Vivo X200 FE vs Honor 400 Pro
78
out of 100
VS
80
out of 100
Here we compared two smartphones: the 6.31-inch Vivo X200 FE (with MediaTek Dimensity 9300 Plus) that was released on June 23, 2025, against the Honor 400 Pro, which is powered by Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 and came out 1 month before. On this page, you will find tests, full specs, strengths, and weaknesses of each of the devices.
Select the amount of RAM to evaluate performance and value for money more precisely
Key differences
Reasons to consider the Vivo X200 FE
- Comes with 1200 mAh larger battery capacity: 6500 vs 5300 mAh
- Delivers 18% higher peak brightness (1750 against 1479 nits)
- Supports Dolby Atmos sound technology
- Weighs 19 grams less
Reasons to consider the Honor 400 Pro
- Handles wireless charging up to 50W
- Has a 0.39 inch larger screen size
- More recent OS version: Android 16 versus 15
- Supports higher wattage charging (100W versus 90W)
- Faster storage type - UFS 4.0 versus UFS 3.1
Review
Display
Screen quality, color accuracy, brightness
Camera
Photo and video recording quality
Performance
CPU and memory performance (apps, system)
Gaming
Capabilities for playing modern games
Battery
Battery life, charging type and speed
Connectivity
Networks, ports, data transmission
Scores with a red asterisk (*) are approximate and may change in the future as we gather more data.
Select your primary usage scenario to get a more accurate NanoReview Score
Value for money (Beta)
Tests and specifications
Comparison table of technical specifications and testsDisplay
| Type | AMOLED | AMOLED |
| Size | 6.31 inches | 6.7 inches |
| Resolution | 1260 x 2800 pixels | 1280 x 2800 pixels |
| Aspect ratio | 19.5:9 | 19.5:9 |
| PPI | 461 ppi | 460 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Adaptive refresh rate | Yes (1-120 Hz) | Yes (60-120 Hz) |
| Max rated brightness | 1800 nits | 1500 nits |
| Max rated brightness in HDR | 5000 nits | 5000 nits |
| HDR support | Yes, HDR10+ | Yes, HDR10+ |
| Touch sampling rate | 300 Hz | - |
| Screen protection | Schott Xensation Core | Tempered glass |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 90.3% | 90% |
| Display features | - DCI-P3 - Always-On Display - DC Dimming |
- DCI-P3 - Always-On Display - DC Dimming |
| RGB color space | 99.8% | - |
| PWM | 360 Hz | - |
| Response time | 1 ms | - |
| Contrast | β Infinity | - |
Screen space comparison
400 Pro
6.7β³ (19.5:9 ratio) = 17.1 in2
X200 FE
6.31β³ (19.5:9 ratio) = 15.1 in2
~12% more screen space
Peak brightness test (auto)
Design and build
| Height | 150.8 mm (5.94 inches) | 160.8 mm (6.33 inches) |
| Width | 71.8 mm (2.83 inches) | 76.1 mm (3 inches) |
| Thickness | 8 mm (0.31 inches) | 8.1 mm (0.32 inches) |
| Weight | 186 g (6.56 oz) | 205 g (7.23 oz) |
| Waterproof | IP69 | IP69 |
| Advanced cooling | Vapor chamber | Vapor chamber |
| Rear material | Glass | Glass |
| Frame material | Metal | Plastic |
| Colors | Black, Blue, Pink, Yellow | Black, Gray, Blue |
| Fingerprint scanner | Yes, in-display | Yes, in-display |
| Repairability | Average (2.99/5) | Good (3.61/5) |
| Drop resistance | Good (C) Β· 100 drops | Excellent (A) Β· 270 drops |
Screen-to-body ratio
Performance
| Chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 9300 Plus | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 |
| Max clock | 3400 MHz | 3000 MHz |
| CPU cores | 8 (1 + 3 + 4) | 8 (1 + 3 + 2 + 2) |
| Architecture | - 4 cores at 2 GHz: Cortex-A720 - 3 cores at 2.85 GHz: Cortex-X4 - 1 core at 3.4 GHz: Cortex-X4 |
