Oppo Find X8 vs Find X7
82
out of 100
VS
73
out of 100
Here we compared two flagship smartphones: the 6.59-inch Oppo Find X8 (with Mediatek Dimensity 9400) that was released on October 24, 2024, against the Oppo Find X7, which is powered by MediaTek Dimensity 9300 and came out 9 months before. On this page, you will find tests, full specs, strengths, and weaknesses of each of the devices.
Select the amount of RAM to evaluate performance and value for money more precisely
Key differences
Reasons to consider the Oppo Find X8
- Handles wireless charging up to 50W
- Waterproof body (IP69 classification)
- 24% better performance in AnTuTu Benchmark (2884K versus 2324K)
- More recent OS version: Android 16 versus 15
- 27% faster in single-core GeekBench 6 test: 2817 and 2225 points
- The phone is 9 months newer
- Ready for eSIM technology
Reasons to consider the Oppo Find X7
- Supports higher wattage charging (100W versus 80W)
Review
Display
Screen quality, color accuracy, brightness
Camera
Photo and video recording quality
Performance
CPU and memory performance (apps, system)
Gaming
Capabilities for playing modern games
Battery
Battery life, charging type and speed
Connectivity
Networks, ports, data transmission
Scores with a red asterisk (*) are approximate and may change in the future as we gather more data.
Select your primary usage scenario to get a more accurate NanoReview Score
Value for money (Beta)
Tests and specifications
Comparison table of technical specifications and testsDisplay
| Type | AMOLED | AMOLED |
| Size | 6.59 inches | 6.78 inches |
| Resolution | 1256 x 2760 pixels | 1264 x 2780 pixels |
| Aspect ratio | 20:9 | 20:9 |
| PPI | 460 ppi | 450 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Adaptive refresh rate | Yes (1-120 Hz) | Yes |
| Max rated brightness | 1600 nits | 4500 nits |
| Max rated brightness in HDR | 4500 nits | 2600 nits |
| HDR support | Yes, Dolby Vision | Yes, Dolby Vision |
| Touch sampling rate | 240 Hz | 240 Hz |
| Screen protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 7i | Gorilla Glass Victus 2 |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 89.6% | 90.5% |
| Display features | - DCI-P3 - Always-On Display - DC Dimming |
- DCI-P3 - Always-On Display - DC Dimming |
Peak brightness test (auto)
Design and build
| Height | 157.35 mm (6.19 inches) | 162.7 mm (6.41 inches) |
| Width | 74.33 mm (2.93 inches) | 75.4 mm (2.97 inches) |
| Thickness | 7.85 mm (0.31 inches) | 8.7 mm (0.34 inches) |
| Weight | 193 g (6.81 oz) | 206 g (7.27 oz) |
| Waterproof | IP69 | IP65 |
| Advanced cooling | Vapor chamber | Vapor chamber |
| Rear material | Glass | Glass |
| Frame material | Metal | Metal |
| Colors | White, Black, Blue, Pink | Black, Blue, Purple, Brown |
| Fingerprint scanner | Yes, in-display | Yes, in-display |
Screen-to-body ratio
Performance
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 9400 | MediaTek Dimensity 9300 |
| Max clock | 3620 MHz | 3250 MHz |
| CPU cores | 8 (1 + 3 + 4) | 8 (1 + 3 + 4) |
| Architecture | - 4 cores at 2.4 GHz: Cortex-A720 - 3 cores at 3.3 GHz: Cortex-X4 - 1 core at 3.62 GHz: Cortex-X925 |
- 4 cores at 2 GHz: Cortex-A720 - 3 cores at 2.85 GHz: Cortex-X4 - 1 core at 3.25 GHz: Cortex-X4 |
| L3 cache | 12 MB | 8 MB |
| Manufacturing | TSMC | TSMC |
| Lithography process | 3 nanometers | 4 nanometers |
| Neural processor (NPU) | MediaTek NPU 890 | MediaTek NPU 790 |
