Oppo Find X9 Ultra vs X6 Pro
95
out of 100
VS
76
out of 100
Here we compared two flagship smartphones: the 6.82-inch Oppo Find X9 Ultra (with Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5) that was released on April 21, 2026, against the Oppo Find X6 Pro, which is powered by Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 and came out 3 years and 1 month before. On this page, you will find tests, full specs, strengths, and weaknesses of each of the devices.
Select the amount of RAM to evaluate performance and value for money more precisely
Key differences
Reasons to consider the Oppo Find X9 Ultra
- The rear camera has a 10x optical zoom
- 2.2x better performance in AnTuTu Benchmark (4231K versus 1933K)
- Delivers 154% higher peak brightness (3377 against 1327 nits)
- Shows 51% longer battery life (37:00 vs 24:35 hours)
- Comes with 2050 mAh larger battery capacity: 7050 vs 5000 mAh
- Better camera quality (According to DxOMark rating)
- Higher display refresh rate – 144 Hz
- Newer Bluetooth version (v6.0)
- Waterproof body (IP69 classification)
- The phone is 3 years and 1 month newer
- Slow-motion recording at 480FPS
Reasons to consider the Oppo Find X6 Pro
- Supports Dolby Atmos sound technology
Review
Display
Screen quality, color accuracy, brightness
Camera
Photo and video recording quality
Performance
CPU and memory performance (apps, system)
Gaming
Capabilities for playing modern games
Battery
Battery life, charging type and speed
Connectivity
Networks, ports, data transmission
Select your primary usage scenario to get a more accurate NanoReview Score
Value for money (Beta)
Tests and specifications
Comparison table of technical specifications and testsDisplay
| Type | AMOLED | AMOLED |
| Size | 6.82 inches | 6.82 inches |
| Resolution | 1440 x 3168 pixels | 1440 x 3168 pixels |
| Aspect ratio | 19.8:9 | 20:9 |
| PPI | 510 ppi | 510 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 144 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Adaptive refresh rate | Yes (1-120 Hz) | Yes |
| Max rated brightness | 1800 nits | 2500 nits |
| Max rated brightness in HDR | 3600 nits | - |
| HDR support | Yes, Dolby Vision | Yes, Dolby Vision |
| Touch sampling rate | 300 Hz | 240 Hz |
| Screen protection | Gorilla Glass Victus 2 | Gorilla Glass Victus 2 |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 90% | 89.5% |
| Display features | - DCI-P3 - Always-On Display - DC Dimming |
- DCI-P3 - Always-On Display - DC Dimming |
| RGB color space | 99.5% | 99.2% |
| PWM | 90 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Response time | 1 ms | 1 ms |
| Contrast | ∞ Infinity | ∞ Infinity |
Peak brightness test (auto)
Design and build
| Height | 163.16 mm (6.42 inches) | 164.8 mm (6.49 inches) |
| Width | 76.97 mm (3.03 inches) | 76.2 mm (3 inches) |
| Thickness | 8.65 mm (0.34 inches) | 9.1 mm (0.36 inches) |
| Weight | 235 g (8.29 oz) | 218 g (7.69 oz) |
| Waterproof | IP69 | IP68 |
| Advanced cooling | Vapor chamber | Vapor chamber |
| Rear material | Glass | Glass |
| Frame material | Metal | Metal |
| Colors | White, Green, Orange | Black, Green, Brown |
| Fingerprint scanner | Yes, in-display | Yes, in-display |
Screen-to-body ratio
Performance
| Chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 |
| Max clock | 4600 MHz | 3200 MHz |
| CPU cores | 8 (2 + 6) | 8 (1 + 2 + 2 + 3) |
| Architecture | - 6 cores at 3.63 GHz: Oryon Gen 3 Performance - 2 cores at 4.74 GHz: Oryon Gen 3 Prime |
- 3 cores at 2 GHz: Cortex-A510 - 2 cores at 2.8 GHz: Cortex-A710 - 2 cores at 2.8 GHz: Cortex-A715 - 1 core at 3.2 GHz: Cortex-X3 |
| L3 cache | 8 MB | 8 MB |
