Oppo Find X9s Pro vs Find X7
91
out of 100
VS
73
out of 100
Here we compared two flagship smartphones: the 6.32-inch Oppo Find X9s Pro (with MediaTek Dimensity 9500) that was released on April 21, 2026, against the Oppo Find X7, which is powered by MediaTek Dimensity 9300 and came out 2 years and 4 months before. On this page, you will find tests, full specs, strengths, and weaknesses of each of the devices.
Select the amount of RAM to evaluate performance and value for money more precisely
Key differences
Reasons to consider the Oppo Find X9s Pro
- Comes with 2025 mAh larger battery capacity: 7025 vs 5000 mAh
- 41% better performance in AnTuTu Benchmark (3274K versus 2324K)
- Higher display refresh rate – 144 Hz
- Handles wireless charging up to 50W
- Newer Bluetooth version (v6.1)
- Waterproof body (IP69 classification)
- The phone is 2 years and 4 months newer
- More recent OS version: Android 16 versus 15
- Faster storage type - UFS 4.1 versus UFS 4.0
- 48% faster in single-core GeekBench 6 test: 3302 and 2225 points
Reasons to consider the Oppo Find X7
- The rear camera has a 3x optical zoom
- Has a 0.46 inch larger screen size
- Supports higher wattage charging (100W versus 80W)
Review
Display
Screen quality, color accuracy, brightness
Camera
Photo and video recording quality
Performance
CPU and memory performance (apps, system)
Gaming
Capabilities for playing modern games
Battery
Battery life, charging type and speed
Connectivity
Networks, ports, data transmission
Scores with a red asterisk (*) are approximate and may change in the future as we gather more data.
Select your primary usage scenario to get a more accurate NanoReview Score
Value for money (Beta)
Tests and specifications
Comparison table of technical specifications and testsDisplay
| Type | AMOLED | AMOLED |
| Size | 6.32 inches | 6.78 inches |
| Resolution | 1216 x 2640 pixels | 1264 x 2780 pixels |
| Aspect ratio | 19.5:9 | 20:9 |
| PPI | 460 ppi | 450 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 144 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Adaptive refresh rate | Yes | Yes |
| Max rated brightness | 1800 nits | 4500 nits |
| Max rated brightness in HDR | 3600 nits | 2600 nits |
| HDR support | Yes, Dolby Vision | Yes, Dolby Vision |
| Touch sampling rate | 300 Hz | 240 Hz |
| Screen protection | Gorilla Glass Victus 2 | Gorilla Glass Victus 2 |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 90.9% | 90.5% |
| Display features | - DCI-P3 - Always-On Display - DC Dimming |
- DCI-P3 - Always-On Display - DC Dimming |
| RGB color space | 99.4% | - |
| PWM | 167 Hz | - |
| Response time | 3 ms | - |
| Contrast | ∞ Infinity | - |
Screen space comparison
Find X7
6.78″ (20:9 ratio) = 17.2 in2
Find X9s Pro
6.32″ (19.5:9 ratio) = 15.2 in2
~13% more screen space
Peak brightness test (auto)
Design and build
| Height | 150.5 mm (5.93 inches) | 162.7 mm (6.41 inches) |
| Width | 71.7 mm (2.82 inches) | 75.4 mm (2.97 inches) |
| Thickness | 8.4 mm (0.33 inches) | 8.7 mm (0.34 inches) |
| Weight | 198 g (6.98 oz) | 206 g (7.27 oz) |
| Waterproof | IP69 | IP65 |
| Advanced cooling | Vapor chamber | Vapor chamber |
| Rear material | Glass | Glass |
| Frame material | Metal | Metal |
| Colors | White, Gray, Blue, Orange | Black, Blue, Purple, Brown |
| Fingerprint scanner | Yes, in-display | Yes, in-display |
Screen-to-body ratio
Performance
| Chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 9500 | MediaTek Dimensity 9300 |
