Intel Core Ultra 7 255H vs Ultra 5 225H

We compared two laptop CPUs: the 2.0 GHz Intel Core Ultra 7 255H with 16-cores against the 1.7 GHz Ultra 5 225H with 14-cores. On this page, you'll find out which processor has better performance in benchmarks, games and other useful information.

Review

General overview and comparison of the processors
Single-Core Performance
Performance in single-threaded apps and benchmarks
Multi-Core Performance
Measure performance when all cores are involved
Power Efficiency
The efficiency score of power consumption
Integrated Graphics
iGPU capabilities for gaming and 3D-intensive tasks
NanoReview Final Score
Choose your main usage scenario to recalculate the Final Score and see which CPU suits your needs.
πŸ”Œ Usage Scenario:

Key Differences

What are the key differences between 225H and 255H
Advantages of Intel Core Ultra 7 255H
  • Has 6 MB larger L3 cache size, helping fully utilize a high-end GPU in gaming
  • More powerful Arc Graphics 140T integrated graphics: 4.6 vs 3.9 TFLOPS
  • Has 2 more physical cores
  • 4% higher Turbo Boost frequency (5.1 GHz vs 4.9 GHz)

Test in Benchmarks

Comparing the performance of CPUs across various tasks

Cinebench

Reputable cross-platform benchmark for high-performance processors
Cinebench 2024 (Single)
Cinebench 2024 (Multi)
Cinebench Scores (143rd and 154th place)

GeekBench v6

The new version of this benchmark emulates common operations often used in real-world apps
Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)
Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)
File compression 1270 MB/sec 1170 MB/sec
Clang compilation 103.2 Klines/sec 95.1 Klines/sec
HTML 5 Browser 399 pages/sec 335.7 pages/sec
PDF Renderer 443.6 Mpixels/sec 352.6 Mpixels/sec
Text processing 283.7 pages/sec 296.4 pages/sec
Background blur 62.4 images/sec 59.8 images/sec
Photo processing 144.8 images/sec 125 images/sec
Ray tracing 24 Mpixels/sec 20.9 Mpixels/sec
Sources: GeekBench [1], [2]

PassMark

Synthetic test that focuses on raw computational performance for low-level functions
Passmark CPU (Single-Core)
Passmark CPU (Multi-Core)
Integer math 78.1 GOps/sec 68.5 GOps/sec
Floating point math 98.9 GOps/sec 86.6 GOps/sec
Find prime numbers 303M Primes/sec 220M Primes/sec
Random string sorting 36.1M Strings/sec 33.7M Strings/sec
Data encryption 23.4 GBytes/sec 21.4 GBytes/sec
Data compression 299.1 MBytes/sec 283.4 MBytes/sec
Physics 2251 Frames/sec 1875 Frames/sec
Extended instructions 23.8B Matrices/sec 21.9B Matrices/sec
Sources: PassMark [3], [4] – 2020 & 750 samples

Blender

3D rendering test that measures CPU performance in 3D modeling tasks (uses all cores)
Blender CPU

Performance Per Watt

Shows the score you get per each watt of PL1 TDP
Cinebench 2024 / Watt 37.5 PPW 35.8 PPW
Geekbench 6 Multi / Watt 540.1 PPW 478.4 PPW
Passmark CPU Mark / Watt 1097.3 PPW 1004.4 PPW
Blender / Watt 9.83 PPW 7.33 PPW
These are rough calculations, as most CPUs surpass PL1 TDP wattage even in multicore workloads.

Recent User Tests

The latest benchmark tests that have been submitted by users
Intel Core Ultra 7 255H
DateBenchmarkResult
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-06 -> xnullcodeGeekbench 6 CPU3009 / 11440
πŸ“˜ 2026-08-15 -> xnullcodeGeekbench 6 CPU2849 / 11877
πŸ“˜ 2026-08-15 -> xnullcodeGeekbench 6 CPU2848 / 11898
πŸ“˜ 2026-08-15 -> xnullcodeCinebench 20260 / 3496
πŸ“˜ 2026-08-15 (xnullcode)Geekbench 6 CPU2708 / 11477
Intel Core Ultra 5 225H
DateBenchmarkResult
πŸ“˜ 2026-01-30 (vsm)Geekbench 6 CPU2721 / 15088
πŸ“˜ 2025-12-15 (AbduAlhuzali)Geekbench 6 CPU2698 / 14644
πŸ“˜ 2025-11-30 (BatmanKun)Geekbench 6 CPU2643 / 14536
πŸ“˜ 2025-09-18 (goektug)Geekbench 6 CPU2782 / 14959
πŸ“˜ 2025-09-11 (vvvvv)Geekbench 6 CPU2791 / 15240

