Intel Core Ultra 7 265U vs Ultra 7 155H

We compared two laptop CPUs: the 2.1 GHz Intel Core Ultra 7 265U with 12-cores against the 1.4 GHz Ultra 7 155H with 16-cores. On this page, you'll find out which processor has better performance in benchmarks, games and other useful information.

Review

General overview and comparison of the processors
Single-Core Performance
Performance in single-threaded apps and benchmarks
Multi-Core Performance
Measure performance when all cores are involved
Power Efficiency
The efficiency score of power consumption
Integrated Graphics
iGPU capabilities for gaming and 3D-intensive tasks
NanoReview Final Score
Choose your main usage scenario to recalculate the Final Score and see which CPU suits your needs.
πŸ”Œ Usage Scenario:

Key Differences

What are the key differences between 155H and 265U
Advantages of Intel Core Ultra 7 265U
  • More modern manufacturing process – 3 versus 7 nanometers
  • Newer - released 1 year and 1 month later
  • Supports up to 128 GB LPDDR5-8400 RAM
  • 10% higher Turbo Boost frequency (5.3 GHz vs 4.8 GHz)
Advantages of Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
  • More powerful Arc Graphics (8-Cores) integrated graphics: 4.6 vs 2.2 TFLOPS
  • Has 12 MB larger L3 cache size, helping fully utilize a high-end GPU in gaming
  • Has 4 more physical cores
  • Newer PCI Express version – 5.0

Test in Benchmarks

Comparing the performance of CPUs across various tasks

Cinebench

Reputable cross-platform benchmark for high-performance processors
Cinebench 2024 (Single)
Cinebench 2024 (Multi)
Cinebench 2026 (Single) - 544
Cinebench 2026 (Multi) - 3749
Cinebench Scores (#165th place)

GeekBench v6

The new version of this benchmark emulates common operations often used in real-world apps
Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)
Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)
File compression 991 MB/sec 1220 MB/sec
Clang compilation 78 Klines/sec 100.8 Klines/sec
HTML 5 Browser 260.8 pages/sec 270.5 pages/sec
PDF Renderer 300.3 Mpixels/sec 356.1 Mpixels/sec
Text processing 255.3 pages/sec 243.4 pages/sec
Background blur 46.9 images/sec 49.2 images/sec
Photo processing 89.2 images/sec 117.2 images/sec
Ray tracing 15.5 Mpixels/sec 19.4 Mpixels/sec
Sources: GeekBench [1], [2] – 910 samples

PassMark

Synthetic test that focuses on raw computational performance for low-level functions
Passmark CPU (Single-Core)
Passmark CPU (Multi-Core)
Integer math 63.5 GOps/sec 85.8 GOps/sec
Floating point math 44.4 GOps/sec 62.5 GOps/sec
Find prime numbers 64M Primes/sec 113M Primes/sec
Random string sorting 21M Strings/sec 31.6M Strings/sec
Data encryption 12 GBytes/sec 16.1 GBytes/sec
Data compression 191.7 MBytes/sec 273.8 MBytes/sec
Physics 1140 Frames/sec 1701 Frames/sec
Extended instructions 10.7B Matrices/sec 16.2B Matrices/sec
Sources: PassMark [3], [4] – 784 & 6648 samples

Blender

3D rendering test that measures CPU performance in 3D modeling tasks (uses all cores)
Blender CPU

Performance Per Watt

Shows the score you get per each watt of PL1 TDP
Cinebench 2024 / Watt 36.5 PPW 14.7 PPW
Geekbench 6 Multi / Watt 694.2 PPW 192.5 PPW
Passmark CPU Mark / Watt 1168 PPW 377.1 PPW
Blender / Watt 7.63 PPW 2.65 PPW
These are rough calculations, as most CPUs surpass PL1 TDP wattage even in multicore workloads.

Recent User Tests

The latest benchmark tests that have been submitted by users
Intel Core Ultra 7 265U
No benchmark results yet
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
DateBenchmarkResult
πŸ“˜ 2026-02-22 (Alex Paulino)Cinebench 2026544 / 3749
πŸ“˜ 2026-01-15 (Ak-Dev)Geekbench 6 CPU2347 / 12862
πŸ“˜ 2025-11-08 (Anuj)Geekbench 6 CPU2248 / 12118
πŸ“˜ 2025-07-25 (Aya)Cinebench 202485 / 943
πŸ“˜ 2025-06-25 (Tarekcoupe)Cinebench 202496 / 930

Specifications

Full technical specification of Intel Core Ultra 7 265U and Ultra 7 155H

General

Vendor Intel Intel
Released January 6, 2025 December 14, 2023
Type Laptop Laptop
Instruction Set x86-64 x86-64
Codename Arrow Lake Meteor Lake
Model number 265U 155H
Integrated GPU Arc Graphics (4-Cores) Arc Graphics (8-Cores)
Rival Equivalent - AMD Ryzen 7 250 - AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS
Successor - - Intel Core Ultra 7 255H
Intel CPU rating (121st and 99th place)

CPU

Performance Cores
P-Cores 2 6
P-Threads 4 12
Base Frequency (P) 2.1 GHz 1.4 GHz
Turbo Boost Frequency (P) 5.3 GHz 4.8 GHz
Efficient Cores
E-Cores 10 10
E-Threads 10 10
Base Frequency (E) 1.7 GHz 0.9 GHz
Turbo Boost Frequency (E) 4.2 GHz 3.8 GHz
Total
Total Cores 12 16
Total Threads 14 22
Bus Frequency 100 MHz 100 MHz
Multiplier 21x 14x
L1 Cache 112K (per core) 112K (per core)
L2 Cache 2MB (per core) 2MB (per core)
L3 Cache 12MB (shared) 24MB (shared)
Unlocked Multiplier No No

Package

Fabrication Process 3 nm 7 nm
TDP (PL1) 12-15 W (configurable) 20-65 W (configurable)
Max. Boost TDP (PL2) 57 W 115 W
Socket FCBGA-2049 FCBGA-2049
Peak Temperature 110Β°C 110Β°C
Laptop processors ranking (160th and 128th place)

iGPU

Integrated Graphics Arc Graphics (4-Cores) Arc Graphics (8-Cores)
GPU Base Clock 300 MHz 300 MHz
GPU Boost Clock 2100 MHz 2250 MHz
Shading Units 512 1024
TMUs 32 64
ROPs 16 32
Execution Units 64 128
TGP 14 W 28 W
iGPU FLOPS
2.2 TFLOPS
4.6 TFLOPS

Memory Support

Memory Types - LPDDR5-8400
- LPDDR5x-8400
- DDR5-6400
- LPDDR5-7467
- LPDDR5x-7467
- DDR5-5600
Max. Memory Size 128 GB 96 GB
Memory Channels 2 2
Max. Memory Bandwidth - 89.6 GB/s
ECC Support No No

Misc

Official Site Intel Core Ultra 7 265U official page Intel Core Ultra 7 155H official page
PCI Express Version 4.0 5.0
PCI Express Lanes 20 28

Cast your vote

Choose between two processors
0 (0%)
3 (100%)
Total votes: 3

Comments

So which CPU will you choose: Intel Core Ultra 7 155H or Ultra 7 265U?
🌐 Register your profile and become part of NanoReview community!