Vivo X300 Pro vs Motorola Signature

90 out of 100
Vivo X300 Pro
VS
89 out of 100
Motorola Signature

Here we compared two flagship smartphones: the 6.78-inch Vivo X300 Pro (with MediaTek Dimensity 9500) that was released on October 13, 2025, against the Motorola Signature, which is powered by Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 5 and came out 3 months after. On this page, you will find tests, full specs, strengths, and weaknesses of each of the devices.

Select the amount of RAM to evaluate performance and value for money more precisely
Memory

Key differences

An overview of the main advantages of each smartphone
Reasons to consider the Vivo X300 Pro
  • Comes with 1310 mAh larger battery capacity: 6510 vs 5200 mAh
  • Delivers 73% higher peak brightness (2627 against 1516 nits)
  • The rear camera has a 3.7x optical zoom
  • 13% better performance in AnTuTu Benchmark (3587K versus 3175K)
  • 13% faster in single-core GeekBench 6 test: 3228 and 2854 points
  • Has a built-in infrared port
Reasons to consider the Motorola Signature
  • Higher display refresh rate – 165 Hz
  • Shows 18% longer battery life (28:57 vs 24:37 hours)
  • Supports Dolby Atmos sound technology
  • Weighs 40 grams less

Review

Evaluation of Vivo X300 Pro and Motorola Signature crucial features
Display
Screen quality, color accuracy, brightness
Camera
Photo and video recording quality
Performance
CPU and memory performance (apps, system)
Gaming
Capabilities for playing modern games
Battery
Battery life, charging type and speed
Connectivity
Networks, ports, data transmission
NanoReview Score
Final comparison evaluation
Select your primary usage scenario to get a more accurate NanoReview Score
📱 Primary usage:

Value for money (Beta)

To get an accurate value-for-money index, update the default prices with actual prices from your country’s retailers (for the selected memory configs) and press the "Calculate" button.
Currency
12 / 256 GB
VS
12 / 256 GB
35.0
(Mediocre)
Value Index
78.6
(Good)

Tests and specifications

Comparison table of technical specifications and tests

Display

Type AMOLED AMOLED
Size 6.78 inches 6.8 inches
Resolution 1260 x 2800 pixels 1264 x 2780 pixels
Aspect ratio 20:9 20:9
PPI 452 ppi 449 ppi
Refresh rate 120 Hz 165 Hz
Adaptive refresh rate Yes (1-120 Hz) Yes
Max rated brightness 2000 nits -
Max rated brightness in HDR 4500 nits 6200 nits
HDR support Yes, Dolby Vision Yes, Dolby Vision
Touch sampling rate 300 Hz 360 Hz
Screen protection Armor Glass Gorilla Glass Victus 2
Screen-to-body ratio 90.8% 90.2%
Display features - DCI-P3
- Always-On Display
- DC Dimming
- DCI-P3
- Always-On Display
- DC Dimming
Display tests
RGB color space 99.7% -
PWM 360 Hz -
Response time 1 ms -
Contrast ∞ Infinity -
Peak brightness test (auto)
X300 Pro +73%
2627 nits
1516 nits
Sources: NotebookCheck [3]

Design and build

Height 161.98 mm (6.38 inches) 162.1 mm (6.38 inches)
Width 75.48 mm (2.97 inches) 76.4 mm (3.01 inches)
Thickness 7.99 mm (0.31 inches) 6.99 mm (0.28 inches)
Weight 226 g (7.97 oz) 186 g (6.56 oz)
Waterproof IP69 IP69
Advanced cooling Vapor chamber Vapor chamber
Rear material Glass -
Frame material Metal Metal
Colors White, Black, Blue, Brown Black, Green
Fingerprint scanner Yes, in-display Yes, in-display
Repairability Good (3/5) -
Drop resistance Very good (B) · 180 drops -
Screen-to-body ratio
X300 Pro +1%
90.8%

