Oppo Find X9 vs Motorola Signature
89
out of 100
VS
89
out of 100
Here we compared two flagship smartphones: the 6.59-inch Oppo Find X9 (with MediaTek Dimensity 9500) that was released on October 16, 2025, against the Motorola Signature, which is powered by Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 5 and came out 3 months after. On this page, you will find tests, full specs, strengths, and weaknesses of each of the devices.
Select the amount of RAM to evaluate performance and value for money more precisely
Key differences
Reasons to consider the Oppo Find X9
- Comes with 1825 mAh larger battery capacity: 7025 vs 5200 mAh
- Slow-motion recording at 480FPS
- 9% faster in single-core GeekBench 6 test: 3107 and 2854 points
- Has a built-in infrared port
Reasons to consider the Motorola Signature
- Higher display refresh rate – 165 Hz
- Delivers 37% higher peak brightness (1516 against 1110 nits)
- Supports higher wattage charging (90W versus 80W)
- Weighs 17 grams less
Review
Display
Screen quality, color accuracy, brightness
Camera
Photo and video recording quality
Performance
CPU and memory performance (apps, system)
Gaming
Capabilities for playing modern games
Battery
Battery life, charging type and speed
Connectivity
Networks, ports, data transmission
Scores with a red asterisk (*) are approximate and may change in the future as we gather more data.
Select your primary usage scenario to get a more accurate NanoReview Score
Value for money (Beta)
Tests and specifications
Comparison table of technical specifications and testsDisplay
| Type | AMOLED | AMOLED |
| Size | 6.59 inches | 6.8 inches |
| Resolution | 1256 x 2760 pixels | 1264 x 2780 pixels |
| Aspect ratio | 20:9 | 20:9 |
| PPI | 460 ppi | 449 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 165 Hz |
| Adaptive refresh rate | Yes (60-120 Hz) | Yes |
| Max rated brightness | 1800 nits | - |
| Max rated brightness in HDR | 3600 nits | 6200 nits |
| HDR support | Yes, Dolby Vision | Yes, Dolby Vision |
| Touch sampling rate | 240 Hz | 360 Hz |
| Screen protection | Corning Gorilla Glass | Gorilla Glass Victus 2 |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 90.3% | 90.2% |
| Display features | - DCI-P3 - Always-On Display - DC Dimming |
- DCI-P3 - Always-On Display - DC Dimming |
| RGB color space | 98.9% | - |
| PWM | 474 Hz | - |
| Response time | 20 ms | - |
| Contrast | ∞ Infinity | - |
Peak brightness test (auto)
Design and build
| Height | 156.98 mm (6.18 inches) | 162.1 mm (6.38 inches) |
| Width | 73.93 mm (2.91 inches) | 76.4 mm (3.01 inches) |
| Thickness | 7.99 mm (0.31 inches) | 6.99 mm (0.28 inches) |
| Weight | 203 g (7.16 oz) | 186 g (6.56 oz) |
| Waterproof | IP69 | IP69 |
| Advanced cooling | Vapor chamber | Vapor chamber |
| Rear material | Glass | - |
| Frame material | Metal | Metal |
| Colors | White, Black, Gray, Red | Black, Green |
| Fingerprint scanner | Yes, in-display | Yes, in-display |
| Repairability | Good (3.71/5) | - |
| Drop resistance | Average (D) · 45 drops | - |
Screen-to-body ratio
Performance
| Chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 9500 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 5 |
| Max clock | 4210 MHz | 3800 MHz |
| CPU cores | 8 (1 + 3 + 4) | 8 (2 + 6) |
| Architecture | - 4 cores at 2.7 GHz: C1-Pro - 3 cores at 3.5 GHz: C1-Premium - 1 core at 4.21 GHz: C1-Ultra |
- 6 cores at 3.32 GHz: Oryon Performance - 2 cores at 3.8 GHz: Oryon Prime |
| L3 cache | 16 MB | 6 MB |
| Manufacturing | TSMC | TSMC |
| Lithography process | 3 nanometers | 3 nanometers |
| Neural processor (NPU) | MediaTek NPU 990 | Hexagon |
