Intel Core Ultra X7 358H vs Apple M6 (12-Core)

We compared two laptop CPUs: the 1.9 GHz Intel Core Ultra X7 358H with 16-cores against the 4.79 GHz Apple M6 (12-Core) with 12-cores. On this page, you'll find out which processor has better performance in benchmarks, games and other useful information.

Review

General overview and comparison of the processors
Single-Core Performance
Performance in single-threaded apps and benchmarks
Multi-Core Performance
Measure performance when all cores are involved
Power Efficiency
The efficiency score of power consumption
Integrated Graphics
iGPU capabilities for gaming and 3D-intensive tasks
NanoReview Final Score
Choose your main usage scenario to recalculate the Final Score and see which CPU suits your needs.
πŸ”Œ Usage Scenario:

Key Differences

What are the key differences between (12-Core) and 358H
Advantages of Intel Core Ultra X7 358H
  • Supports up to 96 GB LPDDR5X-9600 RAM
  • More powerful Intel Arc B390 integrated graphics: 7.7 vs 4.9 TFLOPS
  • Has 4 more physical cores
Advantages of Apple M6 (12-Core)
  • Newer - released 8 months later
  • 62% faster in a single-core Geekbench v6 test - 4610 vs 2839 points
  • Around 16.4 GB/s (11%) higher theoretical memory bandwidth

Test in Benchmarks

Comparing the performance of CPUs across various tasks

Cinebench

Reputable cross-platform benchmark for high-performance processors
Cinebench 2024 (Single)
Cinebench 2024 (Multi)
Cinebench 2026 (Single) 502 -
Cinebench 2026 (Multi) 4689 -
Cinebench Scores (#32nd place)

GeekBench v6

The new version of this benchmark emulates common operations often used in real-world apps
Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)
Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)
20676
File compression 1210 MB/sec -
Clang compilation 98.2 Klines/sec -
HTML 5 Browser 371.3 pages/sec -
PDF Renderer 368 Mpixels/sec -
Text processing 293 pages/sec -
Background blur 59.2 images/sec -
Photo processing 118.3 images/sec -
Ray tracing 19.7 Mpixels/sec -
Sources: GeekBench [1], [2]

PassMark

Synthetic test that focuses on raw computational performance for low-level functions
Passmark CPU (Single-Core)
Passmark CPU (Multi-Core)
Integer math 82.8 GOps/sec -
Floating point math 103.3 GOps/sec -
Find prime numbers 336M Primes/sec -
Random string sorting 40.2M Strings/sec -
Data encryption 25.9 GBytes/sec -
Data compression 331.3 MBytes/sec -
Physics 3011 Frames/sec -
Extended instructions 27.2B Matrices/sec -
Sources: PassMark [3] – 334 samples

Blender

3D rendering test that measures CPU performance in 3D modeling tasks (uses all cores)
Blender CPU

Performance Per Watt

Shows the score you get per each watt of PL1 TDP
Cinebench 2024 / Watt 44.6 PPW -
Geekbench 6 Multi / Watt 682.5 PPW -
Passmark CPU Mark / Watt 1346.9 PPW -
Blender / Watt 11.27 PPW -
These are rough calculations, as most CPUs surpass PL1 TDP wattage even in multicore workloads.

Recent User Tests

The latest benchmark tests that have been submitted by users
Intel Core Ultra X7 358H
DateBenchmarkResult
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-05 -> asterismxGeekbench 6 CPU2910 / 17150
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-05 -> asterismxCinebench 2024126 / 1182
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-05 -> asterismxCinebench 20260 / 4753
Apple M6 (12-Core)
No benchmark results yet

Specifications

Full technical specification of Intel Core Ultra X7 358H and Apple M6 (12-Core)

General

Vendor Intel Apple
Released January 5, 2026 August 25, 2026
Type Laptop Laptop
Instruction Set x86-64 ARMv9
Codename Panther Lake Apple M6
Model number 358H T8152
Integrated GPU Arc B390 Apple M6 GPU (12-core)
Intel CPU rating (#39th place)

CPU

Performance Cores
P-Cores 4 6
P-Threads 4 6
Base Frequency (P) 1.9 GHz 4.79 GHz
Turbo Boost Frequency (P) 4.8 GHz -
Efficient Cores
E-Cores 12 6
E-Threads 12 6
Base Frequency (E) 1.5 GHz -
Turbo Boost Frequency (E) 3.5 GHz -
Total
Total Cores 16 12
Total Threads 16 12
Bus Frequency 100 MHz 100 MHz
Multiplier 19x 47x
L1 Cache 192K (per core) 256K (per core)
L2 Cache 3MB (per core) 8MB (shared)
L3 Cache 18MB (shared) -
Unlocked Multiplier No No

Package

Fabrication Process 2 nm 2 nm
TDP (PL1) 15-25 W (configurable) -
Max. Boost TDP (PL2) 80 W -
Socket FCBGA2540 Apple M-Socket
Peak Temperature 100Β°C -
Laptop processors ranking (48th and 10th place)

iGPU

Integrated Graphics Intel Arc B390 Apple M6 GPU (12-core)
GPU Base Clock 300 MHz -
GPU Boost Clock 2500 MHz 1600 MHz
Shading Units 1536 1536
TMUs 48 96
ROPs 24 80
Execution Units 12 192
TGP 30 W -
iGPU FLOPS
7.7 TFLOPS
4.9 TFLOPS

Memory Support

Memory Types - LPDDR5X-9600 - LPDDR5X-10667
Max. Memory Size 96 GB 32 GB
Memory Channels 2 8
Max. Memory Bandwidth 153.6 GB/s 170 GB/s
ECC Support No No

Misc

Official Site Intel Core Ultra X7 358H official page -
PCI Express Version 5.0 -
PCI Express Lanes 12 -

Cast your vote

Choose between two processors
4 (66.7%)
2 (33.3%)
Total votes: 6

Comments

So which CPU will you choose: Apple M6 (12-Core) or Intel Core Ultra X7 358H?
🌐 Register your profile and become part of NanoReview community!
Avatar
ComputerNerd October 29, 2026 at 06:38 PM
Depends on someone plans on using the laptop/desktop CPU for. The M6 for photography and programming wins out easily. Even light video editing is going to be good. The Intel Core Ultra X7 358H for laptop gamers or programs that cannot run on MacOS.
0 Reply