Vivo X100 Pro vs Oppo Find X6 Pro
79
out of 100
VS
76
out of 100
Here we compared two flagship smartphones: the 6.78-inch Vivo X100 Pro (with MediaTek Dimensity 9300) that was released on November 13, 2023, against the Oppo Find X6 Pro, which is powered by Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 and came out 8 months before. On this page, you will find tests, full specs, strengths, and weaknesses of each of the devices.
Select the amount of RAM to evaluate performance and value for money more precisely
Key differences
Reasons to consider the Vivo X100 Pro
- The rear camera has a 4.3x optical zoom
- Newer Bluetooth version (v5.4)
- Slow-motion recording at 960FPS
- 27% better performance in AnTuTu Benchmark (2450K versus 1933K)
- Delivers 12% higher peak brightness (1486 against 1327 nits)
- More recent OS version: Android 15 versus 14
- The phone is 8 months newer
- Ready for eSIM technology
Reasons to consider the Oppo Find X6 Pro
- Shows 10% longer battery life (24:35 vs 22:26 hours)
- Has 2 SIM card slots
- 13% higher pixel density (510 vs 452 PPI)
Review
Display
Screen quality, color accuracy, brightness
Camera
Photo and video recording quality
Performance
CPU and memory performance (apps, system)
Gaming
Capabilities for playing modern games
Battery
Battery life, charging type and speed
Connectivity
Networks, ports, data transmission
Select your primary usage scenario to get a more accurate NanoReview Score
Value for money (Beta)
Tests and specifications
Comparison table of technical specifications and testsDisplay
| Type | AMOLED | AMOLED |
| Size | 6.78 inches | 6.82 inches |
| Resolution | 1260 x 2800 pixels | 1440 x 3168 pixels |
| Aspect ratio | 20:9 | 20:9 |
| PPI | 452 ppi | 510 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Adaptive refresh rate | Yes (1-120 Hz) | Yes |
| Max rated brightness | 3000 nits | 2500 nits |
| HDR support | Yes, HDR10+ | Yes, Dolby Vision |
| Touch sampling rate | 300 Hz | 240 Hz |
| Screen protection | Corning Gorilla Glass | Gorilla Glass Victus 2 |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 89.9% | 89.5% |
| Display features | - DCI-P3 - Always-On Display - DC Dimming |
- DCI-P3 - Always-On Display - DC Dimming |
| RGB color space | 99.8% | 99.2% |
| PWM | 369 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Response time | 1 ms | 1 ms |
| Contrast | ∞ Infinity | ∞ Infinity |
Peak brightness test (auto)
Design and build
| Height | 164.05 mm (6.46 inches) | 164.8 mm (6.49 inches) |
| Width | 75.28 mm (2.96 inches) | 76.2 mm (3 inches) |
| Thickness | 8.91 mm (0.35 inches) | 9.1 mm (0.36 inches) |
| Weight | 225 g (7.94 oz) | 218 g (7.69 oz) |
| Waterproof | IP68 | IP68 |
| Advanced cooling | Vapor chamber | Vapor chamber |
| Rear material | Glass | Glass |
| Frame material | Metal | Metal |
| Colors | White, Black, Blue, Orange | Black, Green, Brown |
| Fingerprint scanner | Yes, in-display | Yes, in-display |
Screen-to-body ratio
Performance
| Chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 9300 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 |
| Max clock | 3250 MHz | 3200 MHz |
| CPU cores | 8 (1 + 3 + 4) | 8 (1 + 2 + 2 + 3) |
| Architecture | - 4 cores at 2 GHz: Cortex-A720 - 3 cores at 2.85 GHz: Cortex-X4 - 1 core at 3.25 GHz: Cortex-X4 |
- 3 cores at 2 GHz: Cortex-A510 - 2 cores at 2.8 GHz: Cortex-A710 - 2 cores at 2.8 GHz: Cortex-A715 - 1 core at 3.2 GHz: Cortex-X3 |
| L3 cache | 8 MB | 8 MB |
| Manufacturing | TSMC | TSMC |
| Lithography process | 4 nanometers | 4 nanometers |
| Neural processor (NPU) | MediaTek NPU 790 | Hexagon |
| Graphics | Immortalis-G720 MC12 | Adreno 740 |
| GPU shading units | 1536 | 1536 |