- 2 cores at 2.27 GHz: Cortex-A520 - 2 cores at 2.96 GHz: Cortex-A720 - 3 cores at 3.15 GHz: Cortex-A720 - 1 core at 3.3 GHz: Cortex-X4 |
| L3 cache | 8 MB | 12 MB |
| Manufacturing | TSMC | TSMC |
| Lithography process | 4 nanometers | 4 nanometers |
| Neural processor (NPU) | MediaTek NPU 790 | Hexagon |
| Graphics | Mali-G720 Immortalis MP12 | Adreno 750 |
| GPU shading units | 1536 | 1536 |
| GPU clock | 1300 MHz | 903-1000 MHz |
| FLOPS | ~3993.6 GFLOPS | ~2774 GFLOPS |
Benchmarks
Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)
Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)
Compute Score (GPU)
| Compute Score (GPU) | 15299 | 14352 |
| Single-core score | 2209 | 2109 |
| Multi-core score | 7239 | 6695 |
AnTuTu Benchmark 11
| CPU | 662181 | 702885 |
| GPU | 664075 | 723128 |
| Memory | 295511 | 332058 |
| UX | 518654 | 485733 |
| Total score | 2140421 | 2243804 |
| Samples | [10 tests] | [24 tests] |
3DMark Steel Nomad Light
| Stability | 65% | 75% |
| Graphics test | 12 FPS | 11 FPS |
| Graphics score | 1561 | 1492 |
3DMark Solar Bay
| Graphics test | 26 FPS | 29 FPS |
| Section 1 | 28 FPS | 32 FPS |
| Section 2 | 26 FPS | 29 FPS |
| Section 3 | 22 FPS | 25 FPS |
| Graphics score | 6745 | 7535 |
PCMark 3.0
| Web score | 13991 | 17920 |
| Video editing | 5556 | 7685 |
| Photo editing | 26454 | 29553 |
| Data manipulation | 12139 | 14371 |
| Writing score | 21943 | 17125 |
AnTuTu 11 Ranking List (#199th place)
Recent User Tests
Vivo X200 FE
| Date | Benchmark | Result |
|---|---|---|
| π 2026-09-11 (Viva plesenΡ) | AnTuTu | 2148340 |
| π 2026-08-31 (Jojorabbit95) | AnTuTu | 2306009 |
| π 2026-06-14 (ShaSha) | AnTuTu | 2235448 |
| π 2026-06-04 (Pranav) | AnTuTu | 2140421 |
| π 2026-05-17 (Sanjeep halder) | AnTuTu | 1793939 |
Honor 400 Pro
| Date | Benchmark | Result |
|---|---|---|
| π 2026-09-09 (Lunka) | AnTuTu | 2094129 |
| π 2026-09-01 (Maska) | AnTuTu | 2163688 |
| π 2026-07-07 -> naufall | AnTuTu | 2162598 |
| π 2026-06-28 (f0NES1k) | AnTuTu | 2306681 |
| π 2026-06-10 (Zhan) | AnTuTu | 2206753 |
Memory
| RAM size | 12 GB | 12 GB |
| Memory type | LPDDR5X | LPDDR5 |
| Channels | 4 | 4 |
| Storage size | 256 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 3.1 | UFS 4.0 |
| Memory card | No | No |
Software
| Operating system | Android 15 | Android 15 (Can be upgraded to Android 16) |
| ROM | Funtouch 15 | MagicOS 10 |
| OS size | 57 GB | - |
| OS updates | 3 years | 6 years |
| Security updates | 4 years | 6 years |
Battery
| Capacity | 6500 mAh | 5300 mAh |
| Max charge power | 90 W | 100 W |
| Battery type | Silicon-Carbon (Si/C) | Silicon-Carbon (Si/C) |
| Replaceable | No | No |
| Wireless charging | No | Yes (50 W) |
| Reverse charging | Yes | Yes, (wireless) |
| Bypass charging | - | Yes |
| Fast charging | Yes (48% in 30 min) | Yes (93% in 30 min) |
| Full charging time | 0:58 hr | 0:38 hr |
| Battery cycles | 800 cycles | 1200 cycles |
| Web browsing | 11:34 hr | 10:11 hr |
| Watching video | 15:00 hr | 14:23 hr |
| Gaming | 07:21 hr | 06:01 hr |
| Standby | 108 hr | 118 hr |
General battery life
Main camera
| Matrix | 50 megapixels | 200 megapixels |
| Image resolution | 8192 x 6144 | 16384 x 12288 |
| Zoom | Optical, 3x | Optical, 3x |
| Flash | LED | Dual LED |
| Stabilization | Optical | Optical |
| 8K video recording | No | No |
| 4K video recording | Up to 60FPS | Up to 60FPS |
| 1080p video recording | Up to 60FPS | Up to 60FPS |
| Slow motion | 960 FPS (1080p) | - |
| Angle of widest lens | 119Β° | 112Β° |
| Lenses | 1) Standard: 50 MP 2) Telephoto: 50 MP 3) Ultrawide: 8 MP |
