AMD Radeon 820M vs Adreno X2-45

VS
AMD Radeon 820M
Krackan Point
Adreno X2-45
Adreno X2

We compared two integrated laptop GPUs: the Radeon 820M with 2 pipelines and 128 shaders against the 9 months newer Adreno X2-45 that utilizes 1152 shaders. Here you will find complete details about specs, efficiency, performance tests, and more.

Review

General comparison of performance in games, applications, power efficiency, and other metrics
Gaming
Performance in DirectX, OpenCL, and Vulkan games
Workstation
Perf. in 3D modeling, video editing and rendering apps
Energy Efficiency
Power consumption efficiency in different scenarios
NanoReview Final Score
Overall video card score
Scores marked with a red asterisk (**) represent initial estimates from early testing.

Key differences

Key distinctions and advantages of Adreno X2-45 over Radeon 820M
Reasons to consider the Adreno X2-45
  • 5.6x higher maximum theoretical performance (3.9 vs 0.7 TFLOPS)
  • Manufactured using a more efficient 3 nm process technology
  • Has 9x more shading units (1152 vs 128)

Benchmarks

Graphics cards’ performance in recent benchmarking apps

Passmark Graphics

Videocard test that focuses on compute shaders, multi-texturing, tessellation, and other features
G3D Mark Score
G2D Mark 756 -
DirectX 11 21 FPS -
DirectX 12 10 FPS -
GPU Compute 986 Ops/s -
Sources: PassMark [5] – 85 samples

Specifications

Technical specifications of Radeon 820M and Adreno X2-45

General

Vendor Amd Qualcomm
Build Integrated Integrated
Released January 6, 2025 September 25, 2025
Case Laptop Laptop
Purpose Generic Generic
Segment Entry-level Entry-level
Architecture RDNA 3.5 Adreno X2
GPU Codename Krackan Point Adreno X2
Rival Equivalent - Intel Xe3 Graphics (2-Core) -
Recommended CPU - AMD Ryzen AI 5 330 or above - Qualcomm Snapdragon X2 Plus (X2P-64-100) or above
Used in CPUs - AMD Ryzen AI 5 330 - Qualcomm Snapdragon X2 Plus (X2P-64-100)
- Qualcomm Snapdragon X2 Plus (X2P-42-100)
Laptop GPU ranking (62nd and 27th place)

Graphics Processing Unit

Base Clock 400 MHz 500 MHz
Boost Clock 2800 MHz 910-1700 MHz (configurable)
Shading Units 128 1152
Texture Mapping Units (TMUs) 8 72
Render Output Units (ROPs) 4 36
Compute Units (Pipelines) 2 -
Tensor Cores No No
Ray-tracing Cores 2 -
L1 Cache 128KB per cluster -
L2 Cache 1MB shared -
Instructions Per Cycle 2 IPC 2 IPC

Raw Performance

Pixel Fill Rate 11 GPixel/s 33-61 GPixel/s
Texture Fill Rate 22 GTexel/s 66-122 GTexel/s
FLOPS (FP32)
0.7 TFLOPS
Adreno X2-45 +457%
2.1-3.9 TFLOPS

Physical

Interface PCIe 4.0 x8 IGP
TGP 15 W -
Manufacturing TSMC TSMC
Fabrication Process 4 nm 3 nm
Die Size 195 mm² 220 mm²
Max. Temperature 100°C -

Memory

Memory Type System Shared System Shared
Bus - 128-bit
ECC No No
Memory Bandwidth
152 GB/s

API

DirectX 12 12.2
Vulkan 1.4 1.4
OpenGL 4.6 -
OpenCL 2.1 3.0
CUDA No No
Ray Tracing Yes Yes
DLSS No No
DisplayPort 2.1 1.4

Cast your vote

Choose between two graphics cards
0 (0%)
0 (0%)
Total votes: < 1

User opinions

You can share your opinion or ask a question in the comments below
🌐 Register your profile and become part of NanoReview community!