AMD Radeon 840M vs Apple M5 GPU (10-Core)

We compared two integrated laptop graphics cards: the Radeon 840M with 4 pipelines and 256 shaders against the 9 months newer Apple M5 GPU (10-Core) that utilizes 160 pipelines and 1280 shaders. Here you will find complete details about specs, efficiency, performance tests, and more.

Review

General comparison of performance in games, applications, power efficiency, and other metrics
Gaming
Performance in DirectX, OpenCL, and Vulkan games
Workstation
Perf. in 3D modeling, video editing and rendering apps
AI/ML
Capabilities for machine learning and AI-related tasks
Energy Efficiency
Power consumption efficiency in different scenarios
NanoReview Final Score
Overall video card score

Key differences

Key distinctions and advantages of M5 GPU (10-Core) over Radeon 840M
Reasons to consider the Apple M5 GPU (10-Core)
  • Performs significantly better (up to 4x) in 3DMark Steel Nomad Lite
  • 2.7x higher maximum theoretical performance (4.1 vs 1.5 TFLOPS)
  • Manufactured using a more efficient 3 nm process technology
  • Achieves 5.4x more points in the GeekBench 6 Compute test (75K vs 14K)
  • Has 5x more shading units (1280 vs 256)

Gaming Performance

Frame rate comparison across popular AAA titles at different resolutions

Games

FPS Table
Forza Horizon 5
25
14
12
-
-
The Witcher 3
11
12
-
-
-
Counter-Strike 2
27
20
14
-
-
Far Cry 6
21
17
12
-
-
Hogwarts Legacy
11
-
-
-
-
CoD: Modern Warfare III
22
19
14
9
-
Ghost of Tsushima
13
10
-
-
-
Cyberpunk 2077
10
10
-
-
-
Shadow of the Tomb Raider
16
18
11
-
-
Average FPS by Resolution
1080p High 17 -
1080p Ultra 14 -
1440p Ultra 10 -
4K Ultra - -
Margin of Error High Low

Benchmarks

Graphics cards’ performance in recent benchmarking apps

3D Mark

Multiplatform graphics benchmark suite that directly correlates with performance in modern games
Steel Nomad Lite Score
5337
Time Spy 1699 -
Solar Bay 6960 24536
Port Royal 553 -
Fire Strike 5303 -
Wild Life Extreme 2671 12278
Night Raid 22563 -
Sources: 3DMark [1], [2]

GeekBench 6 GPU Compute

GPU test for computational tasks (image processing, photography, computer vision, and ML)
GB6 Compute Score
14025
75777
Background Blur 31.8 img/sec 155.7 img/sec
Face Detection 16.8 img/sec 178.1 img/sec
Horizon Detection 0.46 Gpixels/sec 2.22 Gpixels/sec
Edge Detection 0.58 Gpixels/sec 2.87 Gpixels/sec
Gaussian Blur 0.42 Gpixels/sec 5.8 Gpixels/sec
Feature Matching 0.18 Gpixels/sec 0.95 Gpixels/sec
Stereo Matching 52.5 Gpixels/sec 190.7 Gpixels/sec
Particle Physics 2048.6 FPS 6579.1 FPS
API OpenCL Metal
Sources: Geekbench [3], [4]

Cinebench 2024 GPU

Hardware benchmark using Maxon's Cinema 4D rendering engine
Cinebench 2024 GPU

Passmark Graphics

Videocard test that focuses on compute shaders, multi-texturing, tessellation, and other features
G3D Mark Score
G2D Mark 870 -
DirectX 11 32 FPS -
DirectX 12 17 FPS -
GPU Compute 1697 Ops/s -
Sources: PassMark [5] – 1020 samples

Blender

Rendering performance test for 3D modeling
Blender GPU
120.67
2011.24
Sources: Blender [9], [10] – 12 & 145 samples

Recent User Tests

The latest benchmark tests that have been submitted by users
Radeon 840M
No benchmark results yet
Apple M5 GPU (10-Core)
DateBenchmarkResult
📘 2026-01-03 -> RennsportGeekbench 6 OpenCL48688

Artificial Intelligence Tests

Performance in machine learning and artificial intelligence tasks

GeekBench 6 ML

Tests throughput of AI operations in single, half, and quantized precision
GB6 ML Single Precision
13289
GB6 ML Half Precision
24800
GB6 ML Quantized
23572
Image Classification (SP) 1988 6348
Image Segmentation (HP) 2184 16813
Image Super Resolution (Q) 4788 30322
Face Detection (HP) 6857 34387
Pose Estimation (Q) 17396 111591
Text Classification (SP) 1628 2319
Machine Translation (HP) 2053 5555
Object Detection (SP) 1825 6450
Depth Estimation (Q) 8471 53195
Style Transfer (SP) 31032 82314
Framework ONNX Core ML
Backend DirectML GPU
Sources: Geekbench [9], [10]
Results were compared using different ML frameworks

Specifications

Technical specifications of Radeon 840M and Apple M5 GPU (10-Core)

General

Vendor Amd Apple
Build Integrated Integrated
Released January 7, 2025 October 15, 2025
Case Laptop Laptop
Purpose Generic Professional
Segment Entry-level Mid-range
Architecture RDNA 3.5 Apple M GPU
GPU Codename Krackan Point Custom
Rival Equivalent - Intel Arc 130T - Adreno X2-90
Recommended CPU - AMD Ryzen AI 5 340 or above - Apple M5 (10-Core) or above
Used in CPUs - AMD Ryzen AI 7 345
- AMD Ryzen AI 5 430
- AMD Ryzen AI 7 445
- AMD Ryzen AI 5 435
- AMD Ryzen AI 5 440
- AMD Ryzen AI 5 340
- Apple M5 (10-Core)
Laptop GPU ranking (108th and 45th place)

Graphics Processing Unit

Base Clock 400 MHz -
Boost Clock 2900 MHz 1620 MHz
Shading Units 256 1280
Texture Mapping Units (TMUs) 16 80
Render Output Units (ROPs) 8 40
Compute Units (Pipelines) 4 160
Tensor Cores No -
Ray-tracing Cores 4 -
L1 Cache 128KB per cluster -
L2 Cache 1MB shared -
Instructions Per Cycle 2 IPC 2 IPC

Raw Performance

Pixel Fill Rate 23 GPixel/s 65 GPixel/s
Texture Fill Rate 46 GTexel/s 130 GTexel/s
FLOPS (FP32)
1.5 TFLOPS
4.1 TFLOPS

Physical

Interface PCIe 4.0 x8 Custom
TGP 15 W -
Manufacturing TSMC TSMC
Fabrication Process 4 nm 3 nm
Die Size 195 mm² -
Transistor Count - 28 billion
Max. Temperature 100°C 100°C

Memory

Memory Type System Shared System Shared
Memory Clock - 9600 MHz
Bus - 128-bit
ECC No No
Memory Bandwidth

API

DirectX 12 -
Vulkan 1.4 -
OpenGL 4.6 -
OpenCL 2.1 -
CUDA No -
Ray Tracing Yes Yes
DLSS No No
DisplayPort 2.1 -

Cast your vote

Choose between two graphics cards
0 (0%)
0 (0%)
Total votes: < 1

User opinions

You can share your opinion or ask a question in the comments below
🌐 Register your profile and become part of NanoReview community!