Oppo Find X7 vs OnePlus 12
74
out of 100
VS
80
out of 100
Here we compared two flagship smartphones: the 6.78-inch Oppo Find X7 (with MediaTek Dimensity 9300) that was released on January 8, 2024, against the OnePlus 12, which is powered by Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 and came out 1 month before. On this page, you will find tests, full specs, strengths, and weaknesses of each of the devices.
Select the amount of RAM to evaluate performance and value for money more precisely
Key differences
Reasons to consider the Oppo Find X7
- Slow-motion recording at 480FPS
Reasons to consider the OnePlus 12
- Handles wireless charging up to 50W
- More recent OS version: Android 16 versus 15
- 13% higher pixel density (510 vs 450 PPI)
- Ready for eSIM technology
Review
Display
Screen quality, color accuracy, brightness
Camera
Photo and video recording quality
Performance
CPU and memory performance (apps, system)
Gaming
Capabilities for playing modern games
Battery
Battery life, charging type and speed
Connectivity
Networks, ports, data transmission
Scores with a red asterisk (*) are approximate and may change in the future as we gather more data.
Select your primary usage scenario to get a more accurate NanoReview Score
Value for money (Beta)
Tests and specifications
Comparison table of technical specifications and testsDisplay
| Type | AMOLED | AMOLED |
| Size | 6.78 inches | 6.82 inches |
| Resolution | 1264 x 2780 pixels | 1440 x 3168 pixels |
| Aspect ratio | 20:9 | 19.8:9 |
| PPI | 450 ppi | 510 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Adaptive refresh rate | Yes | Yes (1-120 Hz) |
| Max rated brightness | 4500 nits | 1600 nits |
| Max rated brightness in HDR | 2600 nits | 4500 nits |
| HDR support | Yes, Dolby Vision | Yes, HDR10+ |
| Touch sampling rate | 240 Hz | 240 Hz |
| Screen protection | Gorilla Glass Victus 2 | Gorilla Glass Victus 2 |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 90.5% | 91.3% |
| Display features | - DCI-P3 - Always-On Display - DC Dimming |
- DCI-P3 - Always-On Display - DC Dimming |
| RGB color space | - | 99.5% |
| PWM | - | Not detected |
| Response time | - | 11 ms |
| Contrast | - | ∞ Infinity |
Peak brightness test (auto)
Design and build
| Height | 162.7 mm (6.41 inches) | 163.3 mm (6.43 inches) |
| Width | 75.4 mm (2.97 inches) | 75.8 mm (2.98 inches) |
| Thickness | 8.7 mm (0.34 inches) | 9.15 mm (0.36 inches) |
| Weight | 206 g (7.27 oz) | 220 g (7.76 oz) |
| Waterproof | IP65 | IP65 |
| Advanced cooling | Vapor chamber | Vapor chamber |
| Rear material | Glass | Glass |
| Frame material | Metal | Metal |
| Colors | Black, Blue, Purple, Brown | White, Black, Green |
| Fingerprint scanner | Yes, in-display | Yes, in-display |
Screen-to-body ratio
Performance
| Chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 9300 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 |
| Max clock | 3250 MHz | 3300 MHz |
| CPU cores | 8 (1 + 3 + 4) | 8 (1 + 3 + 2 + 2) |
| Architecture | - 4 cores at 2 GHz: Cortex-A720 - 3 cores at 2.85 GHz: Cortex-X4 - 1 core at 3.25 GHz: Cortex-X4 |
- 2 cores at 2.27 GHz: Cortex-A520 - 2 cores at 2.96 GHz: Cortex-A720 - 3 cores at 3.15 GHz: Cortex-A720 - 1 core at 3.3 GHz: Cortex-X4 |
| L3 cache | 8 MB | 12 MB |
| Manufacturing | TSMC | TSMC |
| Lithography process | 4 nanometers | 4 nanometers |
| Neural processor (NPU) | MediaTek NPU 790 | Hexagon |
| Graphics | Immortalis-G720 MC12 | Adreno 750 |
| GPU shading units | 1536 | 1536 |
