GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop vs RTX 5070
VS
Nvidia GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop
GB206-300
Nvidia GeForce RTX 5070
GB205-300
We performed a head-to-head comparison of the GeForce RTX 5070 Mobile 8 GB with 36 pipelines and 4608 shaders against the RTX RTX 5070 12 GB that utilizes 48 pipelines and 6144 shaders. Here you will find complete details about specs, efficiency, performance tests, and more.
Review
Gaming
Performance in DirectX, OpenCL, and Vulkan games
Workstation
Perf. in 3D modeling, video editing and rendering apps
AI/ML
Capabilities for machine learning and AI-related tasks
Energy Efficiency
Power consumption efficiency in different scenarios
NanoReview Final Score
Overall video card score
The "Energy Efficiency" metric has less impact on the NanoReview Score for desktop GPU.
Key differences
Reasons to consider the GeForce RTX 5070
- Performs significantly better (up to 66%) in 3DMark Steel Nomad Lite
- Shows 45% higher average frame rate in modern games at QHD resolution – 128 vs 88 FPS
- 33% higher maximum theoretical performance (30.9 vs 23.2 TFLOPS)
- Includes 4 GB more video memory
- Has 75% higher memory bandwidth: 672 vs 384 GB/s
- Achieves 42% more points in the GeekBench 6 Compute test (190K vs 134K)
- Features 48 more tensor cores for effective ML and AI workloads
- Has 33% more shading units (6144 vs 4608)
Gaming Performance
Frame rate comparison across popular AAA titles at different resolutionsGames
| Forza Horizon 5 | 148 95 87 62 |
197 140 130 97 |
| The Witcher 3 | 166 140 101 57 |
216 183 131 71 |
| Counter-Strike 2 | 242 191 136 79 |
293 210 160 81 |
| Far Cry 6 | 128 118 93 57 |
164 145 128 82 |
| Hogwarts Legacy | 98 79 61 34 |
140 117 92 51 |
| CoD: Modern Warfare III | 124 111 80 54 |
178 171 136 89 |
| Ghost of Tsushima | 88 77 59 31 |
123 107 89 58 |
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 104 92 60 27 |
164 144 99 43 |
| Shadow of the Tomb Raider | 165 150 113 59 |
253 238 189 98 |
| 1080p High | 140 | 192 |
| 1080p Ultra | 117 | 162 |
| 1440p Ultra | 88 | 128 |
| 4K Ultra | 51 | 74 |
| Margin of Error | Low | Low |
Benchmarks
Graphics cards’ performance in recent benchmarking apps3D Mark
Steel Nomad Lite Score
| Time Spy | 13620 | 22708 |
| Solar Bay | 60191 | 107004 |
| Port Royal | 8718 | 14498 |
| Fire Strike | 35708 | 58324 |
| Wild Life Extreme | 24700 | 43879 |
| Night Raid | 124794 | 172064 |
GeekBench 6 OpenCL
GB6 Compute Score
| Background Blur | 213.4 img/sec | 254.4 img/sec |
| Face Detection | 130.4 img/sec | 180.6 img/sec |
| Horizon Detection | 4.89 Gpixels/sec | 7.91 Gpixels/sec |
| Edge Detection | 6.23 Gpixels/sec | 10.2 Gpixels/sec |
| Gaussian Blur | 7.41 Gpixels/sec | 10.7 Gpixels/sec |
| Feature Matching | 1.46 Gpixels/sec | 1.84 Gpixels/sec |
| Stereo Matching | 661.9 Gpixels/sec | 975.7 Gpixels/sec |
| Particle Physics | 19395.6 FPS | 27816.5 FPS |
| API | OpenCL | OpenCL |
Passmark Graphics
G3D Mark Score
| G2D Mark | 895 | 1291 |
| DirectX 11 | 185 FPS | 280 FPS |
| DirectX 12 | 91 FPS | 106 FPS |
| GPU Compute | 6944 Ops/s | 14310 Ops/s |
Blender
Blender GPU