Specifications

Full technical specification of Intel Core Ultra 7 255H and Ultra 5 225H

General

Vendor Intel Intel
Released January 6, 2025 January 6, 2025
Type Laptop Laptop
Instruction Set x86-64 x86-64
Codename Arrow Lake Arrow Lake
Model number 255H 225H
Integrated GPU Arc Graphics 140T Arc Graphics 130T
Rival Equivalent - AMD Ryzen AI 7 350 - AMD Ryzen 5 230
Intel CPU rating (50th and 67th place)

CPU

Performance Cores
P-Cores 6 4
P-Threads 6 4
Base Frequency (P) 2.0 GHz 1.7 GHz
Turbo Boost Frequency (P) 5.1 GHz 4.9 GHz
Efficient Cores
E-Cores 10 10
E-Threads 10 10
Base Frequency (E) 1.5 GHz 1.3 GHz
Turbo Boost Frequency (E) 4.4 GHz 4.3 GHz
Total
Total Cores 16 14
Total Threads 16 14
Bus Frequency 100 MHz 100 MHz
Multiplier 20x 17x
L1 Cache 192K (per core) 192K (per core)
L2 Cache 2MB (per core) 2MB (per core)
L3 Cache 24MB (shared) 18MB (shared)
Unlocked Multiplier No No

Package

Fabrication Process 3 nm 3 nm
TDP (PL1) 20-28 W (configurable) 20-28 W (configurable)
Max. Boost TDP (PL2) 115 W 115 W
Socket FCBGA-2049 FCBGA-2049
Peak Temperature 110Β°C 110Β°C
Laptop processors ranking (61st and 76th place)

iGPU

Integrated Graphics Arc Graphics 140T Arc Graphics 130T
GPU Base Clock 300 MHz 300 MHz
GPU Boost Clock 2250 MHz 2200 MHz
Shading Units 1024 896
TMUs 64 56
ROPs 32 28
Execution Units 8 7
TGP 35 W 35 W
iGPU FLOPS
4.6 TFLOPS
3.9 TFLOPS

Memory Support

Memory Types - LPDDR5-8400
- LPDDR5x-8400
- DDR5-6400
- LPDDR5-8400
- LPDDR5x-8400
- DDR5-6400
Max. Memory Size 128 GB 128 GB
Memory Channels 2 2
ECC Support No No

Misc

Official Site Intel Core Ultra 7 255H official page Intel Core Ultra 5 225H official page
PCI Express Version 5.0 5.0
PCI Express Lanes 28 28

Cast your vote

Choose between two processors
164 (44%)
209 (56%)
Total votes: 373

Comments

So which CPU will you choose: Intel Core Ultra 5 225H or Ultra 7 255H?
🌐 Register your profile and become part of NanoReview community!
Avatar
kage February 19, 2026 at 03:02 PM
in real world performance, thermals among the cpu matter more since these are generally used in light laptops, performance is much closer
+19 Reply
Avatar
AMD November 11, 2025 at 06:55 AM
Both are good but core ultra 5 offers much value for money performance
+27 Reply
Avatar
drp May 3, 2025 at 06:27 PM
Whats your testing machine
+31 Reply
Avatar
ComputerNerd April 11, 2025 at 10:48 PM
Both of these CPU can be used with the new Asus NUC 15 Pro. I don't know if the Ultra 7 255H is worth $300 more than the Ultra 5 225H. Yes, the CPU multicore score is better by 17 to 25% and the iGPU is better by 18%. Value hunters are better off with an Intel Ultra 5 225H CPU. People wanting a high-performance Intel CPU should go after the Intel Ultra 7 255H.
+44 Reply
Avatar
Core Ultra 5 225H should be 12 threads, right? February 12, 2025 at 05:36 PM
Is it a mistake, should be 4+8.
+21 Reply
Avatar
Arun April 24, 2025 at 12:50 PM
Core Ultra 5 225H is 4+8+2 - 14 cores Core Utra 7 255h is 6+8+2 - 16 cores
+63 Reply