Oppo Find X9 Ultra vs X2 Pro
95
out of 100
VS
59
out of 100
Here we compared two flagship smartphones: the 6.82-inch Oppo Find X9 Ultra (with Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5) that was released on April 21, 2026, against the Oppo Find X2 Pro, which is powered by Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 and came out 6 years and 2 months before. On this page, you will find tests, full specs, strengths, and weaknesses of each of the devices.
Select the amount of RAM to evaluate performance and value for money more precisely
Key differences
Reasons to consider the Oppo Find X9 Ultra
- 4.3x better performance in AnTuTu Benchmark (4231K versus 992K)
- Delivers 287% higher peak brightness (3347 against 865 nits)
- Shows 105% longer battery life (37:00 vs 18:02 hours)
- Comes with 2790 mAh larger battery capacity: 7050 vs 4260 mAh
- Better camera quality (According to DxOMark rating)
- The rear camera has a 10x optical zoom
- Higher display refresh rate – 144 Hz
- Newer Bluetooth version (v6.0)
- Handles wireless charging up to 50W
- Waterproof body (IP69 classification)
- Supports higher wattage charging (100W versus 65W)
- The phone is 6 years and 2 months newer
- More recent OS version: Android 16 versus 13
Reasons to consider the Oppo Find X2 Pro
- Slow-motion recording at 960FPS
- Supports Dolby Atmos sound technology
- Weighs 28 grams less
Review
Display
Screen quality, color accuracy, brightness
Camera
Photo and video recording quality
Performance
CPU and memory performance (apps, system)
Gaming
Capabilities for playing modern games
Battery
Battery life, charging type and speed
Connectivity
Networks, ports, data transmission
Select your primary usage scenario to get a more accurate NanoReview Score
Value for money (Beta)
Tests and specifications
Comparison table of technical specifications and testsDisplay
| Type | AMOLED | OLED |
| Size | 6.82 inches | 6.7 inches |
| Resolution | 1440 x 3168 pixels | 1440 x 3168 pixels |
| Aspect ratio | 19.8:9 | 19.8:9 |
| PPI | 510 ppi | 519 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 144 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Adaptive refresh rate | Yes (1-120 Hz) | No |
| Max rated brightness | 1800 nits | 800 nits |
| Max rated brightness in HDR | 3600 nits | - |
| HDR support | Yes, Dolby Vision | Yes, HDR10+ |
| Touch sampling rate | 300 Hz | 240 Hz |
| Screen protection | Gorilla Glass Victus 2 | Corning Gorilla Glass 6 |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 90% | 88.7% |
| Display features | - DCI-P3 - Always-On Display - DC Dimming |
- DCI-P3 - Always-On Display - DC Dimming |
| RGB color space | 99.5% | 100% |
| PWM | 90 Hz | 480 Hz |
| Response time | 1 ms | 2.6 ms |
| Contrast | ∞ Infinity | ∞ Infinity |
Peak brightness test (auto)
Design and build
| Height | 163.16 mm (6.42 inches) | 165.2 mm (6.5 inches) |
| Width | 76.97 mm (3.03 inches) | 74.4 mm (2.93 inches) |
| Thickness | 8.65 mm (0.34 inches) | 8.8 mm (0.35 inches) |
| Weight | 235 g (8.29 oz) | 207 g (7.3 oz) |
| Waterproof | IP69 | IP68 |
| Advanced cooling | Vapor chamber | - |
| Rear material | Glass | Ceramic |
| Frame material | Metal | Metal |
| Colors | White, Green, Orange | Black, Blue |
| Fingerprint scanner | Yes, in-display | Yes, in-display |
Screen-to-body ratio
Performance
| Chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 |
| Max clock | 4600 MHz | 2840 MHz |
| CPU cores | 8 (2 + 6) | 8 (1 + 3 + 4) |
| Architecture | - 6 cores at 3.63 GHz: Oryon Gen 3 Performance - 2 cores at 4.74 GHz: Oryon Gen 3 Prime |
