Vivo X300 FE vs X200 FE
Here we compared two flagship smartphones: the 6.31-inch Vivo X300 FE (with Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 5) that was released on March 4, 2026, against the Vivo X200 FE, which is powered by MediaTek Dimensity 9300 Plus and came out 8 months before. On this page, you will find tests, full specs, strengths, and weaknesses of each of the devices.
Select the amount of RAM to evaluate performance and value for money more precisely
Key differences
Reasons to consider the Vivo X300 FE
- Handles wireless charging up to 40W
- Newer Bluetooth version (v6.0)
- 34% better performance in AnTuTu Benchmark (2869K versus 2140K)
- More recent OS version: Android 16 versus 15
- Faster storage type - UFS 4.1 versus UFS 3.1
- The phone is 8 months newer
- 28% faster in single-core GeekBench 6 test: 2818 and 2209 points
Reasons to consider the Vivo X200 FE
- Delivers 65% higher peak brightness (1750 against 1060 nits)
Review
Display
Screen quality, color accuracy, brightness
Camera
Photo and video recording quality
Performance
CPU and memory performance (apps, system)
Gaming
Capabilities for playing modern games
Battery
Battery life, charging type and speed
Connectivity
Networks, ports, data transmission
Scores with a red asterisk (*) are approximate and may change in the future as we gather more data.
Select your primary usage scenario to get a more accurate NanoReview Score
Value for money (Beta)
Tests and specifications
Comparison table of technical specifications and testsDisplay
| Type | AMOLED | AMOLED |
| Size | 6.31 inches | 6.31 inches |
| Resolution | 1260 x 2800 pixels | 1260 x 2800 pixels |
| Aspect ratio | 19.5:9 | 19.5:9 |
| PPI | 461 ppi | 461 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Adaptive refresh rate | Yes (1-120 Hz) | Yes (1-120 Hz) |
| Max rated brightness | 1800 nits | 1800 nits |
| Max rated brightness in HDR | 5000 nits | 5000 nits |
| HDR support | Yes, HDR10+ | Yes, HDR10+ |
| Touch sampling rate | 300 Hz | 300 Hz |
| Screen protection | Tempered glass | Schott Xensation Core |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 90.3% | 90.3% |
| Display features | - DCI-P3 - Always-On Display - DC Dimming |
- DCI-P3 - Always-On Display - DC Dimming |
| RGB color space | 99.8% | 99.8% |
| PWM | 360 Hz | 360 Hz |
| Response time | 1 ms | 1 ms |
| Contrast | β Infinity | β Infinity |
Peak brightness test (auto)
Design and build
| Height | 150.83 mm (5.94 inches) | 150.8 mm (5.94 inches) |
| Width | 71.76 mm (2.83 inches) | 71.8 mm (2.83 inches) |
| Thickness | 7.99 mm (0.31 inches) | 8 mm (0.31 inches) |
| Weight | 190 g (6.7 oz) | 186 g (6.56 oz) |
| Waterproof | IP69 | IP69 |
| Advanced cooling | Vapor chamber | Vapor chamber |
| Rear material | Glass | Glass |
| Frame material | Metal | Metal |
| Colors | White, Black, Purple | Black, Blue, Pink, Yellow |
| Fingerprint scanner | Yes, in-display | Yes, in-display |
| Repairability | - | Average (2.99/5) |
| Drop resistance | - | Good (C) Β· 100 drops |
Screen-to-body ratio
Performance
| Chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 5 | MediaTek Dimensity 9300 Plus |
| Max clock | 3800 MHz | 3400 MHz |
| CPU cores | 8 (2 + 6) | 8 (1 + 3 + 4) |
| Architecture | - 6 cores at 3.32 GHz: Oryon Performance - 2 cores at 3.8 GHz: Oryon Prime |
