Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra vs A56 5G

Here we compared two smartphones: the 6.8-inch Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra (with Exynos 2200) that was released on February 9, 2022, against the Samsung Galaxy A56 5G, which is powered by Exynos 1580 and came out 3 years and 1 month after. On this page, you will find tests, full specs, strengths, and weaknesses of each of the devices.

Select the amount of RAM to evaluate performance and value for money more precisely
Memory

Key differences

An overview of the main advantages of each smartphone
Reasons to consider the Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra
  • The rear camera has a 10x optical zoom
  • Better camera quality (According to DxOMark rating)
  • 30% higher pixel density (500 vs 385 PPI)
  • Handles wireless charging up to 15W
  • Waterproof body (IP68 classification)
  • Slow-motion recording at 960FPS
  • 15% better performance in AnTuTu Benchmark (1434K versus 1251K)
  • Has 33% more RAM: 8GB versus 6GB
  • Reverse charging feature
  • 22% faster in single-core GeekBench 6 test: 1648 and 1354 points
Reasons to consider the Samsung Galaxy A56 5G
  • Shows 24% longer battery life (28:42 vs 23:05 hours)
  • Newer Bluetooth version (v5.3)
  • The phone is 3 years and 1 month newer
  • Weighs 30 grams less

Review

Evaluation of Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra and A56 5G crucial features
Display
Screen quality, color accuracy, brightness
Camera
Photo and video recording quality
Performance
CPU and memory performance (apps, system)
Gaming
Capabilities for playing modern games
Battery
Battery life, charging type and speed
Connectivity
Networks, ports, data transmission
NanoReview Score
Final comparison evaluation
Select your primary usage scenario to get a more accurate NanoReview Score
📱 Primary usage:

Value for money (Beta)

To get an accurate value-for-money index, update the default prices with actual prices from your country’s retailers (for the selected memory configs) and press the "Calculate" button.
Currency
8 / 128 GB
VS
6 / 128 GB
28.7
(Mediocre)
Value Index
93.2
(Very good)

Tests and specifications

Comparison table of technical specifications and tests

Display

Type Dynamic AMOLED Super AMOLED
Size 6.8 inches 6.7 inches
Resolution 1440 x 3088 pixels 1080 x 2340 pixels
Aspect ratio 19.3:9 19.5:9
PPI 500 ppi 385 ppi
Refresh rate 120 Hz 120 Hz
Adaptive refresh rate Yes (24-120 Hz) Yes (60-120 Hz)
Max rated brightness 830 nits 1200 nits
Max rated brightness in HDR 1750 nits 1900 nits
HDR support Yes, HDR10+ Yes, HDR10+
Screen protection Gorilla Glass Victus Plus Gorilla Glass Victus Plus
Screen-to-body ratio 89.8% 87.6%
Display features - DCI-P3
- Always-On Display
- DCI-P3
- Always-On Display
Display tests
RGB color space 98.2% 99.1%
PWM 120 Hz 120 Hz
Response time 1 ms 1 ms
Contrast ∞ Infinity ∞ Infinity
Peak brightness test (auto)
1266 nits
1205 nits
Sources: NotebookCheck [3], [4]

Design and build

Height 163.3 mm (6.43 inches) 162.2 mm (6.39 inches)
Width 77.9 mm (3.07 inches) 77.5 mm (3.05 inches)
Thickness 8.9 mm (0.35 inches) 7.4 mm (0.29 inches)
Weight 228 g (8.04 oz) 198 g (6.98 oz)
Waterproof IP68 IP67
Advanced cooling Vapor chamber Vapor chamber
Rear material Glass Glass
Frame material Metal Metal
Colors White, Black, Gray, Blue, Green, Red Black, Gray, Green, Pink
Fingerprint scanner Yes, in-display Yes, in-display
Repairability - Good (3.19/5)
Drop resistance - Excellent (A) · 270 drops
Screen-to-body ratio

Performance

Chipset specifications of Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra and Samsung Galaxy A56 5G
SoC
Chipset Samsung Exynos 2200 Samsung Exynos 1580
Max clock 2800 MHz 2900 MHz
CPU cores 8 (1 + 3 + 4) 8 (1 + 3 + 4)
Architecture - 4 cores at 1.82 GHz: Cortex-A510
- 3 cores at 2.52 GHz: Cortex-A710
- 1 core at 2.8 GHz: Cortex-X2
- 4 cores at 1.95 GHz: Cortex-A520
- 3 cores at 2.6 GHz: Cortex-A720
- 1 core at 2.9 GHz: Cortex-A720
L3 cache 4 MB 4 MB
Manufacturing Samsung Samsung
Lithography process 4 nanometers 4 nanometers
Neural processor (NPU) Yes Yes
GPU
Graphics Xclipse 920 Xclipse 540
GPU shading units 384 256
GPU clock 1306 MHz 1300 MHz
FLOPS ~1003 GFLOPS ~1331.2 GFLOPS

