Home > Laptop comparison > Gram Style 16" (2023) or Gram 14 (2023) – what's better?

LG Gram Style 16" (2023) vs Gram 14 (2023)

62 out of 100
LG Gram Style 16
VS
52 out of 100
LG Gram 14 (2023)
LG Gram Style 16" (2023)
LG Gram 14 (2023)
Please select specific configurations for the laptops to get a more accurate comparative review
RAM
Storage

Review

Evaluation of LG Gram Style 16" (2023) and Gram 14 (2023) important characteristics
Performance
System and application performance
Gaming
Performance in popular 3D games
Display
Viewing angle, color accuracy, brightness
Battery Life
Potential battery life in light and average use
Connectivity
Ports, webcam and other interfaces
Portability
Design, materials, durability and usability
NanoReview Score
Pick the usage scenario that best matches your needs
Primary usage:

Value for money (Beta)

Please input up-to-date prices for the selected laptop configurations to get an accurate value-for-money index.
Currency
VS
40.8
(Average)
Value Index
48.2
(Average)

Key Differences

What are the key differences between the notebooks
Advantages of the LG Gram Style 16" (2023)
  • Higher screen refresh rate: 120 versus 60 Hz
  • Thinner bezels and 2% higher screen-to-body ratio
  • Features a bigger (~11%) battery – 80 against 72 watt-hours
  • 46% sharper screen – 236 versus 162 pixels per inch (PPI)
  • Provides 14% higher max. screen brightness: 400 vs 350 nits
Advantages of the LG Gram 14 (2023)
  • Easier to carry: weighs 240 grams less (around 0.53 lbs)
  • Includes an old-school USB-A port
  • Much smaller footprint: 22% more compact case (103.4 vs 132.8 square inches)

Tests and Specifications

Comparison table of test results and technical specs
Laptop:
Gram Style 16" (2023)
vs
Gram 14 (2023)

Case

Weight 1.23 kg (2.71 lbs) 0.99 kg (2.18 lbs)
Dimensions 355.1 x 241.3 x 15.9 mm
13.98 x 9.5 x 0.63 inches		 312 x 213.9 x 16.8 mm
12.28 x 8.42 x 0.66 inches
Area 857 cm2 (132.8 inches2) 667 cm2 (103.4 inches2)
Screen-to-body ratio ~86.6% ~85.2%
Side bezels 5.3 mm 5.3 mm
Colors White, Black Black
Transformer No No
Size comparison
Cooling solution
Cooling system Active Active
Vapor chamber No No
Liquid metal No No
Number of fans 2 1

Display

Size 16 inches 14 inches
Type OLED IPS LCD
Refresh rate 120 Hz 60 Hz
PPI 236 ppi 162 ppi
Aspect ratio 16:10 16:10
Resolution 3200 x 2000 pixels 1920 x 1200 pixels
HDR support No No
Sync technology No No
Touchscreen No No
Coating Glossy Matte
Screen space comparison
Gram Style 16" (2023)
16″ (16:10 ratio) = 115.1 in2
Gram 14 (2023)
14″ (16:10 ratio) = 88.1 in2
~30% more screen space
Display tests
Contrast 1000000:1 -
sRGB color space 100% -
DCI-P3 color gamut 100% 99%
Response time 1 ms -
Max. brightness
Gram Style 16" (2023) +14%
400 nits
Gram 14 (2023)
350 nits

Battery

Capacity
Full charging time 2:10 hr -
Battery type Li-Ion Li-Ion
Replaceable No No
Fast charging Yes Yes
Charging via USB (Power Delivery) Yes Yes
Charging port position Left Left
Charge power 65 W 65 W
Cable length 2 meters -
Weight of AC adapter 195 grams 230 grams