1) Standard: 200 MP 2) Telephoto: 50 MP 3) Ultrawide: 12 MP 4) Depth: 2 MP |
| Camera features | - Bokeh mode - Pro mode - RAW support |
- Bokeh mode - Pro mode |
| Image resolution | 50 MP | 200 MP |
| Aperture | f/1.9 | f/1.9 |
| Focal length | 23 mm | - |
| Sensor | Sony IMX921 | Samsung ISOCELL HP3 |
| Sensor size | 1/1.56" (β 0.64 inch) | 1/1.4" (β 0.71 inch) |
| Pixel size | 1 micron | 0.56 micron |
| Autofocus | Laser autofocus | Phase autofocus |
| Stabilization | Optical | Optical |
| Image resolution | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Aperture | f/2.6 | f/2.4 |
| Focal length | 70 mm | 68 mm |
| Sensor | Sony IMX882 | Sony IMX856 |
| Sensor size | 1/1.95" (β 0.51 inch) | 1/2" (β 0.5 inch) |
| Pixel size | 0.8 micron | 0.8 micron |
| Stabilization | Optical | Optical |
| Image resolution | 8 MP | 12 MP |
| Aperture | f/2.2 | f/2.2 |
| Focal length | 15 mm | 16 mm |
| Sensor | OmniVision OV08D10 | - |
| Sensor size | 1/4.0" (β 0.25 inch) | - |
| Pixel size | 1.12 micron | - |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
Selfie camera
| Megapixels | 50 megapixels | 50 megapixels |
| Image resolution | 8192 x 6144 | 8192 x 6144 |
| Aperture | f/2.0 | f/2.1 |
| Focal length | 20 mm | - |
| Sensor | Samsung S5KKD1 | - |
| Sensor size | 1/3.44" (β 0.29 inch) | - |
| Pixel size | 0.64 micron | 0.64 micron |
| Autofocus | No | Phase autofocus |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
| Video resolution | 2160p (4K) at 60 FPS | 2160p (4K) at 30 FPS |
| Depth sensor (TOF 3D) | No | No |
Connectivity
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 7 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be) | Wi-Fi 7 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be) |
| Wi-Fi features | - Dual Band - Wi-Fi MiMO - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
- Dual Band - Wi-Fi MiMO - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
| Bluetooth version | 5.4 | 5.4 |
| Bluetooth features | LE | LE |
| USB type | USB Type-C | USB Type-C |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| USB features | - Charging - USB-Storage mode - OTG |
- Charging - USB-Storage mode - OTG |
| DisplayPort | Yes | No |
| GPS | GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS | GPS, GLONASS, Galileo, QZSS |
| NFC* | Yes | Yes |
| Infrared port | Yes | Yes |
| Number of SIM* | 2 | 2 |
| Type of SIM card | Nano | Nano |
| Multi SIM mode | Standby | Standby |
| eSIM support* | Yes | Yes |
| Hybrid slot | No | No |
| 5G support | Yes | Yes |
Sound
| Speakers | Stereo | Stereo |
| Headphone audio jack | No | No |
| FM radio | No | No |
| Dolby Atmos | Yes | No |
Speakers test
Max loudness
Other
| Category | Flagship | Mid-range |
| Announced | June 2025 | May 2025 |
| Release date | July 2025 | May 2025 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $650 | $799 |
| Successor | - Vivo X300 FE | - Honor 500 Pro |
| Sensors | - Proximity sensor - Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Ambient light sensor - Compass - Fingerprint |
- Proximity sensor - Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Ambient light sensor - Compass - Fingerprint |
| Bundled charger | Yes, 90 W | Yes, 100 W |
*Disclaimer! NFC, GSM network support, and some other specs can be different depending on the country.
Conclusion
If the camera, connectivity, and software are more important to you, then choose the Honor 400 Pro. But if the battery life and sound are more of a priority β go for the Vivo X200 FE.
Cast your vote
Total votes: 217
Related comparisons
3.
Vivo X200 FE vs OnePlus 13s (2)