Intel Core i5 12400F

Intel Core i5 12400F
  • Cores: 6
  • L3 cache: 18MB (shared)
  • TDP: 65 W (max. boost up to 117 W)
  • Transistor size: 10 nm
Core i5 12400F - desktop processor produced by Intel for socket LGA-1700 that has 6 cores and 12 threads. The base clock frequency of the CPU is 2500 MHz, but due to Turbo Boost technology, it can perform up to 4400 MHz. The size of the L3 cache is 18 MB. Please note that this chip doesnโ€™t have integrated graphics.

Review

Single-Core Performance
64
Multi-Core Performance
30
Power Efficiency
49
Integrated Graphics
n/a
NanoReview Final Score
49
Compare Intel Core i5 12400F with other CPUs

Test in Benchmarks

Performance test of Intel Core i5 12400F in benchmarks

Cinebench

Reputable cross-platform benchmark for high-performance processors
Cinebench 2024 (Single)
95
Cinebench 2024 (Multi)
640

GeekBench v6

The new version of this benchmark emulates common operations often used in real-world apps
Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)
2300
Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)
9477
File compression 789 MB/sec
Clang compilation 69.9 Klines/sec
HTML 5 Browser 221 pages/sec
PDF Renderer 263.7 Mpixels/sec
Text processing 230 pages/sec
Background blur 49.5 images/sec
Photo processing 77.9 images/sec
Ray tracing 16.2 Mpixels/sec
Sources: GeekBench [1] โ€“ 1128 samples

PassMark

Synthetic test that focuses on raw computational performance for low-level functions
Passmark CPU (Single-Core)
3486
Passmark CPU (Multi-Core)
19551
Integer math 60.1 GOps/sec
Floating point math 46.9 GOps/sec
Find prime numbers 74M Primes/sec
Random string sorting 23.2M Strings/sec
Data encryption 11.7 GBytes/sec
Data compression 233.1 MBytes/sec
Physics 1257 Frames/sec
Extended instructions 15.9B Matrices/sec
Sources: PassMark [3] โ€“ 17200 samples

Blender

3D rendering test that measures CPU performance in 3D modeling tasks (uses all cores)
Blender CPU
161.36

Performance Per Watt

Shows the score you get per each watt of PL1 TDP
Cinebench 2024 / Watt 9.8 PPW
Geekbench 6 Multi / Watt 145.8 PPW
Passmark CPU Mark / Watt 300.8 PPW
Blender / Watt 2.48 PPW
These are rough calculations, as most CPUs surpass PL1 TDP wattage even in multicore workloads.

Recent User Tests

The latest benchmark tests that have been submitted by users
DateBenchmarkResult
๐Ÿ“˜ 2026-01-24 (Ecstatify)Geekbench 6 CPU2918 / 13277
๐Ÿ“˜ 2025-08-17 (Olini)Cinebench 2024101 / 664
๐Ÿ“˜ 2025-07-21 (Rolling Manatee)Cinebench 202495 / 640
๐Ÿ“˜ 2025-05-12 (inoklike)Cinebench 202493 / 646
๐Ÿ“˜ 2025-03-04 (RD)Cinebench 202488 / 620

Specifications

Core i5 12400F technical specifications

General

Vendor Intel
Released January 4, 2022
Type Desktop
Instruction Set x86-64
Codename Alder Lake
Model number i5-12400F
Integrated GPU No
Successor - Intel Core Ultra 5 225F
Intel CPU rating - 163rd place

CPU

Performance Cores
P-Cores 6
P-Threads 12
Base Frequency (P) 2.5 GHz
Turbo Boost Frequency (P) 4.4 GHz
Total
Total Cores 6
Total Threads 12
Bus Frequency 100 MHz
Multiplier 25x
L1 Cache 80K (per core)
L2 Cache 1280K (per core)
L3 Cache 18MB (shared)
Unlocked Multiplier No

Package

Fabrication Process 10 nm
TDP (PL1) 65 W
Max. Boost TDP (PL2) 117 W
Socket LGA-1700
Peak Temperature 100ยฐC
Desktop CPU ranking - 108th place

Memory Support

Memory Types - DDR5-4800
- DDR4-3200
Max. Memory Size 128 GB
Memory Channels 2
Max. Memory Bandwidth 76.8 GB/s
ECC Support No

Misc

Official Site Intel Core i5 12400F official page
PCI Express Version 5.0
PCI Express Lanes 20
Technologies
- Compute: ABM, ADX, BMI1, BMI2, CLMUL, F16C, SHA
- Performance: EIST, TBT 2.0, TSX
- Virtualization: VT-d, VT-x
- Security: RDRAND, TXT, XD bit

Comments

Do you have any questions about Core i5 12400F? Please, use comment form below
๐ŸŒ Register your profile and become part of NanoReview community!
Avatar
not bad October 15, 2024 at 12:52 PM
overclocks well. my Bus Frequency is at 125, so my all core boost is around 5GHz (stock is 3.9) at 1.15V. When benching, I ran 1.37V at 5.3GHz - 2861 ST, 12000 MT in GB6, a touch slower than R5 7600! sad that Intel killed bclk ocs in raptor lake and later. Would have been even better value coming from older DDR4 platforms if ASRock still made the DDR4 PG Riptides, but now it would be better if you save a little more for entry level AM5 since you're going to need a new DDR5 kit for the B760m PG Riptide anyway.
+1 Reply