Intel Arc 140V vs Adreno X1-85
VS
Intel Arc 140V
Lunar Lake iGPU
Adreno X1-85
Adreno X1
We compared two integrated laptop GPUs: the Intel Arc 140V with 1024 shaders against the 11 months older Adreno X1-85 that utilizes 6 pipelines and 1536 shaders. Here you will find complete details about specs, efficiency, performance tests, and more.
Some GPUs come in different configurations. For greater precision, pick a specific config below
Review
Gaming
Performance in DirectX, OpenCL, and Vulkan games
Workstation
Perf. in 3D modeling, video editing and rendering apps
Energy Efficiency
Power consumption efficiency in different scenarios
NanoReview Final Score
Overall video card score
Key differences
Reasons to consider the Intel Arc 140V
- Manufactured using a more efficient 3 nm process technology
- Ray-tracing support with 8 dedicated RT cores
- Achieves 23% more points in the GeekBench 6 Compute test (30K vs 24K)
Reasons to consider the Adreno X1-85
- Has 50% more shading units (1536 vs 1024)
Benchmarks
Graphics cards’ performance in recent benchmarking apps3D Mark
Steel Nomad Lite Score
| Time Spy | 3715 | 1695 |
| Solar Bay | - | 10596 |
| Fire Strike | - | 6134 |
| Wild Life Extreme | - | 6152 |
| Night Raid | - | 28868 |
GeekBench 6 OpenCL
GB6 Compute Score
| Background Blur | 73.6 img/sec | 36.4 img/sec |
| Face Detection | 39 img/sec | 17.3 img/sec |
| Horizon Detection | 0.79 Gpixels/sec | 1.19 Gpixels/sec |
| Edge Detection | 1.11 Gpixels/sec | 1.3 Gpixels/sec |
| Gaussian Blur | 1.6 Gpixels/sec | 1.42 Gpixels/sec |
| Feature Matching | 0.38 Gpixels/sec | 0.3 Gpixels/sec |
| Stereo Matching | 107.1 Gpixels/sec | 72.4 Gpixels/sec |
| Particle Physics | 4521.5 FPS | 4692.5 FPS |
| API | OpenCL | OpenCL |
Passmark Graphics
G3D Mark Score
| G2D Mark | 657 | 518 |
| DirectX 11 | 38 FPS | 19 FPS |
| DirectX 12 | 28 FPS | 10 FPS |
| GPU Compute | 2750 Ops/s | 1958 Ops/s |
Recent User Tests
Intel Arc 140V
| Date | Benchmark | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 📘 2026-04-15 -> maheshkondraju | Geekbench 6 OpenCL | 31387 |
Adreno X1-85
No benchmark results yet
Artificial Intelligence Tests
Performance in machine learning and artificial intelligence tasksGeekBench 6 ML
GB6 ML Single Precision
GB6 ML Half Precision
GB6 ML Quantized
| Image Classification (SP) | - | 1347 |
| Image Segmentation (HP) | - | 2661 |
| Image Super Resolution (Q) | - | 3084 |
| Face Detection (HP) | - | 5354 |
| Pose Estimation (Q) | - | 7719 |
| Text Classification (SP) | - | 292 |
| Machine Translation (HP) | - | 1108 |
| Object Detection (SP) | - | 660 |
| Depth Estimation (Q) | - | 3876 |
| Style Transfer (SP) | - | 12048 |
| Framework | - | ONNX |
| Backend | - | DirectML |
Specifications
Technical specifications of Intel Arc 140V and Adreno X1-85General
| Vendor | Intel | Qualcomm |
| Build | Integrated | Integrated |
| Released | September 4, 2024 | October 24, 2023 |
| Case | Laptop | Laptop |
| Purpose | Generic | Generic |
| Segment | Mid-range | Entry-level |
| Architecture | Xe2 | Adreno X1 |
| GPU Codename | Lunar Lake iGPU | Adreno X1 |
| Rival Equivalent | - | - Apple M4 GPU (10-Core) |
| Successor | - | - Adreno X2-90 |
| Recommended CPU | - Intel Core Ultra 7 256V or above | - Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus (X1P-64-100) or above |
| Used in CPUs | - Intel Core Ultra 9 288V - Intel Core Ultra 7 268V - Intel Core Ultra 7 266V - Intel Core Ultra 7 258V - Intel Core Ultra 7 256V |
- Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus (X1P-66-100) - Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite (X1E-78-100) - Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite (X1E-80-100) - Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus (X1P-64-100) - Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite (X1E-84-100) |
Laptop GPU ranking (72nd and 113th place)
Graphics Processing Unit
| Base Clock | 600 MHz | 300 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 1950-2050 MHz (configurable) | 1200-1500 MHz (configurable) |
| Shading Units | 1024 | 1536 |
| Texture Mapping Units (TMUs) | - | 96 |
| Render Output Units (ROPs) | - | 48 |
| Compute Units (Pipelines) | - | 6 |
| Tensor Cores | No | - |
| Ray-tracing Cores | 8 | No |
| L1 Cache | - | 192KB per cluster |
| L2 Cache | - | 1MB shared |
| Instructions Per Cycle | 2 IPC | 2 IPC |
Raw Performance
| Pixel Fill Rate | - | 58-72 GPixel/s |
| Texture Fill Rate | - | 115-144 GTexel/s |
FLOPS (FP32)
Physical
| Interface | Ring Bus | IGP |
| TGP | 30 W | 30 W |
| Manufacturing | Intel | TSMC |
| Fabrication Process | 3 nm | 4 nm |
| Max. Temperature | 100°C | - |
Memory
| Memory Type | System Shared | System Shared |
| ECC | No | - |
API
| DirectX | 12.2 | 12.1 |
| Vulkan | - | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 3.2 |
| OpenCL | 3.0 | 3.0 |
| CUDA | No | No |
| Ray Tracing | Yes | Yes |
| DLSS | No | No |
| DisplayPort | 2.1 | 1.4 |
Cast your vote
Total votes: 15
Related comparisons
10.
Intel Arc 140V vs Radeon 890M (3)