equivalent - AMD Ryzen 9 9850HX - Apple M4 Pro (14-Core)
Intel CPU rating (#18th place)

CPU

Performance Cores
P-Cores 8 16
P-Threads 8 32
Base Frequency (P) 2.7 GHz 3.0 GHz
Turbo Boost Frequency (P) 5.4 GHz 5.1 GHz
Efficient Cores
E-Cores 16 -
E-Threads 16 -
Base Frequency (E) 2.1 GHz -
Turbo Boost Frequency (E) 4.6 GHz -
Total
Total Cores 24 16
Total Threads 24 32
Bus Frequency 100 MHz 100 MHz
Multiplier 27x 30x
L1 Cache 192K (per core) 80K (per core)
L2 Cache 3MB (per core) 1MB (per core)
L3 Cache 36MB (shared) 64MB (shared)
Unlocked Multiplier Yes No

Package

Fabrication Process 3 nm 4 nm
TDP (PL1) 45-55 W (configurable) 45-120 W (configurable)
Max. Boost TDP (PL2) 160 W -
Socket FCBGA-2114 FP11
Peak Temperature 105Β°C 100Β°C
Laptop processors ranking (25th and 16th place)

iGPU

Integrated Graphics Arc Graphics (4-Cores) Radeon 8060S
GPU Base Clock 300 MHz 1295 MHz
GPU Boost Clock 1900 MHz 2900 MHz
Shading Units 512 2560
TMUs 32 160
ROPs 16 64
Execution Units 64 40
TGP 14 W 55 W
iGPU FLOPS
Core Ultra 9 275HX
1.9 TFLOPS
Ryzen AI Max+ 395 +679%
14.8 TFLOPS
More info: Radeon 8060S compared to Arc iGPU (4-Cores)

Memory Support

Memory Types - DDR5-6400 - LPDDR5X-8000
Max. Memory Size 256 GB 128 GB
Memory Channels 2 4
Max. Memory Bandwidth 102.4 GB/s 256 GB/s
ECC Support No Yes

Misc

Official Site Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX official page AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395 official page
PCI Express Version 5.0 4.0
PCI Express Lanes 24 16

Cast your vote

Choose between two processors
59 (44%)
75 (56%)
Total votes: 134

Competitors

1. AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395 vs AMD Ryzen 9 9900X
2. AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395 vs Intel Core Ultra 9 285H
3. AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395 vs AMD Ryzen AI Max 390 (1)
4. AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395 vs Apple M4 Pro (14-Core) (2)
5. AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395 vs AMD Ryzen AI Max+ Pro 395 (3)
6. Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX vs Intel Core Ultra 9 285HX
7. Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX vs Intel Core Ultra 9 285K
8. Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX vs AMD Ryzen 9 9955HX (7)
9. Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX vs Intel Core Ultra 9 285H
10. Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX vs Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
Compare other CPUs (460+)

Comments

So which CPU will you choose: AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395 or Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX?
🌐 Register your profile and become part of NanoReview community!
Avatar
ComputerNerd December 13, 2025 at 05:31 AM
The pure CPU edge goes to the Intel Ultra 9 275HX CPU (for laptops), but the CPU and iGPU goes to the Ryzen Ai Max+ 395. 14 TFLOPs is more than my PS5 gaming console.
0 Reply
EnglishРусский