- 4 cores at 1.8 GHz: Kryo 585 Silver (Cortex-A55) - 3 cores at 2.42 GHz: Kryo 585 Gold (Cortex-A77) - 1 core at 2.84 GHz: Kryo 585 Prime (Cortex-A77) |
| L3 cache | 8 MB | 4 MB |
| Manufacturing | TSMC | TSMC |
| Lithography process | 3 nanometers | 7 nanometers |
| Neural processor (NPU) | Hexagon | Hexagon 698 |
| Graphics | Adreno 840 | Adreno 650 |
| GPU shading units | 1536 | 768 |
| GPU clock | 1200 MHz | 587 MHz |
| FLOPS | ~3993.6 GFLOPS | ~901.6 GFLOPS |
Benchmarks
Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)
Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)
Compute Score (GPU)
| Compute Score (GPU) | 27916 | 2987 |
| Single-core score | 3536 | 1156 |
| Multi-core score | 10744 | 2744 |
AnTuTu Benchmark 11
| CPU | 1184661 | 359802 |
| GPU | 1577144 | 170732 |
| Memory | 509054 | 206466 |
| UX | 961129 | 255401 |
| Total score | 4231988 | 992401 |
| Samples | [5 tests] | [2 tests] |
3DMark Wild Life Extreme
| Stability | - | 99% |
| Graphics test | - | 6 FPS |
| Graphics score | - | 1110 |
PCMark 3.0
| Web score | - | 8423 |
| Video editing | - | 5846 |
| Photo editing | - | 28705 |
| Data manipulation | - | 8390 |
| Writing score | - | 14503 |
AnTuTu 11 Ranking List (#24th place)
Recent User Tests
Oppo Find X9 Ultra
| Date | Benchmark | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 📘 2026-11-06 (IlyaLub) | AnTuTu 12 | 4054542 |
| 📘 2026-07-21 (IlyaLub) | AnTuTu 11 | 4231988 |
| 📘 2026-07-19 (KY.w) | Geekbench 6 GPU | 23623 |
| 📘 2026-07-19 (KY.w) | Geekbench 6 CPU | 3536 / 10744 |
| 📘 2026-07-19 (KY.w) | AnTuTu 11 | 3766077 |
Oppo Find X2 Pro
| Date | Benchmark | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 📘 2026-11-06 (Dims) | AnTuTu 12 | 1312816 |
| 📘 2026-08-03 -> penguin_1234 | Geekbench 6 GPU | 3056 |
| 📘 2026-08-03 -> penguin_1234 | Geekbench 6 CPU | 1129 / 3155 |
| 📘 2026-08-03 -> penguin_1234 | AnTuTu 11 | 992401 |
| 📘 2026-04-20 (DQ) | CPU Throttle | 95% |
Memory
| RAM size | 12 GB | 12 GB |
| Memory type | LPDDR5X | LPDDR5 |
| Memory clock | 5300 MHz | 2750 MHz |
| Channels | 4 | 2 |
| Storage size | 256 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 4.1 | UFS 3.0 |
| Memory card | No | No |
Software
| Operating system | Android 16 | Android 10.0 (Can be upgraded to Android 13) |
| ROM | ColorOS 16 | ColorOS 13.1 |
| OS size | 31.6 GB | 53 GB |
| OS updates | 5 years | - |
| Security updates | 6 years | - |
Battery
| Capacity | 7050 mAh | 4260 mAh |
| Max charge power | 100 W | 65 W |
| Battery type | Silicon-Carbon (Si/C) | Li-Po |
| Replaceable | No | No |
| Wireless charging | Yes (50 W) | No |
| Reverse charging | Yes, (wireless) | No |
| Bypass charging | Yes | - |
| Fast charging | Yes (75% in 30 min) | Yes, SuperVOOC 2.0 Flash Charge (100% in 40 min) |
| Full charging time | 0:45 hr | 0:40 hr |
| Web browsing | 16:45 hr | 06:49 hr |
| Watching video | 26:15 hr | 10:55 hr |
| Gaming | 08:23 hr | 04:44 hr |
| Standby | 144 hr | 89 hr |
General battery life
Smartphones With Long Battery Life (#13th place)
Main camera
| Matrix | 200 megapixels | 48 megapixels |
| Image resolution | 16320 x 12240 | 8000 x 6000 |
| Zoom | Optical, 10x | Optical, 5x |
| Flash | LED | LED |
| Stabilization | Optical | Optical |
| 8K video recording | Up to 30FPS | No |
| 4K video recording | Up to 120FPS | Up to 60FPS |
| 1080p video recording | Up to 240FPS | Up to 60FPS |
| Slow motion | 480 FPS (720p) | 960 FPS (720p) |
| Angle of widest lens | 120° | 120° |
| Lenses | 1) Standard: 200 MP 2) Telephoto: 200 MP 3) Telephoto: 50 MP 4) Ultrawide: 50 MP |
1) Standard: 48 MP 2) Telephoto: 13 MP 3) Ultrawide: 48 MP |
| Camera features | - Bokeh mode - Pro mode |
- Bokeh mode - Pro mode |