| Graphics | Mali-G925 Immortalis MP12 | Immortalis-G720 MC12 |
| GPU shading units | 1536 | 1536 |
| GPU clock | 1612 MHz | 1300 MHz |
| FLOPS | ~4952.1 GFLOPS | ~3993.6 GFLOPS |
Benchmarks
Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)
Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)
Compute Score (GPU)
| Compute Score (GPU) | 21515 | 15748 |
| Single-core score | 2817 | 2225 |
| Multi-core score | 8739 | 7438 |
AnTuTu Benchmark 11
| CPU | 886862 | 747304 |
| GPU | 990238 | 706084 |
| Memory | 373773 | 355178 |
| UX | 634100 | 515466 |
| Total score | 2884973 | 2324032 |
| Samples | [15 tests] | Less than 3 |
3DMark Steel Nomad Light
| Stability | 62% | 85% |
| Graphics test | 18 FPS | 13 FPS |
| Graphics score | 2422 | 1716 |
3DMark Solar Bay
| Stability | - | 63% |
| Graphics test | 42 FPS | 28 FPS |
| Section 1 | 47 FPS | 30 FPS |
| Section 2 | 43 FPS | 28 FPS |
| Section 3 | 37 FPS | 24 FPS |
| Graphics score | 11119 | 7273 |
3DMark Wild Life Extreme
| Stability | - | 59% |
| Graphics test | 37 FPS | 28 FPS |
| Graphics score | 6339 | 4692 |
PCMark 3.0
| Web score | 18471 | 9404 |
| Video editing | 6861 | 5474 |
| Photo editing | 30985 | 28034 |
| Data manipulation | 16334 | 12671 |
| Writing score | 18942 | 17595 |
AnTuTu 11 Ranking List (127th and 193rd place)
Recent User Tests
Oppo Find X8
| Date | Benchmark | Result |
|---|---|---|
| π 2026-07-04 -> linematcha | AnTuTu 11 | 2860237 |
| π 2026-01-25 (Nguyeen) | AnTuTu 11 | 2966814 |
| π 2026-01-16 (Wezi) | AnTuTu 11 | 3008410 |
| π 2026-01-06 (MaksatGizzat) | AnTuTu 11 | 3239067 |
| π 2026-01-04 (MaksatGizzat) | Geekbench 6 CPU | 2830 / 8933 |
Oppo Find X7
No benchmark results yet
Memory
| RAM size | 12 GB | 12 GB |
| Memory type | LPDDR5X | LPDDR5X |
| Memory clock | - | 4266 MHz |
| Channels | 4 | 4 |
| Storage size | 256 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 4.0 | UFS 4.0 |
| Memory card | No | No |
Software
| Operating system | Android 15 (Can be upgraded to Android 16) | Android 14 (Can be upgraded to Android 15) |
| ROM | ColorOS 16 | ColorOS 15 |
| OS updates | 4 years | 4 years |
| Security updates | 5 years | 5 years |
Battery
| Capacity | 5630 mAh | 5000 mAh |
| Max charge power | 80 W | 100 W |
| Battery type | Silicon-Carbon (Si/C) | Li-Po |
| Replaceable | No | No |
| Wireless charging | Yes (50 W) | No |
| Reverse charging | Yes, (wireless) | - |
| Fast charging | Yes (70% in 30 min) | Yes (50% in 10 min) |
| Full charging time | 0:52 hr | 0:27 hr |
| Web browsing | 09:03 hr | - |
| Watching video | 14:03 hr | - |
| Gaming | 06:50 hr | - |
| Standby | 102 hr | - |
General battery life
Main camera
| Matrix | 50 megapixels | 50 megapixels |
| Image resolution | 8192 x 6144 | 8192 x 6144 |
| Zoom | Optical, 3x | Optical, 3x |
| Flash | LED | LED |
| Stabilization | Optical | Optical |
| 8K video recording | No | No |
| 4K video recording | Up to 60FPS | Up to 60FPS |
| 1080p video recording | Up to 60FPS | Up to 60FPS |
| Slow motion | 480 FPS (720p) | 480 FPS (720p) |
| Angle of widest lens | 120Β° | 119Β° |
| Lenses | 1) Standard: 50 MP 2) Telephoto: 50 MP 3) Ultrawide: 50 MP |
1) Standard: 50 MP 2) Telephoto: 64 MP 3) Ultrawide: 50 MP |
| Camera features | - Bokeh mode - Pro mode - RAW support |
- Bokeh mode - Pro mode - RAW support |
| Image resolution | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.6 |
| Focal length | 24 mm | 23 mm |
| Sensor | Sony LYT-700 | Sony LYT-T808 |