| Graphics | Mali-G1 Ultra MP12 | Adreno 840 |
| GPU shading units | 1536 | 1024 |
| GPU clock | 1716 MHz | 1225 MHz |
| FLOPS | ~5271.5 GFLOPS | ~2508.8 GFLOPS |
Benchmarks
Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)
Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)
Compute Score (GPU)
| Compute Score (GPU) | 28255 | 21397 |
| Single-core score | 3107 | 2854 |
| Multi-core score | 9557 | 9411 |
AnTuTu Benchmark 11
| CPU | 966933 | 944002 |
| GPU | 1291009 | 1076398 |
| Memory | 423697 | 490538 |
| UX | 718784 | 664619 |
| Total score | 3400423 | 3175557 |
| Samples | [7 tests] | [4 tests] |
3DMark Steel Nomad Light
| Stability | 52% | - |
| Graphics test | 23 FPS | - |
| Graphics score | 3119 | - |
3DMark Solar Bay
| Graphics test | 48 FPS | - |
| Section 1 | 55 FPS | - |
| Section 2 | 48 FPS | - |
| Section 3 | 41 FPS | - |
| Graphics score | 12571 | - |
PCMark 3.0
| Web score | 11502 | - |
| Video editing | 5863 | - |
| Photo editing | 23536 | - |
| Data manipulation | 12903 | - |
| Writing score | 19110 | - |
AnTuTu 11 Ranking List (55th and 80th place)
Recent User Tests
Oppo Find X9
| Date | Benchmark | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 📘 2026-10-02 (weipoh09) | AnTuTu 12 | 3319530 |
| 📘 2026-08-01 (Azad Boyka) | AnTuTu 11 | 3406583 |
| 📘 2026-07-13 (Dazza29) | Geekbench 6 GPU | 24276 |
| 📘 2026-07-13 (Dazza29) | Geekbench 6 CPU | 1953 / 3134 |
| 📘 2026-06-29 (No name) | AnTuTu 11 | 3272691 |
Motorola Signature
| Date | Benchmark | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 📘 2026-09-30 (Feary7) | AnTuTu 12 | 3338986 |
| 📘 2026-09-27 (Sam) | AnTuTu 12 | 3267778 |
| 📘 2026-07-27 -> Luizs | AnTuTu 11 | 3175557 |
| 📘 2026-06-03 (Lucky) | AnTuTu 11 | 3140269 |
| 📘 2026-05-27 (MaylonXTG) | AnTuTu 11 | 3237650 |
Memory
| RAM size | 12 GB | 12 GB |
| Memory type | LPDDR5X | LPDDR5X |
| Memory clock | 5333 MHz | - |
| Channels | 4 | 4 |
| Storage size | 256 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 4.1 | UFS 4.1 |
| Memory card | No | No |
Software
| Operating system | Android 16 | Android 16 |
| ROM | ColorOS 16 | - |
| OS size | 14 GB | - |
| OS updates | 5 years | - |
| Security updates | 5 years | - |
Battery
| Capacity | 7025 mAh | 5200 mAh |
| Max charge power | 80 W | 90 W |
| Battery type | Silicon-Carbon (Si/C) | Silicon-Carbon (Si/C) |
| Replaceable | No | No |
| Wireless charging | Yes (50 W) | Yes (50 W) |
| Reverse charging | Yes, (wireless) | Yes, (wireless) |
| Bypass charging | No | No |
| Fast charging | Yes (54% in 30 min) | Yes (88% in 15 min) |
| Full charging time | 1:15 hr | 0:42 hr |
| Battery cycles | 1300 cycles | - |
| Web browsing | - | 11:39 hr |
| Watching video | - | 18:02 hr |
| Gaming | - | 06:50 hr |
| Standby | - | 137 hr |
General battery life
Smartphones With Long Battery Life (#65th place)
Main camera
| Matrix | 50 megapixels | 50 megapixels |
| Image resolution | 8192 x 6144 | 8192 x 6144 |
| Zoom | Optical, 3x | Optical, 3x |
| Flash | LED | Dual LED |
| Stabilization | Optical | Optical |
| 8K video recording | No | Up to 30FPS |
| 4K video recording | Up to 120FPS | Up to 120FPS |
| 1080p video recording | Up to 60FPS | Up to 60FPS |
| Slow motion | 480 FPS (720p) | 240 FPS (1080p) |
| Angle of widest lens | 120° | 122° |
| Lenses | 1) Standard: 50 MP 2) Telephoto: 50 MP 3) Ultrawide: 50 MP |
1) Standard: 50 MP 2) Telephoto: 50 MP 3) Ultrawide: 50 MP |
| Camera features | - Bokeh mode - Pro mode - RAW support |
- Bokeh mode - Pro mode |
| Image resolution | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Aperture | f/1.65 | f/1.9 |