| Manufacturing | TSMC | TSMC |
| Lithography process | 3 nanometers | 4 nanometers |
| Neural processor (NPU) | Hexagon | Hexagon |
| Graphics | Adreno 840 | Adreno 740 |
| GPU shading units | 1536 | 1536 |
| GPU clock | 1200 MHz | 680 MHz |
| FLOPS | ~3993.6 GFLOPS | ~2089 GFLOPS |
Benchmarks
Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)
Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)
Compute Score (GPU)
| Compute Score (GPU) | 27916 | - |
| Single-core score | 3536 | 2045 |
| Multi-core score | 10744 | 5688 |
AnTuTu Benchmark 11
| CPU | 1184661 | 655394 |
| GPU | 1577144 | 434084 |
| Memory | 509054 | 320411 |
| UX | 961129 | 523874 |
| Total score | 4231988 | 1933763 |
| Samples | [5 tests] | [2 tests] |
3DMark Steel Nomad Light
| Stability | - | 98% |
| Graphics test | - | 8 FPS |
| Graphics score | - | 1089 |
3DMark Solar Bay
| Stability | - | 67% |
| Graphics test | - | 20 FPS |
| Section 1 | - | 23 FPS |
| Section 2 | - | 20 FPS |
| Section 3 | - | 17 FPS |
| Graphics score | - | 5296 |
3DMark Wild Life Extreme
| Stability | - | 45% |
| Graphics test | - | 21 FPS |
| Graphics score | - | 3667 |
AnTuTu 11 Ranking List (#24th place)
Recent User Tests
Oppo Find X9 Ultra
| Date | Benchmark | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 📘 2026-07-21 (IlyaLub) | AnTuTu 11 | 4231988 |
| 📘 2026-07-19 (KY.w) | Geekbench 6 GPU | 23623 |
| 📘 2026-07-19 (KY.w) | Geekbench 6 CPU | 3536 / 10744 |
| 📘 2026-07-19 (KY.w) | AnTuTu 11 | 3766077 |
| 📘 2026-07-15 (IlyaLub) | AnTuTu 11 | 4231988 |
Oppo Find X6 Pro
| Date | Benchmark | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 📘 2026-10-29 (KarlderaL) | AnTuTu 12 | 2036067 |
| 📘 2026-10-05 -> KarlderaL | Geekbench 6 CPU | 2065 / 5707 |
| 📘 2026-09-27 -> sento raito | AnTuTu 12 | 2035354 |
| 📘 2026-09-26 (Shion Sari) | AnTuTu 12 | 2035354 |
| 📘 2026-04-29 -> xxbflxx | AnTuTu 11 | 1933763 |
Memory
| RAM size | 12 GB | 12 GB |
| Memory type | LPDDR5X | LPDDR5X |
| Memory clock | 5300 MHz | 4266 MHz |
| Channels | 4 | 4 |
| Storage size | 256 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 4.1 | UFS 4.0 |
| Memory card | No | No |
Software
| Operating system | Android 16 | Android 13 (Can be upgraded to Android 16) |
| ROM | ColorOS 16 | ColorOS 14 |
| OS size | 31.6 GB | - |
| OS updates | 5 years | 4 years |
| Security updates | 6 years | 5 years |
Battery
| Capacity | 7050 mAh | 5000 mAh |
| Max charge power | 100 W | 100 W |
| Battery type | Silicon-Carbon (Si/C) | Li-Po |
| Replaceable | No | No |
| Wireless charging | Yes (50 W) | Yes (50 W) |
| Reverse charging | Yes, (wireless) | Yes, (wireless) |
| Bypass charging | Yes | - |
| Fast charging | Yes (75% in 30 min) | Yes (64% in 10 min) |
| Full charging time | 0:45 hr | 0:30 hr |
| Web browsing | 16:45 hr | 10:13 hr |
| Watching video | 26:15 hr | 16:47 hr |
| Gaming | 08:23 hr | 05:51 hr |
| Standby | 144 hr | 106 hr |
General battery life
Smartphones With Long Battery Life (#12th place)
Main camera
| Matrix | 200 megapixels | 50 megapixels |
| Image resolution | 16320 x 12240 | 8192 x 6144 |
| Zoom | Optical, 10x | Optical, 2.8x |
| Flash | LED | Dual LED |
| Stabilization | Optical | Optical |
| 8K video recording | Up to 30FPS | No |
| 4K video recording | Up to 120FPS | Up to 60FPS |
| 1080p video recording | Up to 240FPS | Up to 60FPS |
| Slow motion | 480 FPS (720p) | 240 FPS (1080p) |
| Angle of widest lens | 120° | 110° |
| Lenses | 1) Standard: 200 MP 2) Telephoto: 200 MP 3) Telephoto: 50 MP 4) Ultrawide: 50 MP |
1) Standard: 50 MP 2) Telephoto: 50 MP 3) Ultrawide: 50 MP |
| Camera features | - Bokeh mode - Pro mode |
- Bokeh mode - Pro mode - RAW support |
