Intel Core Ultra 7 265U vs AMD Ryzen 7 250
We compared two laptop CPUs: the 2.1 GHz Intel Core Ultra 7 265U with 12-cores against the 3.3 GHz AMD Ryzen 7 250 with 8-cores. On this page, you'll find out which processor has better performance in benchmarks, games and other useful information.
Review
Single-Core Performance
Performance in single-threaded apps and benchmarks
Multi-Core Performance
Measure performance when all cores are involved
Power Efficiency
The efficiency score of power consumption
Integrated Graphics
iGPU capabilities for gaming and 3D-intensive tasks
Choose your main usage scenario to recalculate the Final Score and see which CPU suits your needs.
Key Differences
Advantages of Intel Core Ultra 7 265U
- Has 4 more physical cores
- More modern manufacturing process β 3 versus 4 nanometers
- More than 10Β° C higher critical temperature
- 4% higher Turbo Boost frequency (5.3 GHz vs 5.1 GHz)
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 7 250
- Supports up to 256 GB LPDDR5X-7500 RAM
- More powerful Radeon 780M integrated graphics: 4.1 vs 2.2 TFLOPS
- Has 4 MB larger L3 cache size
Test in Benchmarks
Comparing the performance of CPUs across various tasksCinebench
Cinebench 2024 (Single)
Cinebench 2024 (Multi)
GeekBench v6
Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)
Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)
| File compression | 991 MB/sec | 1060 MB/sec |
| Clang compilation | 78 Klines/sec | 83.3 Klines/sec |
| HTML 5 Browser | 260.8 pages/sec | 233.7 pages/sec |
| PDF Renderer | 300.3 Mpixels/sec | 316.4 Mpixels/sec |
| Text processing | 255.3 pages/sec | 254.9 pages/sec |
| Background blur | 46.9 images/sec | 49.6 images/sec |
| Photo processing | 89.2 images/sec | 91 images/sec |
| Ray tracing | 15.5 Mpixels/sec | 18.8 Mpixels/sec |
PassMark
Passmark CPU (Single-Core)
Passmark CPU (Multi-Core)
| Integer math | 63.5 GOps/sec | 91.5 GOps/sec |
| Floating point math | 44.4 GOps/sec | 53.2 GOps/sec |
| Find prime numbers | 64M Primes/sec | 72M Primes/sec |
| Random string sorting | 21M Strings/sec | 35.8M Strings/sec |
| Data encryption | 12 GBytes/sec | 17.6 GBytes/sec |
| Data compression | 191.7 MBytes/sec | 300.5 MBytes/sec |
| Physics | 1140 Frames/sec | 1138 Frames/sec |
| Extended instructions | 10.7B Matrices/sec | 21.6B Matrices/sec |
Blender
Blender CPU
Performance Per Watt
| Cinebench 2024 / Watt | 36.5 PPW | 27.5 PPW |
| Geekbench 6 Multi / Watt | 694.2 PPW | 377.4 PPW |
| Passmark CPU Mark / Watt | 1168 PPW | 834.5 PPW |
| Blender / Watt | 7.63 PPW | 7.1 PPW |
These are rough calculations, as most CPUs surpass PL1 TDP wattage even in multicore workloads.
Recent User Tests
Intel Core Ultra 7 265U
No benchmark results yet
AMD Ryzen 7 250
| Date | Benchmark | Result |
|---|---|---|
| π 2026-01-14 (PRAVEEN PRO) | Geekbench 6 CPU | 2463 / 9185 |
| π 2025-12-11 (Nidhin) | Cinebench 2024 | 101 / 826 |
| π 2025-11-17 (Sanky) | Geekbench 6 CPU | 2526 / 9803 |
| π 2025-10-12 (Shrifty) | Cinebench 2024 | 103 / 774 |
| π 2025-09-27 (Arkblade) | Geekbench 6 CPU | 2473 / 9614 |
Specifications
Full technical specification of Intel Core Ultra 7 265U and AMD Ryzen 7 250General
| Vendor | Intel | Amd |
| Released | January 6, 2025 | January 7, 2025 |
| Type | Laptop | Laptop |
| Instruction Set | x86-64 | x86-64 |
| Codename | Arrow Lake | Zen 4 (Hawk Point) |
| Model number | 265U | - |
| Integrated GPU | Arc Graphics (4-Cores) | Radeon 780M |
| Rival Equivalent | - AMD Ryzen 7 250 | - Intel Core Ultra 7 265U |
Intel CPU rating (#121st place)
AMD Ryzen CPU ranking (#57th place)
CPU
| P-Cores | 2 | 8 |
| P-Threads | 4 | 16 |
| Base Frequency (P) | 2.1 GHz | 3.3 GHz |
| Turbo Boost Frequency (P) | 5.3 GHz | 5.1 GHz |
| E-Cores | 10 | - |
| E-Threads | 10 | - |
| Base Frequency (E) | 1.7 GHz | - |
| Turbo Boost Frequency (E) | 4.2 GHz | - |
| Total Cores | 12 | 8 |
| Total Threads | 14 | 16 |
| Bus Frequency | 100 MHz | 100 MHz |
| Multiplier | 21x | 33x |
| L1 Cache | 112K (per core) | 64K (per core) |
| L2 Cache | 2MB (per core) | 1MB (per core) |
| L3 Cache | 12MB (shared) | 16MB (shared) |
| Unlocked Multiplier | No | No |
Package
| Fabrication Process | 3 nm | 4 nm |
| TDP (PL1) | 12-15 W (configurable) | 15-30 W (configurable) |
| Max. Boost TDP (PL2) | 57 W | - |
| Socket | FCBGA-2049 | FP8 |
| Peak Temperature | 110Β°C | 100Β°C |
Laptop processors ranking (160th and 89th place)
iGPU
| Integrated Graphics | Arc Graphics (4-Cores) | Radeon 780M |
| GPU Base Clock | 300 MHz | 800 MHz |
| GPU Boost Clock | 2100 MHz | 2700 MHz |
| Shading Units | 512 | 768 |
| TMUs | 32 | 48 |
| ROPs | 16 | 32 |
| Execution Units | 64 | 12 |
| TGP | 14 W | 15 W |
iGPU FLOPS
More info: Radeon 780M compared to Arc iGPU (4-Cores)
Memory Support
| Memory Types | - LPDDR5-8400 - LPDDR5x-8400 - DDR5-6400 |
- LPDDR5X-7500 - DDR5-5600 |
| Max. Memory Size | 128 GB | 256 GB |
| Memory Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | No | No |
Misc
| Official Site | Intel Core Ultra 7 265U official page | AMD Ryzen 7 250 official page |
| PCI Express Version | 4.0 | 4.0 |
| PCI Express Lanes | 20 | 20 |
Cast your vote
Total votes: 12