Home > CPU Comparison > M4 Pro (14-Core) or Ryzen AI Max+ 395: what's better?

Apple M4 Pro (14-Core) vs AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395

89 out of 100
Apple M4 Pro (14-Core)
VS
82 out of 100
AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395
Apple M4 Pro (14-Core)
AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395

We compared two laptop CPUs: the 4.51 GHz Apple M4 Pro (14-Core) with 14-cores against the 3.0 GHz AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395 with 16-cores. On this page, you'll find out which processor has better performance in benchmarks, games and other useful information.

  1. Review
  2. Differences
  3. Performance
  4. Specs
  5. Comments (2)

Review

General overview and comparison of the processors
Single-Core Performance
Performance in single-threaded apps and benchmarks
Multi-Core Performance
Measure performance when all cores are involved
Power Efficiency
The efficiency score of power consumption
Integrated Graphics
iGPU capabilities for gaming and 3D-intensive tasks
NanoReview Final Score
Choose your main usage scenario to recalculate the Final Score and see which CPU suits your needs.
πŸ”Œ Usage Scenario:

Key Differences

What are the key differences between 395 and (14-Core)
Advantages of Apple M4 Pro (14-Core)
  • More modern manufacturing process – 3 versus 4 nanometers
  • 29% faster in a single-core Geekbench v6 test - 3899 vs 3017 points
  • Around 17 GB/s (7%) higher theoretical memory bandwidth
Advantages of AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395
  • Supports up to 128 GB LPDDR5X-8000 RAM
  • More powerful Radeon 8060S integrated graphics: 14.8 vs 8.1 TFLOPS
  • Has 2 more physical cores

Test in Benchmarks

Comparing the performance of CPUs across various tasks
CPU:
M4 Pro (14-Core)
vs
Ryzen AI Max+ 395

Cinebench

Reputable cross-platform benchmark for high-performance processors
Cinebench 2024 (Single)
Cinebench 2024 (Multi)
Cinebench 2026 (Single) - 619
Cinebench 2026 (Multi) 6050 7559
Cinebench Scores (52nd and 37th place)
Submit your benchmark results

GeekBench v6

The new version of this benchmark emulates common operations often used in real-world apps
Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)
Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)
File compression 2250 MB/sec 2050 MB/sec
Clang compilation 187.5 Klines/sec 202 Klines/sec
HTML 5 Browser 586.6 pages/sec 527.3 pages/sec
PDF Renderer 624.4 Mpixels/sec 586.3 Mpixels/sec
Text processing 367.3 pages/sec 339.2 pages/sec
Background blur 86.9 images/sec 72.8 images/sec
Photo processing 200.3 images/sec 200 images/sec
Ray tracing 30.5 Mpixels/sec 45.8 Mpixels/sec
Sources: GeekBench [1], [2]

PassMark

Synthetic test that focuses on raw computational performance for low-level functions
Passmark CPU (Single-Core)
Passmark CPU (Multi-Core)
Integer math 84 GOps/sec 200.8 GOps/sec
Floating point math 85.5 GOps/sec 128.8 GOps/sec
Find prime numbers 530M Primes/sec 303M Primes/sec
Random string sorting 54.9M Strings/sec 76.2M Strings/sec
Data encryption 23 GBytes/sec 35.5 GBytes/sec
Data compression 487.6 MBytes/sec 691 MBytes/sec
Physics 5313 Frames/sec 3481 Frames/sec
Extended instructions 25.7B Matrices/sec 56.4B Matrices/sec
Sources: PassMark [3], [4] – 805 & 1115 samples

Blender

3D rendering test that measures CPU performance in 3D modeling tasks (uses all cores)
Blender CPU

Performance Per Watt

Shows the score you get per each watt of PL1 TDP
Cinebench 2024 / Watt 36.5 PPW 15.5 PPW
Geekbench 6 Multi / Watt 492.2 PPW 186.4 PPW
Passmark CPU Mark / Watt 825.7 PPW 458 PPW
Blender / Watt - 3.51 PPW
These are rough calculations, as most CPUs surpass PL1 TDP wattage even in multicore workloads.