Performance

Chipset specifications of Vivo X300 Pro and Motorola Signature
SoC
Chipset MediaTek Dimensity 9500 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 5
Max clock 4210 MHz 3800 MHz
CPU cores 8 (1 + 3 + 4) 8 (2 + 6)
Architecture - 4 cores at 2.7 GHz: C1-Pro
- 3 cores at 3.5 GHz: C1-Premium
- 1 core at 4.21 GHz: C1-Ultra
- 6 cores at 3.32 GHz: Oryon Performance
- 2 cores at 3.8 GHz: Oryon Prime
L3 cache 16 MB 6 MB
Manufacturing TSMC TSMC
Lithography process 3 nanometers 3 nanometers
Neural processor (NPU) MediaTek NPU 990 Hexagon
GPU
Graphics Mali-G1 Ultra MP12 Adreno 840
GPU shading units 1536 1024
GPU clock 1716 MHz 1225 MHz
FLOPS ~5271.5 GFLOPS ~2508.8 GFLOPS

Benchmarks

Benchmark comparison of Vivo X300 Pro and Motorola Signature
Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)
X300 Pro +13%
3228
Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)
Compute Score (GPU)
X300 Pro +28%
27383
Compute Score (GPU) 27383 21397
Single-core score 3228 2854
Multi-core score 9553 9411
Sources: Geekbench [3], [4]
AnTuTu Benchmark 11
X300 Pro +13%
3587829
CPU 1046355 944002
GPU 1382122 1076398
Memory 388628 490538
UX 770724 664619
Total score 3587829 3175557
Samples [28 tests] [4 tests]
3DMark Steel Nomad Light
Stability 53% -
Graphics test 22 FPS -
Graphics score 3036 -
3DMark Solar Bay
Graphics test 51 FPS -
Section 1 57 FPS -
Section 2 51 FPS -
Section 3 45 FPS -
Graphics score 13426 -
Sources: 3DMark [5]
PCMark 3.0
Web score 14329 -
Video editing 6016 -
Photo editing 36698 -
Data manipulation 14869 -
Writing score 25904 -
AnTuTu 11 Ranking List (46th and 80th place)

Recent User Tests

The latest benchmark tests that have been submitted by users
Vivo X300 Pro
DateBenchmarkResult
📘 2026-09-27 (Pradip)AnTuTu 123930709
📘 2026-09-09 (tiktok: @anonchapix)CPU Throttle81%
📘 2026-09-09 (tiktok: @anonchapix)AnTuTu 124215102
📘 2026-09-03 (chapix)AnTuTu 113935655
📘 2026-08-28 -> Rlamac012AnTuTu 113729488
Motorola Signature
DateBenchmarkResult
📘 2026-09-30 (Feary7)AnTuTu 123338986
📘 2026-09-27 (Sam)AnTuTu 123267778
📘 2026-07-27 -> LuizsAnTuTu 113175557
📘 2026-06-03 (Lucky)AnTuTu 113140269
📘 2026-05-27 (MaylonXTG)AnTuTu 113237650

Memory

RAM
RAM size 12 GB 12 GB
Memory type LPDDR5X LPDDR5X
Memory clock 5333 MHz -
Channels 4 4
Storage
Storage size 256 GB 256 GB
Storage type UFS 4.1 UFS 4.1
Memory card No No

Software

Operating system Android 16 Android 16
ROM OriginOS 6 -
OS size 37 GB -
OS updates 5 years -
Security updates 7 years -

Battery

Capacity 6510 mAh 5200 mAh
Max charge power 90 W 90 W
Battery type Silicon-Carbon (Si/C) Silicon-Carbon (Si/C)
Replaceable No No
Wireless charging Yes (40 W) Yes (50 W)
Reverse charging Yes, (wireless) Yes, (wireless)
Bypass charging Yes No
Fast charging Yes (55% in 24 min) Yes (88% in 15 min)
Full charging time 0:50 hr 0:42 hr
Battery cycles 1200 cycles -
Battery life tests
Web browsing 13:30 hr 11:39 hr
Watching video 15:47 hr 18:02 hr
Gaming 07:14 hr 06:50 hr
Standby 81 hr 137 hr
General battery life
24:37 hr
28:57 hr

