Vivo X100 vs Oppo Find X7
74
out of 100
VS
74
out of 100
Here we compared two flagship smartphones: the 6.78-inch Vivo X100 (with MediaTek Dimensity 9300) that was released on November 13, 2023, against the Oppo Find X7, which is powered by the same chip and came out 2 months after. On this page, you will find tests, full specs, strengths, and weaknesses of each of the devices.
Select the amount of RAM to evaluate performance and value for money more precisely
Key differences
Reasons to consider the Vivo X100
- Waterproof body (IP68 classification)
- Slow-motion recording at 960FPS
- Supports higher wattage charging (120W versus 100W)
Review
Display
Screen quality, color accuracy, brightness
Camera
Photo and video recording quality
Performance
CPU and memory performance (apps, system)
Gaming
Capabilities for playing modern games
Battery
Battery life, charging type and speed
Connectivity
Networks, ports, data transmission
Scores with a red asterisk (*) are approximate and may change in the future as we gather more data.
Select your primary usage scenario to get a more accurate NanoReview Score
Value for money (Beta)
Tests and specifications
Comparison table of technical specifications and testsDisplay
| Type | AMOLED | AMOLED |
| Size | 6.78 inches | 6.78 inches |
| Resolution | 1260 x 2800 pixels | 1264 x 2780 pixels |
| Aspect ratio | 20:9 | 20:9 |
| PPI | 453 ppi | 450 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Adaptive refresh rate | Yes | Yes |
| Max rated brightness | 3000 nits | 4500 nits |
| Max rated brightness in HDR | - | 2600 nits |
| HDR support | Yes, HDR10+ | Yes, Dolby Vision |
| Touch sampling rate | 300 Hz | 240 Hz |
| Screen protection | Corning Gorilla Glass | Gorilla Glass Victus 2 |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 90% | 90.5% |
| Display features | - DCI-P3 - Always-On Display - DC Dimming |
- DCI-P3 - Always-On Display - DC Dimming |
Design and build
| Height | 164.05 mm (6.46 inches) | 162.7 mm (6.41 inches) |
| Width | 75.19 mm (2.96 inches) | 75.4 mm (2.97 inches) |
| Thickness | 8.49 mm (0.33 inches) | 8.7 mm (0.34 inches) |
| Weight | 206 g (7.27 oz) | 206 g (7.27 oz) |
| Waterproof | IP68 | IP65 |
| Advanced cooling | Vapor chamber | Vapor chamber |
| Rear material | Glass | Glass |
| Frame material | Metal | Metal |
| Colors | White, Black, Blue, Red | Black, Blue, Purple, Brown |
| Fingerprint scanner | Yes, in-display | Yes, in-display |
Screen-to-body ratio
Performance
| Chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 9300 | MediaTek Dimensity 9300 |
| Max clock | 3250 MHz | 3250 MHz |
| CPU cores | 8 (1 + 3 + 4) | 8 (1 + 3 + 4) |
| Architecture | - 4 cores at 2 GHz: Cortex-A720 - 3 cores at 2.85 GHz: Cortex-X4 - 1 core at 3.25 GHz: Cortex-X4 |
- 4 cores at 2 GHz: Cortex-A720 - 3 cores at 2.85 GHz: Cortex-X4 - 1 core at 3.25 GHz: Cortex-X4 |
| L3 cache | 8 MB | 8 MB |
| Manufacturing | TSMC | TSMC |
| Lithography process | 4 nanometers | 4 nanometers |
| Neural processor (NPU) | MediaTek NPU 790 | MediaTek NPU 790 |
| Graphics | Immortalis-G720 MC12 | Immortalis-G720 MC12 |
| GPU shading units | 1536 | 1536 |
| GPU clock | 1300 MHz | 1300 MHz |
| FLOPS | ~3993.6 GFLOPS | ~3993.6 GFLOPS |
Benchmarks
Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)
Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)
Compute Score (GPU)
| Compute Score (GPU) | 15081 | 15748 |
| Single-core score | 2186 | 2225 |
| Multi-core score | 7422 | 7438 |
AnTuTu Benchmark 11
| CPU | 740213 | 747304 |
| GPU | 789881 | 706084 |
| Memory | 362038 | 355178 |
| UX | 555582 | 515466 |
| Total score | 2447714 | 2324032 |
| Samples | [6 tests] | Less than 3 |
3DMark Steel Nomad Light
| Stability | 50% | 85% |
| Graphics test | 14 FPS | 13 FPS |
| Graphics score | 1877 | 1716 |
3DMark Solar Bay
| Stability | 53% | 63% |
| Graphics test | 29 FPS | 28 FPS |
| Section 1 | 32 FPS | 30 FPS |
| Section 2 | 30 FPS | 28 FPS |
| Section 3 | 26 FPS | 24 FPS |
| Graphics score | 7740 | 7273 |
3DMark Wild Life Extreme
| Stability | 41% | 59% |
| Graphics test | 28 FPS | 28 FPS |
| Graphics score | 4700 | 4692 |
PCMark 3.0
| Web score | 11741 | 9404 |
| Video editing | 5651 | 5474 |
| Photo editing | 28882 | 28034 |
| Data manipulation | 12096 | 12671 |
| Writing score | 22861 | 17595 |
AnTuTu 11 Ranking List (141st and 180th place)
Recent User Tests
Vivo X100
| Date | Benchmark | Result |
|---|---|---|
| π 2026-08-29 (Bhumit) | AnTuTu | 2262755 |
| π 2026-08-08 (holu096) | GeekBench CPU | 2186 / 7422 |
| π 2026-08-08 (holu096) | AnTuTu | 2517701 |
| π 2026-06-17 (lnz) | GeekBench CPU | 2253 / 7347 |
| π 2026-06-17 (lnz) | AnTuTu | 2447714 |
Oppo Find X7
No benchmark results yet
Memory
| RAM size | 12 GB | 12 GB |
| Memory type | LPDDR5X | LPDDR5X |
| Memory clock | 4200 MHz | 4266 MHz |
| Channels | 4 | 4 |
| Storage size | 256 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 4.0 | UFS 4.0 |
| Memory card | No | No |
Software
| Operating system | Android 14 (Can be upgraded to Android 15) | Android 14 (Can be upgraded to Android 15) |
| ROM | Funtouch 15 | ColorOS 15 |
| OS updates | 3 years | 4 years |
| Security updates | 3 years | 5 years |
Battery
| Capacity | 5000 mAh | 5000 mAh |
| Max charge power | 120 W | 100 W |
| Battery type | Li-Po | Li-Po |
| Replaceable | No | No |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Reverse charging | Yes | - |
| Fast charging | Yes (50% in 11 min) | Yes (50% in 10 min) |
| Full charging time | 0:21 hr | 0:27 hr |
Main camera
| Matrix | 50 megapixels | 50 megapixels |
| Image resolution | 8192 x 6144 | 8192 x 6144 |
| Zoom | Optical, 3x | Optical, 3x |
| Flash | LED | LED |
| Stabilization | Optical | Optical |
| 8K video recording | No | No |
| 4K video recording | Up to 60FPS | Up to 60FPS |
| 1080p video recording | Up to 60FPS | Up to 60FPS |
| Slow motion | 960 FPS (1080p) | 480 FPS (720p) |
| Angle of widest lens | 119Β° | 119Β° |
| Lenses | 1) Standard: 50 MP 2) Telephoto: 64 MP 3) Ultrawide: 50 MP |
1) Standard: 50 MP 2) Telephoto: 64 MP 3) Ultrawide: 50 MP |
| Camera features | - Bokeh mode - Pro mode - RAW support |
- Bokeh mode - Pro mode - RAW support |
| Image resolution | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Aperture | f/1.6 | f/1.6 |
| Focal length | - | 23 mm |
| Sensor | Sony IMX920 | Sony LYT-T808 |
| Sensor size | 1/1.49" (β 0.67 inch) | 1/1.43" (β 0.7 inch) |
| Pixel size | 1.2 micron | 1.12 micron |
| Autofocus | Laser autofocus | Phase autofocus |
| Stabilization | Optical | Optical |
| Image resolution | 64 MP | 64 MP |
| Aperture | f/2.6 | f/2.6 |