Recent User Tests

The latest benchmark tests that have been submitted by users
Apple M4 Pro (14-Core)
DateBenchmarkResult
πŸ“˜ 2025-10-24 (TechWolf)Cinebench 2024171 / 1698
πŸ“˜ 2025-04-26 (cyw)Cinebench 2024172 / 1678
Add View all (2)
AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395
DateBenchmarkResult
πŸ“˜ 2026-06-20 -> RhyndGeekBench2885 / 20105
πŸ“˜ 2026-04-23 -> RhyndCinebench 2026619 / 7559
πŸ“˜ 2026-04-20 (Rhynd)Cinebench 2026608 / 7101
πŸ“˜ 2025-09-11 (dsc)Cinebench 2024115 / 1855
πŸ“˜ 2025-06-30 (Declan)GeekBench2744 / 17850
Add View all (9)

Specifications

Full technical specification of Apple M4 Pro (14-Core) and AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395

General

Vendor Apple Amd
Released October 29, 2024 January 7, 2025
Type Laptop Laptop
Instruction Set ARMv9 x86-64
Codename Apple M4 Zen 5 (Strix Halo)
Integrated GPU Apple M4 GPU (20-core) Radeon 8060S
Rival Equivalent - - Apple M4 Pro (14-Core)
Successor - Apple M5 Pro (18-Core) -

CPU

Performance Cores
P-Cores 10 16
P-Threads 10 32
Base Frequency (P) 4.51 GHz 3.0 GHz
Turbo Boost Frequency (P) - 5.1 GHz
Efficient Cores
E-Cores 4 -
E-Threads 4 -
Base Frequency (E) 2.59 GHz -
Total
Total Cores 14 16
Total Threads 14 32
Bus Frequency - 100 MHz
Multiplier 45x 30x
L1 Cache 192K (per core) 80K (per core)
L2 Cache 16MB (shared) 1MB (per core)
L3 Cache - 64MB (shared)
Unlocked Multiplier No No

Package

Fabrication Process 3 nm 4 nm
TDP (PL1) 46 W 45-120 W (configurable)
Socket Apple M-Socket FP11
Peak Temperature 100Β°C 100Β°C
Laptop processors ranking (8th and 15th place)

iGPU

Integrated Graphics Apple M4 GPU (20-core) Radeon 8060S
GPU Base Clock 500 MHz 1295 MHz
GPU Boost Clock 1578 MHz 2900 MHz
Shading Units 2560 2560
TMUs 160 160
ROPs 80 64
Execution Units 320 40
TGP 26 W 55 W
iGPU FLOPS
M4 Pro (14-Core)
8.1 TFLOPS
Ryzen AI Max+ 395 +83%
14.8 TFLOPS
More info: Radeon 8060S compared to Apple M4 Pro GPU (20-core)

Memory Support

Memory Types - LPDDR5X-8533 - LPDDR5X-8000
Max. Memory Size 64 GB 128 GB
Memory Channels 16 4
Max. Memory Bandwidth 273 GB/s 256 GB/s
ECC Support No Yes

Misc

Official Site - AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395 official page
PCI Express Version - 4.0
PCI Express Lanes - 16

Cast your vote

Choose between two processors
94 (42.5%)
127 (57.5%)
Total votes: 221

Competitors

1. AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395 vs AMD Ryzen AI Max 390 (1)
2. AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395 vs AMD Ryzen AI Max+ Pro 395 (3)
3. AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395 vs Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX (1)
4. AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395 vs AMD Ryzen 9 9900X
5. AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395 vs AMD Ryzen AI Max 385
6. Apple M4 Pro (14-Core) vs Apple M4 Pro (12-Core) (3)
7. Apple M4 Pro (14-Core) vs Apple M4 Max (14-Core) (7)
8. Apple M4 Pro (14-Core) vs Intel Core i9 14900KF
9. Apple M4 Pro (14-Core) vs AMD Ryzen 9 9900X
10. Apple M4 Pro (14-Core) vs Apple M3 Pro
Compare other CPUs (460+)

Comments

So which CPU will you choose: AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395 or Apple M4 Pro (14-Core)?
🌐 Register your profile and become part of NanoReview community!
Avatar
berat tunca March 1, 2025 at 06:27 AM
amd domination pc industry!
+8 Reply
Avatar
ComputerNerd January 20, 2025 at 03:13 PM
The M4 Pro (14-core) still dominates the industry in single core CPU performance in early 2025, but the Ryzen AI Max+ 395 (horrible name) give it very close competition in the multi-core performance. In fact, it slightly edges it out according to the Cinebench R24. For those with a MacOS bias will be fine with an M4 Pro CPU for heavy duty CPU tasks. For those with an AMD bias will be fine with the Ryzen AI Max+ 395 for heavy duty CPU tasks. The only differences are the AMD fans get full X86 software compatibility, and the MacOS fans get slightly more energy efficiency (TDP 45 watts vs 55 watts).
+24 Reply
EnglishРусский