Recent User Tests
GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop
| Date | Benchmark | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 📘 2026-06-05 (Levi) | Geekbench 6 OpenCL | 141514 |
| 📘 2026-04-11 (Cyrus) | Geekbench 6 OpenCL | 131880 |
GeForce RTX 5070
No benchmark results yet
Artificial Intelligence Tests
Performance in machine learning and artificial intelligence tasksGeekBench 6 ML
GB6 ML Single Precision
GB6 ML Half Precision
GB6 ML Quantized
| Image Classification (SP) | 8984 | 12270 |
| Image Segmentation (HP) | 26270 | 30237 |
| Image Super Resolution (Q) | 24606 | 35585 |
| Face Detection (HP) | 48283 | 62662 |
| Pose Estimation (Q) | 98180 | 145190 |
| Text Classification (SP) | 3260 | 4198 |
| Machine Translation (HP) | 5770 | 6233 |
| Object Detection (SP) | 11172 | 16709 |
| Depth Estimation (Q) | 43305 | 58300 |
| Style Transfer (SP) | 165555 | 246598 |
| Framework | ONNX | ONNX |
| Backend | DirectML | DirectML |
Specifications
Technical specifications of GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop and RTX 5070General
| Vendor | Nvidia | Nvidia |
| Build | Discrete | Discrete |
| Released | January 7, 2025 | January 7, 2025 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | - | $549 |
| Case | Laptop | Desktop |
| Purpose | Gaming | Gaming |
| Segment | Mid-range | Mid-range |
| Architecture | Blackwell 2.0 | Blackwell 2.0 |
| GPU Codename | GB206-300 | GB205-300 |
| Rival Equivalent | - | - Radeon RX 9070 |
| Recommended CPU | - Intel Core Ultra 7 255HX or above | - Intel Core Ultra 5 245K or above |
Laptop GPU ranking (#16th place)
Desktop GPU rating (#21st place)
Graphics Processing Unit
| Base Clock | 890-1410 MHz (configurable) | 2160 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 1410-2520 MHz (configurable) | 2512 MHz |
| Shading Units | 4608 | 6144 |
| Texture Mapping Units (TMUs) | 144 | 192 |
| Render Output Units (ROPs) | 48 | 80 |
| Compute Units (Pipelines) | 36 | 48 |
| Tensor Cores | 144 | 192 |
| Ray-tracing Cores | 36 | 48 |
| L1 Cache | 128KB per cluster | 128KB per cluster |
| L2 Cache | 32MB shared | 48MB shared |
| Instructions Per Cycle | 2 IPC | 2 IPC |
Raw Performance
| Pixel Fill Rate | 68-121 GPixel/s | 201 GPixel/s |
| Texture Fill Rate | 203-363 GTexel/s | 482 GTexel/s |
FLOPS (FP32)
Physical
| Interface | PCIe 5.0 x16 | PCIe 5.0 x16 |
| TGP | 50-125 W (configurable) | 250 W |
| Manufacturing | TSMC | TSMC |
| Fabrication Process | 4 nm | 4 nm |
| Die Size | 181 mm² | 263 mm² |
| Transistor Count | 21.9 billion | 31.1 billion |
| Transistor Density | 120.99 MTr/mm² | 118.25 MTr/mm² |
Memory
| Memory Type | GDDR7 | GDDR7 |
| Memory Size | 8 GB | 12 GB |
| Memory Clock | 1750 MHz | 1750 MHz |
| Effective Memory Speed | 24000 Mbps | 28000 Mbps |
| Bus | 128-bit | 192-bit |
| ECC | No | No |
Memory Bandwidth
API
| DirectX | 12.2 | 12.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.4 | 1.4 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 3.0 | 3.0 |
| CUDA | 12.0 | 12.0 |
| Ray Tracing | Yes | Yes |
| DLSS | DLSS 4 | DLSS 4 |
| DisplayPort | 2.1b | 2.1b |
Cast your vote
Total votes: 114
