Samsung Galaxy A55 5G vs Motorola Edge 40

Here we compared two smartphones: the 6.6-inch Samsung Galaxy A55 5G (with Exynos 1480) that was released on March 11, 2024, against the Motorola Edge 40, which is powered by MediaTek Dimensity 8020 and came out 11 months before. On this page, you will find tests, full specs, strengths, and weaknesses of each of the devices.

Select the amount of RAM to evaluate performance and value for money more precisely
Memory

Key differences

An overview of the main advantages of each smartphone
Reasons to consider the Samsung Galaxy A55 5G
  • Shows 20% longer battery life (26:41 vs 22:15 hours)
  • Newer Bluetooth version (v5.3)
  • Expandable storage via MicroSD card up to 1024GB
  • More recent OS version: Android 16 versus 14
  • Uses a faster type of memory: LPDDR5 3200 MHz
  • Has 2 SIM card slots
  • The phone is 11 months newer
  • More energy-efficient CPU – Exynos 1480
Reasons to consider the Motorola Edge 40
  • Higher display refresh rate – 144 Hz
  • Handles wireless charging up to 15W
  • Supports higher wattage charging (68W versus 25W)
  • Waterproof body (IP68 classification)
  • Has 33% more RAM: 8GB versus 6GB
  • Thinner bezels – 5% more screen real estate
  • Weighs 46 grams less
  • Better grip in hands – the body is 5.41 mm narrower

Review

Evaluation of Samsung Galaxy A55 5G and Motorola Edge 40 crucial features
Display
Screen quality, color accuracy, brightness
Camera
Photo and video recording quality
Performance
CPU and memory performance (apps, system)
Gaming
Capabilities for playing modern games
Battery
Battery life, charging type and speed
Connectivity
Networks, ports, data transmission
NanoReview Score
Final comparison evaluation
Select your primary usage scenario to get a more accurate NanoReview Score
📱 Primary usage:

Value for money (Beta)

To get an accurate value-for-money index, update the default prices with actual prices from your country’s retailers (for the selected memory configs) and press the "Calculate" button.
Currency
6 / 128 GB
VS
8 / 128 GB
62.2
(Average)
Value Index
35.2
(Mediocre)

Tests and specifications

Comparison table of technical specifications and tests

Display

Type Super AMOLED POLED
Size 6.6 inches 6.55 inches
Resolution 1080 x 2340 pixels 1080 x 2400 pixels
Aspect ratio 19.5:9 20:9
PPI 390 ppi 402 ppi
Refresh rate 120 Hz 144 Hz
Adaptive refresh rate Yes (60-120 Hz) Yes (60-144 Hz)
Max rated brightness 1000 nits 500 nits
Max rated brightness in HDR - 1200 nits
HDR support Yes, HDR10+ Yes, HDR10+
Touch sampling rate 240 Hz 360 Hz
Screen protection Gorilla Glass Victus Plus Corning Gorilla Glass 5
Screen-to-body ratio 85.8% 90.8%
Display features - DCI-P3
- Always-On Display
- DCI-P3
- Always-On Display
- DC Dimming
Display tests
RGB color space 100% 97.1%
PWM 120 Hz 144 Hz
Response time 1 ms 1 ms
Contrast ∞ Infinity ∞ Infinity
Peak brightness test (auto)
1003 nits
Edge 40 +3%
1034 nits
Sources: NotebookCheck [3], [4]

Design and build

Height 161.1 mm (6.34 inches) 158.43 mm (6.24 inches)
Width 77.4 mm (3.05 inches) 71.99 mm (2.83 inches)
Thickness 8.2 mm (0.32 inches) 7.49 mm (0.29 inches)
Weight 213 g (7.51 oz) 167 g (5.89 oz)
Waterproof IP67 IP68
Advanced cooling Vapor chamber -
Rear material Glass Plastic
Frame material Metal Metal
Colors White, Blue, Purple, Yellow Black, Blue, Green, Red
Fingerprint scanner Yes, in-display Yes, in-display
Screen-to-body ratio
Edge 40 +6%
90.8%

Performance

Chipset specifications of Samsung Galaxy A55 5G and Motorola Edge 40
SoC
Chipset Samsung Exynos 1480 MediaTek Dimensity 8020
Max clock 2750 MHz 2600 MHz
CPU cores 8 (4 + 4) 8 (4 + 4)
Architecture - 4 cores at 2 GHz: Cortex-A55
- 4 cores at 2.75 GHz: Cortex-A78
- 4 cores at 2 GHz: Cortex-A55
- 4 cores at 2.6 GHz: Cortex-A78
L3 cache 4 MB 8 MB
Manufacturing Samsung TSMC
Lithography process 4 nanometers 6 nanometers
Neural processor (NPU) Yes MediaTek APU 570
GPU
Graphics Xclipse 530 Mali-G77 MC9
GPU shading units 128 288
GPU clock 1300 MHz 836 MHz
FLOPS ~665.6 GFLOPS ~481.5 GFLOPS

