Nvidia RTX A500 Laptop vs GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop

We compared two discrete laptop graphics cards: the Nvidia RTX A500 Mobile 4 GB with 16 pipelines and 2048 shaders against the 11 months newer GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile 6 GB that utilizes 20 pipelines and 2560 shaders. Here you will find complete details about specs, efficiency, performance tests, and more.

Some GPUs come in different configurations. For greater precision, pick a specific config below
TGP / Version -

Review

General comparison of performance in games, applications, power efficiency, and other metrics
Gaming
Performance in DirectX, OpenCL, and Vulkan games
Workstation
Perf. in 3D modeling, video editing and rendering apps
AI/ML
Capabilities for machine learning and AI-related tasks
Energy Efficiency
Power consumption efficiency in different scenarios
NanoReview Final Score
Overall video card score

Key differences

Key distinctions and advantages of RTX 4050 Mobile over RTX A500 Mobile
Reasons to consider the GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop
  • Performs significantly better (up to 2.6x) in 3DMark Steel Nomad Lite
  • Shows 2.8x higher average frame rate in modern games at QHD resolution – 53 vs 19 FPS
  • 73% higher maximum theoretical performance (12.1 vs 7 TFLOPS)
  • Manufactured using a more efficient 5 nm process technology

Gaming Performance

Frame rate comparison across popular AAA titles at different resolutions

Games

FPS Table
Forza Horizon 5
47
24
19
12
107
66
56
35
The Witcher 3
32
26
20
-
117
91
67
34
Counter-Strike 2
66
41
30
12
167
126
88
43
Far Cry 6
37
37
26
12
87
79
59
32
Hogwarts Legacy
23
14
14
-
62
52
34
20
CoD: Modern Warfare III
35
27
19
12
75
68
44
30
Ghost of Tsushima
18
14
11
-
57
45
33
17
Cyberpunk 2077
24
17
10
-
61
57
34
13
Shadow of the Tomb Raider
40
35
21
11
98
90
62
32
Average FPS by Resolution
1080p High 36 92
1080p Ultra 26 75
1440p Ultra 19 53
4K Ultra 9 28
Margin of Error Medium Low

Benchmarks

Graphics cards’ performance in recent benchmarking apps

3D Mark

Multiplatform graphics benchmark suite that directly correlates with performance in modern games
Steel Nomad Lite Score
Time Spy 3022 8212
Solar Bay 13710 35375
Port Royal 625 4624
Fire Strike 10265 21909
Wild Life Extreme 4053 15492
Night Raid 38312 84848
Sources: 3DMark [1], [2]

GeekBench 6 OpenCL

GPU test for computational tasks (image processing, photography, computer vision, and ML)
GB6 Compute Score
81436
Background Blur 62.4 img/sec 141.4 img/sec
Face Detection 35.7 img/sec 84.1 img/sec
Horizon Detection 1.62 Gpixels/sec 3.07 Gpixels/sec
Edge Detection 2.11 Gpixels/sec 3.91 Gpixels/sec
Gaussian Blur 2.05 Gpixels/sec 3.85 Gpixels/sec
Feature Matching 0.52 Gpixels/sec 1.1 Gpixels/sec
Stereo Matching 185.1 Gpixels/sec 325.9 Gpixels/sec
Particle Physics 5502.5 FPS 11008.8 FPS
API OpenCL OpenCL
Sources: Geekbench [3], [4]

Cinebench 2024 GPU

Hardware benchmark using Maxon's Cinema 4D rendering engine
Cinebench 2024 GPU

Passmark Graphics

Videocard test that focuses on compute shaders, multi-texturing, tessellation, and other features
G3D Mark Score
14217
G2D Mark 411 622
DirectX 11 40 FPS 129 FPS
DirectX 12 38 FPS 60 FPS
GPU Compute 2901 Ops/s 5847 Ops/s
Sources: PassMark [5], [6] – 941 & 14311 samples

Blender

Rendering performance test for 3D modeling
Blender GPU
2567.25
Sources: Blender [9], [10] – 32 & 2120 samples

