AMD Radeon 780M vs Intel Arc 140V

VS
Intel Arc 140V
Lunar Lake iGPU

We compared two integrated laptop GPUs: the Radeon 780M with 12 pipelines and 768 shaders against the 1 year and 8 months newer Intel Arc 140V that utilizes 1024 shaders. Here you will find complete details about specs, efficiency, performance tests, and more.

Review

General comparison of performance in games, applications, power efficiency, and other metrics
Gaming
Performance in DirectX, OpenCL, and Vulkan games
Workstation
Perf. in 3D modeling, video editing and rendering apps
Energy Efficiency
Power consumption efficiency in different scenarios
NanoReview Final Score
Overall video card score

Key differences

Key distinctions and advantages of Arc 140V over Radeon 780M
Reasons to consider the Intel Arc 140V
  • Manufactured using a more efficient 3 nm process technology
  • Has 33% more shading units (1024 vs 768)

Gaming Performance

Frame rate comparison across popular AAA titles at different resolutions

Games

FPS Table
Forza Horizon 5
52
26
22
11
-
The Witcher 3
26
26
13
-
-
Counter-Strike 2
44
31
21
9
-
Far Cry 6
39
29
21
10
-
Hogwarts Legacy
22
15
11
-
-
CoD: Modern Warfare III
34
29
19
12
-
Ghost of Tsushima
21
15
10
-
-
Cyberpunk 2077
19
20
10
-
-
Shadow of the Tomb Raider
36
31
20
9
-
Average FPS by Resolution
1080p High 33 -
1080p Ultra 25 -
1440p Ultra 16 -
4K Ultra - -
Margin of Error Low High

Benchmarks

Graphics cards’ performance in recent benchmarking apps

3D Mark

Multiplatform graphics benchmark suite that directly correlates with performance in modern games
Steel Nomad Lite Score
Time Spy 2787 3715
Solar Bay 11525 -
Port Royal 1579 -
Fire Strike 7885 -
Wild Life Extreme 5305 -
Night Raid 33367 -
Sources: 3DMark [1]

GeekBench 6 OpenCL

GPU test for computational tasks (image processing, photography, computer vision, and ML)
GB6 Compute Score
32713
30059
Background Blur 86.4 img/sec 73.6 img/sec
Face Detection 35.8 img/sec 39 img/sec
Horizon Detection 1.03 Gpixels/sec 0.79 Gpixels/sec
Edge Detection 1.36 Gpixels/sec 1.11 Gpixels/sec
Gaussian Blur 1.41 Gpixels/sec 1.6 Gpixels/sec
Feature Matching 0.41 Gpixels/sec 0.38 Gpixels/sec
Stereo Matching 132.4 Gpixels/sec 107.1 Gpixels/sec
Particle Physics 4470.7 FPS 4521.5 FPS
API OpenCL OpenCL
Sources: Geekbench [3], [4]

Passmark Graphics

Videocard test that focuses on compute shaders, multi-texturing, tessellation, and other features
G3D Mark Score
6762
5139
G2D Mark 885 656
DirectX 11 65 FPS 38 FPS
DirectX 12 30 FPS 28 FPS
GPU Compute 3577 Ops/s 2768 Ops/s
Sources: PassMark [5], [6]12072 & 4446 samples

Blender

Rendering performance test for 3D modeling
Blender GPU
262.58
Arc 140V +114%
561.81
Sources: Blender [9], [10]179 & 89 samples

Recent User Tests

The latest benchmark tests that have been submitted by users
Radeon 780M
DateBenchmarkResult
📘 2026-08-17 -> RennsportGeekBench32197
📘 2026-02-26 (iFraan)GeekBench28558
Intel Arc 140V
DateBenchmarkResult
📘 2026-04-15 -> maheshkondrajuGeekBench31387

Artificial Intelligence Tests

Performance in machine learning and artificial intelligence tasks

GeekBench 6 ML

Tests throughput of AI operations in single, half, and quantized precision
GB6 ML Single Precision
GB6 ML Half Precision
13510
n/a
GB6 ML Quantized
Image Classification (SP) 3860 -
Image Segmentation (HP) 5435 -
Image Super Resolution (Q) 10580 -
Face Detection (HP) 12855 -
Pose Estimation (Q) 34716 -
Text Classification (SP) 2578 -
Machine Translation (HP) 3897 -
Object Detection (SP) 3078 -
Depth Estimation (Q) 14989 -
Style Transfer (SP) 78608 -
Framework ONNX -
Backend DirectML -
Sources: Geekbench [9], [10]

Specifications

Technical specifications of Radeon 780M and Intel Arc 140V

General

Vendor Amd Intel
Build Integrated Integrated
Released January 4, 2023 September 4, 2024
Case Laptop Laptop
Purpose Generic Generic
Segment Mid-range Mid-range
Architecture RDNA 3.0 Xe2
GPU Codename Phoenix Lunar Lake iGPU
Rival Equivalent - Intel Arc iGPU (8-Cores) -
Successor - Radeon 8050S -
Recommended CPU - AMD Ryzen 7 7840U or above - Intel Core Ultra 7 256V or above
Used in CPUs - AMD Ryzen 7 H 255
- AMD Ryzen 7 8745HS
- AMD Ryzen 7 250
- AMD Ryzen 7 260
- AMD Ryzen 9 270
- AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme
- AMD Ryzen 7 8700G
- AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS
- and 6 more
- Intel Core Ultra 9 288V
- Intel Core Ultra 7 268V
- Intel Core Ultra 7 266V
- Intel Core Ultra 7 258V
- Intel Core Ultra 7 256V
Laptop GPU ranking (97th and 70th place)

Graphics Processing Unit

Base Clock 800 MHz 600 MHz
Boost Clock 2700-2800 MHz (configurable) 1950-2050 MHz (configurable)
Shading Units 768 1024
Texture Mapping Units (TMUs) 48 -
Render Output Units (ROPs) 32 -
Compute Units (Pipelines) 12 -
Tensor Cores - No
Ray-tracing Cores 12 8
L1 Cache 128KB per cluster -
L2 Cache 2MB shared -
Instructions Per Cycle 2 IPC 2 IPC

Raw Performance

Pixel Fill Rate 86-90 GPixel/s -
Texture Fill Rate 130-134 GTexel/s -
FLOPS (FP32)
4.1-4.3 TFLOPS
4-4.2 TFLOPS

Physical

Interface PCIe 4.0 x8 Ring Bus
TGP 15 W 30 W
Manufacturing TSMC Intel
Fabrication Process 4 nm 3 nm
Die Size 178 mm² -
Transistor Count 25.4 billion -
Transistor Density 142.7 MTr/mm² -
Max. Temperature - 100°C

Memory

Memory Type System Shared System Shared
ECC - No

API

DirectX 12 12.2
Vulkan 1.3 -
OpenGL 4.6 4.6
OpenCL 2.1 3.0
CUDA - No
Ray Tracing Yes Yes
DLSS No No
DisplayPort 2.1 2.1

Cast your vote

Choose between two graphics cards
69 (62.7%)
41 (37.3%)
Total votes: 110

User opinions

You can share your opinion or ask a question in the comments below
🌐 Register your profile and become part of NanoReview community!
Avatar
780m is awesome, 140V doesn't cut it May 6, 2025 at 07:16 PM
780m is awesome, 140V doesn't cut it despite decent stats, and doesn't reflect real gaming performance
+2 Reply
Avatar
ur kid September 9, 2025 at 03:58 AM
kid 140v performs better than 780m while 140v's tgp is lower than 780m
+13 Reply