| GPU clock | 1300 MHz | 903-1000 MHz |
| FLOPS | ~3993.6 GFLOPS | ~2774 GFLOPS |
Benchmarks
Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)
Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)
Compute Score (GPU)
| Compute Score (GPU) | 15748 | 15111 |
| Single-core score | 2225 | 2182 |
| Multi-core score | 7438 | 6465 |
AnTuTu Benchmark 11
| CPU | 747304 | 700922 |
| GPU | 706084 | 914074 |
| Memory | 355178 | 313211 |
| UX | 515466 | 573571 |
| Total score | 2324032 | 2401788 |
| Samples | Less than 3 | [26 tests] |
3DMark Steel Nomad Light
| Stability | 85% | 67% |
| Graphics test | 13 FPS | 12 FPS |
| Graphics score | 1716 | 1676 |
3DMark Solar Bay
| Stability | 63% | 57% |
| Graphics test | 28 FPS | 32 FPS |
| Section 1 | 30 FPS | 36 FPS |
| Section 2 | 28 FPS | 32 FPS |
| Section 3 | 24 FPS | 27 FPS |
| Graphics score | 7273 | 8360 |
3DMark Wild Life Extreme
| Stability | 59% | 83% |
| Graphics test | 28 FPS | 27 FPS |
| Graphics score | 4692 | 4646 |
PCMark 3.0
| Web score | 9404 | 12226 |
| Video editing | 5474 | 6195 |
| Photo editing | 28034 | 23810 |
| Data manipulation | 12671 | 13418 |
| Writing score | 17595 | 17373 |
AnTuTu 11 Ranking List (180th and 154th place)
Recent User Tests
Oppo Find X7
No benchmark results yet
OnePlus 12
| Date | Benchmark | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 📘 2026-08-26 (Luvish) | GeekBench GPU | 14849 |
| 📘 2026-08-26 (Luvish) | GeekBench CPU | 2267 / 7083 |
| 📘 2026-08-11 -> Lukisek.CZ | AnTuTu | 2612288 |
| 📘 2026-07-31 (LukisekCZ) | AnTuTu | 2540776 |
| 📘 2026-07-27 (михаил) | AnTuTu | 2192049 |
Memory
| RAM size | 12 GB | 12 GB |
| Memory type | LPDDR5X | LPDDR5X |
| Memory clock | 4266 MHz | 4266 MHz |
| Channels | 4 | 4 |
| Storage size | 256 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 4.0 | UFS 4.0 |
| Memory card | No | No |
Software
| Operating system | Android 14 (Can be upgraded to Android 15) | Android 14 (Can be upgraded to Android 16) |
| ROM | ColorOS 15 | OxygenOS 16 |
| OS size | - | 30 GB |
| OS updates | 4 years | 4 years |
| Security updates | 5 years | 6 years |
Battery
| Capacity | 5000 mAh | 5400 mAh |
| Max charge power | 100 W | 100 W |
| Battery type | Li-Po | Li-Po |
| Replaceable | No | No |
| Wireless charging | No | Yes (50 W) |
| Reverse charging | - | Yes, (wireless) |
| Fast charging | Yes (50% in 10 min) | Yes (70% in 15 min) |
| Full charging time | 0:27 hr | 0:24 hr |
| Web browsing | - | 13:10 hr |
| Watching video | - | 18:49 hr |
| Gaming | - | 06:05 hr |
| Standby | - | 114 hr |
General battery life
Smartphones With Long Battery Life (#82nd place)
Main camera
| Matrix | 50 megapixels | 50 megapixels |
| Image resolution | 8192 x 6144 | 8192 x 6144 |
| Zoom | Optical, 3x | Optical, 3x |
| Flash | LED | Dual LED |
| Stabilization | Optical | Optical |
| 8K video recording | No | Up to 24FPS |
| 4K video recording | Up to 60FPS | Up to 60FPS |
| 1080p video recording | Up to 60FPS | Up to 60FPS |
| Slow motion | 480 FPS (720p) | 240 FPS (1080p) |
| Angle of widest lens | 119° | 114° |
| Lenses | 1) Standard: 50 MP 2) Telephoto: 64 MP 3) Ultrawide: 50 MP |
1) Standard: 50 MP 2) Telephoto: 64 MP 3) Ultrawide: 48 MP |
| Camera features | - Bokeh mode - Pro mode - RAW support |
- Bokeh mode - Pro mode |
| Image resolution | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Aperture | f/1.6 | f/1.6 |
| Focal length | 23 mm | 23 mm |
| Sensor | Sony LYT-T808 | Sony LYT-T808 |