Recent User Tests

The latest benchmark tests that have been submitted by users
Nvidia RTX A500 Laptop
No benchmark results yet
GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop
DateBenchmarkResult
📘 2026-07-17 (kam)Geekbench 6 OpenCL93074
📘 2026-07-15 (Mr._.Flexo)Cinebench 20248096
📘 2026-07-02 (SuperDuck)Geekbench 6 OpenCL90032
📘 2026-05-18 (TheMan)Cinebench 20248523
📘 2026-05-15 -> ZayGeekbench 6 OpenCL89343

Artificial Intelligence Tests

Performance in machine learning and artificial intelligence tasks

GeekBench 6 ML

Tests throughput of AI operations in single, half, and quantized precision
GB6 ML Single Precision
15570
GB6 ML Half Precision
27160
GB6 ML Quantized
12230
Image Classification (SP) 3298 6233
Image Segmentation (HP) 8358 16395
Image Super Resolution (Q) 6219 18240
Face Detection (HP) 14319 30758
Pose Estimation (Q) 22995 61300
Text Classification (SP) 2226 3124
Machine Translation (HP) 3163 4357
Object Detection (SP) 3768 7812
Depth Estimation (Q) 12079 29192
Style Transfer (SP) 53139 117759
Framework ONNX ONNX
Backend DirectML DirectML
Sources: Geekbench [9], [10]

Specifications

Technical specifications of Nvidia RTX A500 Laptop and GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop

General

Vendor Nvidia Nvidia
Build Discrete Discrete
Released March 22, 2022 February 22, 2023
Case Laptop Laptop
Purpose Professional Gaming
Segment Entry-level Entry-level
Architecture Ampere Ada Lovelace
GPU Codename GA107S AD107 (GN21-X2)
Rival Equivalent - - Radeon RX 7700S
Successor - - GeForce RTX 5050 Laptop
Recommended CPU - Intel Core i7 12700H or above - Intel Core Ultra 7 155H or above
Laptop GPU ranking (103rd and 67th place)

Graphics Processing Unit

Base Clock 370-890 MHz (configurable) 1140-2070 MHz (configurable)
Boost Clock 745-1710 MHz (configurable) 1605-2370 MHz (configurable)
Shading Units 2048 2560
Texture Mapping Units (TMUs) 64 80
Render Output Units (ROPs) 32 32
Compute Units (Pipelines) 16 20
Tensor Cores 64 80
Ray-tracing Cores 16 20
L1 Cache 128KB per cluster 128KB per cluster
L2 Cache 2MB shared 12MB shared
Instructions Per Cycle 2 IPC 2 IPC

Raw Performance

Pixel Fill Rate 24-55 GPixel/s 51-76 GPixel/s
Texture Fill Rate 48-109 GTexel/s 128-190 GTexel/s
FLOPS (FP32)
3.1-7 TFLOPS
8.2-12.1 TFLOPS

Physical

Interface PCIe 4.0 x8 PCIe 4.0 x16
TGP 20-60 W (configurable) 35-140 W (configurable)
Manufacturing Samsung TSMC
Fabrication Process 8 nm 5 nm
Die Size 200 mm² 156 mm²
Transistor Count 8.7 billion 18.9 billion
Transistor Density 43.5 MTr/mm² 121.15 MTr/mm²

Memory

Memory Type GDDR6 GDDR6
Memory Size 4 GB 6 GB
Memory Clock 1500 MHz 2000 MHz
Effective Memory Speed 12000 Mbps 16000 Mbps
Bus 64-bit 96-bit
ECC No No
Memory Bandwidth
96 GB/s
192 GB/s

API

DirectX 12 12
Vulkan 1.3 1.3
OpenGL 4.6 4.6
OpenCL 3.0 3.0
CUDA 8.6 8.9
Ray Tracing Yes Yes
DLSS DLSS 2 DLSS 3
DisplayPort 1.4a 1.4a

Cast your vote

Choose between two graphics cards
0 (0%)
4 (100%)
Total votes: 4

User opinions

You can share your opinion or ask a question in the comments below
🌐 Register your profile and become part of NanoReview community!