| Max clock | 4210 MHz | 3250 MHz |
| CPU cores | 8 (1 + 3 + 4) | 8 (1 + 3 + 4) |
| Architecture | - 4 cores at 2.7 GHz: C1-Pro - 3 cores at 3.5 GHz: C1-Premium - 1 core at 4.21 GHz: C1-Ultra |
- 4 cores at 2 GHz: Cortex-A720 - 3 cores at 2.85 GHz: Cortex-X4 - 1 core at 3.25 GHz: Cortex-X4 |
| L3 cache | 16 MB | 8 MB |
| Manufacturing | TSMC | TSMC |
| Lithography process | 3 nanometers | 4 nanometers |
| Neural processor (NPU) | MediaTek NPU 990 | MediaTek NPU 790 |
| Graphics | Mali-G925 Immortalis MP12 | Immortalis-G720 MC12 |
| GPU shading units | 1536 | 1536 |
| GPU clock | 1716 MHz | 1300 MHz |
| FLOPS | ~5271.5 GFLOPS | ~3993.6 GFLOPS |
Benchmarks
Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)
Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)
Compute Score (GPU)
| Compute Score (GPU) | - | 15748 |
| Single-core score | 3302 | 2225 |
| Multi-core score | 10598 | 7438 |
AnTuTu Benchmark 11
| CPU | 909385 | 747304 |
| GPU | 1204662 | 706084 |
| Memory | 403028 | 355178 |
| UX | 757015 | 515466 |
| Total score | 3274090 | 2324032 |
| Samples | Less than 3 | Less than 3 |
3DMark Steel Nomad Light
| Stability | - | 85% |
| Graphics test | - | 13 FPS |
| Graphics score | - | 1716 |
3DMark Solar Bay
| Stability | - | 63% |
| Graphics test | - | 28 FPS |
| Section 1 | - | 30 FPS |
| Section 2 | - | 28 FPS |
| Section 3 | - | 24 FPS |
| Graphics score | - | 7273 |
3DMark Wild Life Extreme
| Stability | - | 59% |
| Graphics test | - | 28 FPS |
| Graphics score | - | 4692 |
PCMark 3.0
| Web score | - | 9404 |
| Video editing | - | 5474 |
| Photo editing | - | 28034 |
| Data manipulation | - | 12671 |
| Writing score | - | 17595 |
AnTuTu 11 Ranking List (#77th place)
Recent User Tests
Oppo Find X9s Pro
| Date | Benchmark | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 📘 2026-07-27 (zwatoo) | AnTuTu 11 | 3274090 |
Oppo Find X7
No benchmark results yet
Memory
| RAM size | 12 GB | 12 GB |
| Memory type | LPDDR5X | LPDDR5X |
| Memory clock | - | 4266 MHz |
| Channels | 4 | 4 |
| Storage size | 256 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 4.1 | UFS 4.0 |
| Memory card | No | No |
Software
| Operating system | Android 16 | Android 14 (Can be upgraded to Android 15) |
| ROM | ColorOS 16 | ColorOS 15 |
| OS size | 58 GB | - |
| OS updates | 5 years | 4 years |
| Security updates | 6 years | 5 years |
Battery
| Capacity | 7025 mAh | 5000 mAh |
| Max charge power | 80 W | 100 W |
| Battery type | Silicon-Carbon (Si/C) | Li-Po |
| Replaceable | No | No |
| Wireless charging | Yes (50 W) | No |
| Reverse charging | Yes, (wireless) | - |
| Bypass charging | Yes | - |
| Fast charging | Yes | Yes (50% in 10 min) |
| Full charging time | - | 0:27 hr |
Main camera
| Matrix | 200 megapixels | 50 megapixels |
| Image resolution | - | 8192 x 6144 |
| Zoom | Optical, 2.8x | Optical, 3x |
| Flash | LED | LED |
| Stabilization | Optical | Optical |
| 8K video recording | Up to 30FPS | No |
| 4K video recording | Up to 120FPS | Up to 60FPS |
| 1080p video recording | Up to 240FPS | Up to 60FPS |
| Slow motion | 480 FPS (720p) | 480 FPS (720p) |
| Angle of widest lens | 120° | 119° |
| Lenses | 1) Standard: 200 MP 2) Telephoto: 200 MP 3) Ultrawide: 50 MP |
1) Standard: 50 MP 2) Telephoto: 64 MP 3) Ultrawide: 50 MP |
| Camera features | - Bokeh mode - Pro mode |
- Bokeh mode - Pro mode - RAW support |
| Image resolution | 200 MP | 50 MP |