Benchmarks

Benchmark comparison of Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra and Samsung Galaxy A56 5G
Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)
Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)
Compute Score (GPU)
Compute Score (GPU) - 6865
Single-core score 1648 1354
Multi-core score 4351 3789
Sources: Geekbench [3], [4]
AnTuTu Benchmark 11
1434169
1251512
CPU 472427 490457
GPU 390230 296896
Memory 216173 173263
UX 355339 290896
Total score 1434169 1251512
Samples [17 tests] [130 tests]
3DMark Steel Nomad Light
Stability 66% 97%
Graphics test 7 FPS 5 FPS
Graphics score 900 641
3DMark Solar Bay
Stability 65% -
Graphics test 15 FPS -
Section 1 18 FPS -
Section 2 15 FPS -
Section 3 12 FPS -
Graphics score 3874 -
3DMark Wild Life Extreme
Stability 66% -
Graphics test 11 FPS -
Graphics score 1967 -
Sources: 3DMark [5], [6]
PCMark 3.0
Web score 13423 14131
Video editing 7399 7744
Photo editing 24771 22842
Data manipulation 12643 11699
Writing score 16337 18128

Recent User Tests

The latest benchmark tests that have been submitted by users
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra
DateBenchmarkResult
📘 2026-07-21 (RAID_0)Geekbench 6 GPU10479
📘 2026-07-12 (João_Rosário_67)AnTuTu 111474557
📘 2026-06-09 (Unknown)AnTuTu 111318666
📘 2026-04-18 (Fsoceinty)AnTuTu 111329673
📘 2026-03-28 (Bakzhan)AnTuTu 111530447
Samsung Galaxy A56 5G
DateBenchmarkResult
📘 2026-09-24 (.)CPU Throttle82%
📘 2026-09-24 (.)Geekbench 7 GPU5755
📘 2026-09-24 (.)Geekbench 7 CPU1191 / 3814
📘 2026-09-24 (.)AnTuTu 121017323
📘 2026-09-24 -> CR7AnTuTu 121030440

Memory

RAM
RAM size 8 GB 6 GB
Memory type LPDDR5 LPDDR5
Memory clock - 3200 MHz
Channels 4 2
Storage
Storage size 128 GB 128 GB
Storage type UFS 3.1 UFS 3.1
Memory card No No

Software

Operating system Android 12 (Can be upgraded to Android 16) Android 15 (Can be upgraded to Android 16)
ROM One UI 8.0 One UI 8.5
OS size 26.8 GB 21.5 GB
OS updates 4 years 6 years
Security updates 5 years 6 years

Battery

Capacity 5000 mAh 5000 mAh
Max charge power 45 W 45 W
Battery type Li-Po Li-Ion
Replaceable No No
Wireless charging Yes (15 W) No
Reverse charging Yes, (wireless) No
Bypass charging No No
Fast charging Yes (60% in 30 min) Yes (65% in 30 min)
Full charging time 0:59 hr 1:13 hr
Battery cycles - 2000 cycles
Battery life tests
Web browsing 09:06 hr 11:28 hr
Watching video 13:47 hr 19:50 hr
Gaming 05:57 hr 04:53 hr
Standby 113 hr 131 hr
General battery life
23:05 hr
28:42 hr