Benchmarks

Benchmark comparison of Samsung Galaxy A55 5G and Motorola Edge 40
Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)
1137
1120
Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)
Edge 40 +7%
3665
Compute Score (GPU)
Edge 40 +16%
4765
Compute Score (GPU) 4101 4765
Single-core score 1137 1120
Multi-core score 3437 3665
Sources: Geekbench [3], [4]
AnTuTu Benchmark 11
1021736
981459
CPU 348485 349209
GPU 226076 150375
Memory 182794 181946
UX 264381 299929
Total score 1021736 981459
Samples [29 tests] [12 tests]
3DMark Steel Nomad Light
459
435
Stability 98% 98%
Graphics test 3 FPS 3 FPS
Graphics score 459 435
3DMark Wild Life Extreme
Edge 40 +28%
1260
Stability 98% 99%
Graphics test 5 FPS 7 FPS
Graphics score 982 1260
Sources: 3DMark [5], [6]
PCMark 3.0
Edge 40 +23%
16124
Web score 11788 15979
Video editing 7255 7875
Photo editing 23283 46444
Data manipulation 10941 10609
Writing score 17673 18299

Recent User Tests

The latest benchmark tests that have been submitted by users
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G
DateBenchmarkResult
📘 2026-09-17 (Артем)AnTuTu 111080442
📘 2026-08-23 (No)AnTuTu 11965699
📘 2026-08-14 (Brice)Geekbench 6 CPU1115 / 3126
📘 2026-08-06 (Mazen)AnTuTu 111057022
📘 2026-06-28 (SK.EMTIAZ)AnTuTu 111021736
Motorola Edge 40
DateBenchmarkResult
📘 2026-08-22 (GEKO973239)AnTuTu 111022272
📘 2026-05-03 (Ren :3)AnTuTu 111007624
📘 2026-04-29 (Ren :3)AnTuTu 11991321
📘 2026-04-15 (Poseidon)AnTuTu 11992657
📘 2026-03-05 (Otuab)AnTuTu 11947213

Memory

RAM
RAM size 6 GB 8 GB
Memory type LPDDR5 LPDDR4X
Memory clock 3200 MHz 2133 MHz
Channels 2 2
Storage
Storage size 128 GB 128 GB
Storage type UFS 3.1 UFS 3.1
Memory card MicroSD No
Memory card max size Up to 1024 GB -

Software

Operating system Android 14 (Can be upgraded to Android 16) Android 13 (Can be upgraded to Android 14)
ROM One UI 8.5 My UX
OS size 20.1 GB 22 GB
OS updates 4 years 3 years
Security updates 5 years 3 years

Battery

Capacity 5000 mAh 4400 mAh
Max charge power 25 W 68 W
Battery type Li-Ion Li-Po
Replaceable No No
Wireless charging No Yes (15 W)
Reverse charging No No
Bypass charging No -
Fast charging Yes (55% in 30 min) Yes (58% in 15 min)
Full charging time 1:03 hr 0:40 hr
Battery life tests
Web browsing 10:24 hr 08:43 hr
Watching video 17:52 hr 13:43 hr
Gaming 05:16 hr 05:18 hr
Standby 125 hr 108 hr
General battery life
26:41 hr
22:15 hr

Main camera

Matrix 50 megapixels 50 megapixels
Image resolution 8160 x 6120 8192 x 6144
Zoom Digital Digital
Flash LED LED
Stabilization Optical Optical
8K video recording No No
4K video recording Up to 30FPS Up to 30FPS
1080p video recording Up to 60FPS Up to 60FPS
Slow motion 240 FPS (720p) 240 FPS (720p)
Angle of widest lens 123° 120°
Lenses 1) Standard: 50 MP
2) Ultrawide: 12 MP
3) Macro: 5 MP
1) Standard: 50 MP
2) Ultrawide: 13 MP
Camera features - Bokeh mode
- Pro mode
- Bokeh mode
- Pro mode
- RAW support
Standard lens
Image resolution 50 MP 50 MP
Aperture f/1.8 f/1.4
Sensor Sony IMX906 Omnivision OV50A
Sensor size 1/1.56" (≈ 0.64 inch) 1/1.55" (≈ 0.65 inch)
Pixel size 1 micron 1 micron
Autofocus Phase autofocus Phase autofocus
Stabilization Optical Optical
Ultra-wide lens
Image resolution 12 MP 13 MP
Aperture f/2.2 f/2.2
Sensor Sony IMX258 -
Sensor size 1/3.06" (≈ 0.33 inch) 1/3.0" (≈ 0.33 inch)
Pixel size 1.12 micron 1.12 micron
Stabilization Digital Digital
Macro lens
Image resolution 5 MP -
Aperture f/2.4 -
Sensor GalaxyCore GC5035 -
Sensor size 1/5" (≈ 0.2 inch) -
Pixel size 1.12 micron -
Stabilization Digital -