- 4 cores at 2 GHz: Cortex-A720 - 3 cores at 2.85 GHz: Cortex-X4 - 1 core at 3.4 GHz: Cortex-X4 |
| L3 cache | 6 MB | 8 MB |
| Manufacturing | TSMC | TSMC |
| Lithography process | 3 nanometers | 4 nanometers |
| Neural processor (NPU) | Hexagon | MediaTek NPU 790 |
| Graphics | Adreno 829 | Mali-G720 Immortalis MP12 |
| GPU shading units | 1024 | 1536 |
| GPU clock | 1225 MHz | 1300 MHz |
| FLOPS | ~2508.8 GFLOPS | ~3993.6 GFLOPS |
Benchmarks
Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)
Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)
Compute Score (GPU)
| Compute Score (GPU) | 16659 | 15299 |
| Single-core score | 2818 | 2209 |
| Multi-core score | 9052 | 7239 |
AnTuTu Benchmark 11
| CPU | 861821 | 662181 |
| GPU | 1005345 | 664075 |
| Memory | 381541 | 295511 |
| UX | 620432 | 518654 |
| Total score | 2869139 | 2140421 |
| Samples | Less than 3 | [10 tests] |
3DMark Steel Nomad Light
| Stability | - | 65% |
| Graphics test | - | 12 FPS |
| Graphics score | - | 1561 |
3DMark Solar Bay
| Graphics test | - | 26 FPS |
| Section 1 | - | 28 FPS |
| Section 2 | - | 26 FPS |
| Section 3 | - | 22 FPS |
| Graphics score | - | 6745 |
PCMark 3.0
| Web score | - | 13991 |
| Video editing | - | 5556 |
| Photo editing | - | 26454 |
| Data manipulation | - | 12139 |
| Writing score | - | 21943 |
AnTuTu 11 Ranking List (#116th place)
Recent User Tests
Vivo X300 FE
No benchmark results yet
Vivo X200 FE
| Date | Benchmark | Result |
|---|---|---|
| π 2026-09-11 (Viva plesenΡ) | AnTuTu | 2148340 |
| π 2026-08-31 (Jojorabbit95) | AnTuTu | 2306009 |
| π 2026-06-14 (ShaSha) | AnTuTu | 2235448 |
| π 2026-06-04 (Pranav) | AnTuTu | 2140421 |
| π 2026-05-17 (Sanjeep halder) | AnTuTu | 1793939 |
Memory
| RAM size | 12 GB | 12 GB |
| Memory type | LPDDR5X | LPDDR5X |
| Channels | 4 | 4 |
| Storage size | 256 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 4.1 | UFS 3.1 |
| Memory card | No | No |
Software
| Operating system | Android 16 | Android 15 |
| ROM | OriginOS 6 | Funtouch 15 |
| OS size | 27 GB | 57 GB |
| OS updates | 5 years | 3 years |
| Security updates | 7 years | 4 years |
Battery
| Capacity | 6500 mAh | 6500 mAh |
| Max charge power | 90 W | 90 W |
| Battery type | Silicon-Carbon (Si/C) | Silicon-Carbon (Si/C) |
| Replaceable | No | No |
| Wireless charging | Yes (40 W) | No |
| Reverse charging | Yes | Yes |
| Fast charging | Yes (48% in 30 min) | Yes (48% in 30 min) |
| Full charging time | 0:58 hr | 0:58 hr |
| Battery cycles | - | 800 cycles |
| Web browsing | - | 11:34 hr |
| Watching video | - | 15:00 hr |
| Gaming | - | 07:21 hr |
| Standby | - | 108 hr |
General battery life
Main camera
| Matrix | 50 megapixels | 50 megapixels |
| Image resolution | 8192 x 6144 | 8192 x 6144 |
| Zoom | Optical, 3x | Optical, 3x |
| Flash | LED | LED |
| Stabilization | Optical | Optical |
| 8K video recording | No | No |
| 4K video recording | Up to 60FPS | Up to 60FPS |
| 1080p video recording | Up to 60FPS | Up to 60FPS |
| Slow motion | 960 FPS (1080p) | 960 FPS (1080p) |
| Angle of widest lens | 110Β° | 119Β° |
| Lenses | 1) Standard: 50 MP 2) Telephoto: 50 MP 3) Ultrawide: 8 MP |
1) Standard: 50 MP 2) Telephoto: 50 MP 3) Ultrawide: 8 MP |
| Camera features | - Bokeh mode - Pro mode - RAW support |
- Bokeh mode - Pro mode - RAW support |
| Image resolution | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Aperture | f/1.6 | f/1.9 |