| Aperture | f/1.6 | f/1.6 |
| Focal length | 23 mm | 23 mm |
| Sensor | Samsung ISOCELL HP9 | Sony LYT-T808 |
| Sensor size | 1/1.4" (≈ 0.71 inch) | 1/1.43" (≈ 0.7 inch) |
| Pixel size | - | 1.12 micron |
| Autofocus | Phase autofocus | Phase autofocus |
| Stabilization | Optical | Optical |
| Image resolution | 200 MP | 64 MP |
| Aperture | f/2.6 | f/2.6 |
| Focal length | 65 mm | 70 mm |
| Sensor | Samsung ISOCELL HP5 | Omnivision OV64B |
| Sensor size | 1/1.56" (≈ 0.64 inch) | 1/2.0" (≈ 0.5 inch) |
| Pixel size | - | 0.7 micron |
| Stabilization | Optical | Optical |
| Image resolution | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Aperture | f/2.0 | f/2.0 |
| Focal length | 15 mm | 15 mm |
| Sensor | Samsung ISOCELL JN5 | Samsung S5KJN1 |
| Sensor size | 1/2.76" (≈ 0.36 inch) | 1/2.76" (≈ 0.36 inch) |
| Pixel size | - | 0.64 micron |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
Selfie camera
| Megapixels | 32 megapixels | 32 megapixels |
| Image resolution | - | 6560 x 4928 |
| Aperture | f/2.4 | f/2.4 |
| Focal length | 21 mm | 21 mm |
| Sensor | - | Sony IMX709 |
| Sensor size | - | 1/2.74" (≈ 0.36 inch) |
| Pixel size | - | 0.8 micron |
| Autofocus | Phase autofocus | Phase autofocus |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
| Video resolution | 2160p (4K) at 60 FPS | 2160p (4K) at 60 FPS |
| Depth sensor (TOF 3D) | No | No |
Connectivity
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 7 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be) | Wi-Fi 7 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be) |
| Wi-Fi features | - Dual Band - Wi-Fi MiMO - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
- Dual Band - Wi-Fi MiMO - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
| Bluetooth version | 6.1 | 5.4 |
| Bluetooth features | LE | LE |
| USB type | USB Type-C | USB Type-C |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| USB features | - Charging - USB-Storage mode - OTG |
- Charging - USB-Storage mode - OTG |
| DisplayPort | No | - |
| GPS | GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, NAVIC | GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS |
| NFC* | Yes | Yes |
| Infrared port | Yes | Yes |
| Number of SIM* | 2 | 2 |
| Type of SIM card | Nano | Nano |
| Multi SIM mode | Standby | Standby |
| eSIM support* | No | No |
| Hybrid slot | No | No |
| 5G support | Yes | Yes |
Sound
| Speakers | Stereo | Stereo |
| Headphone audio jack | No | No |
| FM radio | No | No |
Speakers test
Max loudness
Other
| Category | Flagship | Flagship |
| Announced | April 2026 | January 2024 |
| Release date | May 2026 | January 2024 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $780 | $565 |
| Successor | - | - Oppo Find X9s Pro |
| Sensors | - Proximity sensor - Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Ambient light sensor - Compass - Fingerprint |
- Proximity sensor - Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Ambient light sensor - Compass - Fingerprint |
| Bundled charger | Yes, 80 W | Yes, 100 W |
Further details
Notes on Find X7:
- The rear cover can be either glass or eco-leather, with a weight difference of 4 grams.
*Disclaimer! NFC, GSM network support, and some other specs can be different depending on the country.
Conclusion
After analyzing all the data, we think that the Oppo Find X9s Pro is definitely a better buy.
Cast your vote
Total votes: < 1