AMD Radeon 8065S vs Intel Xe3 Graphics (2-Core)
VS
AMD Radeon 8065S
Gorgon Halo
Intel Xe3 Graphics (2-Core)
Panther Lake
We compared two integrated laptop GPUs: the Radeon 8065S with 40 pipelines and 2560 shaders against the 8 months older Intel Xe3 Graphics (2-Core) that utilizes 4 pipelines and 256 shaders. Here you will find complete details about specs, efficiency, performance tests, and more.
Review
Gaming
Performance in DirectX, OpenCL, and Vulkan games
Workstation
Perf. in 3D modeling, video editing and rendering apps
Energy Efficiency
Power consumption efficiency in different scenarios
NanoReview Final Score
Overall video card score
Scores marked with a red asterisk (**) represent initial estimates from early testing.
Key differences
Reasons to consider the Radeon 8065S
- 11.8x higher maximum theoretical performance (15.4 vs 1.3 TFLOPS)
- Has 10x more shading units (2560 vs 256)
Reasons to consider the Intel Xe3 Graphics (2-Core)
- Manufactured using a more efficient 3 nm process technology
- Features 32 tensor cores for effective deep learning and AI workloads
Benchmarks
Graphics cards’ performance in recent benchmarking appsGeekBench 6 GPU Compute
GB6 Compute Score
| API | - | OpenCL |
Specifications
Technical specifications of Radeon 8065S and Intel Xe3 Graphics (2-Core)General
| Vendor | Amd | Intel |
| Build | Integrated | Integrated |
| Released | September 5, 2026 | January 5, 2026 |
| Case | Laptop | Laptop |
| Purpose | Generic | Generic |
| Segment | Mid-range | Entry-level |
| Architecture | RDNA 3.5 | Celestial |
| GPU Codename | Gorgon Halo | Panther Lake |
| Recommended CPU | - AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 495 or above | - Intel Core Ultra 5 332 or above |
| Used in CPUs | - AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 495 | - Intel Core 5 315 - Intel Core 7 350 - Intel Core 5 320 - Intel Core Ultra 5 332 - Intel Core Ultra 5 322 |
Laptop GPU ranking (17th and 81st place)
Graphics Processing Unit
| Base Clock | 1295 MHz | 300 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 3000 MHz | 2500 MHz |
| Shading Units | 2560 | 256 |
| Texture Mapping Units (TMUs) | 160 | 16 |
| Render Output Units (ROPs) | 64 | 8 |
| Compute Units (Pipelines) | 40 | 4 |
| Tensor Cores | No | 32 |
| Ray-tracing Cores | 40 | 2 |
| L1 Cache | - | 64KB per cluster |
| L2 Cache | 2MB shared | 4MB shared |
| Instructions Per Cycle | 2 IPC | 2 IPC |
Raw Performance
| Pixel Fill Rate | 192 GPixel/s | 20 GPixel/s |
| Texture Fill Rate | 480 GTexel/s | 40 GTexel/s |
FLOPS (FP32)
Physical
| Interface | PCIe 5.0 x16 | PCIe 5.0 |
| TGP | 55 W | 25 W |
| Manufacturing | TSMC | TSMC |
| Fabrication Process | 4 nm | 3 nm |
| Die Size | 308 mm² | - |
| Max. Temperature | 100°C | 100°C |
Memory
| Memory Type | System Shared | System Shared |
| ECC | No | No |
API
| DirectX | 12.2 | 12.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.4 | 1.4 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 2.1 | 3.0 |
| CUDA | No | - |
| Ray Tracing | Yes | Yes |
| DLSS | No | No |
| DisplayPort | 2.1a | 2.1 |
Cast your vote
Total votes: < 1