| GPU clock | 1300 MHz | 680 MHz |
| FLOPS | ~3993.6 GFLOPS | ~2089 GFLOPS |
Benchmarks
Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)
Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)
Compute Score (GPU)
| Compute Score (GPU) | 14742 | - |
| Single-core score | 2141 | 2045 |
| Multi-core score | 7010 | 5688 |
AnTuTu Benchmark 11
| CPU | 729780 | 655394 |
| GPU | 860537 | 434084 |
| Memory | 356464 | 320411 |
| UX | 504205 | 523874 |
| Total score | 2450986 | 1933763 |
| Samples | [7 tests] | [2 tests] |
3DMark Steel Nomad Light
| Stability | 68% | 98% |
| Graphics test | 13 FPS | 8 FPS |
| Graphics score | 1814 | 1089 |
3DMark Solar Bay
| Stability | 64% | 67% |
| Graphics test | 29 FPS | 20 FPS |
| Section 1 | 32 FPS | 23 FPS |
| Section 2 | 30 FPS | 20 FPS |
| Section 3 | 25 FPS | 17 FPS |
| Graphics score | 7667 | 5296 |
3DMark Wild Life Extreme
| Stability | 66% | 45% |
| Graphics test | 27 FPS | 21 FPS |
| Graphics score | 4592 | 3667 |
PCMark 3.0
| Web score | 11968 | - |
| Video editing | 5599 | - |
| Photo editing | 29205 | - |
| Data manipulation | 12432 | - |
| Writing score | 22989 | - |
AnTuTu 11 Ranking List (#140th place)
Recent User Tests
Vivo X100 Pro
| Date | Benchmark | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 📘 2026-08-10 (Mnich.cz) | AnTuTu | 2575927 |
| 📘 2026-08-10 (Mnich) | AnTuTu | 2575927 |
| 📘 2026-06-07 (Kelol6554) | AnTuTu | 2422700 |
| 📘 2026-04-11 (Chin) | AnTuTu | 2252279 |
| 📘 2025-12-21 (Alpha) | AnTuTu | 2260515 |
Oppo Find X6 Pro
| Date | Benchmark | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 📘 2026-04-29 -> xxbflxx | AnTuTu | 1933763 |
| 📘 2025-12-09 (KarlderaL) | GeekBench CPU | 2045 / 5688 |
| 📘 2025-12-09 (KarlderaL) | AnTuTu | 1904332 |
| 📘 2025-05-27 (KarlderaL) | GeekBench CPU | 2046 / 5600 |
| 📘 2024-07-09 (Meow) | GeekBench CPU | 1978 / 5366 |
Memory
| RAM size | 12 GB | 12 GB |
| Memory type | LPDDR5X | LPDDR5X |
| Memory clock | 4200 MHz | 4266 MHz |
| Channels | 4 | 4 |
| Storage size | 256 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 4.0 | UFS 4.0 |
| Memory card | No | No |
Software
| Operating system | Android 14 (Can be upgraded to Android 15) | Android 13 (Can be upgraded to Android 14) |
| ROM | Funtouch 15 | ColorOS 14 |
| OS updates | 3 years | 4 years |
| Security updates | 3 years | 5 years |
Battery
| Capacity | 5400 mAh | 5000 mAh |
| Max charge power | 100 W | 100 W |
| Battery type | Li-Po | Li-Po |
| Replaceable | No | No |
| Wireless charging | Yes (50 W) | Yes (50 W) |
| Reverse charging | Yes | Yes, (wireless) |
| Fast charging | Yes (60% in 15 min) | Yes (64% in 10 min) |
| Full charging time | 0:31 hr | 0:30 hr |
| Web browsing | 09:38 hr | 10:13 hr |
| Watching video | 14:53 hr | 16:47 hr |
| Gaming | 06:25 hr | 05:51 hr |
| Standby | 94 hr | 106 hr |
General battery life
Main camera
| Matrix | 50 megapixels | 50 megapixels |
| Image resolution | 8192 x 6144 | 8192 x 6144 |
| Zoom | Optical, 4.3x | Optical, 2.8x |
| Flash | LED | Dual LED |
| Stabilization | Optical | Optical |
| 8K video recording | Up to 30FPS | No |
| 4K video recording | Up to 60FPS | Up to 60FPS |
| 1080p video recording | Up to 60FPS | Up to 60FPS |
| Slow motion | 960 FPS (1080p) | 240 FPS (1080p) |
| Angle of widest lens | 119° | 110° |
| Lenses | 1) Standard: 50 MP 2) Telephoto: 50 MP 3) Ultrawide: 50 MP |
1) Standard: 50 MP 2) Telephoto: 50 MP 3) Ultrawide: 50 MP |
| Camera features | - Bokeh mode - Pro mode - RAW support |
- Bokeh mode - Pro mode - RAW support |
| Image resolution | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.8 |
| Focal length | 23 mm | 23 mm |
| Sensor | Sony IMX989 | Sony IMX989 |
