AMD Radeon 840M vs Intel Arc B370

VS
AMD Radeon 840M
Krackan Point
Intel Arc B370
Panther Lake

We compared two integrated laptop GPUs: the Radeon 840M with 4 pipelines and 256 shaders against the 1 year newer Intel Arc B370 that utilizes 10 pipelines and 1280 shaders. Here you will find complete details about specs, efficiency, performance tests, and more.

Review

General comparison of performance in games, applications, power efficiency, and other metrics
Gaming
Performance in DirectX, OpenCL, and Vulkan games
Workstation
Perf. in 3D modeling, video editing and rendering apps
AI/ML
Capabilities for machine learning and AI-related tasks
Energy Efficiency
Power consumption efficiency in different scenarios
NanoReview Final Score
Overall video card score

Key differences

Key distinctions and advantages of Arc B370 over Radeon 840M
Reasons to consider the Intel Arc B370
  • Performs significantly better (up to 3.7x) in 3DMark Steel Nomad Lite
  • 4.1x higher maximum theoretical performance (6.1 vs 1.5 TFLOPS)
  • Shows 2.9x higher average frame rate in modern games at QHD resolution – 29 vs 10 FPS
  • Manufactured using a more efficient 3 nm process technology
  • Achieves 3.4x more points in the GeekBench 6 Compute test (48K vs 14K)
  • Has 5x more shading units (1280 vs 256)
  • Features 80 tensor cores for effective deep learning and AI workloads

Gaming Performance

Frame rate comparison across popular AAA titles at different resolutions

Games

FPS Table
Forza Horizon 5
25
14
12
-
71
41
32
18
The Witcher 3
11
12
-
-
65
55
39
19
Counter-Strike 2
27
20
14
-
85
62
41
19
Far Cry 6
21
17
12
-
56
50
36
17
Hogwarts Legacy
11
-
-
-
31
22
17
9
CoD: Modern Warfare III
22
19
14
9
36
32
24
14
Ghost of Tsushima
13
10
-
-
35
27
21
11
Cyberpunk 2077
10
10
-
-
38
32
20
-
Shadow of the Tomb Raider
16
18
11
-
61
50
34
20
Average FPS by Resolution
1080p High 17 53
1080p Ultra 14 41
1440p Ultra 10 29
4K Ultra - 15
Margin of Error High Low

Benchmarks

Graphics cards’ performance in recent benchmarking apps

3D Mark

Multiplatform graphics benchmark suite that directly correlates with performance in modern games
Steel Nomad Lite Score
Arc B370 +275%
4941
Time Spy 1699 6028
Solar Bay 6960 23177
Port Royal 553 3498
Fire Strike 5303 15198
Wild Life Extreme 2671 11657
Night Raid 22563 69941
Sources: 3DMark [1], [2]

GeekBench 6 OpenCL

GPU test for computational tasks (image processing, photography, computer vision, and ML)
GB6 Compute Score
14025
Arc B370 +244%
48273
Background Blur 31.8 img/sec 117.4 img/sec
Face Detection 16.8 img/sec 60.6 img/sec
Horizon Detection 0.46 Gpixels/sec 1.39 Gpixels/sec
Edge Detection 0.58 Gpixels/sec 1.95 Gpixels/sec
Gaussian Blur 0.42 Gpixels/sec 2.45 Gpixels/sec
Feature Matching 0.18 Gpixels/sec 0.66 Gpixels/sec
Stereo Matching 52.5 Gpixels/sec 144.8 Gpixels/sec
Particle Physics 2048.6 FPS 7272.6 FPS
API OpenCL OpenCL
Sources: Geekbench [3], [4]

Passmark Graphics

Videocard test that focuses on compute shaders, multi-texturing, tessellation, and other features
G3D Mark Score
Arc B370 +130%
8433
G2D Mark 870 832
DirectX 11 32 FPS 65 FPS
DirectX 12 17 FPS 45 FPS
GPU Compute 1697 Ops/s 3369 Ops/s
Sources: PassMark [5], [6] – 1020 & 48 samples

Blender

Rendering performance test for 3D modeling
Blender GPU
120.67
Arc B370 +969%
1289.45
Sources: Blender [9], [10] – 12 & 5 samples

Artificial Intelligence Tests

Performance in machine learning and artificial intelligence tasks

GeekBench 6 ML

Tests throughput of AI operations in single, half, and quantized precision
GB6 ML Single Precision
Arc B370 +122%
10834
GB6 ML Half Precision
Arc B370 +238%
20482
GB6 ML Quantized
Arc B370 +86%
7349
Image Classification (SP) 1988 5389
Image Segmentation (HP) 2184 18899
Image Super Resolution (Q) 4788 8326
Face Detection (HP) 6857 25377
Pose Estimation (Q) 17396 16174
Text Classification (SP) 1628 1763
Machine Translation (HP) 2053 4140
Object Detection (SP) 1825 7138
Depth Estimation (Q) 8471 20034
Style Transfer (SP) 31032 84880
Framework ONNX ONNX
Backend DirectML DirectML
Sources: Geekbench [9], [10]

Specifications

Technical specifications of Radeon 840M and Intel Arc B370

General

Vendor Amd Intel
Build Integrated Integrated
Released January 7, 2025 January 5, 2026
Case Laptop Laptop
Purpose Generic Generic
Segment Entry-level Mid-range
Architecture RDNA 3.5 Celestial
GPU Codename Krackan Point Panther Lake
Rival Equivalent - Intel Arc 130T -
Recommended CPU - AMD Ryzen AI 5 340 or above - Intel Core Ultra 7 356H or above
Used in CPUs - AMD Ryzen AI 7 345
- AMD Ryzen AI 5 430
- AMD Ryzen AI 7 445
- AMD Ryzen AI 5 435
- AMD Ryzen AI 5 440
- AMD Ryzen AI 5 340
- Intel Core Ultra 5 338H
Laptop GPU ranking (108th and 71st place)

Graphics Processing Unit

Base Clock 400 MHz 300 MHz
Boost Clock 2900 MHz 2400 MHz
Shading Units 256 1280
Texture Mapping Units (TMUs) 16 40
Render Output Units (ROPs) 8 20
Compute Units (Pipelines) 4 10
Tensor Cores No 80
Ray-tracing Cores 4 10
L1 Cache 128KB per cluster 64KB per cluster
L2 Cache 1MB shared 16MB shared
Instructions Per Cycle 2 IPC 2 IPC

Raw Performance

Pixel Fill Rate 23 GPixel/s 48 GPixel/s
Texture Fill Rate 46 GTexel/s 96 GTexel/s
FLOPS (FP32)
1.5 TFLOPS
Arc B370 +307%
6.1 TFLOPS

Physical

Interface PCIe 4.0 x8 IGP
TGP 15 W 25 W
Manufacturing TSMC TSMC
Fabrication Process 4 nm 3 nm
Die Size 195 mm² -
Max. Temperature 100°C 100°C

Memory

Memory Type System Shared System Shared
ECC No No

API

DirectX 12 12.1
Vulkan 1.4 1.4
OpenGL 4.6 4.6
OpenCL 2.1 3.0
CUDA No No
Ray Tracing Yes Yes
DLSS No No
DisplayPort 2.1 2.1

Cast your vote

Choose between two graphics cards
0 (0%)
0 (0%)
Total votes: < 1

User opinions

You can share your opinion or ask a question in the comments below
🌐 Register your profile and become part of NanoReview community!