CPU

CPU name
Base frequency 2.2 GHz 2.2 GHz
Turbo frequency 5 GHz 5 GHz
Cores 12 (4P + 8E) 12 (4P + 8E)
Threads 16 16
L3 Cache 18 MB 18 MB
Integrated GPU Intel Iris Xe Graphics (96EU) Intel Iris Xe Graphics (96EU)
Fabrication process 10 nm 10 nm

Benchmarks

Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)
Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)
Cinebench 2024 (Single-Core)
Cinebench 2024 (Multi-Core)
Submit your benchmark results

Graphics Card

GPU name
TGP 15 W 15 W
Type Integrated Integrated
Fabrication process 10 nm 10 nm
GPU base clock 300 MHz 300 MHz
GPU boost clock 1500 MHz 1500 MHz
FLOPS 2.3 TFLOPS 2.3 TFLOPS
Memory size System Shared System Shared
Memory type LPDDR5 LPDDR5
Memory speed 6 Gbps 6 Gbps
Shading units (cores) 768 768
Texture mapping units (TMUs) 48 48
Raster operations pipelines (ROPs) 24 24
GPU performance 2.3 TFLOPS 2.3 TFLOPS

GPU Benchmarks

Steel Nomad Lite Score
Expected FPS based on average performance across 9 popular games. Details
Add your GPU benchmark result

RAM

RAM size
Channels 2x4 GB 2x4 GB
Clock 6000 MHz 6000 MHz
Type LPDDR5 LPDDR5
Upgradable No No

Storage

Storage size
Bus PCI-E Gen 4.0 (4x) PCI-E Gen 4.0 (4x)
Storage type SSD (M2) SSD (M2)
Channels 1x256 GB 1x256 GB
Upgradable Yes Yes
Total slots 2 1
NVMe Yes Yes

Sound

Speakers 2.0 2.0
Power 2x2W 2x1.5W
Dolby Atmos Yes Yes
Microphones 2 2

Connectivity

Wi-Fi standard v6E v6E
Bluetooth v5.1 v5.1
Fingerprint No No
Infrared sensor Yes Yes
Optical drive No No
Webcam Above the display Above the display
Webcam resolution 1920 x 1080 1920 x 1080
Ports
USB-A 1x USB 3.2 2x USB 3.2
USB Type-C 2x USB 4.0 2x USB 4.0
Thunderbolt Thunderbolt 4 Thunderbolt 4
HDMI No 1x HDMI 2.0
DisplayPort No No
VGA No No
Audio jack (3.5 mm) Yes Yes
Ethernet (RJ45) No No
SD card reader Yes Yes
Proprietary charging port No No

Input

Keyboard
Keyboard type Island Island
Numpad Yes No
Backlight Yes Yes
Touchpad
Surface Glass Plastic
Windows Precision Yes Yes
Further details
Notes on Gram Style 16" (2023):
    - Full magnesium-alloy body
Notes on Gram 14 (2023):
    - Full magnesium-alloy body
*Disclaimer! Ports, speakers, display, and other specifications can vary depending on the laptop's specific configuration or region.

Cast your vote

So, which laptop would you choose?
0 (0%)
0 (0%)
Total votes: < 1

Related Comparisons

1. LG Gram Style 16" (2023) vs LG Gram SuperSlim 15.6" (2023)
2. LG Gram Style 16" (2023) vs LG Gram 17 (2023)
3. LG Gram Style 16" (2023) vs Microsoft Surface Laptop 5 15
4. LG Gram 14 (2023) vs Samsung Galaxy Book 3 Pro (14")
5. LG Gram 14 (2023) vs Asus Zenbook S 13 OLED (UX5304)
6. LG Gram 14 (2023) vs LG Gram 14 (2025)
7. LG Gram 14 (2023) vs Lenovo Slim 7i (14”, Gen 8)
8. LG Gram 14 (2023) vs LG Gram Style 14" (2023)
Compare other laptops (1100+)

Comments

Write your opinion about the comparison of LG Gram 14 (2023) and Style 16" (2023) or ask any questions
🌐 Register your profile and become part of NanoReview community!
EnglishРусский