Main camera

Matrix 50 megapixels 50 megapixels
Image resolution 8192 x 6144 8192 x 6144
Zoom Optical, 3.7x Optical, 3x
Flash Dual LED Dual LED
Stabilization Optical Optical
8K video recording Up to 30FPS Up to 30FPS
4K video recording Up to 120FPS Up to 120FPS
1080p video recording Up to 60FPS Up to 60FPS
Slow motion 240 FPS (1080p) 240 FPS (1080p)
Angle of widest lens 119° 122°
Lenses 1) Standard: 50 MP
2) Telephoto: 200 MP
3) Ultrawide: 50 MP
1) Standard: 50 MP
2) Telephoto: 50 MP
3) Ultrawide: 50 MP
Camera features - Bokeh mode
- Pro mode
- Bokeh mode
- Pro mode
Standard lens
Image resolution 50 MP 50 MP
Aperture f/1.6 f/1.9
Focal length 24 mm 23 mm
Sensor Sony LYT-828 -
Sensor size 1/1.28" (≈ 0.78 inch) 1/1.28" (≈ 0.78 inch)
Pixel size 1.22 micron 1.22 micron
Autofocus Laser autofocus Laser autofocus
Stabilization Optical Optical
Telephoto lens
Image resolution 200 MP 50 MP
Aperture f/2.7 -
Focal length 85 mm 71 mm
Sensor Samsung ISOCELL HPB -
Sensor size 1/1.4" (≈ 0.71 inch) 1/1.95" (≈ 0.51 inch)
Pixel size 0.56 micron 0.8 micron
Stabilization Optical Optical
Ultra-wide lens
Image resolution 50 MP 50 MP
Aperture f/2.0 f/2.0
Focal length 15 mm 12 mm
Sensor Samsung S5KJN1 Samsung S5KJN1
Sensor size 1/2.76" (≈ 0.36 inch) 1/2.76" (≈ 0.36 inch)
Pixel size 0.64 micron 0.64 micron
Stabilization Digital Digital

DxOMark main camera tests

Photo quality
Video quality
Generic main camera score
Bokeh 180 180
Zoom 159 153
Samples Photo samples of Vivo X300 Pro from DxOMark Photo samples of Motorola Signature from DxOMark

Selfie camera

Megapixels 50 megapixels 50 megapixels
Image resolution 8192 x 6144 8192 x 6144
Aperture f/2.0 f/2.0
Focal length 20 mm 21 mm
Sensor Samsung S5KJN1 Samsung S5KJN1
Sensor size 1/2.76" (≈ 0.36 inch) 1/2.93" (≈ 0.34 inch)
Pixel size 0.64 micron 0.6 micron
Autofocus Phase autofocus No
Stabilization Digital Digital
Video resolution 2160p (4K) at 60 FPS 2160p (4K) at 60 FPS
Depth sensor (TOF 3D) No No

Connectivity

Wi-Fi standard Wi-Fi 7 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be) Wi-Fi 7 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be)
Wi-Fi features - Dual Band
- Wi-Fi MiMO
- Wi-Fi Direct
- Wi-Fi Hotspot
- Wi-Fi Display
- Dual Band
- Wi-Fi MiMO
- Wi-Fi Direct
- Wi-Fi Hotspot
- Wi-Fi Display
Bluetooth version 6.0 6.0
Bluetooth features LE LE
USB type USB Type-C USB Type-C
USB version 3.2 3.2
USB features - Charging
- USB-Storage mode
- OTG
- Charging
- USB-Storage mode
- OTG
DisplayPort Yes Yes, DP 1.4
GPS GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, NAVIC GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo
NFC* Yes Yes
Infrared port Yes No
Network
Number of SIM* 2 2
Type of SIM card Nano Nano
Multi SIM mode Standby Standby
eSIM support* Yes Yes
Hybrid slot No No
5G support Yes Yes

Sound

Speakers Stereo Stereo
Headphone audio jack No No
FM radio No No
Dolby Atmos No Yes
Speakers test
Max loudness

Other

Category Flagship Flagship
Announced October 2025 January 2026
Release date October 2025 February 2026
Launch price (MSRP) $899 $999
Successor - - Motorola Razr (2025)
Sensors - Proximity sensor
- Gyroscope
- Accelerometer
- Ambient light sensor
- Compass
- Fingerprint
- Proximity sensor
- Gyroscope
- Accelerometer
- Ambient light sensor
- Compass
- Fingerprint
Bundled charger Not included Not included
*Disclaimer! NFC, GSM network support, and some other specs can be different depending on the country.

Conclusion

If the gaming is more important to you, then choose the Vivo X300 Pro. But if the design and sound are more of a priority – go for the Motorola Signature.

Cast your vote

So, which phone would you choose?
7 (33.3%)
14 (66.7%)
Total votes: 21

User opinions

You can share your opinion or ask a question in the comments below
🌐 Register your profile and become part of NanoReview community!