| Sensor size | 1/1.43" (≈ 0.7 inch) | 1/1.43" (≈ 0.7 inch) |
| Pixel size | 1.12 micron | 1.12 micron |
| Autofocus | Phase autofocus | Phase autofocus (Dual Pixel) |
| Stabilization | Optical | Optical |
| Image resolution | 64 MP | 64 MP |
| Aperture | f/2.6 | f/2.6 |
| Focal length | 70 mm | 70 mm |
| Sensor | Omnivision OV64B | Omnivision OV64B |
| Sensor size | 1/2.0" (≈ 0.5 inch) | 1/2" (≈ 0.5 inch) |
| Pixel size | 0.7 micron | 0.7 micron |
| Stabilization | Optical | Optical |
| Image resolution | 50 MP | 48 MP |
| Aperture | f/2.0 | f/2.2 |
| Focal length | 15 mm | 14 mm |
| Sensor | Samsung S5KJN1 | Sony IMX581 |
| Sensor size | 1/2.76" (≈ 0.36 inch) | 1/2" (≈ 0.5 inch) |
| Pixel size | 0.64 micron | 0.8 micron |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
Selfie camera
| Megapixels | 32 megapixels | 32 megapixels |
| Image resolution | 6560 x 4928 | 6560 x 4928 |
| Aperture | f/2.4 | f/2.4 |
| Focal length | 21 mm | 21 mm |
| Sensor | Sony IMX709 | Sony IMX615 |
| Sensor size | 1/2.74" (≈ 0.36 inch) | 1/2.74" (≈ 0.36 inch) |
| Pixel size | 0.8 micron | 0.8 micron |
| Autofocus | Phase autofocus | No |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
| Video resolution | 2160p (4K) at 60 FPS | 2160p (4K) at 30 FPS |
| Depth sensor (TOF 3D) | No | No |
Connectivity
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 7 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be) | Wi-Fi 7 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax) |
| Wi-Fi features | - Dual Band - Wi-Fi MiMO - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
- Dual Band - Wi-Fi MiMO - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
| Bluetooth version | 5.4 | 5.4 |
| Bluetooth features | LE | LE |
| USB type | USB Type-C | USB Type-C |
| USB version | 2 | 3.2 |
| USB features | - Charging - USB-Storage mode - OTG |
- Charging - USB-Storage mode - OTG |
| DisplayPort | - | Yes |
| GPS | GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS | GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, NAVIC |
| NFC* | Yes | Yes |
| Infrared port | Yes | Yes |
| Number of SIM* | 2 | 2 |
| Type of SIM card | Nano | Nano |
| Multi SIM mode | Standby | Standby |
| eSIM support* | No | Yes |
| Hybrid slot | No | No |
| LTE Cat* | - | 20 |
| 5G support | Yes | Yes |
Sound
| Speakers | Stereo | Stereo |
| Headphone audio jack | No | No |
| FM radio | No | No |
| Dolby Atmos | - | Yes |
Speakers test
Max loudness
Other
| Category | Flagship | Flagship |
| Announced | January 2024 | December 2023 |
| Release date | January 2024 | February 2024 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $565 | $799 |
| Successor | - Oppo Find X9 | - OnePlus 15 |
| Sensors | - Proximity sensor - Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Ambient light sensor - Compass - Fingerprint |
- Proximity sensor - Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Ambient light sensor - Compass - Fingerprint |
| Bundled charger | Yes, 100 W | Yes, 100 W |
Further details
Notes on Find X7:
- The rear cover can be either glass or eco-leather, with a weight difference of 4 grams.
*Disclaimer! NFC, GSM network support, and some other specs can be different depending on the country.
Conclusion
These smartphones have a lot in common, but we would recommend the OnePlus 12. It has a better display, camera, gaming, battery life, connectivity, software, and sound.
Cast your vote
Total votes: 190
Related comparisons
9.
OnePlus 12 vs OnePlus 12R (1)