| Sensor size | 1/1.56" (β 0.64 inch) | 1/1.43" (β 0.7 inch) |
| Pixel size | 1 micron | 1.12 micron |
| Autofocus | Phase autofocus | Phase autofocus |
| Stabilization | Optical | Optical |
| Image resolution | 50 MP | 64 MP |
| Aperture | f/2.6 | f/2.6 |
| Focal length | 73 mm | 70 mm |
| Sensor | Sony LYT-600 | Omnivision OV64B |
| Sensor size | 1/1.95" (β 0.51 inch) | 1/2.0" (β 0.5 inch) |
| Pixel size | 0.8 micron | 0.7 micron |
| Stabilization | Optical | Optical |
| Image resolution | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Aperture | f/2.0 | f/2.0 |
| Focal length | 15 mm | 15 mm |
| Sensor | Samsung S5KJN5 | Samsung S5KJN1 |
| Sensor size | 1/2.76" (β 0.36 inch) | 1/2.76" (β 0.36 inch) |
| Pixel size | 0.64 micron | 0.64 micron |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
Selfie camera
| Megapixels | 32 megapixels | 32 megapixels |
| Image resolution | - | 6560 x 4928 |
| Aperture | f/2.4 | f/2.4 |
| Focal length | 21 mm | 21 mm |
| Sensor | Sony IMX615 | Sony IMX709 |
| Sensor size | 1/2.74" (β 0.36 inch) | 1/2.74" (β 0.36 inch) |
| Pixel size | 0.8 micron | 0.8 micron |
| Autofocus | No | Phase autofocus |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
| Video resolution | 2160p (4K) at 60 FPS | 2160p (4K) at 60 FPS |
| Depth sensor (TOF 3D) | No | No |
Connectivity
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 7 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be) | Wi-Fi 7 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be) |
| Wi-Fi features | - Dual Band - Wi-Fi MiMO - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
- Dual Band - Wi-Fi MiMO - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
| Bluetooth version | 5.4 | 5.4 |
| Bluetooth features | LE | LE |
| USB type | USB Type-C | USB Type-C |
| USB version | 3.0 | 2 |
| USB features | - Charging - USB-Storage mode - OTG |
- Charging - USB-Storage mode - OTG |
| DisplayPort | No | - |
| GPS | GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, NAVIC | GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS |
| NFC* | Yes | Yes |
| Infrared port | Yes | Yes |
| Number of SIM* | 2 | 2 |
| Type of SIM card | Nano | Nano |
| Multi SIM mode | Standby | Standby |
| eSIM support* | Yes | No |
| Hybrid slot | No | No |
| 5G support | Yes | Yes |
Sound
| Speakers | Stereo | Stereo |
| Headphone audio jack | No | No |
| FM radio | No | No |
Other
| Category | Flagship | Flagship |
| Announced | October 2024 | January 2024 |
| Release date | October 2024 | January 2024 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $590 | $565 |
| Successor | - Oppo Find X9 | - Oppo Find X9 |
| Sensors | - Proximity sensor - Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Ambient light sensor - Compass - Fingerprint |
- Proximity sensor - Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Ambient light sensor - Compass - Fingerprint |
| Bundled charger | Yes, 80 W | Yes, 100 W |
Further details
Notes on Find X8:
- The Chinese model has USB 2.0; the international one gets 3.0.
Notes on Find X7:
- The rear cover can be either glass or eco-leather, with a weight difference of 4 grams.
*Disclaimer! NFC, GSM network support, and some other specs can be different depending on the country.
Conclusion
After analyzing all the data, we think that the Oppo Find X8 is definitely a better buy.
Cast your vote
Total votes: 95
Related comparisons
1.
Oppo Find X8 vs Vivo X200 (9)
2.
Oppo Find X8 vs Xiaomi 15 (2)