| Sensor size | 1/0.98" (≈ 1.02 inch) | 1/1.0" (≈ 1 inch) |
| Pixel size | 1.6 micron | 1.6 micron |
| Autofocus | Laser autofocus | Laser autofocus |
| Stabilization | Optical | Optical |
| Image resolution | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Aperture | f/2.5 | f/2.6 |
| Focal length | 100 mm | 65 mm |
| Sensor | Omnivision OV64B | Sony IMX890 |
| Sensor size | 1/2" (≈ 0.5 inch) | 1/1.56" (≈ 0.64 inch) |
| Pixel size | 0.7 micron | 1 micron |
| Stabilization | Optical | Optical |
| Image resolution | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Aperture | f/2.0 | f/2.2 |
| Focal length | 15 mm | 15 mm |
| Sensor | Samsung S5KJN1 | Sony IMX890 |
| Sensor size | 1/2.76" (≈ 0.36 inch) | 1/1.56" (≈ 0.64 inch) |
| Pixel size | 0.64 micron | 1 micron |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
DxOMark main camera tests
Photo quality
Video quality
Generic main camera score
| Bokeh | 70 | 80 |
| Preview | 81 | 72 |
| Zoom | 155 | 154 |
| Samples | Photo samples of Vivo X100 Pro from DxOMark | Photo samples of Oppo Find X6 Pro from DxOMark |
Selfie camera
| Megapixels | 32 megapixels | 32 megapixels |
| Image resolution | 6528 x 4896 | 6560 x 4928 |
| Aperture | f/2.0 | f/2.4 |
| Focal length | 20 mm | 21 mm |
| Sensor | Samsung S5KGD2 | Sony IMX709 |
| Sensor size | 1/2.8" (≈ 0.36 inch) | 1/2.74" (≈ 0.36 inch) |
| Pixel size | 0.8 micron | 0.8 micron |
| Autofocus | No | Phase autofocus |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
| Video resolution | 2160p (4K) at 60 FPS | 2160p (4K) at 30 FPS |
| Depth sensor (TOF 3D) | No | No |
Connectivity
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 7 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be) | Wi-Fi 7 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be) |
| Wi-Fi features | - Dual Band - Wi-Fi MiMO - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
- Dual Band - Wi-Fi MiMO - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
| Bluetooth version | 5.4 | 5.3 |
| Bluetooth features | LE | LE |
| USB type | USB Type-C | USB Type-C |
| USB version | 3.2 | 3.1 |
| USB features | - Charging - USB-Storage mode - OTG |
- Charging - USB-Storage mode - OTG |
| DisplayPort | Yes | Yes |
| GPS | GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, NAVIC | GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS |
| NFC* | Yes | Yes |
| Infrared port | Yes | Yes |
| Number of SIM* | 1 | 2 |
| Type of SIM card | Nano | Nano |
| Multi SIM mode | - | Standby |
| eSIM support* | Yes | No |
| Hybrid slot | No | No |
| 5G support | Yes | Yes |
Sound
| Speakers | Stereo | Stereo |
| Headphone audio jack | No | No |
| FM radio | No | No |
| Dolby Atmos | Yes | Yes |
Speakers test
Max loudness
Other
| Category | Flagship | Flagship |
| Announced | November 2023 | March 2023 |
| Release date | November 2023 | March 2023 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $800 | $875 |
| Successor | - Vivo X300 Pro | - Oppo Find X9 Pro |
| Sensors | - Proximity sensor - Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Ambient light sensor - Compass - Fingerprint |
- Proximity sensor - Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Ambient light sensor - Compass - Fingerprint |
| Bundled charger | Yes, 100 W | Yes, 100 W |
Further details
Notes on X100 Pro:
- The top version (with 16 GB) comes with LPDDR5T memory, while the others feature LPDDR5X.
*Disclaimer! NFC, GSM network support, and some other specs can be different depending on the country.
Conclusion
These smartphones have a lot in common, but we would recommend the Vivo X100 Pro. It has a better performance, gaming, and software.
Cast your vote
Total votes: 121