Intel Core Ultra 7 265U vs AMD Ryzen 7 250

We compared two laptop CPUs: the 2.1 GHz Intel Core Ultra 7 265U with 12-cores against the 3.3 GHz AMD Ryzen 7 250 with 8-cores. On this page, you'll find out which processor has better performance in benchmarks, games and other useful information.

Review

General overview and comparison of the processors
Single-Core Performance
Performance in single-threaded apps and benchmarks
Multi-Core Performance
Measure performance when all cores are involved
Power Efficiency
The efficiency score of power consumption
Integrated Graphics
iGPU capabilities for gaming and 3D-intensive tasks
NanoReview Final Score
Choose your main usage scenario to recalculate the Final Score and see which CPU suits your needs.
πŸ”Œ Usage Scenario:

Key Differences

What are the key differences between 250 and 265U
Advantages of Intel Core Ultra 7 265U
  • Has 4 more physical cores
  • More modern manufacturing process – 3 versus 4 nanometers
  • More than 10Β° C higher critical temperature
  • 4% higher Turbo Boost frequency (5.3 GHz vs 5.1 GHz)
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 7 250
  • Supports up to 256 GB LPDDR5X-7500 RAM
  • More powerful Radeon 780M integrated graphics: 4.1 vs 2.2 TFLOPS
  • Has 4 MB larger L3 cache size

Test in Benchmarks

Comparing the performance of CPUs across various tasks

Cinebench

Reputable cross-platform benchmark for high-performance processors
Cinebench 2024 (Single)
Cinebench 2024 (Multi)

GeekBench v6

The new version of this benchmark emulates common operations often used in real-world apps
Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)
Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)
11322
File compression 991 MB/sec 1060 MB/sec
Clang compilation 78 Klines/sec 83.3 Klines/sec
HTML 5 Browser 260.8 pages/sec 233.7 pages/sec
PDF Renderer 300.3 Mpixels/sec 316.4 Mpixels/sec
Text processing 255.3 pages/sec 254.9 pages/sec
Background blur 46.9 images/sec 49.6 images/sec
Photo processing 89.2 images/sec 91 images/sec
Ray tracing 15.5 Mpixels/sec 18.8 Mpixels/sec
Sources: GeekBench [1], [2]

PassMark

Synthetic test that focuses on raw computational performance for low-level functions
Passmark CPU (Single-Core)
Passmark CPU (Multi-Core)
25034
Integer math 63.5 GOps/sec 91.5 GOps/sec
Floating point math 44.4 GOps/sec 53.2 GOps/sec
Find prime numbers 64M Primes/sec 72M Primes/sec
Random string sorting 21M Strings/sec 35.8M Strings/sec
Data encryption 12 GBytes/sec 17.6 GBytes/sec
Data compression 191.7 MBytes/sec 300.5 MBytes/sec
Physics 1140 Frames/sec 1138 Frames/sec
Extended instructions 10.7B Matrices/sec 21.6B Matrices/sec
Sources: PassMark [3], [4] – 784 & 531 samples

Blender

3D rendering test that measures CPU performance in 3D modeling tasks (uses all cores)
Blender CPU
212.91

Performance Per Watt

Shows the score you get per each watt of PL1 TDP
Cinebench 2024 / Watt 36.5 PPW 27.5 PPW
Geekbench 6 Multi / Watt 694.2 PPW 377.4 PPW
Passmark CPU Mark / Watt 1168 PPW 834.5 PPW
Blender / Watt 7.63 PPW 7.1 PPW
These are rough calculations, as most CPUs surpass PL1 TDP wattage even in multicore workloads.

Recent User Tests

The latest benchmark tests that have been submitted by users
Intel Core Ultra 7 265U
No benchmark results yet
AMD Ryzen 7 250
DateBenchmarkResult
πŸ“˜ 2026-01-14 (PRAVEEN PRO)Geekbench 6 CPU2463 / 9185
πŸ“˜ 2025-12-11 (Nidhin)Cinebench 2024101 / 826
πŸ“˜ 2025-11-17 (Sanky)Geekbench 6 CPU2526 / 9803
πŸ“˜ 2025-10-12 (Shrifty)Cinebench 2024103 / 774
πŸ“˜ 2025-09-27 (Arkblade)Geekbench 6 CPU2473 / 9614

Specifications

Full technical specification of Intel Core Ultra 7 265U and AMD Ryzen 7 250

General

Vendor Intel Amd
Released January 6, 2025 January 7, 2025
Type Laptop Laptop
Instruction Set x86-64 x86-64
Codename Arrow Lake Zen 4 (Hawk Point)
Model number 265U -
Integrated GPU Arc Graphics (4-Cores) Radeon 780M
Rival Equivalent - AMD Ryzen 7 250 - Intel Core Ultra 7 265U
Intel CPU rating (#121st place)
AMD Ryzen CPU ranking (#57th place)

CPU

Performance Cores
P-Cores 2 8
P-Threads 4 16
Base Frequency (P) 2.1 GHz 3.3 GHz
Turbo Boost Frequency (P) 5.3 GHz 5.1 GHz
Efficient Cores
E-Cores 10 -
E-Threads 10 -
Base Frequency (E) 1.7 GHz -
Turbo Boost Frequency (E) 4.2 GHz -
Total
Total Cores 12 8
Total Threads 14 16
Bus Frequency 100 MHz 100 MHz
Multiplier 21x 33x
L1 Cache 112K (per core) 64K (per core)
L2 Cache 2MB (per core) 1MB (per core)
L3 Cache 12MB (shared) 16MB (shared)
Unlocked Multiplier No No

Package

Fabrication Process 3 nm 4 nm
TDP (PL1) 12-15 W (configurable) 15-30 W (configurable)
Max. Boost TDP (PL2) 57 W -
Socket FCBGA-2049 FP8
Peak Temperature 110Β°C 100Β°C
Laptop processors ranking (160th and 89th place)

iGPU

Integrated Graphics Arc Graphics (4-Cores) Radeon 780M
GPU Base Clock 300 MHz 800 MHz
GPU Boost Clock 2100 MHz 2700 MHz
Shading Units 512 768
TMUs 32 48
ROPs 16 32
Execution Units 64 12
TGP 14 W 15 W
iGPU FLOPS
2.2 TFLOPS
4.1 TFLOPS

Memory Support

Memory Types - LPDDR5-8400
- LPDDR5x-8400
- DDR5-6400
- LPDDR5X-7500
- DDR5-5600
Max. Memory Size 128 GB 256 GB
Memory Channels 2 2
ECC Support No No

Misc

Official Site Intel Core Ultra 7 265U official page AMD Ryzen 7 250 official page
PCI Express Version 4.0 4.0
PCI Express Lanes 20 20

Cast your vote

Choose between two processors
2 (16.7%)
10 (83.3%)
Total votes: 12

Comments

So which CPU will you choose: AMD Ryzen 7 250 or Intel Core Ultra 7 265U?
🌐 Register your profile and become part of NanoReview community!