| Image resolution | 200 MP | 48 MP |
| Aperture | f/1.5 | f/1.7 |
| Focal length | 23 mm | 25 mm |
| Sensor | Sony LYTIA-901 | Sony IMX689 |
| Sensor size | 1/1.12" (≈ 0.89 inch) | 1/1.43" (≈ 0.7 inch) |
| Pixel size | 0.7 micron | 1.12 micron |
| Autofocus | Phase autofocus | Phase autofocus |
| Stabilization | Optical | Optical |
| Image resolution | 200 MP | 13 MP |
| Aperture | f/2.2 | f/3.0 |
| Focal length | 70 mm | 129 mm |
| Sensor | OmniVision OV52A | Samsung S5K3M5 |
| Sensor size | 1/1.28" (≈ 0.78 inch) | 1/3.4" (≈ 0.29 inch) |
| Pixel size | 0.61 micron | 1 micron |
| Stabilization | Optical | Optical |
| Image resolution | 50 MP | 48 MP |
| Aperture | f/2.0 | f/2.2 |
| Focal length | 14 mm | 17 mm |
| Sensor | Sony LYTIA-600 | Sony IMX586 |
| Sensor size | 1/1.95" (≈ 0.51 inch) | 1/2" (≈ 0.5 inch) |
| Pixel size | 0.8 micron | 0.8 micron |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
DxOMark main camera tests
Photo quality
Video quality
Generic main camera score
| Bokeh | 185 | - |
| Zoom | 173 | - |
| Samples | Photo samples of Oppo Find X9 Ultra from DxOMark | Photo samples of Oppo Find X2 Pro from DxOMark |
Selfie camera
| Megapixels | 50 megapixels | 32 megapixels |
| Image resolution | 8160 x 6128 | 6464 x 4864 |
| Aperture | f/2.4 | f/2.4 |
| Focal length | 21 mm | 26 mm |
| Sensor | Samsung ISOCELL JN5 | Sony IMX616 |
| Sensor size | 1/2.75" (≈ 0.36 inch) | 1/2.8" (≈ 0.36 inch) |
| Pixel size | 0.64 micron | 0.8 micron |
| Autofocus | Phase autofocus | No |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
| Video resolution | 2160p (4K) at 60 FPS | 1080p (Full HD) at 30 FPS |
| Depth sensor (TOF 3D) | No | No |
DxOMark front camera
| Photo | - | 87 |
| Video | - | 114 |
Connectivity
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 7 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be) | Wi-Fi 6 (802.11 b/g/n/ac/ax) |
| Wi-Fi features | - Dual Band - Wi-Fi MiMO - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
- Dual Band - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
| Bluetooth version | 6.0 | 5.1 |
| Bluetooth features | LE | LE, A2DP |
| USB type | USB Type-C | USB Type-C |
| USB version | 3.2 | 3.1 |
| USB features | - Charging - USB-Storage mode - OTG |
- Charging - USB-Storage mode - OTG |
| DisplayPort | Yes | - |
| GPS | GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, NAVIC | GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo |
| NFC* | Yes | Yes |
| Infrared port | Yes | No |
| Number of SIM* | 2 | 2 |
| Type of SIM card | Nano | Nano |
| Multi SIM mode | Standby | Standby |
| eSIM support* | Yes | No |
| Hybrid slot | No | No |
| LTE Cat* | - | 20 |
| 5G support | Yes | Yes |
Sound
| Speakers | Stereo | Stereo |
| Headphone audio jack | No | No |
| FM radio | No | Yes |
| Dolby Atmos | No | Yes |
Speakers test
Max loudness
Other
| Category | Flagship | Flagship |
| Announced | April 2026 | March 2020 |
| Release date | May 2026 | April 2020 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $1299 | $1320 |
| Successor | - | - Oppo Find X9 Ultra |
| Sensors | - Proximity sensor - Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Ambient light sensor - Compass - Fingerprint |
- Proximity sensor - Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Ambient light sensor - Compass - Fingerprint |
| Bundled charger | Not included | - |
*Disclaimer! NFC, GSM network support, and some other specs can be different depending on the country.
Conclusion
After analyzing all the data, we think that the Oppo Find X9 Ultra is definitely a better buy.
Cast your vote
Total votes: < 1