| Focal length | 70 mm | 70 mm |
| Sensor | Omnivision OV64B | Omnivision OV64B |
| Sensor size | 1/2.0" (β 0.5 inch) | 1/2.0" (β 0.5 inch) |
| Pixel size | 0.7 micron | 0.7 micron |
| Stabilization | Optical | Optical |
| Image resolution | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Aperture | f/2.0 | f/2.0 |
| Focal length | 15 mm | 15 mm |
| Sensor | Samsung S5KJN1 | Samsung S5KJN1 |
| Sensor size | 1/2.76" (β 0.36 inch) | 1/2.76" (β 0.36 inch) |
| Pixel size | 0.64 micron | 0.64 micron |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
Selfie camera
| Megapixels | 32 megapixels | 32 megapixels |
| Image resolution | 6528 x 4896 | 6560 x 4928 |
| Aperture | f/2.0 | f/2.4 |
| Focal length | 20 mm | 21 mm |
| Sensor | Samsung S5KGD2 | Sony IMX709 |
| Sensor size | 1/2.8" (β 0.36 inch) | 1/2.74" (β 0.36 inch) |
| Pixel size | 0.8 micron | 0.8 micron |
| Autofocus | No | Phase autofocus |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
| Video resolution | 2160p (4K) at 60 FPS | 2160p (4K) at 60 FPS |
| Depth sensor (TOF 3D) | No | No |
Connectivity
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 7 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be) | Wi-Fi 7 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be) |
| Wi-Fi features | - Dual Band - Wi-Fi MiMO - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
- Dual Band - Wi-Fi MiMO - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
| Bluetooth version | 5.4 | 5.4 |
| Bluetooth features | LE | LE |
| USB type | USB Type-C | USB Type-C |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| USB features | - Charging - USB-Storage mode - OTG |
- Charging - USB-Storage mode - OTG |
| DisplayPort | No | - |
| GPS | GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, NAVIC | GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS |
| NFC* | Yes | Yes |
| Infrared port | Yes | Yes |
| Number of SIM* | 2 | 2 |
| Type of SIM card | Nano | Nano |
| Multi SIM mode | Standby | Standby |
| eSIM support* | No | No |
| Hybrid slot | No | No |
| 5G support | Yes | Yes |
Sound
| Speakers | Stereo | Stereo |
| Headphone audio jack | No | No |
| FM radio | No | No |
Other
| Category | Flagship | Flagship |
| Announced | November 2023 | January 2024 |
| Release date | November 2023 | January 2024 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $569 | $565 |
| Successor | - Vivo X300 | - Oppo Find X9 |
| Sensors | - Proximity sensor - Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Ambient light sensor - Compass - Fingerprint |
- Proximity sensor - Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Ambient light sensor - Compass - Fingerprint |
| Bundled charger | Yes, 120 W | Yes, 100 W |
Further details
Notes on Vivo X100:
- The top version with 16 GB of RAM comes with LPDDR5T memory type, while the others utilize LPDDR5X.
Notes on Find X7:
- The rear cover can be either glass or eco-leather, with a weight difference of 4 grams.
*Disclaimer! NFC, GSM network support, and some other specs can be different depending on the country.
Conclusion
These smartphones have a lot in common, but we would recommend the Vivo X100. It has a better gaming and battery life.
Cast your vote
Total votes: 176
Related comparisons
1.
Vivo X100 vs Vivo iQOO 12 (2)