| Image resolution | 200 MP | 50 MP |
| Aperture | f/1.5 | f/1.8 |
| Focal length | 23 mm | 23 mm |
| Sensor | Sony LYTIA-901 | Sony IMX989 |
| Sensor size | 1/1.12" (≈ 0.89 inch) | 1/1.0" (≈ 1 inch) |
| Pixel size | 0.7 micron | 1.6 micron |
| Autofocus | Phase autofocus | Laser autofocus |
| Stabilization | Optical | Optical |
| Image resolution | 200 MP | 50 MP |
| Aperture | f/2.2 | f/2.6 |
| Focal length | 70 mm | 65 mm |
| Sensor | OmniVision OV52A | Sony IMX890 |
| Sensor size | 1/1.28" (≈ 0.78 inch) | 1/1.56" (≈ 0.64 inch) |
| Pixel size | 0.61 micron | 1 micron |
| Stabilization | Optical | Optical |
| Image resolution | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Aperture | f/2.0 | f/2.2 |
| Focal length | 14 mm | 15 mm |
| Sensor | Sony LYTIA-600 | Sony IMX890 |
| Sensor size | 1/1.95" (≈ 0.51 inch) | 1/1.56" (≈ 0.64 inch) |
| Pixel size | 0.8 micron | 1 micron |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
DxOMark main camera tests
Photo quality
Video quality
Generic main camera score
| Bokeh | 185 | 80 |
| Preview | - | 72 |
| Zoom | 173 | 154 |
| Samples | Photo samples of Oppo Find X9 Ultra from DxOMark | Photo samples of Oppo Find X6 Pro from DxOMark |
Selfie camera
| Megapixels | 50 megapixels | 32 megapixels |
| Image resolution | 8160 x 6128 | 6560 x 4928 |
| Aperture | f/2.4 | f/2.4 |
| Focal length | 21 mm | 21 mm |
| Sensor | Samsung ISOCELL JN5 | Sony IMX709 |
| Sensor size | 1/2.75" (≈ 0.36 inch) | 1/2.74" (≈ 0.36 inch) |
| Pixel size | 0.64 micron | 0.8 micron |
| Autofocus | Phase autofocus | Phase autofocus |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
| Video resolution | 2160p (4K) at 60 FPS | 2160p (4K) at 30 FPS |
| Depth sensor (TOF 3D) | No | No |
Connectivity
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 7 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be) | Wi-Fi 7 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be) |
| Wi-Fi features | - Dual Band - Wi-Fi MiMO - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
- Dual Band - Wi-Fi MiMO - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
| Bluetooth version | 6.0 | 5.3 |
| Bluetooth features | LE | LE |
| USB type | USB Type-C | USB Type-C |
| USB version | 3.2 | 3.1 |
| USB features | - Charging - USB-Storage mode - OTG |
- Charging - USB-Storage mode - OTG |
| DisplayPort | Yes | Yes |
| GPS | GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, NAVIC | GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS |
| NFC* | Yes | Yes |
| Infrared port | Yes | Yes |
| Number of SIM* | 2 | 2 |
| Type of SIM card | Nano | Nano |
| Multi SIM mode | Standby | Standby |
| eSIM support* | Yes | No |
| Hybrid slot | No | No |
| 5G support | Yes | Yes |
Sound
| Speakers | Stereo | Stereo |
| Headphone audio jack | No | No |
| FM radio | No | No |
| Dolby Atmos | No | Yes |
Speakers test
Max loudness
Other
| Category | Flagship | Flagship |
| Announced | April 2026 | March 2023 |
| Release date | May 2026 | March 2023 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $1299 | $875 |
| Successor | - | - Oppo Find X9 Ultra |
| Sensors | - Proximity sensor - Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Ambient light sensor - Compass - Fingerprint |
- Proximity sensor - Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Ambient light sensor - Compass - Fingerprint |
| Bundled charger | Not included | Yes, 100 W |
*Disclaimer! NFC, GSM network support, and some other specs can be different depending on the country.
Conclusion
After analyzing all the data, we think that the Oppo Find X9 Ultra is definitely a better buy.
Cast your vote
Total votes: 1