AMD Radeon 8065S vs Intel Arc B390
AMD Radeon 8065S
Gorgon Halo
Intel Arc B390
Panther Lake
We compared two integrated laptop graphics cards: the Radeon 8065S with 40 pipelines and 2560 shaders against the 8 months older Intel Arc B390 that utilizes 12 pipelines and 1536 shaders. Here you will find complete details about specs, efficiency, performance tests, and more.
Review
Gaming
Performance in DirectX, OpenCL, and Vulkan games
Workstation
Perf. in 3D modeling, video editing and rendering apps
Energy Efficiency
Power consumption efficiency in different scenarios
NanoReview Final Score
Overall video card score
Scores marked with a red asterisk (**) represent initial estimates from early testing.
Key differences
Reasons to consider the Radeon 8065S
- 2x higher maximum theoretical performance (15.4 vs 7.7 TFLOPS)
- Has 67% more shading units (2560 vs 1536)
Reasons to consider the Intel Arc B390
- Manufactured using a more efficient 3 nm process technology
- Features 96 tensor cores for effective deep learning and AI workloads
Gaming Performance
Frame rate comparison across popular AAA titles at different resolutionsGames
| Forza Horizon 5 | - | 80 41 36 20 |
| The Witcher 3 | - | 76 63 44 19 |
| Counter-Strike 2 | - | 96 70 46 23 |
| Far Cry 6 | - | 63 56 38 18 |
| Hogwarts Legacy | - | 33 24 18 - |
| CoD: Modern Warfare III | - | 37 35 28 13 |
| Ghost of Tsushima | - | 37 31 24 12 |
| Cyberpunk 2077 | - | 43 38 21 9 |
| Shadow of the Tomb Raider | - | 65 57 39 23 |
| 1080p High | - | 59 |
| 1080p Ultra | - | 46 |
| 1440p Ultra | - | 33 |
| 4K Ultra | - | 16 |
| Margin of Error | High | Low |
Benchmarks
Graphics cards’ performance in recent benchmarking apps3D Mark
Steel Nomad Lite Score
| Time Spy | - | 6880 |
| Solar Bay | - | 26783 |
| Port Royal | - | 3880 |
| Fire Strike | - | 16845 |
| Wild Life Extreme | - | 11778 |
| Night Raid | - | 72249 |
GeekBench 6 GPU Compute
GB6 Compute Score
| Background Blur | - | 87.6 img/sec |
| Face Detection | - | 58.5 img/sec |
| Horizon Detection | - | 1.9 Gpixels/sec |
| Edge Detection | - | 2.68 Gpixels/sec |
| Gaussian Blur | - | 4.74 Gpixels/sec |
| Feature Matching | - | 1.01 Gpixels/sec |
| Stereo Matching | - | 249.7 Gpixels/sec |
| Particle Physics | - | 10821.1 FPS |
| API | - | OpenCL |
Passmark Graphics
G3D Mark Score
| G2D Mark | - | 812 |
| DirectX 11 | - | 70 FPS |
| DirectX 12 | - | 48 FPS |
| GPU Compute | - | 3669 Ops/s |
Recent User Tests
Radeon 8065S
No benchmark results yet
Intel Arc B390
| Date | Benchmark | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 📘 2026-09-05 -> asterismx | Geekbench 6 OpenCL | 57164 |
Artificial Intelligence Tests
Performance in machine learning and artificial intelligence tasksGeekBench 6 ML
GB6 ML Single Precision
GB6 ML Half Precision
GB6 ML Quantized
| Image Classification (SP) | - | 5487 |
| Image Segmentation (HP) | - | 16864 |
| Image Super Resolution (Q) | - | 8788 |
| Face Detection (HP) | - | 25029 |
| Pose Estimation (Q) | - | 18852 |
| Text Classification (SP) | - | 2115 |
| Machine Translation (HP) | - | 4266 |
| Object Detection (SP) | - | 7449 |
| Depth Estimation (Q) | - | 22207 |
| Style Transfer (SP) | - | 95039 |
| Framework | - | ONNX |
| Backend | - | DirectML |
Specifications
Technical specifications of Radeon 8065S and Intel Arc B390General
| Vendor | Amd | Intel |
| Build | Integrated | Integrated |
| Released | September 5, 2026 | January 5, 2026 |
| Case | Laptop | Laptop |
| Purpose | Generic | Gaming |
| Segment | Mid-range | Mid-range |
| Architecture | RDNA 3.5 | Celestial |
| GPU Codename | Gorgon Halo | Panther Lake |
| Recommended CPU | - AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 495 or above | - Intel Core Ultra X9 388H or above |
| Used in CPUs | - AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 495 | - Intel Core Ultra X9 378H - Intel Core Ultra X7 368H - Intel Core Ultra X9 388H - Intel Core Ultra X7 358H |
Laptop GPU ranking (17th and 63rd place)
Graphics Processing Unit
| Base Clock | 1295 MHz | 300 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 3000 MHz | 2500 MHz |
| Shading Units | 2560 | 1536 |
| Texture Mapping Units (TMUs) | 160 | 48 |
| Render Output Units (ROPs) | 64 | 24 |
| Compute Units (Pipelines) | 40 | 12 |
| Tensor Cores | No | 96 |
| Ray-tracing Cores | 40 | 12 |
| L1 Cache | - | 64KB per cluster |
| L2 Cache | 2MB shared | 16MB shared |
| Instructions Per Cycle | 2 IPC | 2 IPC |
Raw Performance
| Pixel Fill Rate | 192 GPixel/s | 60 GPixel/s |
| Texture Fill Rate | 480 GTexel/s | 120 GTexel/s |
FLOPS (FP32)
Physical
| Interface | PCIe 5.0 x16 | IGP |
| TGP | 55 W | 30 W |
| Manufacturing | TSMC | TSMC |
| Fabrication Process | 4 nm | 3 nm |
| Die Size | 308 mm² | - |
| Max. Temperature | 100°C | 100°C |
Memory
| Memory Type | System Shared | System Shared |
| ECC | No | No |
API
| DirectX | 12.2 | 12.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.4 | 1.4 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 2.1 | 3.0 |
| CUDA | No | No |
| Ray Tracing | Yes | Yes |
| DLSS | No | No |
| DisplayPort | 2.1a | 2.1 |
Cast your vote
Total votes: < 1