| Focal length | 23 mm | 23 mm |
| Sensor | Sony LYT-808 | - |
| Sensor size | 1/1.4" (≈ 0.71 inch) | 1/1.28" (≈ 0.78 inch) |
| Pixel size | 1.12 micron | 1.22 micron |
| Autofocus | Laser autofocus | Laser autofocus |
| Stabilization | Optical | Optical |
| Image resolution | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Aperture | f/2.6 | - |
| Focal length | 73 mm | 71 mm |
| Sensor | Sony LYT-600 | - |
| Sensor size | 1/1.95" (≈ 0.51 inch) | 1/1.95" (≈ 0.51 inch) |
| Pixel size | 0.5 micron | 0.8 micron |
| Stabilization | Optical | Optical |
| Image resolution | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Aperture | f/2.0 | f/2.0 |
| Focal length | 15 mm | 12 mm |
| Sensor | Samsung S5KJN5 | Samsung S5KJN1 |
| Sensor size | 1/2.76" (≈ 0.36 inch) | 1/2.76" (≈ 0.36 inch) |
| Pixel size | 0.64 micron | 0.64 micron |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
DxOMark main camera tests
Photo quality
Video quality
Generic main camera score
| Bokeh | - | 180 |
| Zoom | - | 153 |
| Samples | - | Photo samples of Motorola Signature from DxOMark |
Selfie camera
| Megapixels | 32 megapixels | 50 megapixels |
| Image resolution | - | 8192 x 6144 |
| Aperture | f/2.4 | f/2.0 |
| Focal length | 21 mm | 21 mm |
| Sensor | Samsung S5KJN5 | Samsung S5KJN1 |
| Sensor size | 1/2.74" (≈ 0.36 inch) | 1/2.93" (≈ 0.34 inch) |
| Pixel size | 0.8 micron | 0.6 micron |
| Autofocus | No | No |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
| Video resolution | 2160p (4K) at 60 FPS | 2160p (4K) at 60 FPS |
| Depth sensor (TOF 3D) | No | No |
Connectivity
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 7 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be) | Wi-Fi 7 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be) |
| Wi-Fi features | - Dual Band - Wi-Fi MiMO - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
- Dual Band - Wi-Fi MiMO - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
| Bluetooth version | 6.0 | 6.0 |
| Bluetooth features | LE | LE |
| USB type | USB Type-C | USB Type-C |
| USB version | 2 | 3.2 |
| USB features | - Charging - USB-Storage mode - OTG |
- Charging - USB-Storage mode - OTG |
| DisplayPort | No | Yes, DP 1.4 |
| GPS | GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, NAVIC | GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo |
| NFC* | Yes | Yes |
| Infrared port | Yes | No |
| Number of SIM* | 2 | 2 |
| Type of SIM card | Nano | Nano |
| Multi SIM mode | Standby | Standby |
| eSIM support* | Yes | Yes |
| Hybrid slot | No | No |
| 5G support | Yes | Yes |
Sound
| Speakers | Stereo | Stereo |
| Headphone audio jack | No | No |
| FM radio | No | No |
| Dolby Atmos | Yes | Yes |
Speakers test
Max loudness
Other
| Category | Flagship | Flagship |
| Announced | October 2025 | January 2026 |
| Release date | October 2025 | February 2026 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $899 | $999 |
| Successor | - | - Motorola Razr (2025) |
| Sensors | - Proximity sensor - Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Ambient light sensor - Compass - Fingerprint |
- Proximity sensor - Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Ambient light sensor - Compass - Fingerprint |
| Bundled charger | Yes, 80 W | Not included |
*Disclaimer! NFC, GSM network support, and some other specs can be different depending on the country.
Conclusion
If the gaming and battery life are more important to you, then choose the Oppo Find X9. But if the camera, connectivity, and design are more of a priority – go for the Motorola Signature.
Cast your vote
Total votes: 14