Main camera

Matrix 108 megapixels 50 megapixels
Image resolution 12000 x 9000 8192 x 6144
Zoom Optical, 10x Digital
Flash LED LED
Stabilization Optical Optical
8K video recording Up to 24FPS No
4K video recording Up to 60FPS Up to 30FPS
1080p video recording Up to 120FPS Up to 60FPS
Slow motion 960 FPS (720p) 240 FPS (720p)
Angle of widest lens 120° 123°
Lenses 1) Standard: 108 MP
2) Telephoto: 10 MP
3) Telephoto: 10 MP
4) Ultrawide: 12 MP
1) Standard: 50 MP
2) Ultrawide: 12 MP
3) Macro: 5 MP
Camera features - Bokeh mode
- Pro mode
- RAW support
- Bokeh mode
- Pro mode
Standard lens
Image resolution 108 MP 50 MP
Aperture f/1.8 f/1.8
Focal length 24 mm -
Sensor Samsung S5KHM3 Sony IMX906
Sensor size 1/1.33" (≈ 0.75 inch) 1/1.56" (≈ 0.64 inch)
Pixel size 0.8 micron 1 micron
Autofocus Laser autofocus Phase autofocus
Stabilization Optical Optical
Telephoto lens
Image resolution 10 MP -
Aperture f/4.9 -
Focal length 230 mm -
Sensor Sony IMX574 -
Sensor size 1/3.52" (≈ 0.28 inch) -
Pixel size 1.12 micron -
Stabilization Optical -
Ultra-wide lens
Image resolution 12 MP 12 MP
Aperture f/2.2 f/2.2
Focal length 13 mm -
Sensor Sony IMX563 Sony IMX258
Sensor size 1/2.55" (≈ 0.39 inch) 1/3.06" (≈ 0.33 inch)
Pixel size 1.4 micron 1.12 micron
Stabilization Digital Digital
Macro lens
Image resolution - 5 MP
Aperture - f/2.4
Stabilization - Digital

DxOMark main camera tests

Photo quality
Video quality
Generic main camera score
Bokeh 70 145
Preview 73 -
Zoom 141 59
Samples Photo samples of Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra from DxOMark Photo samples of Samsung Galaxy A56 5G from DxOMark

Selfie camera

Megapixels 40 megapixels 12 megapixels
Image resolution 7864 x 5200 -
Aperture f/2.2 f/2.2
Focal length 26 mm -
Sensor CMOS Samsung S5K3LC
Sensor size 1/2.82" (≈ 0.35 inch) -
Pixel size 0.7 micron -
Autofocus Phase autofocus No
Stabilization Digital Digital
Video resolution 2160p (4K) at 60 FPS 2160p (4K) at 30 FPS
Depth sensor (TOF 3D) No No
DxOMark front camera
Photo 139 -
Video 145 -

Connectivity

Wi-Fi standard Wi-Fi 6E (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax) Wi-Fi 6 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax)
Wi-Fi features - Dual Band
- Wi-Fi MiMO
- Wi-Fi Direct
- Wi-Fi Hotspot
- Wi-Fi Display
- Dual Band
- Wi-Fi MiMO
- Wi-Fi Direct
- Wi-Fi Hotspot
- Wi-Fi Display
Bluetooth version 5.2 5.3
Bluetooth features LE LE
USB type USB Type-C USB Type-C
USB version 3.2 2
USB features - Charging
- USB-Storage mode
- OTG
- Charging
- USB-Storage mode
- OTG
DisplayPort Yes, DP 1.2 No
GPS GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS
NFC* Yes Yes
Infrared port No No
Network
Number of SIM* 2 2
Type of SIM card Nano Nano
Multi SIM mode Standby Standby
eSIM support* Yes Yes
Hybrid slot No No
LTE Cat* 20 -
5G support Yes Yes

Sound

Speakers Stereo Stereo
Headphone audio jack No No
FM radio No No
Dolby Atmos Yes Yes
Speakers test
Max loudness
90.2 dB
87.7 dB

Other

Category Flagship Mid-range
Announced February 2022 March 2025
Release date March 2022 March 2025
Launch price (MSRP) $1199 $499
Successor - - Samsung Galaxy A57 5G
SAR (head) 1.05 W/kg 0.61 W/kg
SAR (body) 1.58 W/kg 1.05 W/kg
Sensors - Hall-effect sensor
- Barometer
- Proximity sensor
- Gyroscope
- Accelerometer
- Ambient light sensor
- Compass
- Fingerprint
- Gyroscope
- Accelerometer
- Ambient light sensor
- Compass
- Fingerprint
Bundled charger Not included Not included
*Disclaimer! NFC, GSM network support, and some other specs can be different depending on the country.

Conclusion

If the camera, performance, gaming, and connectivity are more important to you, then choose the Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra. But if the battery life and design are more of a priority – go for the Samsung Galaxy A56 5G.

Cast your vote

So, which phone would you choose?
162 (76.4%)
50 (23.6%)
Total votes: 212

User opinions

You can share your opinion or ask a question in the comments below
🌐 Register your profile and become part of NanoReview community!
Avatar
Caleb Elderbello February 21, 2026 at 01:51 AM
Hello Team I'd love to be part of the community Keep up the good work guys
0 Reply