DxOMark main camera tests

Photo quality
Video quality
Generic main camera score
Bokeh 45 -
Preview 54 -
Zoom 75 -
Samples Photo samples of Samsung Galaxy A55 5G from DxOMark -

Selfie camera

Megapixels 32 megapixels 32 megapixels
Image resolution 6464 x 4864 3264 x 2448
Aperture f/2.2 f/2.4
Focal length 26 mm -
Sensor Sony IMX616 CMOS
Sensor size 1/2.74" (≈ 0.36 inch) 1/3.0" (≈ 0.33 inch)
Pixel size 0.8 micron 0.7 micron
Autofocus No No
Stabilization Digital Digital
Video resolution 2160p (4K) at 30 FPS 2160p (4K) at 30 FPS
Depth sensor (TOF 3D) No No

Connectivity

Wi-Fi standard Wi-Fi 6 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax) Wi-Fi 6E (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax)
Wi-Fi features - Dual Band
- Wi-Fi MiMO
- Wi-Fi Direct
- Wi-Fi Hotspot
- Wi-Fi Display
- Dual Band
- Wi-Fi Direct
- Wi-Fi Hotspot
- Wi-Fi Display
Bluetooth version 5.3 5.2
Bluetooth features LE LE
USB type USB Type-C USB Type-C
USB version 2 2
USB features - Charging
- USB-Storage mode
- OTG
- Charging
- USB-Storage mode
- OTG
GPS GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo
NFC* Depends on the region Yes
Infrared port No No
Network
Number of SIM* 2 1
Type of SIM card Nano Nano
Multi SIM mode Standby -
eSIM support* Yes Yes
Hybrid slot Yes No
LTE Cat* 18 21
5G support Yes Yes

Sound

Speakers Stereo Stereo
Headphone audio jack No No
FM radio No No
Dolby Atmos Yes Yes
Speakers test
Max loudness
91.4 dB
89.4 dB

Other

Category Mid-range Flagship
Announced March 2024 May 2023
Release date March 2024 May 2023
Launch price (MSRP) $439 $600
Successor - Samsung Galaxy A57 5G - Motorola Edge 70
SAR (head) 0.68 W/kg -
SAR (body) 1.04 W/kg -
Sensors - Hall-effect sensor
- Barometer
- Gyroscope
- Accelerometer
- Ambient light sensor
- Compass
- Fingerprint
- Proximity sensor
- Gyroscope
- Accelerometer
- Ambient light sensor
- Compass
- Fingerprint
Bundled charger Not included Yes, 68 W
Further details
Notes on Galaxy A55 5G:
    - The barometer is only available in the model for the USA.
    - SM-A556B/DS and A556E/DS models come with two physical SIM cards.
Notes on Edge 40:
    - The back cover could be made of eco-leather (optionally).
*Disclaimer! NFC, GSM network support, and some other specs can be different depending on the country.

Conclusion

If the battery life and software are more important to you, then choose the Samsung Galaxy A55 5G. But if the connectivity is more of a priority – go for the Motorola Edge 40.

Cast your vote

So, which phone would you choose?
44 (13.8%)
275 (86.2%)
Total votes: 319

User opinions

You can share your opinion or ask a question in the comments below
🌐 Register your profile and become part of NanoReview community!
Avatar
Ingraphic June 14, 2024 at 01:59 AM
We have to be honest; Samsung has been evolving well and this battery life is great. In addition to offering the performance of an 865/870, I wanted the next generation to come with a 2.80 configuration with 4 Cortex-A710/720 and 4 Cortex-A510/520, and a GPU with at least 40% more performance gain.
+6 Reply
Avatar
Maik June 6, 2024 at 01:28 PM
Hello and don't be tired to the site operators. Between these two comparisons, which one is better for gaming and has temperature control as well as stability?
+11 Reply
Avatar
SHA May 7, 2026 at 02:26 PM
I have tested both, in games like codm samsug will give u 60 fps for 2 hours where as moto will give u 7p fps for 15min and then 50-60 for the rest of the time since moto will heat a lot quicker NOTE: Samsung will run at 60hz in codm, while moto will run at 144hz
0 Reply