Home > CPU Comparison > Ryzen AI Max+ 395 or Ryzen AI Max+ 392: what's better?

AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395 vs AI Max+ 392

82 out of 100
AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395
VS
75 out of 100
AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 392
AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395
AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 392

We compared two laptop CPUs: the 3.0 GHz AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395 with 16-cores against the 3.2 GHz AI Max+ 392 with 12-cores. On this page, you'll find out which processor has better performance in benchmarks, games and other useful information.

  1. Review
  2. Differences
  3. Performance
  4. Specs
  5. Comments

Review

General overview and comparison of the processors
Single-Core Performance
Performance in single-threaded apps and benchmarks
Multi-Core Performance
Measure performance when all cores are involved
Power Efficiency
The efficiency score of power consumption
Integrated Graphics
iGPU capabilities for gaming and 3D-intensive tasks
NanoReview Final Score
Choose your main usage scenario to recalculate the Final Score and see which CPU suits your needs.
πŸ”Œ Usage Scenario:

Key Differences

What are the key differences between 392 and 395
Advantages of AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395
  • Has 4 more physical cores
  • 2% higher Turbo Boost frequency (5.1 GHz vs 5 GHz)
Advantages of AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 392
  • Newer - released 1 year later

Test in Benchmarks

Comparing the performance of CPUs across various tasks
CPU:
Ryzen AI Max+ 395
vs
Ryzen AI Max+ 392

Cinebench

Reputable cross-platform benchmark for high-performance processors
Cinebench 2024 (Single)
Cinebench 2024 (Multi)
Cinebench 2026 (Single) 619 -
Cinebench 2026 (Multi) 7559 -
Cinebench Scores (38th and 78th place)
Submit your benchmark results

GeekBench v6

The new version of this benchmark emulates common operations often used in real-world apps
Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)
Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)
File compression 2050 MB/sec 1450 MB/sec
Clang compilation 202 Klines/sec 147 Klines/sec
HTML 5 Browser 527.3 pages/sec 426.6 pages/sec
PDF Renderer 586.3 Mpixels/sec 429.7 Mpixels/sec
Text processing 339.2 pages/sec 314.8 pages/sec
Background blur 72.8 images/sec 72.5 images/sec
Photo processing 200 images/sec 175.7 images/sec
Ray tracing 45.8 Mpixels/sec 28.8 Mpixels/sec
Sources: GeekBench [1], [2]

PassMark

Synthetic test that focuses on raw computational performance for low-level functions
Passmark CPU (Single-Core)
Passmark CPU (Multi-Core)
Integer math 200.8 GOps/sec 152.5 GOps/sec
Floating point math 128.8 GOps/sec 99.8 GOps/sec
Find prime numbers 303M Primes/sec 315M Primes/sec
Random string sorting 76.2M Strings/sec 59.5M Strings/sec
Data encryption 35.5 GBytes/sec 27.8 GBytes/sec
Data compression 691 MBytes/sec 555.7 MBytes/sec
Physics 3481 Frames/sec 2881 Frames/sec
Extended instructions 56.4B Matrices/sec 45.8B Matrices/sec
Sources: PassMark [3], [4] – 1115 & 23 samples

Blender

3D rendering test that measures CPU performance in 3D modeling tasks (uses all cores)
Blender CPU

Performance Per Watt

Shows the score you get per each watt of PL1 TDP
Cinebench 2024 / Watt 15.5 PPW 26.3 PPW
Geekbench 6 Multi / Watt 186.4 PPW 327.3 PPW
Passmark CPU Mark / Watt 458 PPW 823 PPW
Blender / Watt 3.51 PPW 7.07 PPW
These are rough calculations, as most CPUs surpass PL1 TDP wattage even in multicore workloads.

Recent User Tests

The latest benchmark tests that have been submitted by users
AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395
DateBenchmarkResult
πŸ“˜ 2026-06-20 -> RhyndGeekbench 6 CPU2885 / 20105
πŸ“˜ 2026-04-23 -> RhyndCinebench 2026619 / 7559
πŸ“˜ 2026-04-20 (Rhynd)Cinebench 2026608 / 7101
πŸ“˜ 2025-09-11 (dsc)Cinebench 2024115 / 1855
πŸ“˜ 2025-06-30 (Declan)Geekbench 6 CPU2744 / 17850
Add View all (9)
AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 392
No benchmark results yet
Add

Specifications

Full technical specification of AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395 and AI Max+ 392

General

Vendor Amd Amd
Released January 7, 2025 January 5, 2026
Type Laptop Laptop
Instruction Set x86-64 x86-64
Codename Zen 5 (Strix Halo) Zen 5 (Strix Halo)
Model number - 392
Integrated GPU Radeon 8060S Radeon 8060S
Rival Equivalent - Apple M4 Pro (14-Core) -
AMD Ryzen CPU ranking (8th and 19th place)

CPU

Performance Cores
P-Cores 16 12
P-Threads 32 24
Base Frequency (P) 3.0 GHz 3.2 GHz
Turbo Boost Frequency (P) 5.1 GHz 5 GHz
Total
Total Cores 16 12
Total Threads 32 24
Bus Frequency 100 MHz 100 MHz
Multiplier 30x 32x
L1 Cache 80K (per core) 80K (per core)
L2 Cache 1MB (per core) 1MB (per core)
L3 Cache 64MB (shared) 64MB (shared)
Unlocked Multiplier No No

Package

Fabrication Process 4 nm 4 nm
TDP (PL1) 45-120 W (configurable) 45-55 W (configurable)
Max. Boost TDP (PL2) - 120 W
Socket FP11 FP11
Peak Temperature 100Β°C 100Β°C
Laptop processors ranking (16th and 31st place)

iGPU

Integrated Graphics Radeon 8060S Radeon 8060S
GPU Base Clock 1295 MHz 1295 MHz
GPU Boost Clock 2900 MHz 2900 MHz
Shading Units 2560 2560
TMUs 160 160
ROPs 64 64
Execution Units 40 40
TGP 55 W 55 W
iGPU FLOPS
Ryzen AI Max+ 395
14.8 TFLOPS
Ryzen AI Max+ 392
14.8 TFLOPS
See: Radeon 8060S benchmarks

Memory Support

Memory Types - LPDDR5X-8000 - LPDDR5X-8000
Max. Memory Size 128 GB 128 GB
Memory Channels 4 4
Max. Memory Bandwidth 256 GB/s 256 GB/s
ECC Support Yes No

Misc

Official Site AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395 official page AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 392 official page
PCI Express Version 4.0 4.0
PCI Express Lanes 16 16

Cast your vote

Choose between two processors
9 (40.9%)
13 (59.1%)
Total votes: 22

Competitors

1. AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395 vs Apple M4 Pro (14-Core) (2)
2. AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395 vs AMD Ryzen AI Max 390 (1)
3. AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395 vs Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX (1)
4. AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395 vs AMD Ryzen AI Max 385
5. AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395 vs AMD Ryzen AI Max+ Pro 395 (3)
6. AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 392 vs Intel Core Ultra 7 255H
Compare other CPUs (460+)

Comments

So which CPU will you choose: AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 392 or AI Max+ 395?
🌐 Register your profile and become part of NanoReview community!
EnglishРусский