Intel Core Ultra 7 268V vs Ultra 7 255H

We compared two laptop CPUs: the 2.2 GHz Intel Core Ultra 7 268V with 8-cores against the 2.0 GHz Ultra 7 255H with 16-cores. On this page, you'll find out which processor has better performance in benchmarks, games and other useful information.

Review

General overview and comparison of the processors
Single-Core Performance
Performance in single-threaded apps and benchmarks
Multi-Core Performance
Measure performance when all cores are involved
Power Efficiency
The efficiency score of power consumption
Integrated Graphics
iGPU capabilities for gaming and 3D-intensive tasks
NanoReview Final Score
Choose your main usage scenario to recalculate the Final Score and see which CPU suits your needs.
πŸ”Œ Usage Scenario:

Key Differences

What are the key differences between 255H and 268V
Advantages of Intel Core Ultra 7 255H
  • Supports up to 128 GB LPDDR5-8400 RAM
  • Has 8 more physical cores
  • Has 12 MB larger L3 cache size, helping fully utilize a high-end GPU in gaming
  • More than 10Β° C higher critical temperature
  • 2% higher Turbo Boost frequency (5.1 GHz vs 5 GHz)

Test in Benchmarks

Comparing the performance of CPUs across various tasks

Cinebench

Reputable cross-platform benchmark for high-performance processors
Cinebench 2024 (Single)
Cinebench 2024 (Multi)
Cinebench Scores (#143rd place)

GeekBench v6

The new version of this benchmark emulates common operations often used in real-world apps
Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)
Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)
File compression 1030 MB/sec 1270 MB/sec
Clang compilation 69 Klines/sec 103.2 Klines/sec
HTML 5 Browser 274.2 pages/sec 399 pages/sec
PDF Renderer 289.2 Mpixels/sec 443.6 Mpixels/sec
Text processing 307.6 pages/sec 283.7 pages/sec
Background blur 51.3 images/sec 62.4 images/sec
Photo processing 117.4 images/sec 144.8 images/sec
Ray tracing 14.4 Mpixels/sec 24 Mpixels/sec
Sources: GeekBench [1], [2]

PassMark

Synthetic test that focuses on raw computational performance for low-level functions
Passmark CPU (Single-Core)
Passmark CPU (Multi-Core)
Integer math 42.7 GOps/sec 78.1 GOps/sec
Floating point math 57.6 GOps/sec 98.9 GOps/sec
Find prime numbers 192M Primes/sec 303M Primes/sec
Random string sorting 22.4M Strings/sec 36.1M Strings/sec
Data encryption 13.8 GBytes/sec 23.4 GBytes/sec
Data compression 181.3 MBytes/sec 299.1 MBytes/sec
Physics 1616 Frames/sec 2251 Frames/sec
Extended instructions 15.3B Matrices/sec 23.8B Matrices/sec
Sources: PassMark [3], [4] – 1293 & 2020 samples

Blender

3D rendering test that measures CPU performance in 3D modeling tasks (uses all cores)
Blender CPU
275.27

Performance Per Watt

Shows the score you get per each watt of PL1 TDP
Cinebench 2024 / Watt 17.2 PPW 37.5 PPW
Geekbench 6 Multi / Watt 302.6 PPW 540.1 PPW
Passmark CPU Mark / Watt 521.2 PPW 1097.3 PPW
Blender / Watt 3.15 PPW 9.83 PPW
These are rough calculations, as most CPUs surpass PL1 TDP wattage even in multicore workloads.

Recent User Tests

The latest benchmark tests that have been submitted by users
Intel Core Ultra 7 268V
No benchmark results yet
Intel Core Ultra 7 255H
DateBenchmarkResult
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-06 -> xnullcodeGeekbench 6 CPU3009 / 11440
πŸ“˜ 2026-08-15 -> xnullcodeGeekbench 6 CPU2849 / 11877
πŸ“˜ 2026-08-15 -> xnullcodeGeekbench 6 CPU2848 / 11898
πŸ“˜ 2026-08-15 -> xnullcodeCinebench 20260 / 3496
πŸ“˜ 2026-08-15 (xnullcode)Geekbench 6 CPU2708 / 11477

Specifications

Full technical specification of Intel Core Ultra 7 268V and Ultra 7 255H

General

Vendor Intel Intel
Released September 4, 2024 January 6, 2025
Type Laptop Laptop
Instruction Set x86-64 x86-64
Codename Lunar Lake Arrow Lake
Model number 268V 255H
Integrated GPU Arc Graphics 140V Arc Graphics 140T
Rival Equivalent - - AMD Ryzen AI 7 350
Intel CPU rating (81st and 50th place)

CPU

Performance Cores
P-Cores 4 6
P-Threads 4 6
Base Frequency (P) 2.2 GHz 2.0 GHz
Turbo Boost Frequency (P) 5 GHz 5.1 GHz
Efficient Cores
E-Cores 4 10
E-Threads 4 10
Base Frequency (E) 2.2 GHz 1.5 GHz
Turbo Boost Frequency (E) 3.7 GHz 4.4 GHz
Total
Total Cores 8 16
Total Threads 8 16
Bus Frequency 100 MHz 100 MHz
Multiplier 22x 20x
L1 Cache 192K (per core) 192K (per core)
L2 Cache 2560K (per core) 2MB (per core)
L3 Cache 12MB (shared) 24MB (shared)
Unlocked Multiplier No No

Package

Fabrication Process 3 nm 3 nm
TDP (PL1) 17-37 W (configurable) 20-28 W (configurable)
Max. Boost TDP (PL2) - 115 W
Socket FCBGA-2833 FCBGA-2049
Peak Temperature 100Β°C 110Β°C
Laptop processors ranking (100th and 61st place)

iGPU

Integrated Graphics Intel Arc Graphics 140V Arc Graphics 140T
GPU Base Clock 600 MHz 300 MHz
GPU Boost Clock 2000 MHz 2250 MHz
Shading Units 1024 1024
TMUs - 64
ROPs - 32
Execution Units - 8
TGP 30 W 35 W
iGPU FLOPS
4.1 TFLOPS
4.6 TFLOPS

Memory Support

Memory Types - LPDDR5X-8533 - LPDDR5-8400
- LPDDR5x-8400
- DDR5-6400
Max. Memory Size 32 GB 128 GB
Memory Channels 2 2
ECC Support No No

Misc

Official Site Intel Core Ultra 7 268V official page Intel Core Ultra 7 255H official page
PCI Express Version 5.0 5.0
PCI Express Lanes 8 28

Cast your vote

Choose between two processors
5 (15.6%)
27 (84.4%)
Total votes: 32

Comments

So which CPU will you choose: Intel Core Ultra 7 255H or Ultra 7 268V?
🌐 Register your profile and become part of NanoReview community!
Avatar
ComputerNerd January 7, 2025 at 10:54 PM
The Intel Ultra V is geared for general computer users that need more snappy responses. The H is for power users that need high multi-core performance. Get the one that meets your needs.
+18 Reply