Apple M5 GPU (10-Core) vs Adreno X1-85

We compared two integrated laptop graphics cards: the Apple M5 GPU (10-Core) with 160 pipelines and 1280 shaders against the 2 years older Adreno X1-85 that utilizes 6 pipelines and 1536 shaders. Here you will find complete details about specs, efficiency, performance tests, and more.

Some GPUs come in different configurations. For greater precision, pick a specific config below
TGP / Version -

Review

General comparison of performance in games, applications, power efficiency, and other metrics
Gaming
Performance in DirectX, OpenCL, and Vulkan games
Workstation
Perf. in 3D modeling, video editing and rendering apps
AI/ML
Capabilities for machine learning and AI-related tasks
Energy Efficiency
Power consumption efficiency in different scenarios
NanoReview Final Score
Overall video card score

Key differences

Key distinctions and advantages of Adreno X1-85 over M5 GPU (10-Core)
Reasons to consider the Apple M5 GPU (10-Core)
  • Performs significantly better (up to 2.6x) in 3DMark Steel Nomad Lite
  • Manufactured using a more efficient 3 nm process technology
  • Achieves 3.1x more points in the GeekBench 6 Compute test (75K vs 24K)

Benchmarks

Graphics cards’ performance in recent benchmarking apps

3D Mark

Multiplatform graphics benchmark suite that directly correlates with performance in modern games
Steel Nomad Lite Score
5338
Time Spy - 1695
Solar Bay 24536 10596
Fire Strike - 6134
Wild Life Extreme 12278 6152
Night Raid - 28868
Sources: 3DMark [1], [2]

GeekBench 6 GPU Compute

GPU test for computational tasks (image processing, photography, computer vision, and ML)
GB6 Compute Score
75777
24387
Background Blur 155.7 img/sec 36.4 img/sec
Face Detection 178.1 img/sec 17.3 img/sec
Horizon Detection 2.22 Gpixels/sec 1.19 Gpixels/sec
Edge Detection 2.87 Gpixels/sec 1.3 Gpixels/sec
Gaussian Blur 5.8 Gpixels/sec 1.42 Gpixels/sec
Feature Matching 0.95 Gpixels/sec 0.3 Gpixels/sec
Stereo Matching 190.7 Gpixels/sec 72.4 Gpixels/sec
Particle Physics 6579.1 FPS 4692.5 FPS
API Metal OpenCL
Sources: Geekbench [3], [4]

Cinebench 2024 GPU

Hardware benchmark using Maxon's Cinema 4D rendering engine
Cinebench 2024 GPU

Passmark Graphics

Videocard test that focuses on compute shaders, multi-texturing, tessellation, and other features
G3D Mark Score
G2D Mark - 518
DirectX 11 - 19 FPS
DirectX 12 - 10 FPS
GPU Compute - 1958 Ops/s
Sources: PassMark [5] – 7 samples

Blender

Rendering performance test for 3D modeling
Blender GPU
Sources: Blender [9] – 135 samples

Recent User Tests

The latest benchmark tests that have been submitted by users
Apple M5 GPU (10-Core)
DateBenchmarkResult
📘 2026-01-03 -> RennsportGeekbench 6 OpenCL48688
Adreno X1-85
No benchmark results yet

Artificial Intelligence Tests

Performance in machine learning and artificial intelligence tasks

GeekBench 6 ML

Tests throughput of AI operations in single, half, and quantized precision
GB6 ML Single Precision
13289
GB6 ML Half Precision
24800
GB6 ML Quantized
23572
Image Classification (SP) 6348 1347
Image Segmentation (HP) 16813 2661
Image Super Resolution (Q) 30322 3084
Face Detection (HP) 34387 5354
Pose Estimation (Q) 111591 7719
Text Classification (SP) 2319 292
Machine Translation (HP) 5555 1108
Object Detection (SP) 6450 660
Depth Estimation (Q) 53195 3876
Style Transfer (SP) 82314 12048
Framework Core ML ONNX
Backend GPU DirectML
Sources: Geekbench [9], [10]
Results were compared using different ML frameworks

Specifications

Technical specifications of Apple M5 GPU (10-Core) and Adreno X1-85

General

Vendor Apple Qualcomm
Build Integrated Integrated
Released October 15, 2025 October 24, 2023
Case Laptop Laptop
Purpose Professional Generic
Segment Mid-range Entry-level
Architecture Apple M GPU Adreno X1
GPU Codename Custom Adreno X1
Rival Equivalent - Adreno X2-90 - Apple M4 GPU (10-Core)
Successor - - Adreno X2-90
Recommended CPU - Apple M5 (10-Core) or above - Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus (X1P-64-100) or above
Used in CPUs - Apple M5 (10-Core) - Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus (X1P-66-100)
- Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite (X1E-78-100)
- Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite (X1E-80-100)
- Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus (X1P-64-100)
- Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite (X1E-84-100)
Laptop GPU ranking (44th and 112th place)

Graphics Processing Unit

Base Clock - 300 MHz
Boost Clock 1620 MHz 1200-1500 MHz (configurable)
Shading Units 1280 1536
Texture Mapping Units (TMUs) 80 96
Render Output Units (ROPs) 40 48
Compute Units (Pipelines) 160 6
Ray-tracing Cores - No
L1 Cache - 192KB per cluster
L2 Cache - 1MB shared
Instructions Per Cycle 2 IPC 2 IPC

Raw Performance

Pixel Fill Rate 65 GPixel/s 58-72 GPixel/s
Texture Fill Rate 130 GTexel/s 115-144 GTexel/s
FLOPS (FP32)
4.1 TFLOPS
3.7-4.6 TFLOPS

Physical

Interface Custom IGP
TGP - 30 W
Manufacturing TSMC TSMC
Fabrication Process 3 nm 4 nm
Transistor Count 28 billion -
Max. Temperature 100°C -

Memory

Memory Type System Shared System Shared
Memory Clock 9600 MHz -
Bus 128-bit -
ECC No -
Memory Bandwidth

API

DirectX - 12.1
Vulkan - 1.3
OpenGL - 3.2
OpenCL - 3.0
CUDA - No
Ray Tracing Yes Yes
DLSS No No
DisplayPort - 1.4

Cast your vote

Choose between two graphics cards
2 (100%)
0 (0%)
Total votes: 2

User opinions

You can share your opinion or ask a question in the comments below
🌐 Register your profile and become part of NanoReview community!