| Focal length | 23 mm | 23 mm |
| Sensor | Sony IMX921 | Sony IMX921 |
| Sensor size | 1/1.56" (β 0.64 inch) | 1/1.56" (β 0.64 inch) |
| Pixel size | 1 micron | 1 micron |
| Autofocus | Phase autofocus | Laser autofocus |
| Stabilization | Optical | Optical |
| Image resolution | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Aperture | f/2.6 | f/2.6 |
| Focal length | 70 mm | 70 mm |
| Sensor | Sony IMX882 | Sony IMX882 |
| Sensor size | 1/1.95" (β 0.51 inch) | 1/1.95" (β 0.51 inch) |
| Pixel size | 0.8 micron | 0.8 micron |
| Stabilization | Optical | Optical |
| Image resolution | 8 MP | 8 MP |
| Aperture | f/2.2 | f/2.2 |
| Focal length | 15 mm | 15 mm |
| Sensor | - | OmniVision OV08D10 |
| Sensor size | 1/4.0" (β 0.25 inch) | 1/4.0" (β 0.25 inch) |
| Pixel size | 1.12 micron | 1.12 micron |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
Selfie camera
| Megapixels | 50 megapixels | 50 megapixels |
| Image resolution | 8192 x 6144 | 8192 x 6144 |
| Aperture | f/2.0 | f/2.0 |
| Focal length | 21 mm | 20 mm |
| Sensor | Samsung S5KJN1 | Samsung S5KKD1 |
| Sensor size | 1/2.76" (β 0.36 inch) | 1/3.44" (β 0.29 inch) |
| Pixel size | 0.64 micron | 0.64 micron |
| Autofocus | Phase autofocus | No |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
| Video resolution | 2160p (4K) at 60 FPS | 2160p (4K) at 60 FPS |
| Depth sensor (TOF 3D) | No | No |
Connectivity
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 7 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be) | Wi-Fi 7 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be) |
| Wi-Fi features | - Dual Band - Wi-Fi MiMO - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
- Dual Band - Wi-Fi MiMO - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
| Bluetooth version | 6.0 | 5.4 |
| Bluetooth features | LE | LE |
| USB type | USB Type-C | USB Type-C |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| USB features | - Charging - USB-Storage mode - OTG |
- Charging - USB-Storage mode - OTG |
| DisplayPort | No | Yes |
| GPS | GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS | GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS |
| NFC* | Yes | Yes |
| Infrared port | Yes | Yes |
| Number of SIM* | 2 | 2 |
| Type of SIM card | Nano | Nano |
| Multi SIM mode | Standby | Standby |
| eSIM support* | Yes | Yes |
| Hybrid slot | No | No |
| 5G support | Yes | Yes |
Sound
| Speakers | Stereo | Stereo |
| Headphone audio jack | No | No |
| FM radio | No | No |
| Dolby Atmos | Yes | Yes |
Speakers test
Max loudness
Other
| Category | Flagship | Flagship |
| Announced | March 2026 | June 2025 |
| Release date | March 2026 | July 2025 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $649 | $650 |
| Successor | - | - Vivo X300 FE |
| Sensors | - Proximity sensor - Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Ambient light sensor - Compass - Fingerprint |
- Proximity sensor - Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Ambient light sensor - Compass - Fingerprint |
| Bundled charger | Yes, 90 W | Yes, 90 W |
*Disclaimer! NFC, GSM network support, and some other specs can be different depending on the country.
Conclusion
After analyzing all the data, we think that the Vivo X300 FE is definitely a better buy.
Cast your vote
Total votes: 171
Related comparisons
6.
Vivo X200 FE vs OnePlus 13s (2)