Intel Arc B390 vs Arc B370

VS
Intel Arc B390
Panther Lake
Intel Arc B370
Panther Lake

We compared two integrated laptop graphics cards: the Intel Arc B390 with 12 pipelines and 1536 shaders against the Arc B370 that utilizes 10 pipelines and 1280 shaders. Here you will find complete details about specs, efficiency, performance tests, and more.

Review

General comparison of performance in games, applications, power efficiency, and other metrics
Gaming
Performance in DirectX, OpenCL, and Vulkan games
Workstation
Perf. in 3D modeling, video editing and rendering apps
AI/ML
Capabilities for machine learning and AI-related tasks
Energy Efficiency
Power consumption efficiency in different scenarios
NanoReview Final Score
Overall video card score

Key differences

Key distinctions and advantages of Arc B370 over Arc B390
Reasons to consider the Intel Arc B390
  • 26% higher maximum theoretical performance (7.7 vs 6.1 TFLOPS)

Gaming Performance

Frame rate comparison across popular AAA titles at different resolutions

Games

FPS Table
Forza Horizon 5
80
41
36
20
74
37
30
17
The Witcher 3
76
63
44
19
66
53
39
18
Counter-Strike 2
96
70
46
23
86
60
41
17
Far Cry 6
63
56
38
18
58
49
34
17
Hogwarts Legacy
33
24
18
-
30
23
14
-
CoD: Modern Warfare III
37
35
28
13
34
32
26
15
Ghost of Tsushima
37
31
24
12
34
26
22
11
Cyberpunk 2077
43
38
21
9
36
35
19
-
Shadow of the Tomb Raider
65
57
39
23
59
49
33
21
Average FPS by Resolution
1080p High 59 53
1080p Ultra 46 40
1440p Ultra 33 29
4K Ultra 16 15
Margin of Error Low Low

Benchmarks

Graphics cards’ performance in recent benchmarking apps

3D Mark

Multiplatform graphics benchmark suite that directly correlates with performance in modern games
Steel Nomad Lite Score
Arc B390 +11%
5461
4940
Time Spy 6880 6025
Solar Bay 26783 22582
Port Royal 3880 3498
Fire Strike 16845 15198
Wild Life Extreme 11778 11657
Night Raid 72249 69825
Sources: 3DMark [1], [2]

GeekBench 6 OpenCL

GPU test for computational tasks (image processing, photography, computer vision, and ML)
GB6 Compute Score
Arc B390 +16%
56204
48273
Background Blur 87.6 img/sec 117.4 img/sec
Face Detection 58.5 img/sec 60.6 img/sec
Horizon Detection 1.9 Gpixels/sec 1.39 Gpixels/sec
Edge Detection 2.68 Gpixels/sec 1.95 Gpixels/sec
Gaussian Blur 4.74 Gpixels/sec 2.45 Gpixels/sec
Feature Matching 1.01 Gpixels/sec 0.66 Gpixels/sec
Stereo Matching 249.7 Gpixels/sec 144.8 Gpixels/sec
Particle Physics 10821.1 FPS 7272.6 FPS
API OpenCL OpenCL
Sources: Geekbench [3], [4]

Passmark Graphics

Videocard test that focuses on compute shaders, multi-texturing, tessellation, and other features
G3D Mark Score
Arc B390 +6%
8926
8459
G2D Mark 812 828
DirectX 11 70 FPS 65 FPS
DirectX 12 48 FPS 45 FPS
GPU Compute 3669 Ops/s 3413 Ops/s
Sources: PassMark [5], [6] – 425 & 44 samples

Blender

Rendering performance test for 3D modeling
Blender GPU
1269.36
Arc B370 +2%
1289.45
Sources: Blender [9], [10] – 95 & 5 samples

Recent User Tests

The latest benchmark tests that have been submitted by users
Intel Arc B390
DateBenchmarkResult
📘 2026-09-05 -> asterismxGeekbench 6 OpenCL57164
Intel Arc B370
No benchmark results yet

Artificial Intelligence Tests

Performance in machine learning and artificial intelligence tasks

GeekBench 6 ML

Tests throughput of AI operations in single, half, and quantized precision
GB6 ML Single Precision
Arc B390 +19%
12930
10834
GB6 ML Half Precision
Arc B390 +16%
23819
20482
GB6 ML Quantized
Arc B390 +15%
8437
7349
Image Classification (SP) 5487 5389
Image Segmentation (HP) 16864 18899
Image Super Resolution (Q) 8788 8326
Face Detection (HP) 25029 25377
Pose Estimation (Q) 18852 16174
Text Classification (SP) 2115 1763
Machine Translation (HP) 4266 4140
Object Detection (SP) 7449 7138
Depth Estimation (Q) 22207 20034
Style Transfer (SP) 95039 84880
Framework ONNX ONNX
Backend DirectML DirectML
Sources: Geekbench [9], [10]

Specifications

Technical specifications of Intel Arc B390 and Arc B370

General

Vendor Intel Intel
Build Integrated Integrated
Released January 5, 2026 January 5, 2026
Case Laptop Laptop
Purpose Gaming Generic
Segment Mid-range Mid-range
Architecture Celestial Celestial
GPU Codename Panther Lake Panther Lake
Recommended CPU - Intel Core Ultra X9 388H or above - Intel Core Ultra 7 356H or above
Used in CPUs - Intel Core Ultra X9 378H
- Intel Core Ultra X7 368H
- Intel Core Ultra X9 388H
- Intel Core Ultra X7 358H
- Intel Core Ultra 5 338H
Laptop GPU ranking (63rd and 70th place)

Graphics Processing Unit

Base Clock 300 MHz 300 MHz
Boost Clock 2500 MHz 2400 MHz
Shading Units 1536 1280
Texture Mapping Units (TMUs) 48 40
Render Output Units (ROPs) 24 20
Compute Units (Pipelines) 12 10
Tensor Cores 96 80
Ray-tracing Cores 12 10
L1 Cache 64KB per cluster 64KB per cluster
L2 Cache 16MB shared 16MB shared
Instructions Per Cycle 2 IPC 2 IPC

Raw Performance

Pixel Fill Rate 60 GPixel/s 48 GPixel/s
Texture Fill Rate 120 GTexel/s 96 GTexel/s
FLOPS (FP32)
Arc B390 +26%
7.7 TFLOPS
6.1 TFLOPS

Physical

Interface IGP IGP
TGP 30 W 25 W
Manufacturing TSMC TSMC
Fabrication Process 3 nm 3 nm
Max. Temperature 100°C 100°C

Memory

Memory Type System Shared System Shared
ECC No No

API

DirectX 12.1 12.1
Vulkan 1.4 1.4
OpenGL 4.6 4.6
OpenCL 3.0 3.0
CUDA No No
Ray Tracing Yes Yes
DLSS No No
DisplayPort 2.1 2.1

Cast your vote

Choose between two graphics cards
24 (75%)
8 (25%)
Total votes: 32

User opinions

You can share your opinion or ask a question in the comments below
🌐 Register your profile and become part of NanoReview community!